Exploring the Relationship Between Board structure and Firm Performance using Meta-Analysis: Moderating Role of Firm Age and Firm Size

Maria  Adil; Muhammad Mudasar  Ghafoor; Muhammad Mobeen  Shafqat; Yasin  Munir; Ghulam  Murtaza; salman naseer

doi:10.32350/jarms.41.12

Maria Adil 1Department of Business Administration, Government College Women University, Sialkot, Pakistan
Muhammad Mudasar Ghafoor 2Department of Commerce, University of the Punjab, Jehlum campus, Pakistan
Muhammad Mobeen Shafqat Department of Business Administration, Government College Women University, Sialkot, Pakistan
Yasin Munir Department of Business Administration, Government College Women University, Sialkot, Pakistan
Ghulam Murtaza Department of Commerce, Islamia University, Bahawalpur, Pakistan
salman naseer Department of Information Technology, University of the Punjab Gujranwala Campus, Pakistan.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32350/jarms.41.12

Keywords: Board structure, Firm performance, Meta-analysis, Firm characteristics

Abstract

Abstract Views: 0

The current research on Corporate Governance (CG) focused mainly on the linkage between board structure and Firm Performance (FP). This meta-analysis aimed to examine the connection between board structure and financial performance, as well as the moderating impact of firm age and size on the link between board structure and performance. A set of 228 effect sizes reported in 50 research studies published between 2015 and 2020 in 47 peer-reviewed publications, exploring board and performance correlations across 22 nations, was analyzed by using the meta-analysis approach proposed by Hedges and Olkin (2014). The analyses were performed in two stages. Firstly, the key effect of board characteristics was determined on FP and was checked for effect size heterogeneity across primary studies. Afterwards, the moderating effect of firm-specific characteristics was explored on this relationship. The results of this meta-analysis revealed that the impact of board structure on FP was influenced by the age and size of the firm. The findings specifically indicated that as compared to older and larger firms, younger and smaller enterprises exhibited a stronger effect of board structure on FP. Additionally, the study also explored particular board structure traits that, depending on firm age and size, had distinctive effects on company performance. Only empirical studies reporting correlation coefficients and regression coefficients as the effect sizes were included in the current research. Subgroup analysis was not performed due to limited time and resources. The current research added to the body of knowledge by carefully examining the findings of previously published studies and by proposing a single statistical value that represents the significant role of the board in FP. Moreover, the study also provided valuable insights that may help the regulators, Board of Directors (BODs), and Chief Executive Officers (CEOs) to make informed decisions in order to improve CG practices and FP.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbas, J., Al-Sulaiti, K., Lorente, D. B., Shah, S. A. R., & Shahzad, U. (2022). Reset the industry redux through corporate social responsibility: The COVID-19 tourism impact on hospitality firms through business model innovation. In M. Shahbaz, D. B. Lorente & R. Sharma (Eds.), Economic growth and environmental quality in a post-pandemic world (pp. 177–201): Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003336563

Abbas, J., Mahmood, S., Ali, H., Ali Raza, M., Ali, G., Aman, J., Bano, S., & Nurunnabi, M. (2019). The effects of corporate social responsibility practices and environmental factors through a moderating role of social media marketing on sustainable performance of business firms. Sustainability, 11(12), Article e3434. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123434

Abdullah, A. H., Yusoff, S., Islam, A., & Ahmad, H. A. (2021). Effect of board composition on the corporate performance: The moderating role of corporate governance practices in Iraq. Psychology and Education Journal, 58(3), 2688–2706.

Adams, R. B., Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (2010). The role of boards of directors in corporate governance: A conceptual framework and survey. Journal of economic literature, 48(1), 58–107.

