State Immunity and its Impact on Investment Protection: Challenges and Prospects in International Investment Law
Abstract
Abstract Views: 0
A fundamental principle in international law is state immunity or state sovereignty. When interacting with investment law, this principle presents significant challenges, especially regarding investment protection. This study focuses on balancing sovereign rights and investor protection by exploring the issues and complications related to state immunity in investment disputes concerning arbitration, for execution of arbitral awards. It is found that legal safeguards for state immunity often obstruct investors from finding remedies for breaches of investment contracts. To reconcile these issues, this study discusses modern-day techniques regarding international investment treaties, following the emerging trends in customary law. By analyzing multiple case laws, the study sheds light on the challenges investors face during the arbitration process and enforcement of arbitral awards against the host state. In search of reforms to find a balanced legal framework, the role of prominent international organizations in the arbitration system is also discussed. The findings of this study suggest that, although state sovereignty is a substantial barrier, specific provisions in agreements including a transparent arbitration process, clarity in attaching assets, continuous review of contracts and right of appeal against arbitral awards should be incorporated.
Downloads
References
Alvik, I. (2020). The justification of privilege in international investment law: Preferential treatment of foreign investors as a problem of legitimacy. European Journal of International Law, 31(1), 289–312. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chaa027
Arp, B. (2023). The influence of foreign jurisprudence about international commercial arbitration in Latin American state courts. Journal of Dispute Resolution, 2023(2), Article e5.
Asudemade, H. (2020). Sovereign immunity from legal and arbitral proceedings and execution against the assets of a sovereign state: The evolving paradigm shift. SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3734860
Baid, A. (2024). Exceptions to enforcement of foreign arbitral award in India and England. SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4826153
Baltag, C., Joshi, R., & Duggal, K. (2023). Recent trends in investment arbitration on the right to regulate, environment, health and corporate social responsibility: Too much or too little? ICSID Review-Foreign Investment Law Journal, 38(2), 381–421. https://doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/siac031
Bankas, E. K. (2005). The state immunity controversy in international law. Springer Berlin.
Bjuhr, A. (2023). Law and justice in Johannesburg; understanding the interaction between head of state immunity and the ICCS jurisdiction when issuing arrest warrants [Unpublished dissertation]. Umea Univercity.
Brenninkmeijer, M., & Gélinas, F. (2021). The problem of execution immunities and the ICSID Convention. The Journal of World Investment & Trade, 22(3), 429–458.
Brewster, R. (2024). Arbitrating corruption. Washington University Law Review, 101(3), 923–960.
Brodlija, F. (2024). Sorting the building blocks of investor-state dispute settlement reform: Recent Developments from the UNCITRAL working group III. European Investment Law and Arbitration Review, 9(1), 69 – 94. https://doi.org/10.54648/eila2024026
Brunk, I. (2023). Central bank immunity, sanctions, and sovereign wealth funds. George Washington Law Review, 91(6), 1616–1660.
Brus, M. M. T. A. (2024). Third-party dispute settlement in an interdependent world: Developing a theoretical framework. Brill.
Cottrell, M. (2021). State immunity and its implications when resolving disputes with–and enforcing outcomes against–states. In R. Nazzini (Ed.), Construction arbitration and alternative dispute resolution: Theory and practice around the world (pp. 311–377). Informa Law from Routledge.
Council of Europe. (1972). European convention on state immunity of 1972. https://rm.coe.int/16800730b1
Dautaj, Y. (2024). Sovereign immunity from execution of foreign arbitral awards in India: The" New" Kid on the (Super) pro-arbitration block. Arbitration Law Review, 15(1), 19–37.
Delimatsis, P., & Hrynkiv, O. (2023). Sovereign investors and national security exceptions in WTO and investment law. SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4471209
Dhivya, U. (2024). Pivotal significance of alternative dispute resolution within the realm of financial institutions. Journal of Law and Legal Research Development, 1(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.69662/jllrd.v1i2.8
Dimitriou, V. (2024). The impact of repeatedly appointed arbitrators in the development of investment law: A de facto bench? an empirical perspective [Doctoral dissertation, University of Leicester]. University of Leicester. https://figshare.le.ac.uk/articles/thesis/The_Impact_of_Repeatedly_Appointed_Arbitrators_In_The_Development_Of_Investment_Law_A_De_Facto_Bench_An_Empirical_Perspective/26311105?file=47714599
Dimitropoulos, G. (2024). Regulating sovereign-driven investments in international trade and investment agreements: the role of investment screening mechanisms. In Pohl, J. H., Papadopoulos, T., & Wiesenthal, J. (Eds.), National security and investment controls (pp. 147–163). Springer Nature Switzerland.
Donoso, P. N. (2024). International investment law in Chile: Recent developments in times of reform. In N. Monebhurrun, C. Olarte-Bácares, & M. A. Velásquez-Ruiz (Eds.) International investment law and arbitration from a Latin American perspective (pp. 51–87). Springer.
Durkee, M. J. (Ed.). (2024). States, firms, and their legal fictions: attributing identity and responsibility to artificial entities. Cambridge University Press.
Ferrari, F., & Rosenfeld, F. (Eds.). (2023). Deference in international commercial arbitration: The shared system of control in international commercial arbitration. Kluwer Law International.
Fox, H., & Webb, P. (2013). The law of state immunity. Oxford University Press.
Gantz, D. A. (2017). The CETA ratification Saga: The demise of ISDS in EU trade agreements. Loyola University Chicago Law Journal, 49(2), 321–361.
