Determining the Efficacy of Available Treatments and Containment Measures against SARS-CoV-2
Alizay, Ariba Nameen, Ayesha Khalid, Tehreem Ishtiaq, Saba, Iram Asim, Humaira Yasmeen*
Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, The Women University Multan, Pakistan
ABSTRACT
Over the past 20 years, outbreaks related to coronavirus-associated diseases, such as MERS and SARS, have been threatening the whole world. The novel coronavirus emerged in Wuhan, China and belongs to the SARS family. It has been named “Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2)”. Keeping in view the history of pandemics faced by the world, it would be fair to say that each of them has been one of its kind, bringing an equal amount of distress and damage to the humanity. With the help of other countries, Pakistan has coped well with the pandemic. Measures taken by different countries included curfews imposed in Italy, Spain, Russia, and India, while the UK, Ireland, and China opted for a more passive approach. South Korea imposed strict self-isolation requirements across the country, whereas UAE suspended all ferry services from Iran. Vaccines authorized by FDA to treat COVID-19 include Pfizer manufactured by Biotech which has 95% efficiency, Moderna with 94% efficiency, and Johnson and Johnson which has an overall efficiency of 72% and 86% efficiency in case of severe infection. These stats are from the USA. Whereas, vaccines such as Sinopharm, Sinovac, CanSino-Bio, and Sputnik have been administered in Pakistan following their approval by the Drug Regulatory Authority of Pakistan (DRAP). This study aims to review the various aspects of the COVID-19 pandemic such as disease symptoms, the mode of action, a brief comparison of control measures taken by different countries, therapeutic trials to cure COVID-19, and the status of vaccines.
Keywords: COVID-19, pandemic, public health, therapeutic trials, vaccination
In December 2019, a pneumonia-like infection was discovered in Wuhan, China. The likely origin site, Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market, was immediately sealed. In Wuhan, social distancing was rigidly enforced before being applied everywhere else. All kinds of social events, including the Lunar New Year celebrations, were put on hold by the Chinese government. The WHO dubbed the new infection as COVID-19 and categorized it as a pandemic in January 2020 [1].
1.1. Symptoms
The symptoms of COVID-19 start to appear within 2-14 days after exposure to the virus. It is not necessary that people infected by COVID-19 show all the symptoms of the disease. Indeed, some people remain asymptomatic or their symptoms vary from mild to severe. In line with CDC, symptoms comprise headache, cold or fever, fatigue, sore throat, cough, shortness of breath, aches in muscles or body, loss of taste or smell, diarrhea or vomiting, and congestion. People with a prior illness or old age can develop severe health issues because of COVID-19.
1.2. Adequacy of Health Systems
Inadequate health facilities have led to a high mortality rate due to various pandemics across the world. Many people lose their lives in pandemics due to neglecting infectious diseases and lack of preparation on behalf of the healthcare system. Multiple kinds of studies have been conducted on SARS-CoV-2 to learn more about it and the effects it has on the society, the economy, and the health system. The COVID-19 pandemic has caused immeasurable human suffering and deaths, disrupted social relations, and deprived people of their livelihoods and prosperity [2]. New and reemerging infectious diseases have been occurring at an uncommon pace. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), more than 20 infectious diseases have been a source of pandemics all over the globe in the preceding decade [3]. A number of these calamities have been brought [4] on by infectious diseases like H1N1 and MERS.
Recently, COVID-19 pandemic has prompted the researchers to understand the science of emerging organisms and human vulnerability to their risks, creating successful measures to overcome them. Recognizing these issues, on the other hand, is the first step in a well-prepared planning process that would help to ensure the best possible public health protection [5].
Researchers suggest that because of the history of responding to other disease outbreaks, fragile and fragmented health systems, and lack of health knowledge, the government of Pakistan and all relevant agencies should remain vigilant and be fully prepared to respond to abnormal situations [6].
1.3. Strategies Developed by Different Countries
With remarkable speed and resource mobilization, the world has responded to the COVID-19 pandemic. Within a few weeks, Chinese scientists identified and sequenced the causative agent of this pandemic. To date, considerable genomic and clinical data have been exchanged rapidly around the world. Several possible treatments have been suggested for this disease [7]. In the worst-affected countries, the virus wreaked havoc on healthcare services, causing shortages of medical equipment, medication, and sanitary supplies.
