Understanding Proactive Personality, Knowledge Sharing, and Innovative Work Behavior in Knowledge-Intensive Firms

  • Tehreem Anjum University of education
  • Farhan Sarwar UE business school, University of Education, Lahore
Keywords: innovative work behavior (IWB), knowledge sharing (KS), knowledge intensive organizations, proactive personality (PP)

Abstract

Abstract Views: 0

The current study aimed to analyse the roles of innovative work behavior (IWB), knowledge sharing (KS), and proactive personality (PP) with gender as the moderator in organizations that are extensively dependent on knowledge. The current study was based on 522 employees of various organizations across different sectors, distinguished for their technical skills and knowledge intensity. The findings revealed rich understanding as to how these aspects underpin the process of innovation in organizations. Resultantly, the study demonstrated that people with proactive personalities directly affect both knowledge sharing (KS) and innovative work behavior (IWB). Self-starters can be defined by their initiative actions to solve problems before they arise. Moreover, they are proactive in contributing to the generation of new ideas within organizations. This behavior is effective to sustain such an environment where change and innovation are key development for competitive knowledge-intensive organizations.The current study also revealed that KS is a significant mediator in the relationship between PP and IWB. Although, this study has shown that a PP is optimal for creative work, this benefit is further boosted and compounded when knowledge is transferred amongst employees. This mediation effect indicates that KS would work synergistically with the proactive actions to enhance innovative capacities in order to generate enhanced innovation results in the organization. One of the interesting issues addressed by the study was the moderating influence of gender prevalent among these issues. This implies that the relationship between PP, KS, and IWB is moderated by gender which supports previous claims. This indicates that intervention type activities within organizations that are geared towards fostering innovation and knowledge management should take the gender factor into consideration for better results. The successful application of these strategies, when informed by gender, may help in holding efforts towards promoting a culture of innovation. One of the main strengths of the current study was that it awarded much of its attention to a singular field, however, it might weaken the transfer-ability of the results to other fields. Some aspects of the presented hypotheses could be more appropriate for knowledge- intensive organizations than for other forms of businesses, since the latter reveal certain peculiarities, which limits the generalisability of the results. Thirdly, conversely, though the participants’ total count was 522, it may also be significant. However, it may also be a source of bias if the provided sample does not reflect all the spectrum and specifics of the target population.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abstein, A., & Spieth, P. (2014). Exploring HRM meta‐ features that foster employees' innovative work behaviour in times of increasing work–life conflict. Creativity and Innovation Management, 23(2), 211–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12053

Aguirre-Urreta, M. I., & Hu, J. (2019). Detecting common method bias: Performance of the Harman's single-factor test. ACM SIGMIS Database: The DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 50(2), 45–70. https://doi.org/10.1145/3330472.3330477

Al Bastaki, S., Haak-Saheem, W., & Darwish, T. K. (2021). Perceived training opportunities and knowledge sharing: The case of the United Arab Emirates. International Journal of Manpower, 42(1), 113–130. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-10-2019-0457

AlEssa, H. S., & Durugbo, C. M. (2022). Systematic review of innovative work behavior concepts and contributions. Management Review Quarterly, 72(4), 1171–1208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-021-00224-x

Alves, R. B., & Pinheiro, P. (2022). Factors influencing tacit knowledge sharing in research groups in higher education institutions. Administrative Sciences, 12(3), Article e89. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12030089

Anand, A., Muskat, B., Creed, A., Zutshi, A., & Csepregi, A. (2021). Knowledge sharing, knowledge transfer and SMEs: Evolution, antecedents, outcomes and directions. Personnel Review, 50(9), 1873–1893. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-05-2020-0372

Bagheri, A., & Akbari, M. (2018). The impact of entrepreneurial leadership on nurses’ innovation behavior. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 50(1), 28–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12354

Bakker, A. B., Tims, M., & Derks, D. (2012). Proactive personality and job performance: The role of job crafting and work engagement. Human Relations, 65(10), 1359–1378. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726712453471

Bateman, T. S., & Crant, J. M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14(2), 103–118. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030140202

Birkinshaw, J., Hamel, G., & Mol, M. J. (2008). Management innovation. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 825–845. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.34421969

Bock, G.-W., Zmud, R. W., Kim, Y.-G., & Lee, J.-N. (2005). Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 87–111. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148669

Bock, G. W., & Kim, Y.-G. (2002). Breaking the myths of rewards: An exploratory study of attitudes about knowledge sharing. Information Resources Management Journal, 15(2), 14–21.

Bozbayındır, F. & Alev, S. (2018). The Analysis of The relationship between self-efficacy, proactive personality and openness to change perceptions teachers. Journal of the Faculty of Education, 19(2), 293–311. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.346666

Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., & Esposito, E. (2019). The mediating role of knowledge exploration and exploitation for the development of an entrepreneurial university. Management Decision, 57(12), 3301–3320. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-11-2018-1240

Crant, J. M. (1995). The proactive personality scale and objective job performance among real estate agents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(4), 532–537

https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0021-9010.80.4.532

Crant, J. M. (2000). Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 26(3), 435–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600304

Davenport, T. H., Prusak, L., & Wilson, H. J. (2003). What's the big idea? Creating and capitalizing on the best management thinking. Harvard Business Press.

