Evolutionary Dynamics of Polintons: A Rarely Investigated Superfamily of DNA Transposons

Muhammad Umair Khan1, Faisal Nouroz1*, Amna Waheed1, and Shumaila Noreen2

1Department of Bioinformatics, Hazara University Mansehra, Pakistan

2Department of Zoology, Hazara University Mansehra, Pakistan

Original Article Open Access
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32350/cto.42.02

Abstract

Polintons, also known as ‘Maverick’ is a rarely investigated superfamily of DNA transposons. Although, discovered in recent decades, these elements are now found in several eukaryotic genomes due to the advancements and expansions in genome sequencing projects. The current study was conducted to investigate the evolutionary genomics and distribution of Polintons in various genomes. Approximately, 102 Polinton elements from various species were collected from Repbase – GIRI database. They have shown a high structural diversity and ranged in sizes from 03 to 42kb. The phylogenetic relationship and evolutionary history of the Polinton superfamily was investigated using bioinformatics software. Phylogenetic trees were created based on two major protein coding domains, such as RVE integrase and DNA POL B. In both cases, the sequences were clustered in 2 clades, several sub-clades, and groups with variable number of elements in each group. The cladograms represented the extensive genetic diversity and evolutionary history of these elements and allowed to observe the intricate branching patterns and relationships within the Polinton superfamily. The cladogram provides a roadmap to explore the relationships and dynamics of the Polinton superfamily in detail. The current study aimed to enhance the understanding of evolutionary dynamics of Polintons found in different organisms.

Keywords : : Evolution, phylogeny, Polinton, RVE integrase, transposons
*Corresponding author: [email protected]

Published: 10-10-2024

Introduction

The transposons or the jumping genes are DNA sequences, which can move and change their position within the genomes. Due to their mobility within the genomes, they may result in genetic diversity, mutations, duplications, and alterations in the gene expression. Therefore, they are the main drivers of genome evolution and duplication. Moreover, they are the abundant elements proliferating in almost all genomes ranging from bacteria to human beings and constitute a major proportion of organism genomes. Due to their diversity and mobility, transposons are important factors which revolutionized the molecular and genetic fields. They are classified into two major classes based on their mode of transposition, such as Class I (Retrotransposons) and Class II (DNA transposons) having further sub-classes and superfamilies with variable structures (Fig. 1). In Class I elements, the Retrotransposons are further sub-divided into LTR Retrotransposons (Copia, Gypsy, Retriviruses superfamilies) and Non-LTR Retrotransposons (LINEs & SINEs). They follow the copy and paste mechanism of transposition, where DNA is first transcribed into RNA template and reverse transcribed into cDNA involving the reverse transcriptase (RT). In contrast, in Class II elements, the DNA transposons follow the cut and paste mechanism, where the DNA element integrates itself into a new site within the genome in presence of transposase without making their copy. DNA transposons are further classified into several superfamilies, which can be differentiated based on their target site duplications (TSDs), terminal inverted repeats (TIRs), transposase domain, and internal sequences. Among DNA transposons, the most active and investigated superfamilies include Ac/Ds or hAT, CACTA, TC1-Mariner, Mutator, Merlin, PIF-Harbinger, Transib, and PiggyBac. On the other hand, the rarely investigated superfamilies include the Helitron, Polinton, and Crypton. The DNA transposons have encoded a transposase domain necessary for their transposition, while the structure of Polintons/Maverik is different from the other DNA transposons. They encode various domains, where retroviral-like integrase (INT), putative ATPase, adenoviral-like protease, and DNA polymerase B (POLB) are important domains [16].

Of DNA transposons, Polinton or Maverick emerged within various genomes and were initially discovered in protist genomes, however, they were later identified in other organisms. They are not as abundant as other DNA transposons, however, still proliferating in several host genomes. They are the largest sized transposons among various DNA transposon superfamilies ranging from 3 to 42kb. They show structural complexity and sophistication as compared to other DNA transposon superfamilies. They exhibit various domains involved in various cellular processes, such as protein synthesis and DNA replication. They encode a protein primed type B DNA polymerase (POL B) and a retroviral like (RVE) family. Recent investigations have shown that Polinton also harbors few virus-like domains, such as major capsid protein (MCP), minor capsid protein (mCP), and a DNA packaging protein ATPase, suggesting their evolutionary relationship with viruses. The structural diversity and presence of Polintons in various sequenced genomes have shown a significant role in shaping the development and evolution of eukaryotic genomes. Based on their sizes and structural architecture, the Polintons show structural diversity with the virophages, the viruses infecting the microbial eukaryotes [610].