More research must be conducted in an innovative laboratory to stop emergency conditions created by countless viruses that reside in nature and have not yet been found or named [8]. Although a coping mechanism cannot be pre-defined for such unprecedented scenarios, different countries may deal with it differently in their unique ways. Strategies have been developed to successfully halt virus transmission that disrupt daily life and economic functioning, prompting officials to take rapid steps to ameliorate their negative impacts. During the pandemic, governments throughout the globe strived to help people cope with the economic and social effects of the lockdown by providing support and compassionate measures for employees and employers. [9].
China, the center of the outbreak, took drastic steps which included lockdowns, bans on traveling, and the closure of theatres, sporting events, and public spaces. South Korea imposed strict self-isolation requirements across the country, with fines or a possible jail term facing those who break them. UAE suspended all ferry services from Iran and demanded a health statement from all the crew members working in ports 72 hours before their arrival. In Singapore, text and web-based solutions were introduced that required restrictions for patients in home quarantine through which they could share their whereabouts with the government [10].
Figure 1. Steps Taken by Countries to Fight COVID-19 Pandemic [9]
1.4. Therapeutic Trials to Cure COVID-19
There is a lot of curiosity about whether drug therapies can be used to prevent COVID-19, although it remains unclear which drugs, if any, are successful. The evidence for hydroxychloroquine is the subject of the first version of the guideline. A panel of international guidelines indicates that hydroxychloroquine is no longer a high priority for research and other promising drugs should be inquired about for their function in the prohibition of COVID-19 [11].
Many therapeutic trials are being conducted to reduce viral transmission, morbidity, and mortality [12]. The only antiviral approved to date is remdesivir. It is a nucleoside analog known for its in vitro role against RNA viruses and ebolavirus. It reduces the recovery time in patients with serious COVID-19. In animal experiments, it was administered to a mouse that was already infected with SARS-CoV-2. The results showed a lower virus titer as compared to the control group, improvement in the damaged lung tissues, and better treatment as compared to interferon-beta combined with lopinavir/ritonavir.
Three common approaches are used to discover antivirals effective against SARS-CoV-2. Testing existing antiviral drugs, which are broad spectrum and accustomed to treating other viral diseases, is the first method. By exploiting standard assays, the result of these drugs on plaque constitution, cytopathy, and pseudo coronavirus can be measured. Interferon-II and Interferon-I were identified by using this methodology. The second method comprises a drug repurposing program [13]. It is a method of drug discovery based on the illustration of a novel treatment for COVID-19 by using the chemical library of previously known compounds that can be at the preclinical stage [12]. The chemical library includes data about transcription properties in distinct cell lines. This method was used to identify various drugs with immunological and anatomical implications, such as influencing estrogen receptors, sterol or lipid metabolism, neurotransmitter regulation, kinase signal transfer, DNA synthesis or repair, and protein processing. The third method is based on the redevelopment of novel drugs by exploiting biophysical and genome comprehension of individual SARS-CoV-2 genome [13]. Instead of investing time and cost in the de-novo elaboration of new drugs, it is better to repurpose the existing drugs to cure COVID-19. Antiviral drugs may show an inadequate response in patients with an austere disease. The reason is the production of CRS (cytokine release syndrome). To halt CRS and virus replication, the fusion of immunomodulators and combination of antivirals are used respectively as treatments. Such fusion and combination comprise the potential therapeutic solution for severe COVID-19 infection [14].
Data that provides evidence regarding the efficacy of these methods is still scarce [15]. There is a requirement to validate the safety and effectiveness of these drugs through clinical trials [13]. RCT (randomized controlled trial) is critical in determining the effectiveness and safety of new therapies. The critical problem is the groups that show low representation and it must be addressed. Due to this problem in trials, the advantages of remdesivir cannot be generalized; therefore, patient recruitment should be a key goal. A small, non-randomized, open-label study was performed in China to estimate the effect of favipiravir on non-severe COVID-19. A comparison was done between 35 patients who received favipiravir and 45 patients who received lopinavir/ritonavir. The group that received favipiravir required a shorter time of 4 days for viral clearance, while the group that received lopinavir/ritonavir required 11 days for viral clearance [14].
