From Bytes to Rights: Enforcing Digital Human Rights through International Law
Abstract
Abstract Views: 0
Digital human rights require careful definition and protection in the contemporary digital landscape. This research employs a jurisprudential analysis based on international law to clarify the evolving nature of digital human rights. Through a methodological approach encompassing a legal framework review, case study analysis, and policy recommendations, the intricate relationship between technology and human rights is examined. Key findings emphasize the importance of international law in protecting digital human rights while also identifying existing legal deficiencies and obstacles. The research further underscores the transformative potential, and associated risks, of artificial intelligence and machine learning. The conclusion presents a future-oriented perspective, advocating for international collaboration and substantial revisions to existing legal frameworks to promote a digital environment that respects human rights. The research also encourages further investigation into the ethical dimensions of emerging technologies, emphasizing the need for innovation guided by human rights principles.
Downloads
References
Alexeyev, G. V. (2024). 1. Metatheory and classification of digital human rights and freedoms. Theoretical and Applied Jurisprudence, 2, 24–36. https://doi.org/10.22394/2686-7834-2024-2-24-36
Alubaidi, A. (2023). Challenges to implementing the international digital law to protect digital rights. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(5), Article e554. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i5.554
Barocas, S., & Selbst, A. D. (2016). Big data's disparate impact. California Law Review, 104, 671–732.
Biswa, A. (2024). International human rights law: Enforcement mechanisms and challenges in a globalized world. In International Journal for Research Publication and Seminar, 15(2), 157–163. https://doi.org/10.36676/jrps.v15.i2.20
Castells, M. (2011). The rise of the network society. John wiley & sons.
Cerf, V. G. (2012, January 4). Internet access is not a human right. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/05/opinion/internet-access-is-not-a-human-right.html
Chadha, K. (2024). 3. Bias and fairness in artificial intelligence: Methods and mitigation strategies. International Journal for Research Publication and Seminar, 15(3), 36–49. https://doi.org/10.36676/jrps.v15.i3.1425
Chau, B. K., & Livermore, M. A. (2024). Computational legal studies comes of age. European Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 1(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.62355/ejels.19684
Chimni, B. S. (2017). International law and world order. Cambridge University Press.
Clavero, S. B., & Benlloch-Dualde, J. (2019, October, 23–25). eSGarden: A European initiative to incorporate ICT in schools [Paper presentation]. In Proceedings 5th CARPE Conference: Horizon Europe and beyond. València, Spain.
Deibert, R., & Rohozinski, R. (2010). Liberation vs. control: The future of cyberspace. J. Democracy, 21(4), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2010.0010
Delfi As v. Estonia, 2015 ECHR 586 (2015).
Donoho, D. L. (2001). Autonomy, self-governance, and the margin of appreciation: Developing a jurisprudence of diversity within universal human rights. Emory International Law Review, 15, 391–466.
Erol, M. U. (2023). An international human rights law perspective on the impact of digitalization on the Alevi community. Journal of Alevism-Bektashism Studies, 28, 147–171. https://doi.org/10.24082/2023.abked.424
Florek, I., & Eroglu, S. E. (2019). The need for protection of human rights in cyberspace. Journal of Modern Science, 42(3), 27–36.
Gasser, U., Budish, R., & West, S. (2015). Multistakeholder as governance groups: Observations from case studies. Harvard Library. http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#OAP
Joseph, S., & Castan, M (2022). International covenant on civil and political rights (ICCPR). Oxford University Press
Lee, L. (2024). Enhancing financial inclusion and regulatory challenges: A critical analysis of digital banks and alternative lenders through digital platforms, machine learning, and large language models integration. ArXiv Preprint https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2404.11898
Lee, M., & Levins, M. (2023). The history of the global evolution of digitally connected families 1990-2022. Studies in Technology Enhanced Learning, 3(3), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.21428/8c225f6e.f14d2707
Lekić, S. (2024). The impact of digital technologies on the cultural rights of deaf and hard-of-hearing people. Eudaimonia-Journal for Legal, Political and Social Theory and Philosophy, 8(1), 55–83. https://doi.org/10.51204/ivrs_24103a
Lytvynenko, E. V., & Skoblyk, M. A. T. (2024). Peculiarities of ensuring human rights in the conditions of digital transformation. Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence, 3, 369–373. https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2024.03.63
Mariniello, M. (2022). Digital inequality. In M. Mariniello (Ed.), Digital economic policy: The economics of digital markets from a European Union perspective (pp. 309–328). Oxford Academic Press.
