Hibba Noor1, and Sana Rehman2*
1 Department of Humanities & Social Sciences, GIFT University, Gujranwala, Pakistan
2Medicine and Health Science Department, University of Malaysia, Sarawak, Malaysia
*Corresponding Author: [email protected]
The current study aimed to investigate the psychosocial predictors of interpersonal problems in transgender people of Pakistan.For this purpose, a sample of (n = 72)transgender individuals were recruitedthrough the snowball sampling technique.The Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ), Personal Self-Concept Questionnaire (PSQ), and Interpersonal Problems Scale (IPS) were usedto find out the predicting role of emotion regulation, self-concept, and interpersonal problems in transgender individuals, respectively. Data was analyzed through SPSS (Version 25). Thefindings revealed a significant positive relationship between all domains of emotion regulation namely awareness, clarity, goals, strategies, and impulse and two domains of interpersonal problems, namely sociability and involved. Only awareness and clarity domains of emotion regulation were found to be inversely correlated with the supportive domain of interpersonal problems.Furthermore,a significantpositive association was observed between self-concept and the two domains of interpersonal problems, that is, sociability and involved. However, the two domains of self-concept, namely self-fulfillment and autonomy were observed to be inversely correlated with the supportive domain of interpersonal problems. These findings indicate that demographics (education) is a negative predictor of interpersonal problems. On the contrary, the two domains of emotion regulation (strategy and impulse) are positive predictors of interpersonal problems. Furthermore, one domain of self-concept(autonomy)is also a positive predictor ofinterpersonalproblems. The study hassignificanttheoretical and practical implicationsconsidering the Pakistani cultural context.
Keywords: emotion regulation, interpersonal problems, self-concept, transgender
Gender diversity among adults has increased to a considerable extent all over the world. Inparticular,diverse gender categories are grouped in the literatureunder the umbrella term transgender,suchastranssexuals, drag queens, butches, hermaphrodites, cross-dressers, masculine women, effeminate men, sissies,andtomboys (Irshad et al., 2020: Saleem,& Rizvi, 2017). However, the acceptance for genders other than male and female is not in vogue throughout the world (Shah et al., 2018). Only a few countries provide equal rights to other genders. In Pakistan, the term "transgender" is used to refer to any individual who defies the traditional gender norms set out by the society, such as drag queens, eunuch, real hermaphrodites, transsexuals, and homo/biosexual cross-dressers (Abdullah et al., 2012).The number of transgender people officially registered by the Pakistani government in past were 10,418; however, thetruefigure is believed to be significantly higher (Wazir & Goujon, 2019).
The life of transgender individuals is not easy in Pakistan and they face substantial challenges. Transgender people encounter social and economic discrimination, lack legal recognition, experience violence,and lack acceptance from the society (Shah et al., 2018). In particular, it becomes more problematic when they experience rejection from significant others, such as family, friends, and parents(Manzoor et al., 2021).The literature is enriched with the studies depicting the interpersonal problems of transgender individuals (Claes et al., 2015; Davey et al., 2015; Gamarel et al., 2019). However, not all transgender people manifest interpersonal problems. According to the literature, emotion regulation is a predictor of interpersonal/interpersonal relationships in a diverse population (Messinger et al., 2022). Emotion regulation refers to the capacity to exercise control overone'semotional state. This includes evaluating stressful situations to reduce anger and anxiety, masking obvious signs of anxiety and sadness, and concentrating on things/the given tasks. Transgender people occasionally depictemotional control, which hasbeneficial impacts on them but can also have negative ones (Kapatais et al., 2023). Unfortunately, the multiplicity and poly victimization to the similar issues lead to weak emotional regulations for transgender (Messinger et al., 2022).
The lack of emotional regulation leads to interpersonal difficulties in transgender people. Recent data illustrated that transgender individuals who are aware of their emotions depict fewer emotional problems and strive to form strong relationships with their close ones. However, a lack of familiarity with self-emotions leads to uncertainty (Solbakken et al., 2023). Consequently, such individuals form weak relationshipsand feel isolated. Furthermore, other dimensions of emotional regulationsuchas clarity, goals, non-acceptance, distress situations, andstrategiesalso play a significant role inthe formation ofinterpersonal relationships (Victor & Kolinsky, 2016).