1.5. Virology of COVID-19 and Drug Therapies
An enveloped ssRNA virus SARS-CoV-2 binds spike protein to the host's ACE2 (angiotensin-converting enzyme 2) receptor upon entry into the cell through receptors on the host cell and endosomes. TMPRSS2, a host transmembrane serine protease assists in viral entry. After entry, it controls the host machinery to synthesize viral glycoproteins that form a transcriptase-replicate complex. Structural proteins play an important function in the assembly and release of virions [16].
Figure 2. Mode of Action and Site-Directed Therapies to Treat COVID-19 [17]
Table 1. Summarization of Different Therapies with their Mode of Action.
Drug |
Rationale for Understanding |
Mode of Action |
Target Site |
Side Effects |
Success |
References |
Chloroquine (CQ) and Hydroxychloro-quine (HCQ) |
They show antiviral immunomodulatory properties against SARS-CoV-2 |
Blockage of viral entry through ACE2, interference of endosome acidification, inhibition of cytokine squall, and impediment of sialic acid receptors. |
Potential targets are enzymes and regulatory proteins linked with SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis. |
Gastrointestinal complications, rashes, itching, and headaches. |
Data obtained from RCTs does not show any clinical benefit and it is not recommended routinely. |
|
5-amino leuvilinic acid (5- ALA) |
It is a natural amino acid and provides virus reducing effect. |
PPIX interferes with G-4 assembly to inhibit infection. |
G- quadruplex (G4) with binding proteins is the target site for antiviral activity. |
Low blood pressure, photosensitivity reactions |
It is still not possible to use as medicine due to the poor bioavailability of the drug. It is a broad-spectrum antiviral drug. |
|
17 beta-estradiol |
COVID-19 affects men more than women and sex hormones are involved in it. |
Reduction in viral load by estradiol treatment of VERO E6 cells. |
SARS-CoV-2 increases the gene expression of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 genes in VERO E6 cells which in turn increases the effective capacity of the coronavirus. Estrogen pretreatment reduces the expression of these genes. |
Headache, vaginal irritation, clouded breast tenderness |
It is suggested that beta-estradiol would apply to human cell lines within a short time before human use as COVID-19 hormone therapy. |
|
3-Hydroxyphthalic Anhydride-Modified Chicken Ovalbumin |
It acts as a viral entry inhibitor against many types of viruses. |
Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 replication by HP-OVA. |
The S glycoprotein forms a connection with ACE2 to mediate fusion and viral entry. HP-OVA binds to both, breaks their interaction, and inhibits infection. |
Not yet known |
It is an efficient, secure, affordable therapeutic, and promising candidate for further development. |
[24] |
Convalescent Plasma |
Transfer of potent neutralizing antibodies |
Plasma acts as the first line of protection against SARS- CoV- 2. |
Antibodies make a connection with the RBD of SARS-CoV-2 and do not allow the interaction between ACE2 and RBD. |
Transfusion reactions, hypercoagulability risk |
Authorization (EUA) from the FDA for emergency use. |
|
Colchicine |
Its administration is associated with betterment in COVID-19 outcomes. |
Given in combination with other antivirals and HCQ to lower cytokine storm |
Inhibits –IL-1beta activates IL-6 and IL-18 and shows action on NLPP3 |
Gastrointestinal symptoms, muscle spasms |
It can be used for COVID-19 treatment according to the findings. To validate this, further RCTs are required |
[26] |
Ionic Liquids |
Hydrophobicity and dispersed charge make them antimicrobial agents |
Shows pharmacokinetic properties and cytotoxicity |