Agrawal, A., & Knoeber, C. R. (1996). Firm performance and mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31(3), 377–397. https://doi.org/10.2307/2331397

Akisimire, R., Abaho, E., & Tweyongyere, M. (2020). CEO duality and financial performance: testing the moderating role of firm age: Evidence from a developing economy. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 12(3), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.22610/jebs.v12i3(J).3016

Aktas, N., Andreou, P. C., Karasamani, I., & Philip, D. (2019). CEO duality, agency costs, and internal capital allocation efficiency. British Journal of Management, 30(2), 473–493. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-

12277

Al-Matari, E. M., Al-Swidi, A. K., Fadzil, F. H., & Al-Matari, Y. A. (2012). The impact of board characteristics on firm performance: Evidence from nonfinancial listed companies in Kuwaiti Stock Exchange. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 2(2), 310–332. http://doi.org/10.5296/ijafr.v2i2.2384

Almajali, A. Y., Alamro, S. A., & Al-Soub, Y. Z. (2012). Factors affecting the financial performance of Jordanian insurance companies listed at Amman Stock Exchange. Journal of Management Research, 4(2), 266–

https://doi.org/10.5296/jmr.v4i2.1482

Altawalbeh, M. A. F. (2020). corporate governance mechanisms and firm’s performance: Evidence from Jordan. Accounting and Finance Research, 9(11), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.5430/afr.v9n2p11

Bathula, H. (2008). Board characteristics and firm performance: Evidence from New Zealand [Doctoral dissertation, Auckland University of Technology]. The AUT Research Repository. https://openrepository.aut.ac.nz/items/5bc22f28-ad72-4986-9fb4- ee80fd2d55af

Baysinger, B. D., & Butler, H. N. (1985). Corporate governance and the board of directors: Performance effects of changes in board composition. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 1(1), 101– 124.

Bhagat, S., & Bolton, B. (2008). Corporate governance and firm performance. Journal of corporate finance, 14(3), 257–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2008.03.006

Boone, A. L., Field, L. C., Karpoff, J. M., & Raheja, C. G. (2007). The determinants of corporate board size and composition: An empirical

analysis. Journal of financial Economics, 85(1), 66–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.05.004

Booth, J. R., & Deli, D. N. (1996). Factors affecting the number of outside directorships held by CEOs. Journal of Financial Economics, 40(1), 81–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(95)00838-6

Borghesi, R., Houston, J., & Naranjo, A. (2007). Value, survival, and the evolution of firm organizational structure. Financial Management, 36(3), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-053X.2007.tb00078.x

Brennan, N. (2006). Boards of directors and firm performance: is there an expectations gap? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(6), 577–593.

Chandler, A. D. (1990). Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the industrial enterprise (Vol. 120). MIT press.

Card, N. A. (2015). Applied meta-analysis for social science research: Guilford Publications.

Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Fan, J. P., & Lang, L. H. (2002). Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. The Journal of Finance, 57(6), 2741–2771. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-

00511

Core, J. E., Holthausen, R. W., & Larcker, D. F. (1999). Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 51(3), 371–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(98)00058-0

Dalimunthe, D. M. J., Fadli, I. M., & Muda, I. (2016). The application of performance measurement system model using Malcolm Baldrige Model (MBM) to Support Civil State Apparatus Law (ASN) Number 5 of 2014 in Indonesia. International Journal of Applied Business & Economic Research, 14(11), 7397–7407.

Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Johnson, J. L., & Ellstrand, A. E. (1999). Number of directors and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 42(6), 674–686. https://doi.org/10.5465/256988

Durnev, A., & Kim, E. H. (2005). To steal or not to steal: Firm attributes, legal environment, and valuation. The Journal of Finance, 60(3), 1461– 1493. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00767.x

Elsayed, K. (2007). Does CEO duality really affect corporate performance? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(6), 1203–1214. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00641.x

Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta- analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Bmj, 315(7109), 629-634.

Ericson, R., & Pakes, A. (1995). Markov-perfect industry dynamics: A framework for empirical work. The Review of Economic Studies, 62(1), 53–82. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297841

Evans, D. S. (1987). The relationship between firm growth, size, and age: Estimates for 100 manufacturing industries. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 35(4), 567–581. https://doi.org/10.2307/2098588

Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control.

The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325.

Garen, J. E. (1994). Executive compensation and principal-agent theory.