Polintons are rarely investigated and were identified from few organism genomes. Their study and investigations have raised several questions regarding their origin, biological significance, and evolutionary history. Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain the origin of Polintons including a potential ancestral relationship with viruses or independent evolutionary events. Exploring the mysteries of Polintons would provide a major dynamic interplay between Polintons and their host genomes. Polintons have not been properly investigated, however, their presence in various genomes clarifies that they play a major role in host genome evolution and their plasticity [1113].

The current study aimed to explore the structural diversity, evolutionary relationship, sizes, and identification of Polintons in various organisms. Notably, the study explored structural genomics and evolutionary dynamics of Polintons by investigating the DNA POL B and RVE Integrase domains.


Figure 1. Schematic Representation of Various Types of Transposable Elements. Class 1 or Retrotransposons are Subdivided into LTR Retrotransposons (Copia, Gypsy, Retroviruses) and Non-LTR Retrotransposons (LINEs) with Various Protein Coding Domains. Class II DNA Transposons have Transposase Domain for their Transposition. Polintons or Maverik Elements Show Different Structure Encoding Domains, Such as Integrase, ATPase, Protease, and DNA Polymerase B in their Structures

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. Data Mining and Sequence Retrieval

The Repbase database of transposable elements was mined for Polinton sequences and various Polinton sequences deposited in Repbase database were retrieved for further analysis.

2.2. Investigation of Polintons and their Domains

Polintons retrieved from Repbase database were further analyzed. The element's name, host organisms from where they were identified, full element sizes, and their domains with sizes were investigated and tabulated. The sequences of Polintons were investigated in conserved domain database (CDD) of NCBI to detect various conserved protein domains.

2.3. Multiple Sequence Alignment and Phylogenetic Analyses

Multiple sequence alignment was performed in CLASTALW implemented in BioEdit software. After the sequence alignment, small gaps were removed and frameshifts were introduced to bring sequences into the same frame for further inspection. Trees were constructed using Mega software with 1000 bootstrap values. To calculate the genetic distance, neighbor joining method was applied in Mega Software.

3. RESULTS

One hundred and two (102) Polinton sequences, deposited in Repbase database of transposable elements, were retrieved and analyzed further. The names of elements, the host organism from where they were detected, full lengths (sizes) of elements, identified domains as well as sizes of domains were identified and listed as shown in Table 1. The Polinton elements ranged in sizes from 1.5kb to 42.5kb with variations in sizes and of various Polintons proliferating in various genomes. The smallest, however, partial Polinton elements were 1589 nucleotide (nt) Polinton-1B_HM identified from host genome Hydra vulgaris and Polinton1B_CPB (1858 nt) from Chrysemys picta bellii both with missing RVE Integrase and DNA POLB domains. The largest elements were Polinton-2_HM (42550) and Polinton-3_HM (38791 nt) from Hydra vulgaris. The important domains of Polinton sequences were also detected by running their sequences in conserved domain database (CDD) implemented in NCBI. The important domains detected from Polintons included AEP, archaeo-eukaryotic primase; MCP, major capsid protein; RVE Integrase; POLB, protein-primed polymerase of family B; Dcm, methyltransferase of the Dcm family; GIY, GIY-YIG family nuclease; S1H, superfamily 1 helicase; primpol, S3H, superfamily 3 helicase; primase-polymerase, and TVpol, transposon-viral polymerase.

Using the MEGA program, phylogenetic tree was constructed to visualize the relationships of Polinton sequences across various species. Of 102 Polinton sequences, the RVE Integrase domain was identified from 75 sequences, which was further used for phylogenetic analyses. The circular cladogram of these 75 Polinton sequences (based on RVE Integrase) was clustered into two distinct clades (Figure 2), with each clade further clustering in sub-clades, groups, and sub-groups. The first clade consists of 41 sequences, while the second exhibits 34 sequences. Clade 1 is further clustered in 8 groups with various numbers of sequences in each group. Polintons from Nasonia vitripennis and Strongylocentrotus purpuratus are mostly clustered together in one group of Clade 1. The Polinton sequences of Nematostella vectensis, Danio rerio, and Xenopus tropicalis are clustered together in one group. The homologous Polinton sequences of Pogonomyrmex barbatus and Strongylocentrotus purpuratus are grouped together, while few elements are clustered in sister group with Nasonia vitripennis. The Polinton sequences from Schmidtea mediterranea and Hydra vulgaris came close together in a group, showing evolutionary relationship with each other. Clade 2 is further clustered in 8 groups with variable numbers of elements in each group. The RVE Integrase-based Polinton sequences from Trichomonas vaginalis are clustered together in a group. Although, the sequences from Nasonia vitripennis, Drosophila bipectinate, and Drosophila eugracilis were found in various groups, indicating evolutionary phenomena (Fig.1). This evolutionary representation allows the observation of intricate branching patterns and relationships within the Polinton superfamily. The cladogram provides a roadmap for exploring the relationships and dynamics of the Polinton superfamily in detail.