The target site is CoV-2 protease. They successfully bind to the active site. |
Not known |
No clinical data is available |
[27] |
siRNA molecules |
Advancement in siRNA therapeutic approaches may be a promising alternative to vaccine |
Suppression of viral gene expression by hybridizing and neutralizing complementary mRNAs |
Target sites are nucleocapsid phosphoprotein and glycoprotein genes |
Not known |
8 siRNA molecules were effective against 139 strains of SARS-CoV-2. No clinical data is available. |
[28] |
Remdesivir |
In vitro research shows that SARS-CoV-2 inhibition is effective. RCTs show a reduction in the time it takes for symptoms to resolve and the length of stay in the hospital. |
Nucleoside analog that causes detention chain termination |
Prohibits RNA-dependent RNA polymerase of the virus |
Elevated liver enzymes, nausea, vomiting, and phlebitis |
For hospitalized patients, this is the current standard of treatment. |
[14] |
Favipiravir |
SARS-CoV-2 inhibition was discovered in vitro. |
Pro-drug that is changed into purine nucleotide |
Prohibits RNA-dependent RNA polymerase of the virus |
Elevated liver enzymes, nausea, QT prolongatin, and diarrhea |
Clinical evidence is scarce, not available in the US. |
[14] |
Azithromycin |
There is no evidence of antiviral action in vitro or in humans. SARS-CoV-2 viral load was reduced in one study with HCQ and azithromycin. |
Possible immunomodulator |
Inhibits CRS |
Nausea, QT prolongation, and diarrhea |
Clinical benefit was not demonstrated in RCTs. COVID-19 is not advised for treatment. |
[14] |
Lopinavir- Ritonavir |
SARS-CoV-2 inhibition was discovered in vitro. |
Viral protease inhibitor |
The target site is a protease. |
Elevated liver enzymes, nausea, QT prolongation, vomiting, and diarrhea |
Significant drug-drug interactions. Not recommended for the treatment of COVID-19 based on available study data. |
[14] |
Interferon- beta |
Possibility of action against SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV |
Immunomodulator |
Inhibits CRS |
Headache, asthenia, myalgia, flu-like symptoms, hypertonia, abdominal pain, edema |
Several RCTs of interferon-beta in combination or alone found no therapeutic benefit. The value of utilization is outweighed by the lack of data. |
[14] |
Ribavirin |
Action against SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV was discovered in vitro. |
Prohibition of the extension of RNA fragments |
Viral RNA polymerase inhibitor |
Headache, nausea, anemia, and fatigue |
When used with other antivirals, it can be quite effective. The scarcity of clinical evidence outweighs the advantage of use. |
[14] |
Umifenovir |
SARS-COV-2 suppression was discovered in vitro. |
Prohibits cell membrane-virus fusion |
The target is spike S glycoprotein. |
Diarrhea, nausea |
It is not available in the United States. Clinical data available through clinical trials is limited. |
[29] |
Ivermectin |
At very high doses, shows activity against SARS-CoV-2 in infected Vero-E6 cells |
Prohibition of viral RNA by NS3 helicase in RNA binding |
The potential target is alpha/ beta1 (host nuclear transport importin) |
Pruritus, lymphadenitis, arthralgia, and fever |
Without clinical study or trial, it cannot be advised. |
[30] |
Nitazoxadine |
In vitro data reveals its effectiveness against SARS COV-2 and MERS-CoV |
Mechanism unknown |
Target host-regulated process involved in viral replication |
Headache, vomiting, nausea |
Clinical data is not available. |
|
Camostat mesylate |
In vitro results showed that mice injected with a lethal dosage of SARS-CoV had a lower mortality rate. |
Prohibition of TMPRSS2 |
Blocks viral entry site TMPRSS2 |
Gastrointestinal symptoms, skin rash, eosinophilic pneumonitis |