Journal of Political Economy, 102(6), 1175–1199.

Gaur, S. S., Bathula, H., & Singh, D. (2015). Ownership concentration, board characteristics and firm performance. Management Decision, 53(5), 911–931. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-08-2014-0519

Ghazali, N. A. M. (2020). Governance and ownership in Malaysia: Their impacts on corporate performance. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 5(2), 285–298. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-03-2020-0017

Goodstein, J., Gautam, K., & Boeker, W. (1994). The effects of board size and diversity on strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 15(3), 241–250. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250150305

Govindan, K., Karaman, A. S., Uyar, A., & Kilic, M. (2023). Board structure and financial performance in the logistics sector: Do contingencies matter? Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 176, Article e103187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2023.103187

Gregory, B. T., Rutherford, M. W., Oswald, S., & Gardiner, L. (2005). An empirical investigation of the growth cycle theory of small firm financing. Journal of Small Business Management, 43(4), 382–392.

Habbash, M. S., & Bajaher, M. S. (2015). An empirical analysis of the impact of board structure on the performance of large Saudi firms. Arab Journal of administrative sciences, 22(1), 91–105.

Hahn, P. D., & Lasfer, M. (2016). Impact of foreign directors on board meeting frequency. International Review of Financial Analysis, 46, 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2015.11.004

Handriani, E., & Robiyanto, R. (2019). Institutional ownership, independent board, the board size, and firm performance: Evidence from Indonesia. Contaduría y Administración, 64(3). https://doi.org/10.22201/fca.24488410e.2018.1849

Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (2014). Statistical methods for meta-analysis.

Academic Press.

Himmelberg, C. P., Hubbard, R. G., & Palia, D. (1999). Understanding the determinants of managerial ownership and the link between ownership and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 53(3), 353–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(99)00025-2

Hossain, A. T., & Kryzanowski, L. (2021). Political corruption and corporate social responsibility (CSR). Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 31, Article e100538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2021.100538

Hussainey, K., & Al‐Najjar, B. (2012). Understanding the determinants of RiskMetrics/ISS Ratings of the quality of UK companies' corporate governance practice. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 29(4), 366–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1227

Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American Economic Review, 76(2), 323–329.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.

Joh, S. W. (2003). Corporate governance and firm profitability: Evidence from Korea before the economic crisis. Journal of financial Economics, 68(2), 287–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(03)00068-0

Khan, K. M., & Mahmood, Z. (2023). Impact of corporate governance on firm performance: a case of Pakistan stock exchange. Liberal Arts and Social Sciences International Journal (LASSIJ), 7(1), 24–38. https://doi.org/10.47264/idea.lassij/7.1.2

Kyere, M., & Ausloos, M. (2020). Corporate governance and firms financial performance in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 26(2), 1871–1885. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.1883

Kim, W., Black, B. S., & Jang, H. (2006). Does corporate governance predict firms' market values? Evidence from Korea. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 22(2), 366-413.

Leech, D., & Leahy, J. (1991). Ownership structure, control type classifications and the performance of large British companies. The Economic Journal, 101(409), 1418–1437. https://doi.org/10.2307/2234893

Lipton, M., & Lorsch, J. W. (1992). A modest proposal for improved corporate governance. The Business Lawyer, 48(1), 59–77.

Liu, H., & Fong, M. W. (2010). Board characteristics of medium and large Chinese companies. Corporate Governance, 10(2), 163–175. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720701011035684

López-Quesada, E., & Idowu, S. O. (2018). Corporate governance practices and comprehensive income. Corporate Governance, 18(3), 462–477. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-01-2017-0011

Mubeen, R., Han, D., Abbas, J., Álvarez-Otero, S., & Sial, M. S. (2021). The relationship between CEO duality and business firms’ performance: the moderating role of firm size and corporate social responsibility. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article e669715. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.669715

Muth, M., & Donaldson, L. (1998). Stewardship theory and board structure: A contingency approach. Corporate Governance, 6(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00076

Mutlu, C. C., Van Essen, M., Peng, M. W., Saleh, S. F., & Duran, P. (2018). Corporate governance in China: A meta‐analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 55(6), 943–979. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12331

Nenova, T. (2003). The value of corporate voting rights and control: A cross-country analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 68(3), 325–

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(03)00069-2

Panasian, C. (2003). The impact of the 1995 TSE Corporate Governance Guidelines on the performance of Canadian companies: A simultaneous equation approach. Concordia University.

