Early Childhood Education through Gamification
Abstract
Abstract Views: 227
Early childhood education through gamification provides a wholly new environment to students. For this reason, compelling opportunities are set to accomplish the challenging goal for educators/ teachers. Hence, in early childhood critical thinking and assessment competencies, is involved to promote the efficiency and mainstream education of gamification. Therefore, this paper aims to decide the effect of personal development in early childhood years that are helpful in gaining knowledge in the classroom and out of the classrooms of pre and primary students' overall performance. The current research aims to prove the significance of gamification and its existing knowledge of gear right into a teacher's coaching technique by upgrading the student's overall performance. The only way to practice digital methods in the study of students and achieve the objectives of the efficiency model, this paper investigated the learner’s autonomy, learning environment, and compelling outputs in students’ academic performance. The design of this research is experimental. For this experimental investigation the overall academic performance of pre and primary students was accessed by using the digital gamification learning based model. Hence, random samples from five institutes were used to collect the data for the further analysis. In these selected five institutes three were the boys’ school and 2 were the girls’ school. Thus, this study targeted the use of gamification in the educational institutes and its effects on the pupil achievements. To measure the performance of the children by using the formula of effectiveness and efficiency this study aimed to investigate the outcome of model enforcement in educational curriculum.
Downloads
References
R. Andrews, “Where next in research on ICT and literacies?” English Educ., vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 28-41, Sept. 2003, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754- 8845.2003.tb00603.x
W. Mougayar, The business blockchain: Promise, practice, and application of the next Internet technology. John Wiley & Sons, 2016.
P. F. Bassett, “Reengineering schools for the 21st century,” Phi Delta Kappan, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 76-83, Sept. 2005, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/003172 170508700112
K. Ibacache, A. Rybin, and E. Vance, “Emergency remote library instruction and tech tools: A matter of equity during a pandemic,” Inf. Technol. Lib., vol. 40, no. 2, June 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v40i 2.12751
H. J. Becker, “Findings from the teaching, learning, and computing survey,” Education Policy Analysis Archives, vol. 8, pp. 51-51, Nov. 2000, doi: https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v 8n51.2000
T. S. Dee and B. Jacob. “The impact of No Child Left Behind on student achievement,” J. Policy Anal. Manage., vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 418-446, May 2011, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20586
E. Byrom, Review of the professional literature on the integration of technology into educational programs. Durham, NC: Southeast Initiatives Regional Technology in Education Consortium, 1998.
R. Young, “Using technology tools in the public-school classroom,” MS thesis, Graduate Sch., Univ. Wisconsin-Stout, Menomonie, USA, 2008.
M. Hennink, I. Hutter, and A. Bailey, Qualitative Research Methods. Sage, 2020.
V. Kapila and M. Iskander, “Lessons learned from conducting a K-12 project to revitalize achievement by using instrumentation in Science Education,” J. Sci. Technol. Eng. Math Educ., vol. 15, no. 1 Apr. 2014.
C. Koziol, Teaching ‘the City’in Cities: Teasing the Global from the Specific in Chicago. Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture, 2011
B. Means, Using technology to support education reform. US Department of Education, 1993.
N. Postman, Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology. Vintage, 2011.
J. M. Roschelle, R. D. Pea, C. M. Hoadley, D. N. Gordin, and B. M. Means, “Changing how and what children learn in school with computer-based technologies,” Future Children, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 76-101, 2000. https://doi.org/10.2307/1602690
R. E. Cimera, “The economics of supported employment: What new data tell us,” J. Vocat. Rehabil., Vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 109-117, 2012, doi: https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-2012-0604
D. Hansen and L. A. Imse, “Student-centered classrooms: Past initiatives, future practices,” Music Educ. J., vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 20-26, 2016.
L. Archambault, H. Leary, and K. Rice. “Pillars of online pedagogy: A framework for
teaching in online learning environments.” Educ. Psych., pp. 1-14, June 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/004615 20.2022.2051513
M. Sbaraglia, M. Lodi, S. P. Zingaro, and S. Martini, “The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly of a Synchronous Online CS1,” in proc. 26th ACM Conf. Innova. Technol. Comput. Sci. Educ., Germany, July 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/345656 5.3460075
G. Tapia-González, R. Martínez-Gutiérrez, and F. Tapia-González, “Hackathon- Edu: a global competitiveness perspective,” Presented at the Int. Conf. Intell. Hum. Syst. Integ., Cham, Netherlands, 2021.
M. K. Shomirzayev, “Developing educational technologies in school technology education,” Next Sci. Conf., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 14–23, 2022.
H. C. A. Kistoro, C. Setiawan, E. Latipah, and H. Putranta, “Teachers' Experiences in Character Education for Autistic Children,” Int. J. Evalu. Res. Educ, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 65-77, Mar. 2021.
C. N. Giannikas, “Interactive whiteboards in EFL from the Teachers' and students' perspective,” Res. Papers Lang. Teach. Learn. vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 203-219, 2021. S. Ghory and H. Ghafory, “The impact of modern technology in the teaching and learning process,” Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci. Stud., vol. 4, no. 3, pp.
Copyright (c) 2022 Muhammad Waseem Aslam, Ghuzanfar Chudhary, Muhammad Aqeel, Danish Irfan, Ameer Hamza, Muhammad Raza
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