Figure 2. Seventy-five (75) Polinton Sequences having RVE Integrase Domain were Subjected to Phylogenetic Analysis. The Phylogenetic Tree was Constructed in Mega X using the 1000 Bootstrap Values. The Genetic Distance was Calculated through Neighbor-Joining Method. The Tree was Resolved in 2 Major Clades with Several Sub-Clades and Groups.

The POLB domain was also brought under evolutionary investigations, where of 102 Polinton sequences, 63 showed the POLB domain. Using the neighbor-joining method in Mega, a circular cladogram was created of these 63 Polinton sequences (Fig. 3). The tree revealed two major clades with distinct subclades and groups. The first clade consists of 52 elements, while the second clade is represented by 11 elements. Notably, the second clade encompassed a wide range of data from Polinton 1 TC to Polinton 2 TC. Although, there were some similarities, the elements in the first and second clades exhibited distinct characteristics. The Polinton sequences from Nasonia vitripennis and Nematostella vectensis were found distributed in various groups. Polinton 5TV and Polinton 1 XT are closely related within the first clade, forming a sister group. However, Polinton 2NV, being a part of the same group, showed a more distant relationship with Polinton 5TV and Polinton 1 XT (Figure 3). This cladogram visually represents the genetic relationships among Polinton sequences, focusing on the DNA POLB domain. The presence of distinct clades and subclades indicates evolutionary divergences within the Polinton superfamily.


Figure 3. Sixty-three (63) Polinton Sequences having POLB Domain were Subjected to Phylogenetic Analysis. The Phylogenetic Tree was Constructed in Mega X using the 1000 Bootstrap Values. The Neighbor-Joining Method was Used to Calculate the Genetic Distance for Tree Construction

The current study highlighted the significance of phylogenetic analysis in understanding the evolutionary connections between transposons and other organisms, shedding light on the origins of eukaryotes and the role of Polinton in eukaryotic genome evolution.

Table 1. List of Polintons/Maverick collected from various host organisms with their sizes and domains. NI; Not identified

No.

Element name

Host organism

Size (nt)

RVE Integrase

size (nt)

POLB

size (nt)