The literatureis enriched with empirical studies that illustrate the strong relationship between emotion regulation and interpersonal difficulties. A recent study was carried out on adults to investigate the relationship between emotion regulation difficulties and interpersonal difficulties.Thefindings depicted a significant relationship between these constructs(Solbakken,et al., 2023).Another recent studywas carried outto investigate the relationship between emotion regulation difficulties and interpersonal conflict among people with borderline personality disorder.The findingsdepictedthat emotion regulation difficultiesare positively correlatedwith emotional conflict (Haliczeret al., 2021).
Studies based on the combination of emotion regulation and interpersonal problems are not scarce in the literature. However, emotional regulation and interpersonaldifficultiesof transgender people have been studied separately,worldwide. According to Drescher et al. (2023), transgender individuals experience difficulties in emotional regulationwhichincreases the risk of self-harm tendencies and induces suicide attempts. In short, literature demonstrates a significant research gap in studies about the emotional regulation and interpersonal difficulties of transgender people in Pakistan.
Self-concept is how human beings view their actions, skills, and distinctive qualities(Hisli Şahin et al., 2009). Transgender individuals witha better sense of who theyarehave a more optimistic outlook on life. On the other hand, transgender individuals who experience criticism and rejection from their families and society have lower self-esteem and develop negative self-concepts for life.In response tosocietal rejection, they develop a lack of self-fulfillment, autonomy, and emotionalcontrol,whichare the dimensions of self-concept (Davey et al., 2015). In response to Due to their weak self-concept, they depict a lack of sociability, assertiveness, supportive attitude, care, and dependent tendencies in their relationships (Kiviruus et al., 2016).
In short, both emotion regulation and interpersonal difficultieswerefoundto bestrongly associated with interpersonal difficulties.Similarly, the literature provides for a strong association between self-concept and interpersonal problems. The findings of Kiviruusu et al. (2016) indicate that people who reportgreaterand more frequent interpersonalconfrontations experience poorer and slower growth in self-esteem from their youth to mid-adulthood.
Hisli Şahin et al. (2009)concluded that self-concept and locus of controlare linkedto the actions takenthroughout the process ofresolving interpersonal disputes. Positive self-concept and internal locus of control are associated withthe adoption ofmore efficient and beneficial interpersonal conflict resolution strategies.
As far as demographic information is concerned,some demographics were observed to behighly interlinked with emotion regulation, self-concept, and interpersonal difficulties. Graziano etal.(2007) showed a favorable correlation between emotion management and early literacy.Literature students depict better emotional regulation as compared to illiterate ones/other students. Peiffer et al. (2020) used German psychology students (N = 1,243) to study the difference of self-concept (SC) and self-efficacy (SE) in higher education. They concluded that higher education leads to greater emotional regulation and control (Hardie et al. 2021).
The literature demonstrates that emotion regulation, self-concept, and interpersonal difficulties havebeen studiedin diverse populationsbutinformation regarding the transgenderpopulation ofPakistan is still missing. Therefore, the current studyaimed to investigatethe predictors of interpersonal difficulties in transgender adolescents of Pakistan.
According to the above literature, transgender individuals experience substantial interpersonal problems (Claes et al., 2015; Davey et al., 2015; Gamarel et al., 2019). Furthermore, emotion regulation and self-concept were found to be strong predictors of interpersonal problems. However, data regarding the predictors of interpersonal problems among transgender people is scarce in literature in the Pakistani context. Therefore, the current study aims to investigate the predictors of interpersonal problems of transgender individuals keeping in view the Pakistani cultural context.
The current study aimed at identifying if emotional regulation and self-concept are predictors of interpersonal difficulties.
The current study has the following objectives:
The current study tests the following hypotheses:
The current study used the cross-sectional survey research design. The sample included 72 transgender 40% were from the community of Islamabad, and 25% were from the city of Lahore. They were chosen using the snowball sampling method.