Pervan, M., Pervan, I., & Ćurak, M. (2017). The influence of age on firm performance: Evidence from the Croatian food industry. Journal of Eastern Europe Research in Business and Economics, 2017(1), 1-10. https://dx.doi.org/10.5171/2017.618681

Pearce, J. A., & Zahra, S. A. (1992). Board composition from a strategic contingency perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 29(4), 411–

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1992.tb00672.x

Pillai, R., & Al-Malkawi, H.-A. N. (2018). On the relationship between corporate governance and firm performance: Evidence from GCC countries. Research in International Business and Finance, 44, 394–

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.110

Pinto, I., Gaio, C., & Gonçalves, T. (2019). Corporate governance, foreign direct investment, and bank income smoothing in African countries. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 15(4), 670–690. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-04-2019-0297

Prashar, A., & Gupta, P. (2021). Corporate boards and firm performance: a meta-analytic approach to examine the impact of contextual factors. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 16(7), 1454–1478. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-10-2019-0860

Ruigrok, W., Peck, S. I., & Keller, H. (2006). Board characteristics and involvement in strategic decision making: Evidence from Swiss companies. Journal of management Studies, 43(5), 1201–1226. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00634.x

Rosenthal, R. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.

Psychological bulletin, 86(3), 638.

Saibaba, M., & Ansari, V. A. (2012). Impact of board size: An empirical study of companies listed in BSE 100 index. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 5(2), 108–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974686220120202

Scherrer, P. S. (2003). Directors’ responsibilities and participation in the strategic decision making process. Corporate Governance, 3(1), 86–90. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700310459890

Serrasqueiro, Z. S., & Nunes, P. M. (2008). Performance and size: Empirical evidence from Portuguese SMEs. Small Business Economics, 31(2), 195–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-007-9092-8

Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x

Strøm, R. Ø., D’Espallier, B., & Mersland, R. (2014). Female leadership, performance, and governance in microfinance institutions. Journal of Banking & Finance, 42, 60–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.01.014

Topak, M. S. (2011). The effect of board size on firm performance: Evidence from Turkey. Middle Eastern Finance and Economics, 14(1), 1450–2889.

Tripsas, M., & Gavetti, G. (2000). Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management Journal, 21(10‐ 11), 1147–1161. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405164054.ch23

Usman, M., Ali, M., Ogbonnaya, C., & Babalola, M. T. (2021). Fueling the intrapreneurial spirit: A closer look at how spiritual leadership motivates employee intrapreneurial behaviors. Tourism Management, 83, Article e104227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2020.104227

Van Essen, M., van Oosterhout, J. H., & Carney, M. (2012). Corporate boards and the performance of Asian firms: A meta-analysis. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29, 873-905.

Wang, C., Wang, D., Abbas, J., Duan, K., & Mubeen, R. (2021). Global financial crisis, smart lockdown strategies, and the COVID-19 spillover

impacts: A global perspective implications from Southeast Asia. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12, Article e643783. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.643783

Yermack, D. (1996). Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 40(2), 185–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(95)00844-5

Yu, M. (2023). CEO duality and firm performance: A systematic review and research agenda. European Management Review, 20(2), 346–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12522

Yu, S., Abbas, J., Draghici, A., Negulescu, O. H., & Ain, N. U. (2022). Social media application as a new paradigm for business communication: the role of COVID-19 knowledge, social distancing, and preventive attitudes. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article e903082. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.903082

Zona, F., Zattoni, A., & Minichilli, A. (2013). A contingency model of boards of directors and firm innovation: The moderating role of firm size. British Journal of Management, 24(3), 299–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00805.x