De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2010). Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00547.x

De Jong, J. P., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2007). How leaders influence employees' innovative behaviour. European Journal of Innovation Management, 10(1), 41–64. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060710720546

Delios, A. (2010). How can organizations be competitive but dare to care? Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(3), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.24.3.25

Dijkstra, T. K., & Henseler, J. (2015). Consistent partial least squares path modeling. MIS Quarterly, 39(2), 297–316.

Rupp, D. E. (2011). An employee-centered model of organizational justice and social responsibility.

Organizational Psychology Review, 1(1), 72–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386610376255

Erdogan, B., & Bauer, T. N. (2005). Enhancing career benefits of employee proactive personality: The role of fit with jobs and organizations. Personnel Psychology, 58(4), 859–891. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00772.x

Farzaneh, M., Wilden, R., Afshari, L., & Mehralian, G. (2022). Dynamic capabilities and innovation ambidexterity: The roles of intellectual capital and innovation orientation. Journal of Business Research, 148, 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.030

Fauchart, E., & Gruber, M. (2011). Darwinians, communitarians, and missionaries: The role of founder identity in entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Journal, 54(5), 935–957. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.0211

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104

Frese, M., & Fay, D. (2001). 4. Personal initiative: An active performance concept for work in the 21st century. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, 133–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(01)23005-6

Fuller, J. B., Marler, L. E., & Hester, K. (2006). Promoting felt responsibility for constructive change and proactive behavior: Exploring aspects of an elaborated model of work design. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 27(8), 1089–1120. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.408

Fuller Jr, B., & Marler, L. E. (2009). Change driven by nature: A meta-analytic review of the proactive personality literature. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 75(3), 329–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.05.008

Ganguly, A., Talukdar, A., & Chatterjee, D. (2019). Evaluating the role of social capital, tacit knowledge sharing, knowledge quality and reciprocity in determining innovation capability of an organization. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(6), 1105–1135. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-03-2018-0190

Grant, A. M., & Ashford, S. J. (2008). The dynamics of proactivity at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.002

Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Parker, S. K. (2007). A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 327–347. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24634438

Gumilang, D. R. F., & Sunaryo, S. (2021). Proactive personality and innovative behavior: role of task conflict and work autonomy (study on state civil personnel in the city government of Surakarta). International Journal of Economics, Business and Management Research, 5(07), 332–350.

Gupta, V. K., Turban, D. B., Wasti, S. A., & Sikdar, A. (2009). The role of gender stereotypes in perceptions of entrepreneurs and intentions to become an entrepreneur. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(2), 397–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00296.x

Hammond, M. M., Neff, N. L., Farr, J. L., Schwall, A. R., & Zhao, X. (2011). Predictors of individual-level innovation at work: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and The Arts, 5(1), 90–105

Harman, D. (1967). A single factor test of common method variance. Journal of Psychology, 35(1967), 359–378.

Hassan, H. A., Asif, J., Waqar, N., & Abbas, S. K. (2018). The impact of knowledge sharing on innovative work behavior. Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 6(5), 22–25.

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Hsu, Y. S., Chen, Y. P., Chiang, F. F., & Shaffer, M. A. (2022). It takes two to tango: Knowledge transfer between expatriates and host country nationals. Human Resource Management, 61(2), 215–238. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22090

Janssen, O. (2010). Job demands, perceptions of effort‐ reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317900167038

Janssen, O., Van de Vliert, E., & West, M. (2004). The bright and dark sides of individual and group innovation: A special issue introduction. Journal of organizational behavior, 25(2), 129–145. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.242

Jiang, W., & Gu, Q. (2017). Leader creativity expectations motivate employee creativity: A moderated mediation examination. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(5), 724–749. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1109535

Jiang, Z., Wang, Y., Li, W., Peng, K. Z., & Wu, C. H. (2023). Career proactivity: A bibliometric literature review and a future research agenda. Applied Psychology, 72(1), 144–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12442

Khan, M. N., & Zaman, U. (2021). The effect of knowledge management practices on organizational innovation: Moderating role of management support. Journal of Public Affairs, 21(3), Article e2284. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2284

Kim, K., Li, F., Yoo, J. W., & Kim, C. Y. (2020). The relationships among environments, external knowledge acquisition, and innovation. Sustainability, 12(14), Article e5541. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145541

Li, M., Wang, Z., Gao, J., & You, X. (2017). Proactive personality and job satisfaction: The mediating effects of self-efficacy and work engagement in teachers. Current Psychology, 36(1), 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-015-9383-1

Maaravi, Y., Heller, B., Shoham, Y., Mohar, S., & Deutsch, B. (2021). Ideation in the digital age: Literature review and integrative model for electronic brainstorming. Review of Managerial Science, 15, 1431–1464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-020-00400-5

Mehmood, K., Iftikhar, Y., Khan, A. N., & Kwan, H. K. (2023). The nexus between high- involvement work practices and employees’ proactive behavior in public service organizations: a time-lagged moderated-mediation model. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 16, 1571–1586. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S399292

Mumford, M. D. (2011). Handbook of organizational creativity. Academic Press.