Difficulty in Emotion Regulation Scale(DERS-18)
The emotion regulation questionnairecomprises an 18-item scale covering six domains, that is,awareness, clarity, goals, non-acceptance, distress situations, and strategies. Non-acceptance is encoded inversely. The scoring keys range from 1–5-point Likert scale. The age range 19-76 years. Emotional regulationwas foundto be in acceptable ranges with an alpha coefficient value above .60-80,exceptfor non-acceptance (Victor & Kolinsky, 2016).
Personal Self-Concept Questionnaire (PSCQ)
PSCQcomprises 22 items covering four domains,namelyself-fulfillment, honesty, autonomy, and emotional self-concept. It is a 5-point Likert scale which applies to the 15-65 age range (Goni et al., 2011). In the current study, two domains of self-concept were considered, that is, SF and AU. These domains of self-concept were also foundto be in the acceptable range of Cronbach';s alpha .79-.80.
Interpersonal Problems (IPP)
The IPP-32was designedto measure the interpersonal problems of the general and medical population. The age range of the scale is 18-88 years (Barkham et al., 1996). The scalecomprises 32 items and covers eight domains namelysociable, assertive, supportive, caring, dependent, aggressive, involved, and open. In the current study,sociable, supportive and involved domains of interpersonal problems havebeen were taken into account. This scale wasusedfor transgender individuals (Davey, 2015). The coefficient of the domains of interpersonalproblemswas also found in the acceptable range of .07- .08.
The data was collectedfrom different communities of transgender people from Gujranwala, Pakistan. Permission was takenfrom the respective gurus of these transgender communities. In the consent form, the researcher ensured participantsabout confidentialitythroughout the process. Atotal of 72 transgender individuals filled in the questionnaire. However, their majority was uneducated.So,it was challenging to collect the data from the participants. Afterwards,datawas analyzed through IBM SPSS Statistics 25.
Descriptive statistics, regression, t-test, and ANOVA results are mentioned below.
Table 1
Demographic Characteristics of Participants (N=72)
Characteristics |
f |
% |
Education |
|
|
No education |
41 |
56.9 |
Middle |
10 |
13.9 |
Matric |
21 |
29.2 |
Table 1 illustrates the descriptive statistics. In the current study, the participants were categorized into five age groups, that is, 16-20 years [12.5%, n=9], 21-25, [34.7%, n=25], 26-30 [25.0, n=18], 31-35 [11.1%, n=8], and 36-40 [16.7%, n=12]. The majority (56.9%) reported themselves as illiterate. While, 13.9% claimed their education as middle and 29.2% claimed to have done matric. Approximately, 97.2% of participants were transgender by birth and 2.8% were those who became transgender through medical treatment.
Table 2
Cronbach';s Alpha
Variable |
k |
Alpha |
Awareness |
3 |
.80 |
Clarity |
3 |
.66 |
Goal |
3 |
.60 |
Impulse |
3 |
.66 |
Non acceptance |
3 |
.93 |
Strategies |
3 |
.50 |
SF |
6 |
.79 |
AU |
5 |
.78 |
Sociable |
4 |
.80 |
Supportive |
4 |
.85 |
Involved |
4 |
.60 |
According to Table 2, the Cronbach';s alpha values of all domains (awareness, clarity, goal, impulse and strategies) of emotion regulation were found to be in acceptable ranges, with an alpha coefficient value above .60-90. The domains of self-concept (SF and AU) were also found to be in the acceptable range of .79-.80. Only the alpha value of one domain of self-concept was below the acceptable range (0.50). The domain of interpersonal problems also lies in the acceptable range of Cronbach alpha for social involved and supportive domains.