1

Mavirus_Spezl Polinton

Cafeteria roenbergensis

19063

314

NI

2

Polinton10_Nvi

Nasonia vitripennis

5601

NI

1085

3

Polinton1B_CPB

Chrysemys picta bellii

1858

NI

NI

4

Polinton-1B_HM 

Hydra vulgaris

1589

NI

NI

5

Polinton-1B_TV 

Trichomonas vaginalis

20519

NI

NI

6

Polinton-1_Ace 

Atta cephalotes

14410

281

869

7

Polinton-1_Ami 

Crocodylidae

14974

320

2333

8

Polinton-1_CB

Caenorhabditis briggsae

16633

326

1454

9

Polinton-1_CGi 

Crassostrea gigas

20773

323

1462

10

Polinton-1_CI 

Ciona intestinalis

15061

326

NI

11

Polinton-1_CPB 

Chrysemys picta bellii

13369

326

1415

12

Polinton-1_CTe 

Capitella teleta

5187

NI

1217

13

Polinton-1_Dan 

Drosophila ananassae

17900

326

1217

14

Polinton-1_DBi 

Drosophila biarmipes

13688

335

857

15

Polinton-1_DBp 

Drosophila bipectinata

7049

326

1451

16

Polinton-1_Del 

Drosophila elegans

10296

NI

563

17

Polinton-1_DEu 

Drosophila eugracilis

10967

332

NI

18

Polinton-1_DGr 

Drosophila grimshawi

15303

326

1268

19

Polinton-1_DK 

Drosophila kikkawai

7252

326

863

20

Polinton-1_Dpe

Drosophila persimilis

15797

335

1460

21

Polinton-1_DR 

Danio rerio

18485

320

1883

22

Polinton-1_DY 

Drosophila yakuba

14782

335

1451

23

Polinton-1_EI 

Entamoeba invadens

16504

NI

473

24

Polinton-1_EL 

Esox Lucius

14284

NI

1883

25

Polinton-1_GI 

Rhizophagus intraradices

11954

347

1583

26

Polinton-1_HM 

Hydra vulgaris

20689

NI

1436

27

Polinton-1_HSal 

Harpegnathos saltator

3554

NI

2267

28

Polinton-1_LCh 

Latimeria chalumnae

17525

218

535

29

Polinton-1_LMi 

Locusta migratoria

8133

NI

NI

30

Polinton-1_NV 

Nematostella vectensis

17653

NI

1295

31

Polinton-1_NVi 

Nasonia vitripennis

14499

329

1408

32

Polinton-1_PBa 

Pogonomyrmex barbatus

16368

329

1247

33

Polinton-1_PH 

Parhyale hawaiensis

10772

NI

692

34

Polinton-1_PI 

Phytophthora infestans

18398

314

755

35

Polinton-1_PSo 

Phytophthora sojae

19227

314

NI

36

Polinton-1_SM 

Schmidtea mediterranea

14867

206

1178

37

Polinton-1_SP 

Strongylocentrotus purpuratus

16918

329

1970

38

Polinton-1_SPU 

Sphenodon punctatus

11940

NI

1567

39

Polinton-1_SSa 

Salmo salar

16270

335

1886

40

Polinton-1_TC 

Tribolium castaneum

13486

332

1919

41

Polinton-1_TV 

Trichomonas vaginalis

20724

NI

NI

42

Polinton-1_XT 

Xenopus tropicalis

13692

329

1922

43

Polinton-2A_NV 

Nematostella vectensis

20836

329

733

44

Polinton-2B_TV 

Trichomonas vaginalis

25444

329

NI

45

Polinton-2_Ace 

Atta cephalotes

14167

335

1958

46

Polinton-2_Ami 

Alligator mississippiensis

15555

320

1916

47

Polinton-2_CB 

Caenorhabditis briggsae

15471

329

923

48

Polinton-2_CI 

Ciona intestinalis

13695

326

NI

49

Polinton-2_CPB 

Chrysemys picta bellii

6310

320

NI

50

Polinton-2_DBi 

Drosophila biarmipes

8566

314

NI

51

Polinton-2_DBp 

Drosophila bipectinata

3416

302

NI

52

Polinton-2_DEu 

Drosophila eugracilis

11524

335

1451

53

Polinton-2_DK 

Drosophila kikkawai

6981

326

1226

54

Polinton-2_DR

Danio rerio

16276

323

1655

55

Polinton-2_HM

Hydra vulgaris

42550

347

NI

56

Polinton-2_Lmi

Locusta migratoria

7239

272

NI

57

Polinton-2_NV

Nematostella vectensis

21301

329

1892

58

Polinton-2_NVi

Nasonia vitripennis

8996

338

NI

59

Polinton-2_PBa

Pogonomyrmex barbatus

18080

335

1958

60

Polinton-2_PH

Parhyale hawaiensis

16250

323

1475

61

Polinton-2_RPr

Rhodnius prolixus

17029

323

1412

62

Polinton-2_SM

Schmidtea mediterranea

15944

326

1762

63

Polinton-2_SP

Strongylocentrotus purpuratus

14353

329

1952

64

Polinton-2_TC

Tribolium castaneum

16981

329

1490

65

Polinton-2_TV

Trichomonas vaginalis

23222

NI

NI

66

Polinton-2_XT

Xenopus tropicalis

14828

320

1910

67

Polinton-3_CI

Ciona intestinalis

6621

NI

NI

68

Polinton-3_DR

Danio rerio

18618

320

365

69

Polinton-3_HM

Hydra vulgaris

38791

344

NI

70

Polinton-3_Lmi

Locusta migratoria

5107

NI

794

71

Polinton-3_NV

Nematostella vectensis

16575

344

1451

72

Polinton-3_Nvi

Nasonia vitripennis

12588

323

1193

73

Polinton-3_Pba

Pogonomyrmex barbatus

18021

335

1949

74

Polinton-3_RPr

Rhodnius prolixus

10522

332

NI

75

Polinton-3_SP 

Strongylocentrotus purpuratus

16510

332

1922

76

Polinton-3_TC

Tribolium castaneum

17681

335

1508

77

Polinton-3_TV

Trichomonas vaginalis