Merino, M. J. M., Plúa, J. N. C., Anchundia, J. C. H., & Gutiérrez, J. A. V. (2023). Information security in the world of digital business. Journal TechInnovation, 2(1), 85–91. https://doi.org/10.47230/journal.techinnovation.v2.n1.2023.85-91 .
Moncau, L. F. M., & Arguelhes, D. W. (2020). The marco civil da internet and digital constitutionalism. In G. Frosio (Ed.), Oxford handbook of online intermediary liability (pp. 190–213). Oxford Academic Press.
Natamiharja, R., & Setiawan, I. (2024). Guarding privacy in the digital age: A comparative analysis of data protection strategies in Indonesia and France. Jambe Law Journal, 7(1), 233–251. https://doi.org/10.22437/home.v7i1.349
Oh, S. J. (2024). A study on the main issues of privacy rights in the digital age. Myongii Law, 22(2), 45–76. https://doi.org/10.53066/mlr.2024.22.2.45
Ortynskyi, V. (2024). Regarding compliance with national standards for ensuring individual rights to protection in accordance with international standards. Law, 11(41), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.23939/law2024.41.001
Papadopoulos, I. (2023). Children's rights and methodologies. In I. Papadopoulos (Ed.), The criminalisation of unaccompanied migrant minors voices from the detention processes in Greece (pp. 13–28). Bristol University Press.
Reis, O., Eneh, N. E., Ehimuan, B., Anyanwu, A., Olorunsogo, T., & Abrahams, T. O. (2024). Privacy law challenges in the digital age: A global review of legislation and enforcement. International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences, 6(1), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.51594/ijarss.v6i1.733
Scheinin, M. (2004). The human rights committee and freedom of religion or belief. In T. Lindholm, W. C. Durham, & B. Tahzib-Lie (Eds.), Facilitating freedom of religion or belief: A deskbook (pp. 189–202). Brill.
Schrems v. Data Prot. Comm’r, 2015 ECR 650 (2015).
Shaw, M. (2008). International law. Cambridge University Press.
Shelton, D. (2015). Remedies in international human rights law. Oxford University Press.
Simmons, B. A. (2009). Mobilizing for human rights: International law in domestic politics. Cambridge University Press.
Singer, P. (2011). The expanding circle: Ethics, evolution, and moral progress. Princeton University Press.
Singh, B. (2024). Cherish data privacy and human rights in the digital age: Harmonizing innovation and individual autonomy. In M. Pucelj & R. Bohinc (Eds.), Balancing human rights, social responsibility, and digital ethics (pp. 199–226). IGI Global.
Smethurst, R. (2023, June 11–16). Digital identity wallets and their semantic contradictions [Paper presentation]. Thirty-first European Conference on Information Systems. Kristiansand, Norway.
Solove, D. J. (2008). Understanding privacy. Harvard University Press.
Sunstein, C. R. (2001). Republic.com: Cass Sustein. Princeton University Press.
Susskind, R. E., & Susskind, D. (2015). The future of the professions: How technology will transform the work of human experts. Oxford University Press.
Trigo, A., Stein, N., & Belfo, F. P. (2024). Strategies to improve fairness in artificial intelligence: A systematic literature review. Education for Information, 40(3), 323–346. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-240045
Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest. Yale University Press.
UNICEF. (n.d.). Convention on the rights of the child. Retrieved July 22, 2024, from https://www.unicef.org/child-rights-convention
Wagner, B., Sanchez, A., Sekwenz, M. T., Dideriksen, S. A. T., & Murray-Rust, D. S. (2023). The politics of digital (human) rights. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.694
Weber, R. H., & Gunnarson, R. S. (2013). A constitutional solution for internet governance. Science and Technology Law Review, 14(1), 1–71.
West, D. M. (2018). The future of work: Robots, AI, and automation. Brookings Institution Press.
Copyright (c) 2024 Showkat Ahmad Mir, Fouzia Khaliq, Zeeshan Ashraf
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
LPR follow an open-access publishing policy and full text of all published articles is available free, immediately upon publication of an issue. The journal’s contents are published and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0) license. Thus, the work submitted to the journal implies that it is original, unpublished work of the authors (neither published previously nor accepted/under consideration for publication elsewhere). On acceptance of a manuscript for publication, a corresponding author on the behalf of all co-authors of the manuscript will sign and submit a completed the Copyright and Author Consent Form.