Table 3
Correlation between Variables
Variable |
awea |
Clarity |
goals |
Stra |
imp |
Non |
SF |
AU |
S |
SU |
IN |
Awea |
1 |
.69** |
.89** |
.67** |
.55** |
-.24* |
.36** |
.42** |
.37** |
-.11 |
.87** |
Clarity |
|
1 |
.69** |
.54** |
.71** |
-.75** |
.77** |
.83** |
.84** |
-.08 |
.86** |
Goals |
|
|
1 |
.77** |
.49** |
-.33** |
.40** |
.41** |
.44** |
.10 |
.87** |
Stra |
|
|
|
1 |
.44** |
-.16 |
.24* |
.24* |
.37** |
.42** |
.77** |
Imp |
|
|
|
|
1 |
-.63** |
.61** |
.69** |
.72** |
.19 |
.57** |
Non |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
-.79** |
-.84** |
-.89** |
.02 |
-.49** |
SF |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
.84** |
.86** |
-.12 |
.61** |
AU |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
.90** |
-.04 |
.61** |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
.13 |
.63** |
SU |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
-.12 |
IN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
M |
9.53 |
8.49 |
9.24 |
8.67 |
7.79 |
9.07 |
15.19 |
13.28 |
10.44 |
10.19 |
12.11 |
SD |
3.59 |
3.40 |
3.10 |
2.74 |
2.52 |
4.55 |
6.00 |
5.35 |
4.84 |
4.54 |
4.51 |
Note. Awae= Awareness, Stra= Strategies, Non=Non acceptance, SF= Self-fullfillment, AU= Autonomy, IN=Involved
Table 3 reveals a significant positive relationship between all domains of emotion regulation, namely awareness, clarity, goals, strategies, and impulse with two domains of interpersonal problems, namely sociability (r=.36) and involved (r=.87). Only awareness (r=-.11) and clarity (r=-0.77) domains of emotion regulation were found to be inversely correlated with the supportive domains of interpersonal problems. Furthermore, a significant positive association was observed between the two domains of self-concept, that is, self-fulfillment and autonomy and the two domains of interpersonal problems, that is, sociability (r=.86: r=.90) and involved (r=.60: r=.61). However, the two domains of self-concept, namely self-fullfillment (r=-.12) and autonomy (r=-.04) were observed to be inversely correlated with the supportive domain of interpersonal problems.
According to Table 4, statistically significant differences exist in awareness and clarity domains of emotion regulation, self-fulfillment and autonomy domains of self-concept, and supportive and involved domains of interpersonal problems. However, there is non-significant difference in goals, strategies, impulsiveness and non-acceptance, domains of emotion regulation and sociable, and domain of interpersonal problems.
Table 4
One-Way ANOVA for Education Difference
Variable |
Illiterate |
Middle |
Matric |
F |
p |
|||
M |
S.D |
M |
S.D |
M |
S.D |
|||
Awareness |
8.34 |
3.46 |
11.10 |
3.78 |
11.09 |
2.95 |
5.91 |
.000 |
Clarity |
7.39 |
2.76 |
9.40 |
3.84 |
10.19 |
3.63 |
5.83 |
.010 |
Goals |
8.51 |
3.08 |
10.10 |
3.57 |
10.24 |
2.62 |
2.73 |
.073 |
Strategies |
8.49 |
2.89 |
9.20 |
2.94 |
8.76 |
2.41 |
.28 |
.751 |
Imp |
7.44 |
2.59 |
8.60 |
2.41 |
8.09 |
2.41 |
1.07 |
.352 |
Non |
9.90 |
4.01 |
8.20 |
5.98 |
7.86 |
4.66 |
1.65 |
.200 |
SF |
13.29 |
4.99 |
17.50 |
6.59 |
17.81 |
6.42 |
5.39 |
.012 |
AU |
11.78 |
4.73 |
14.90 |
6.10 |
15.43 |
5.43 |
4.09 |
.020 |
S |
9.34 |
4.07 |
11.90 |
5.59 |
11.90 |
5.49 |
2.58 |
.085 |
SU |
11.83 |
4.01 |
9.20 |
4.59 |
7.47 |
4.21 |
7.99 |
.002 |
IN |
10.41 |
3.76 |
14.00 |
4.67 |
14.52 |
4.51 |
8.14 |
.001 |
Table 5
Predictors of Interpersonal Problems (N=72)
Factors |
B |
95% CI for B |
SEB |
β |
R |
∆R2 |
|
LL |
UL |
||||||
Step 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
.04 |
.02 |
Education |
-0.83 |
-1.73 |
0.07 |
0.45 |
-.20 |
|
|
Step 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
.58 |
.54 |
Constant |
6.16 |
1.62 |
10.69 |
2.28 |
|
|
|
Education |
-0.75 |
-1.45 |
-0.04 |
0.35 |
-.18 |
|
|
Stra |
0.90 |
0.56 |
1.23 |