In a clinical trial of COVID-19 therapy, it was discovered as a potential oral medication with minimal adverse effects. |
[14] |
Baricitinib |
|
Disrupts endocytosis regulators and viral assembly |
Inhibits CRS |
High risk of infection when utilized for other indications |
Clinical data with baricitinib is limited. |
[14] |
* PPIX: Protoporphyrin IX; RBD: Receptor Binding Domain; VERO: Verdo Reno; siRNA: Small Interfering RNA; iRNA stands for RNA Interference: ILs Ionic Liquids
1.6. Status of COVID-19 Vaccine
Table 2. Types of Vaccines, Their Target, and Who Formulated Them
Vaccine Platform |
Vaccine |
Vaccine Type |
Vaccine Target |
Formulated by |
Status |
Reference |
Inactivated virus |
Adsorbed COVID‑19 (inactivated) vaccine |
Non-activated |
Viral structural proteins |
Sinovac Biotech (China) |
Stage-3 |
|
Inactivated SARS‑ CoV‑2 vaccine (Vero cell) |
Non-activated |
All structural proteins of the virus |
Wuhan Institute of Biological Products/Sinopharm |
Level-3 |
||
BBIBP‑CorV |
Inactivated/adjuvant-based |
Spike proteins |
Institute of Biological Products/Sinopharm in Beijing |
Phase-3 |
||
BBV152A BBV152B BBV152C |
Inactivated |
Structural proteins from the virus |
Bharat Biotech |
Phase-1/2 |
||
Inactivated SARS‑ CoV‑2 Vaccine |
|
Inactivated |
All structural proteins of the virus |
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Institute of Medical Biology |
Stage-1/2 |
|
QazCovid‑in |
Inactivated |
All structural proteins of the virus |
Kazakhstani Research Institute for Biological Safety Issues |
Level-1/2 |
||
Virus-like particle (VLP) |
COVID 19 Vaccine Recombinant Coronavirus‑Like Particle |
Recombinant particles |
Unknown |
ExpreS2ion Biotechnologies ApS (Denmark), Medicago (Canada), Griffith University (Australia) |
Phase-1 |
[33] |
Receptor binding domain SARS‑CoV‑2 HBsAg virus-like particle |
Receptor binding domain ‑HBsAg virus-like particles |
Spike proteins |
India's SpyBiotech/Serum Institute |
Level-1/2 |
||
Recombinant Coro‑ navirus‑ like the COVID 19 vaccine particle |
Adjuvanted Plant-derivative virus-like particle with CpG 1018 or AS03 |
Spike proteins |
Medicago Inc. |
Stage-1 |
||
Virus-related vector |
Gam‑COVID Vaccine |
Adeno‑built (rAd26‑ S+rAd5‑S) |
Spike proteins |
Institute of Gamaleya Research |
Stage-3 |
|
AZD1222 |
ChAdOx1‑S |
Spike proteins |
Oxford University /AstraZeneca |
Phase 3 |
||
Ad5‑nCoV |
Adenovirus (Class 5) |
Spike proteins |
Beijing Institute of Biotechnology and CanSino Biological Corp |
Level 3 |
||
Ad26.COV2. S |
Adeno‑derived |
S glycoprotein/ unknown |
Janssen Pharmaceuticals |
Stage 3 |
||
hAd5‑S‑combination and N‑ETSD |
hAd5 Spike (S) and NucleocapsidN |
Spike proteins |
NantKwest Inc and ImmunityBio Inc. |
Stage 1 |
||
GRAd‑COV2 |
replication error Adenovirus Simian (GRAd) |
Spike proteins |
LEUKOCARE/Univercells |
Phase 1 |
||
Ad5(nCoV) |
Ad5‑derived |
Spike proteins |
Academy of Military Medical Sciences, CanSino Biological Inc./Institute of Biotechnology, PLA of China |
Level 1 |
||
VXA(CoV2‑1) |
dsRNA‑adjuvanted Ad5 |
Spike proteins |
Vaxart |
Stage 1 |
||
MVA‑SARS (2S) |
MVA and spike protein |
Spike proteins |
Ludwig Maximilian University in Munich |
Level 1 |
||
V590 |
VSV and S protein |
Spike proteins |
IAV / Merck Sharp and Dohme |
Stage 1 |
||
TMV 083 |
Measles derived vector |
Spike proteins |
Institute Pasteur, Themis, University of Pittsburgh CVR, and Merck Sharp and Dohme |
Level 1 |
||
DelNS1‑2019 (nCoV) RBD OPT1 |
Intranasal flu‑derived Receptor binding domain |
Spike proteins |
Xia Men University/Beijing Wantai Biological Pharmacy |
Stage 1 |
||
Ad26 (COV2.S) |
Adeno-derived |
Spike proteins |
Janssen Pharmaceuticals (Belgium) |
Level 3 |
||
RNA |
mRNA (1273) |
Lipid nanoparticles encapsulated mRNA |
S glycoprotein/ unknown |
NIAID/ Moderna USA |
Stage 3 |
|