22038

284

1244

78

Polinton-4B_TV

Trichomonas vaginalis

21735

281

1244

79

Polinton-4N1_DR

Danio rerio

10436

NI

NI

80

Polinton-4_DR

Danio rerio

20287

NI

769

81

Polinton-4_Hma

Hydra vulgaris

8516

NI

NI

82

Polinton-4_LMi

Locusta migratoria

14821

188

NI

83

Polinton-4_LVa

Litopenaeus vannamei

16994

NI

NI

84

Polinton-4_NV

Nematostella vectensis

13070

317

NI

85

Polinton-4_NV

Nasonia vitripennis

12608

323

1007

86

Polinton-4_Pba

Pogonomyrmex barbatus

15965

329

1247

87

Polinton-4_SP

Strongylocentrotus purpuratus

15575

326

1892

88

Polinton-4_TV

Trichomonas vaginalis

21843

221

1244

89

Polinton-5B_TV

Trichomonas vaginalis

3963

NI

NI

90

Polinton-5_NV

Nematostella vectensis

19102

329

1895

91

Polinton-5_NVi

Nasonia vitripennis

18379

335

1222

92

Polinton-5_Pba

Pogonomyrmex barbatus

19981

326

1244

93

Polinton-5_SP

Strongylocentrotus purpuratus

16525

323

1922

94

Polinton-5_TV

Trichomonas vaginalis

21759

332

1373

95

Polinton-6_NV

Nasonia vitripennis

10272

323

716

96

Polinton-7_Nvi

Nasonia vitripennis

8494

326

1229

97

Polinton-8_NVi

Nasonia vitripennis

16996

338

1979

98

Polinton-9_N 

Nasonia vitripennis

17121

329

1454

99

Polinton-N1A_NV

Nematostella vectensis

14335

NI

NI

100

Polinton1_SM

Schmidtea mediterranea

12786

431

743

101

Polinton2_SM

Schmidtea mediterranea

11578

NI

1114

102

Polinton3_SM

Schmidtea mediterranea

2836

NI

1379

4. DISCUSSION

The exploration of different databases has revolutionized the field of genomics and has led to the discovery of numerous new groups of organisms. One such group is the small viral genomes. This group has been identified through the detection of novel viruses. These small viral genomes pose unique challenges in terms of sequence analysis due to their rapid evolution and high mutation rates [12]. Moreover, another intriguing group of organisms which has garnered attention in recent years is the Polinton or Maverick transposons. Initially, classified as a type of DNA transposon, Mavericks have since been recognized as a viral group due to their distinct features and similarities to viral elements. They encode a unique class of integrases called c-integrases, which play essential roles in their replication and integration into host genomes [14].

The discovery of c-integrases has opened new avenues to understand the evolutionary relationships and functional significance of these elements. Comparative analyses of c-integrases have revealed striking similarities to retroviral integrases (RVE) in terms of the catalytic core domain and chromodomain [14, 15]. The presence of these conserved domains suggests a shared ancestry and functional convergence between c-integrases and RVE. By analyzing the positioning of segments in the current study, common ancestry, shared domains, and genetic similarities may be identified among Polinton elements. They also serve as a guide for further investigations into the functional implications and evolutionary significance of specific Polinton subgroups. The similarity of these Polintons was observed in various specie genomes and variations within same or closely-related genomes, revealing their diverse evolutionary nature.

To elucidate the evolutionary history of c-integrases, phylogenetic analyses have been performed. The RVE domain of Polintons was aligned with integrases from diverse elements, such as Tlr1 (ciliate), Tdd4 (slime mold), Ty1 (budding yeast), and Copia (Drosophila). The resulting phylogenetic tree revealed a monophyletic clade within the Polinton c-integrases group, with Tlr1 and Tdd-4 integrases forming a deep-branching position alongside the c-integrase of Mav_Tv1.1 from the parabasalid Trichomonas vaginalis. These findings suggest a common ancestry and potential functional similarities between Tlr1, Tdd-4, and the c-integrase of T. vaginalis. Moreover, the presence of c-integrases in parabasalids, is considered as one of the ancient groups of eukaryotes, highlighting their deep-rooted evolutionary origins. Notably, the c-integrases found in Phytophthora infestans and Tetrahymena thermophila demonstrate a monophyletic grouping with the other protozoan eukaryotes, underscoring their basal position within the c-integrases phylogeny [1416]. This provides valuable insights into the evolutionary history and diversification of c-integrases across different eukaryotic lineages.