0.17 |
.63 |
|
|
Impulse |
0.30 |
0.03 |
0.57 |
0.14 |
.24 |
|
|
Step 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
.78 |
.75 |
Education |
-0.62 |
-1.14 |
-0.10 |
0.26 |
-.15 |
|
|
Clarity |
-0.31 |
-0.61 |
-0.01 |
0.15 |
-.25 |
|
|
Stra |
0.57 |
0.31 |
0.83 |
0.13 |
.40 |
|
|
NON |
0.21 |
0.03 |
0.40 |
0.09 |
.29 |
|
|
AU |
0.06 |
-0.09 |
0.20 |
0.07 |
.82 |
|
|
Note. Model 1, F (3.34), 1, 78, Model 2, F (714.65), 7, 72 Model 3, F (28.04), 9, .72
According to Table 5, Model 1 shows that education is not a significant positive predictor of interpersonal difficulties. Model 2 shows that education is a negative predictor, whereas strategy and impulse domains of emotion regulation are positive predictors of interpersonal problems. Model 3 shows that the autonomy domain of self-concept is a positive predictor of interpersonal problems.
The study sought to examine the predictors of transgender interpersonal problems in the Pakistani context. The findings revealed a significant positive relationship between all domains of emotion regulation, namely awareness, clarity, goals, strategies, and impulse and two domains of interpersonal problems, namely sociability and involved. The findings are unique as emotional regulation does not support interpersonal relationships among transgender individuals in Pakistan. Only one domain of awarenesswas observedto be a negative predictor of interpersonal relations. This is significant in view of literature which depicts contradictory findings. A Norwegian studydepicteda significant relationship between emotion regulation and interpersonal relationships in Norway's population within the age range 18-65 years (Solbakken,et al., 2023). Another recent studywas carried outto investigate the relationship between emotion regulation difficulties and interpersonal conflict among undergraduates with borderline personality disorderin Massachusetts, USA.
The findingsdepictedthat emotion regulation difficultiesare positively correlatedwith emotional conflict (Haliczeret al., 2021). In European countries like Norway, gender types and formation are considered as part and parcel of human rights and transgender experience minimumdiscrimination. Consequently, their emotional regulation helps them to maintain healthy interpersonal relationships (Gasol et al., 2022). Unlike European countries, in Pakistan, transgender people have not gained a significant or even an acceptable placein the society Reeck et al. (2022). Therefore, despite having emotional regulation traits, they still experience interpersonal difficulties. Hence,it can be concludedthat emotion regulation is not atruepredictor of interpersonal problems intransgenderindividuals of Pakistan.
Despite this fact, a significant positive association was found to exist between interpersonal problems and self-concept, except for one interpersonal problem dimension (supportive). In other words, the current study found that self-concept helpsto maintainsupportive interpersonal relationships in the Pakistani transgender community, as compared to emotion regulation. In Pakistan, the transgender identity is still questionable/remains contentious and only two genders(male and female) are consideredfor personal and occupational settings. (Saleem& Rizvi, 2017). This discrimination adversely impacts the self-conceptof transgender individuals andthey start to evaluate their personal traits poorly (Sani et al., 2023).Consequently, they report poor interpersonal relationships anddepict a lack ofsocial skills and supportive attitudes towards others.Moreover,their involvement in diverse social events was foundto bepoor. The literature also depicts that self-concept impacts interpersonal relationships. However, autonomy and SFwere observedto have a positive relationship with interpersonal problems.