CVnCoV |
mRNA |
Spike proteins |
CureVac (Germany) |
Phase 2 |
||
Lipid nanoparticles (nCoVsaRNA) |
Self-amplifying ribonucleic acid (saRNA) that codes for the S protein |
Spike proteins |
Imperial College London (UK) |
Level 1 |
||
ARCT‑021 |
mRNA |
Spike proteins |
Arcturus Therapeutics/DukeNUS Medical School (USA) |
Phase 1/2 |
||
SARS (CoV‑2) mRNA |
mRNA encoding for S protein receptor binding domain |
Spike proteins |
Academy of Military Sciences of the People's Liberation Army (PLA) and Walvax Biotech |
Stage 1 |
||
BNT162b1 BNT162b2 |
Lipid nanoparticle ‑mRNAs |
Spike proteins |
BioNTech, Fosum Pharma, and Pfizer (Germany/China/ USA) |
Phase 3 |
||
DNA |
INO(4800) |
DNA plasmid created using electroporation |
S glycoprotein/ unknown |
International Vaccine Institute/Inovio Pharma |
Stage 1/2 |
|
AG0301 (COVID-19) |
DNA plasmid with adjuvant |
Spike proteins |
Takara Bio, AnGes, and Osaka University |
Level 1/2 |
||
nCov |
DNA (plasmid) |
Spike proteins |
Cadila Healthcare Limited |
Stage 1/2 |
||
GX 19 |
DNA |
Spike proteins |
Genexine Consortium |
Level 1/2 |
||
Protein subunit |
SARS CoV‑2 vaccine |
Adjuvanted S protein |
S glycoprotein and peptides/unknown |
Sanofi Pasteur (France)/GSK |
Phase 1/2 |
|
NVX (CoV2373) |
rS/Matrix SARS CoV 2 adjuvant |
S-glycoprotein |
Novavax |
Stage 3 |
||
SCB (2019) |
Modified S protein |
Unknown |
GSK/Dynavax/Clover Biopharmaceuticals Inc. |
Stage 1 |
||
COVAX (19) |
S protein with Advax‑SM adjuvant |
Spike proteins |
Vaxine Pty Ltd |
Level 1 |
||
|
SARS (CoV‑2) Sclamp vaccine |
S protein with Molecular Clamp Stabilization and MF59 Adjuvant |
Spike proteins |
University of Queensland/ Seqirus |
Stage 1 |
|
MVC (COV1901) |
S2P protein plus CpG 1018 |
Spike proteins |
Dynavax/NIAID/Medigen Vaccine Biologics Corporation |
Step 1 |
||
Soberana (01) |
Receptor binding domain for S protein with adjuvant |
Spike proteins |
Cuba's Instituto Finlay de Vacunas |
Level 1 |
||
EpiVac Corona |
Adjuvanted with peptide antigen |
Spike proteins |
Rospotrebnadzor, Koltsovo, and FBRI SRC VB VECTOR |
Stage 1 |
||
Recombinant SARS (CoV‑2) |
S protein Receptor binding domain (Sf9 cells) |
Spike proteins |
Sichuan University's West China Hospital |
Level 1 |
||
IMP CoVac 1 |
Cocktail of SARS-CoV2 HLA-DR peptides |
Spike proteins |
Tuebingen University Hospital |
Level 1 |
||
UB 612 |
S1‑receptor binding domain protein |
Spike proteins |
COVAXX |
Stage 1 |
||
Novel recombinant coronavirus vaccine (CHO cell) |
Recombinant receptor binding domain -Dimer adjuvanted |
Spike proteins |
Anhui Zhifei Longcom Biopharmaceutical/Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences |
Level 2 |
||
KBP (COVID‑19) |
S protein receptor binding domain derivative |
Spike proteins |
Kentucky Bioprocessing, Inc |
Stage 1/2 |
||
Live attenuated virus |
COVI-VAC |
Live attenuated strain |
All proteins of the virus |
Codagenix/Serum Institute of India (USA/India) |
Phase 1 |
The pandemic brought on by the SARS-CoV-2 infection was dubbed COVID-19 by the World Health Organization (WHO). There are numerous vaccines available that protect against the SARS-CoV-2 infection, although there are no widely available effective antiviral medications for COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2. Remdesivir has simultaneously been approved by many nations as the first treatment for COVID-19. The requirement of a COVID-19 vaccination that is both safe and effective is widely acknowledged as essential in the containment of the pandemic. The difficulties and work required to quickly design, assess, and deliver something at scale are significant. So, all the available vaccines should be evaluated to know which are effective against the disease.
REFERENCES
* Corresponding Author: humaira.6127@wum.edu.pk