From Fear to Framework: Tracing the Social Construction of Magic, Religion, and Science
Abstract
Abstract Views: 270
The current study aimed to explore how the boundaries between magic, religion, and science have changed over time in human history. It explained that these categories are not fixed or universal, however, have been shaped by different cultures, historical events, and power dynamics. Using historical, anthropological, and sociological texts, this study attempted to identify five key themes. These include fear and control, institutional boundary-making, cultural fluidity, knowledge progression, and epistemic exclusion. Furthermore, the study determined that the differences between magic, religion, and science are not fixed or natural instead, they are created by cultures and societies over time. These findings add to the ongoing discussions about how people in different times and places have understood, accepted, or challenged different belief systems. In the end, it argued that all three, magic, religion, and science, are ways that human beings have developed to understand and deal with the mysteries of life.
Downloads
References
Bartlett, F. C. (1937). Witchcraft, oracles and magic among the Azande, Nature, 140, 338–340 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/140338a0
Bell, C. M. (1997). Ritual: Perspectives and dimensions. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195110517.001.0001
Benavides, G. (1997). Magic, religion, materiality. Historical Reflections/Réflexions Historiques, 23(3), 301–330.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bremmer, J. N. (1999). The birth of the term'magic'. Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 126, 1–12
Dear, P. (1995). Discipline and experience: The mathematical way in the scientific revolution. University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226139524.001.0001
Geertz, H. (1975). An anthropology of religion and magic, I. The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 6(1), 71–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/202825
Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48(6), 781–795. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095325 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2095325
Hesselbach, R. A., Petering, D. H., Berg, C. A., Tomasiewicz, H., & Weber, D. (2012). A guide to writing a scientific paper: A focus on high school through graduate level student research. Zebrafish, 9(4), 246–249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/zeb.2012.0743
Kotansky, R. D. (2019). Textual amulets and writing traditions in the ancient world. In D. Frankfurter (Ed.), Guide to the study of ancient magic (pp. 507–554). Brill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004390751_020
Lloyd-Jones, H. (1995). [Review of Tradizione e innovazione nella cultura greca da omero all' eta ellenistica. scritti in onore di bruno gentili by R. Pretagostini]. The Classical Review, 45(2), 417–427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009840X00294572
Levack, B. P. (2013). The witch-hunt in early modern Europe. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315838014
Mair, L. (1970). [Review of Witchcraft and sorcery; A witch in my heart: A play set in Swaziland in the 1930s, by M. Marwick & H. Kuper]. Man, 5(4), 722–722. https://doi.org/10.2307/2799145 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2799145
Manning, M. C. (2014). Magic, religion, and ritual in historical archaeology. Historical Archaeology, 48(3), 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03376934
Mansour, R. (2017). Monotheism between evolutionary phenomena and built-in human instinct. EPH-International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(1), 8–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53555/eijhss.v2i1.14
Martin, R. P. (2018). Hesiodic theology. In A. Loney & S. Scully (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Hesiod (pp. 125–141). Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190209032.013.6
Pattie, F. A. (1994). Mesmer and animal magnetism: A chapter in the history of medicine. Edmonston Publishing.
Simpson, G. (1967). [Review of the social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge, by P. L. Berger & T. Luckmann]. American Sociological Review, 32(1), 137–138. https://doi.org/10.2307/2091739 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2091739
Stark, R. (2004). Religion, magic & science. In R. Stark (Ed.), Exploring the religious life (pp. 1–20). JHU Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56021/9780801878442
Stoler, A. L. (2020). Carnal knowledge and imperial power: Race and the intimate in colonial rule. In S. Howe (Ed.), The new imperial histories reader (pp. 177–194). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003060871-18
Tarbet, D. W. (1978). [Review of Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison, by M. Foucault & A. Sheridan]. Eighteenth-Century Studies, 11(4), 509–514. https://doi.org/10.2307/2737970 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2737970
Thomas, K. (1975). An anthropology of religion and magic, II. The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 6(1), 91–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/202826
Thomas, N. (2009). Entangled objects: Exchange, material culture, and colonialism in the Pacific. Harvard University Press.
Urban, H. B. (2005). Tantra: Sex, secrecy, politics, and power in the study of religion. Motilal Banarsidass Publisher. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/nr.2005.8.3.131
Versnel, H. S. (1991). Some reflections on the relationship magic-religion. Numen, 38(2), 177–197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156852791X00114
Wei, D. (2021, October 29–31). Primary source analysis of Malleus Maleficarum [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Humanities Education and Social Sciences, Xishuangbanna, China. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211220.309
Whitford, D. M. (2008). The Papal antichrist: Martin Luther and the underappreciated influence of Lorenzo Valla. Renaissance Quarterly, 61(1), 26–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/ren.2008.0027
Winkelman, M. J. (1990). Shamans and other" magico-religious" healers: A cross-cultural study of their origins, nature, and social transformations. Ethos, 18(3), 308–352. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/eth.1990.18.3.02a00040
Copyright (c) 2025 Ahsan Fazal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