Notably, it was found that the literature contradicts the current study findings. According to Hisli Şahin et al. (2009), those with positive self-concept and internal locus of control use conflict resolution strategies that are more successful and beneficial to resolve interpersonal problems. However, in Pakistan people are less flexible and more awareness is needed to uplift the status of transgender people in Pakistan.Theyhave poor self-concept despitehaving emotional regulation whichaffects their interpersonal relationship.According to the current findings, strategy and impulse domains of emotion regulation and autonomy domain of self-concept are positive predictors of interpersonal problems. The literature supports the findings of the current study, since a substantial number of studies found that emotion regulation and self-esteem are predictors of interpersonalproblemsin a diverse population (Monell et al.,2015; Solbakken et al.,2023).
According to the current study, education is a negative predictor of interpersonal problems. The education level helpsto broadenthe individual';s perspective. Therefore, a strong relationship between literacy level and study constructs was found. The literature also depicts the same results. Graziano etal.(2007) showed a favorable correlation between emotion management and early literacy. Literature students depict better emotional regulation as compared to illiterate ones/other students. Peiffer et al. (2020) studied German Psychology students to examine the association between empirical distinction of self-concept and self-efficacy in higher education. They concluded that higher education leads to more emotional regulation and control.Hardie et al. (2021) depicted the current educational practices for fostering interpersonal and communication skills. The study found that educated people experience interpersonal issues theleast and solvethemwith insight.
The current study was primarily quantitative.Qualitative research should be carried outto investigate the in-depth understanding of the phenomenon. Moreover, the current study was cross-sectional. Therefore, longitudinal research should be carried out as well toinvestigateemotion regulation, self-concept, and interpersonal problems of transgender individuals throughout/across their lifespan.Furthermore, asthe majorityof the study population was illiterate, better data collecting strategies should be usedin future studies to get more valid and reliable results.
The research on transgender clearly outlines how they live their lives despite all the prejudice and labels that the society assigns to them. This study can aid in developing transgender-inclusive policies in the future to promote their status in the society. Also, it would help psychologists to design appropriate intervention plans.
Abdullah, M. A., Basharat, Z., Kamal, B., Sattar, N. Y., Hassan, Z. F., Jan, A. D., & Shafqat, A. (2012). Is social exclusion pushing the Pakistani hijras (transgenders) towards commercial sex work? A qualitative study.BMC international Health and Human Rights,12, Article e32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-698X-12-32
Barkham, M., Hardy, G. E., & Startup, M. (1996). The IIP-32: A short version of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 35(1), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1996.tb01159.x
Claes, L., Bouman, W. P., Witcomb, G., Thurston, M., Fernandez-Aranda, F., & Arcelus, J. (2015). Non-suicidal self-injury in trans people: Associations with psychological symptoms, victimization, interpersonal functioning, and perceived social support. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 12(1), 168–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12711
Davey, A., Bouman, W. P., Meyer, C., & Arcelus, J. (2015). Interpersonal functioning among treatment-seeking trans individuals. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 71(12), 1173–1185. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22209
Drescher, C, F., Kassing, F., Mahajan, A., & Stepleman, L. M. (2023). The impact of transgender minority stress and emotion regulation on suicidality and self-harm. Psychology and Sexuality, 14 (2), 432–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2023.2164867
Gamarel, K. E., Sevelius, J. M., Reisner, S. L., Coats, C. S., Nemoto, T., & Operario, D. (2019). Commitment, interpersonal stigma, and mental health in romantic relationships between transgender women and cisgender male partners. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(7), 2180–2201. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407518785768
Gasol, X., Navarro-Haro, M. V., Fernández-Felipe, I., García-Palacios, A., Suso-Ribera, C., & Gasol-Colomina, M. (2022). Preventing emotional dysregulation: Acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of a DBT skills training program for adolescents in the Spanish school system. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(1), Article e494. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010494
Goni, E., Madariaga, J. M., Axpe, I., & Goñi, A. (2011). Structure of the Personal Self-Concept (PSC) Questionnaire. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 11(3), 509–522.