Polintons, characterized by their large genome size and vertical inheritance, represent an ancient group of transposable elements that have diversified over billions of years. They have played a significant role in shaping the genomes of various eukaryotic organisms. Through the analysis of conserved domains, such as the DNA POLB region and the identification of conserved motifs, researchers have been able to discover new sequences and unveil the diversity of these elements within eukaryotic genomes [1518].

4.1. Conclusion

The current study aimed to shed light on the diversity, activity, and evolution of the Polinton superfamily across various organisms. This study has the potential to impact disciplines, such as genetics, medicine, and evolutionary biology, contributing to a broader understanding of nature. By examining the RVE Integrase and POLB domains of Polinton, valuable insights were gained into the genetic diversity and evolutionary history of Polintons, since these 2 domains were major and the most conserved domains. The investigation of Polintons and their role in evolution remains a critical field that calls for further exploration.

Conflict of Interest

The author of the manuscript has no financial or non-financial conflict of interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Data Availability Statement

The data associated with this study will be provided by the corresponding author upon request.

Funding details

This research did not receive grant from any funding source or agency.

Bibliography

  1. Kapitonov VV, Jurka J. A universal classification of eukaryotic transposable elements implemented in Repbase. Nat Rev Genet. 2008;9:411–412. https://doi.org/1038/nrg2165-c2
  2. Wicker T, Sabot F, Hua-Van A, et al. A unified classification system for eukaryotic transposable elements. Nat Rev Genet. 2007;8:973–982. https://doi.org/1038/nrg2165
  3. Nouroz F, Noreen S, Heslop-Harrison JS. Identification and characterization of LTR Retrotransposons in Brassica. Turk J Biol. 2015;39(5):740–757. https://doi.org/3906/biy-1501-77
  4. Nouroz F, Noreen S, Heslop-Harrison JS. Characterization and diversity of novel PIF/Harbinger DNA transposons in Brassica Pak J Bot. 2016;48(1):167–178.
  5. Nouroz F, Noreen S, Heslop-Harrison JS. Identification and evolutionary dynamics of CACTA DNA transposons in Brassica. Pak J Bot. 2017;49(2):789–798.
  6. Pritham EJ. Transposable elements and factors influencing their success in eukaryotes. J Hered. 2009;100(5):648–655. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esp065
  7. Krupovic M, Koonin EV. Self-synthesizing transposons: unexpected key players in the evolution of viruses and defense systems. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2016;31:25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2016.01.006  
  8. Arensburger P, Piégu B, Bigot Y. The future of transposable element annotation and their classification in the light of functional genomics - what we can learn from the fables of Jean de la Fontaine? Mob Genet Elements. 2016;6(6):e1256852. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159256X.2016.1256852
  9. Blanc-Mathieu R, Ogata H. DNA repair genes in the Megavirales pangenome. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2016;31:94–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2016.03.011
  10. Brum JR, Sullivan MB. Rising to the challenge: accelerated pace of discovery transforms marine virology. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2015;13(3):147–159. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3404
  11. Bouvet GF, Jacobi V, Plourde KV, Bernier L. Stress-induced mobility of OPHIO1 and OPHIO2, DNA transposons of the Dutch elm disease fungi. Fungal Genet Biol. 2008;45(4):565–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fgb.2007.12.007
  12. Fischer MG. The virophage family Lavidaviridae. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2021;40:1–24. https://doi.org/10.21775/cimb.040.001
  13. Cosby RL, Chang NC, Feschotte C. Host-transposon interactions: conflict, cooperation, and cooption. Genes Dev. 2019;33(17-18):1098–1116. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.327312.119
  14. Pritham EJ, Putliwala T, Feschotte C. Mavericks, a novel class of giant transposable elements widespread in eukaryotes and related to DNA viruses. 2007;390(1-2):3–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2006.08.008  
  15. Haapa-Paananen S, Wahlberg N, Savilahti H. Phylogenetic analysis of Maverick/Polinton giant transposons across organisms. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2014;78:271–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2014.05.024  
  16. Beck CR, Garcia-Perez JL, Badge RM, Moran JV. LINE-1 elements in structural variation and disease. Annu Rev Genomics Hum. Genet. 2011;12:187–215. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genom-082509-141802
  17. da Cruz MHP, Domingues DS, Saito PTM, Paschoal AR, Bugatti PH. TERL: classification of transposable elements by convolutional neural networks. Brief Bioinform. 2021;22(3):ebbaa185. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbaa185
  18. Haapa-Paananen A, Wahlberg N, Savilahti H. Phylogenetic analysis of Maverick/Polinton giant transposons across organisms. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2014;78:271–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2014.05.024