Palan, K. M. (2001). Gender identity in consumer behavior research: A literature review and research agenda. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 10, 1–31.

Pan, B., Song, Z., & Wang, Y. (2021). The relationship between preschool teachers’ proactive personality and innovative behavior: The chain-mediated role of error management climate and self-efficacy. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article e734484. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.734484

Parker, S. K., Bindl, U. K., & Strauss, K. (2010). Making things happen: A model of proactive motivation. Journal of Management, 36(4), 827–856. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310363732

Parker, S. K., & Collins, C. G. (2010). Taking stock: Integrating and differentiating multiple proactive behaviors. Journal of Management, 36(3), 633–662. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308321554

Pecis, L., & Berglund, K. (2021). Hidden in the limelight: A feminist engagement with innovation studies. Organization, 28(6), 993–1017. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505084211015380

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0021-

88.5.879

Renzl, B. (2008). Trust in management and knowledge sharing: The mediating effects of fear and knowledge documentation. Omega, 36(2), 206–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2006.06.005

Rhee, Y. W., & Choi, J. N. (2017). Knowledge management behavior and individual creativity: Goal orientations as antecedents and in‐ group social status as moderating contingency. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(6), 813–832. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2168

Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607. https://doi.org/10.5465/256701

Seibert, S. E., Kraimer, M. L., & Crant, J. M. (2001). What do proactive people do? A longitudinal model linking proactive personality and career success. Personnel Psychology, 54(4), 845–874. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00234.x

Shrestha, N. (2021). Factor analysis as a tool for survey analysis. American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 9(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.12691/ajams-9-1-2

Siemsen, E., Roth, A. V., & Balasubramanian, S. (2008). How motivation, opportunity, and ability drive knowledge sharing: The constraining-factor model. Journal of Operations Management, 26(3), 426–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2007.09.001

Sitko‐ Lutek, A., Chuancharoen, S., Sukpitikul, A., & Phusavat, K. (2010). Applying social network analysis on customer complaint handling. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 110(9), 1402–1419. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635571011087455

Srirahayu, D. P., Ekowati, D., & Sridadi, A. R. (2023). Innovative work behavior in public organizations: A systematic literature review. Heliyon, 9(2). Article e13557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13557

Strawser, J. A., Hechavarría, D. M., & Passerini, K. (2021). Gender and entrepreneurship: Research frameworks, barriers and opportunities for women entrepreneurship worldwide. Journal of Small Business Management, 59(sup1), S1–S15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2021.1965615

Tajeddini, K., & Trueman, M. (2008). The potential for innovativeness: A tale of the Swiss watch industry. Journal of Marketing Management, 24(1-2), 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1362/026725708X273984

Teece, D. J. (2012). Dynamic capabilities: Routines versus entrepreneurial action. Journal of Management Studies, 49(8), 1395–1401. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01080.x

Tekeli, M., & Özkoç, A. G. (2022). The effect of proactive personality and locus of control on innovative work behavior: The mediating role of work engagement. Anais Brasileiros de Estudos Turísticos, 12(2022), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5821836

Thornhill-Miller, B., & Dupont, J.-M. (2016). Virtual reality and the enhancement of creativity and innovation: Under recognized potential among converging technologies? Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 15(1), 102–121. https://doi.org/10.1891/1945-8959.15.1.102

Wang, J., Kim, H.-R., & Tran, T. B. H. (2024). Can shared leadership stimulate team members’ proactive behaviour? Exploring through the bridge of psychological empowerment. Tourism & Management Studies, 20(2), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.18089/tms.20240206

Wang, S., & Noe, R. A. (2010). Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 20(2), 115–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.10.001

Wu, D. (2020). Withholding effort in sharing knowledge in online space: Differential effects of task characteristics. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(10), 2401–2429. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-04-2020-0310

Yang, J. (2007). The impact of knowledge sharing on organizational learning and effectiveness. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(2), 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270710738933

Yuan, F., & Woodman, R. W. (2010). Innovative behavior in the workplace: The role of performance and image outcome expectations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(2), 323–342. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.49388995

Zhang, H. (2020). A review and prospects of literature on proactivity. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 8(2), 211–230. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2020.82017

Published
2024-06-30
How to Cite
Tehreem Anjum, & Farhan Sarwar. (2024). Understanding Proactive Personality, Knowledge Sharing, and Innovative Work Behavior in Knowledge-Intensive Firms. Journal of Applied Research and Multidisciplinary Studies, 5(1), 14-26. https://doi.org/10.32350/jarms.51.02