Graziano, P. A., Reavis, R. D., Keane, S. P., & Calkins, S. D. (2007). The role of emotion regulation and children's early academic success. Journal of School Psychology, 45(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.09.002
Haliczer, L. A., Woods, S. E., & Dixon-Gordon, K. L. (2021). Emotion regulation difficulties and interpersonal conflict in borderline personality disorder. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 12(4), 347–353. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000436
Hardie, P., Darley, A., Langan, L., Lafferty, A., Jarvis, S., & Redmond, C. (2022). Interpersonal and communication skills development in general nursing preceptorship education and training programmes: A scoping review. Nurse Education in Practice, 65, Article e103482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103482
Hisli Şahin, N., Basim, H. N., & Çetin, F. (2009). Kişilerarası çatişma çözme yaklaşımlarında kendilik algısı ve kontrol odağı [Locus of control and self-concept in interpersonal conflict resolution approaches]. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi/ Turkish Journal of Psychiatry, 20(2), 153–163.
Irshad, U., Hashmi, A. M., & Aamer, I. (2020). Between a rock and a hard place - Gender dysphoria and comorbid depression in a young, low-income, Pakistani transgender man. Cureus, 12(9), Article e10205. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.10205
Kapatais, A., Williams, A. J., & Townsend, E. (2023). The mediating role of emotion regulation on self-harm among gender identity and sexual orientation minority (LGBTQ+) individuals. Archives of Suicide Research: Official Journal of the International Academy for Suicide Research, 27(2), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2022.2064254
Kiviruusu, O., Berg, N., Huurre, T., Aro, H., Marttunen, M., & Haukkala, A. (2016). Interpersonal conflicts and development of self-esteem from adolescence to mid-adulthood. A 26-year follow-up. PloS One, 11(10), Article e0164942. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164942
Manzoor, I., Khan, Z. H., Tariq, R., & Shahzad, R. (2021). Health problems & barriers to healthcare services for the transgender community in Lahore, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 38(1). https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.38.1.4375
Messinger, A. M., Guadalupe-Diaz, X. L., & Kurdyla, V. (2022). Transgender polyvictimization in the U.S. transgender survey. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(19-20), NP18810-NP18836. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211039250
Monell, E., Högdahl, L., Mantilla, E. F., & Birgegård, A. (2015) Emotion dysregulation, self-image and eating disorder symptoms in university women. Journal of Eating Disorders, 3, Article e44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-015-0083-x
Peiffer, H., Ellwart, T., & Preckel, F. (2020). Ability self-concept and self-efficacy in higher education: An empirical differentiation based on their factorial structure. PloS One, 15(7), Article e0234604. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234604
Reeck, C., & Onuklu, N. N. Y. (2022). Interpersonal emotion regulation: Consequences for brands in customer service interactions. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article e872670. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.872670
Saleem, F., & Rizvi, S. W. (2017). Transgender associations and possible etiology: A literature review. Cureus, 9(12), Article e1984. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1984
Sani, S., Mehmood, Q., Jamal, H., Mukhtar, M. U., & Ullah, I. (2023). Raising the alarm: Mental health status of the transgender community in Pakistan. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 79, Article e103360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2022.103360
Shah, H. B. U., Rashid, F., Atif, I., Hydrie, M. Z., Fawad, M. W. B., Muzaffar, H. Z., Rehman, A., Anjum, S., Mehroz, M. B., Haider, A., Hassan, A., & Shukar, H. (2018). Challenges faced by marginalized communities such as transgenders in Pakistan. The Pan African Medical Journal, 30, Article e96. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2018.30.96.12818
Solbakken, O. A., Ebrahimi, O. V., Hoffart, A., Monsen, J. T., & Johnson, S. U. (2023). Emotion regulation difficulties and interpersonal problems during the COVID-19 pandemic: Predicting anxiety and depression. Psychological Medicine, 53(5), 2181–2185. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291721001987
Victor, S. E., & Klonsky, E. D. (2016). Validation of a brief version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS-18) in five samples. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 38(4), 582–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-016-9547-9
Wazir, M. A., & Goujon, A. (2019). Assessing the 2017 census of Pakistan using demographic analysis: A sub-national perspective.Vienna Institute of Demography.https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/207062/1/1667013416.pdf