The Role of the Zakat System during the Colonial-period in Malaysia and Uzbekistan

A Comparative Analysis

  • Avazbek Ganiyev Oybekovich PhD Scholar, Sultan Omar ‘Ali Saifuddin Centre for Islamic Studies, University of Brunei Darussalam, Brunei Darussalam.
  • Dr. Hassan Shakeel Shah Assistant Professor, Institute of Islamic Banking, University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan.
  • Dr. Mohammad Ayaz Assistant Professor at the Institute of Islamic Banking, University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan.
Keywords: Zakat, Zakat institution, colonialism, Muslim society

Abstract

Abstract Views: 219

During the colonial period, the zakat system in both Uzbekistan and Malaysia experienced serious changes due to imperial powers’ intervention. The zakat system was an important source of economy for these states. This paper highlights the zakat practices of pre-colonial and colonial Uzbekistan and Malaysia, and clarifies the nature of encounters of different civilizations such as Islamic and Christian in these regions. The main objective of this study is to find similarities and differences in the imperialists’ influence on structural level of taxation and zakat systems between the countries studied. This study reveals that there are similarities such as in the administration of zakat collection after the arrival of the imperial powers, where in both countries, the colonial powers appointed supervisors over local zakat collectors, in order to control revenues. This research also found some important differences that arose because of the intervention of the colonialists, where British helped in establishing centralized zakat collection, whereas Russians totally abolished zakat system by turning it into conventional taxation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2017-11-07
How to Cite
Avazbek Ganiyev Oybekovich, Dr. Hassan Shakeel Shah, & Dr. Mohammad Ayaz. (2017). The Role of the Zakat System during the Colonial-period in Malaysia and Uzbekistan. Islamic Banking and Finance Review, 4, 40-54. https://doi.org/10.32350/ibfr.2017.04.03
Section
Articles