Prevalence of Suicide Risk Factors among University Students in Gilgit Baltistan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32350/sri.41.02Keywords:
economic factors, Gilgit-Baltistan, psychological factors, suicide, suicidal ideation, social factors, university studentsAbstract
The research explores the prevalence of suicide and underlying factors among university students in Gilgit Baltistan, Pakistan. This study explores how psychological, social, family, and economic factors shape suicidal ideation in an area where young adults are subjected to increasing social and professional pressures. Although the intended sample size was 300 respondents, data were collected from 400 respondents selected through a random sampling technique. A quantitative research design was employed and data were collected through questionnaires administered to students enrolled in public sector universities of Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan. The results show that the most significant factors of suicidal thoughts are psychological ones. High levels of anxiety (37.3%), loneliness (38.1%), and mood swings (54.2%) were reported among respondents. On the other hand, economic issues like financial stress had a relatively smaller impact (only 22.3% agreement). The study also found that that students residing in hostels (13.5%) were at greater risk of suicidal ideation than those living with their families (86.5%). Among the respondents, 56.7% were female and 43.3% were male. The findings further suggest that suicidal ideation can be prevented by supportive relationships and close familial ties. Overall, the study concludes that psychological distress and social isolation, rather than financial difficulty, are the main factors associated with suicidal ideation among university students in Gilgit-Baltistan. In order to reduce psychological stress, it is important to build a social support network for the students, such as mental health services, awareness campaigns, and institutional counseling facilities.
The research explores the prevalence of suicide and underlying factors among university students in Gilgit Baltistan, Pakistan. This study explores how psychological, social, family, and economic factors shape suicidal ideation in an area where young adults are subjected to increasing social and professional pressures. Although the intended sample size was 300 respondents, data were collected from 400 respondents selected through a random sampling technique. A quantitative research design was employed and data were collected through questionnaires administered to students enrolled in public sector universities of Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan. The results show that the most significant factors of suicidal thoughts are psychological ones. High levels of anxiety (37.3%), loneliness (38.1%), and mood swings (54.2%) were reported among respondents. On the other hand, economic issues like financial stress had a relatively smaller impact (only 22.3% agreement). The study also found that that students residing in hostels (13.5%) were at greater risk of suicidal ideation than those living with their families (86.5%). Among the respondents, 56.7% were female and 43.3% were male. The findings further suggest that suicidal ideation can be prevented by supportive relationships and close familial ties. Overall, the study concludes that psychological distress and social isolation, rather than financial difficulty, are the main factors associated with suicidal ideation among university students in Gilgit-Baltistan. In order to reduce psychological stress, it is important to build a social support network for the students, such as mental health services, awareness campaigns, and institutional counseling facilities.
Downloads
References
1. Abrutyn, S., Mueller, A. S., & Osborne, M. (2020). Rekeying cultural scripts for youth suicide: How social networks facilitate suicide diffusion and suicide clusters following exposure to suicide. Society and Mental Health, 10(2), 112–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156869319834063
Beghi, M., Rosenbaum, J. F., Cerri, C., & Cornaggia, C. M. (2013). Risk factors for fatal and nonfatal repetition of suicide attempts: A literature review. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 9, 1725–1736. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S40213
Canetto, S. S., & Sakinofsky, I. (1998). The gender paradox in suicide. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 28(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1943-278X.1998.tb00622.x
Durkheim, E. (1897). Le suicide: étude de sociologie. Routledge
Glenn, C. R., Kleiman, E. M., Kellerman, J., Pollak, O., Cha, C. B., Esposito, E. C., Porter, A. C., Wyman, P. A., & Boatman, A. E. (2020). Annual research review: A meta-analytic review of worldwide suicide rates in adolescents. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 61(3), 294–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13106
Hawton, K., Saunders, K. E. A., & O’Connor, R. C. (2012). Self-harm and suicide in adolescents. The Lancet, 379(9834), 2373–2382. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60322-5
Hochhauser, S., Rao, S., England-Kennedy, E., & Roy, S. (2020). Why social justice matters: A context for suicide prevention efforts. International Journal for Equity in Health, 19(1), Article e76. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-020-01173-9
Joiner, T. (2005). Why people die by suicide. Harvard University Press.
Khan, M. M. (1998). Suicide and attempted suicide in Pakistan. Crisis, 19(4), 172–176. https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910.19.4.172
Khan, M. M. (2005). Suicide prevention and developing countries. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 98(10), 459–463. https://doi.org/10.1258/jrsm.98.10.459
Kposowa, A. J., Ezzat, D. A., & Breault, K. D. (2020). Marital status, sex, and suicide: New longitudinal findings and Durkheim’s marital status propositions. Sociological Spectrum, 40(2), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/02732173.2020.1758261
Mahesar, R. A., Chandio, D. A., Latif, M., Abbas, S., & Shabbir, T. (2023). Demography and risk factors of suicide deaths in Pakistan: A twelve-month content analysis study. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 80, Article e103364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2022.103364
Maloku, A., & Maloku, E. (2020). Sociological perspective of suicides. Uluslararası Ekonomi İşletme ve Politika Dergisi, 4(2), 319–334. https://doi.org/10.29216/ueip.784154
Mann, J. J., Apter, A., Bertolote, J., Beautrais, A., Currier, D., Haas, A., Hegerl, U., Lonnqvist, J., Malone, K., Marusic, A., Mehlum, L., Patton, G. C., Phillips, M., Rutz, W., Rihmer, Z., Schmidtke, A., Shaffer, D., Silverman, M., Takahashi, Y., . . . Hendin, H. (2005). Suicide prevention strategies: A systematic review. JAMA, 294(16), 2064–2074. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.294.16.2064
Nock, M. K., Borges, G., Bromet, E. J., Cha, C. B., Kessler, R. C., & Lee, S. (2008). Suicide and suicidal behavior. Epidemiologic Reviews, 30(1), 133–154. https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxn002
Noreen, N., Shoukat, M., Asghar, S., & Farooq, R. (2024). The challenges faced by women in blue-collar jobs. Journal of Professional Research in Social Sciences, 11(1), 57–78. https://doi.org/10.58932/MULA0021
Rehman, A., & Haque, J. (2020, December 31). Pakistan’s silent suicide problem Dawn. https://www.dawn.com/news/1494208
Shaukat, M. (2025). Exploring work-family conflict and perceived burden among female university teachers. Sociological Research and Innovation, 3(2), 49–67.
Shaw, C., Stuart, J., Thomas, T., & Kõlves, K. (2025). Pathways to suicide for children and youth in Guyana: A life charts analysis. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 71(1), 100–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/00207640241280625
Stack, S. (2021). Contributing factors to suicide: Political, social, cultural and economic. Preventive Medicine, 152, Article 106498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106498
Vijayakumar, L. (2007). Suicide and its prevention: The urgent need in India. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 49(2), 81–84. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5545.33252
Wasserman, D., Cheng, Q., & Jiang, G.-X. (2005). Global suicide rates among young people aged 15–19. World Psychiatry, 4(2), 114–120.
World Health Organization. (2025, March 25). Sucide. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/suicide
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Maryam Shaukat, Dil Sultana, Arooj Nazir

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