Ghodoosi, F., & Sharif, M. M. (2023). Arbitration effect. American Business Law Journal, 60(2), 235–287. https://doi.org/10.1111/ablj.12222
Gugler, P., & de Raemy, B. (2024). Features and trends of international investment agreements (IIAs). In P. Gugler & A. T. Tavares-Lehmann (Eds.), Handbook of international business policy (pp. 43–61). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Gutiérrez, J. P. V. (2024). The use of MFN clauses in investment arbitration: the problem of importation. Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 15(3), 424–439. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idae008
Halim, A. (2024). Host state controls vs. foreign investment protection: indigenous people rights on rempang island, Indonesia. Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 26(1), 62–80.
Hobér, K. (2023). State immunity and international arbitration in Sweden. In P. B. Donath, A. Heger, M. Malkmus, & O. Bayrak (Eds.), Der Schutz des Individuums durch das Recht: Festschrift für Rainer Hofmann zum 70. Geburtstag (pp. 697–716). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Holden, J. T. (2024). Access or rovereignty. SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4742776
Howse, R. (2019). International investment law and arbitration: A conceptual framework. In H. R. Fabri (Ed.), International law and litigation: A look into procedure (pp. 363–446). Nomos.
Hu, Y. (2023). Legal risks and regulatory suggestions for cross-border leveraged buyouts. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 13, 291–298.
Imanuddin, S. A. (2023). The optimization of bilateral investment treaty to encourage the development of micro small and medium enterprises in Indonesia as host states in international investment activities. Transnational Business Law Journal, 4(2), 123–139. https://doi.org/10.23920/transbuslj.v4i2.1523
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes. (2006). ICSID convention, regulations and rules. https://icsid.worldbank.org/sites/default/files/ICSID%20Convention%20English.pdf
Italaw (2004). Tokios Tokelės v. Ukraine (ICSID Case No. ARB/02/18), decision on Jurisdiction. https://www.italaw.com/cases/1100
Italaw. (2003). Técnicas medioambientales Tecmed, S.A. v. United Mexican States (ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/00/2). https://www.italaw.com/cases/1087
Italaw. (2005). Methanex Corporation v. United States of America (UNCITRAL, NAFTA). https://www.italaw.com/cases/683
Italaw. (2010). Piero Foresti, Laura de Carli & Others v. Republic of South Africa (ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/07/1). https://www.italaw.com/cases/446
Kohl, U. (2024). Towards a regulatory theory of platform rule: corporate" sovereignty" through immunities. SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4764035
Kryvoi, Y. (2024a). Definition of foreign investors and protected investments: A comparative analysis. In J. H. Pohl, T. Papadopoulos, & J. Wiesenthal (Eds.), National security and investment controls (pp. 165–186). Springer Nature Switzerland.
Kryvoi, Y. (2024b). Key concepts of international arbitration. SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4834154
Levashova, Y., & Zugliani, N. (2024). Investor obligations through the prism of the EU foreign investment screening framework. In J. H. Pohl, T. Papadopoulos, & J. Wiesenthal (Eds.), National security and investment controls (pp. 187–208). Springer Nature Switzerland.
Maalouf, E. (2024). Achieving corporate environmental responsibility through emerging sustainability laws. Asia Pacific Journal of Environmental Law, 27(1), 64–99. https://doi.org/10.4337/apjel.2024.01.03
Marisa, F. (2023). Rethinking investor-state arbitration. Springer.
Mohanty, G., & Doshi, A. (2024). Expropriation of arbitral awards: Contextualising the Indian Practice Vis-À-Vis the anthrax-devas dispute. In M. Andenas & M. Heidemann (Eds.), Commercial contract law and arbitration (pp. 105-137). Routledge.
Mokaled, L. (2023). Arbitrating investment disputes in time of geopolitical unrest: Focus on investment protection in Russia. Journal of International Arbitration, 40(5), 567–604. https://doi.org/10.54648/joia2023024
Ndayisabye, A. (2023). Analysis of state immunity versus state property seizure in enforcement of judgement on international loan agreement: Analytical study of some EAC member states debt status for recovery. Beijing Law Review, 14(4), 1615–1633. https://doi.org/10.4236/blr.2023.144087
New York Convention. (n.d.). United Nations convention on the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards (New York, 10 June 1958). Retrieved June 24, 2024, from https://www.newyorkconvention.org/english
Nweze, N., & Ukwueze, F. O. (2023). The effect of arbitral jurisdictional decision on national courts. Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal, 16(2), 187–214.
Onyeani, O. (2023). The need to apply full protection and security (FPS) standard to cyber security: digital assets. The Boğaziçi Law Review, 1(1), 15–68.
Oxford International Public Law. (2012). Germany v Italy, Judgment, ICGJ 434 (ICJ 2012), https://opil.ouplaw.com/display/10.1093/law:icgj/434icj12.case.1/law-icgj-434icj12
Price, D., & Hallam, A. (2024). Investor-State dispute settlement and international investment agreements: The case of the gulf cooperation council member states. Taylor & Francis.
Segger, M-C. C., & Garcia, M. (2025). The impact of EU’s sustainability impact assessment in promoting sustainable development in free trade agreements. European Foreign Affairs Review, 30(SI), 35–60. https://doi.org/10.54648/eerr2025006
Subedi, S. P. (2024). International investment law: Reconciling policy and principle. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Supreme Court of the United States. (2014). Republic of Argentina v. NML Capital, Ltd., 573 U.S. 134. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/13pdf/12-842_5h26.pdf
Taylor, A. (2023). Much dispute about nothing? A critical examination of the backlash against investment treaty arbitration in international intellectual property disputes. Cybaris Intellectual Property Law Review, 14(1), Article e2.
Thomas, K. R. (2024). Defining a “state” and the role of the commercial activity exception. In K. R. Thomas (Ed.), The commercial activity exception to state immunity (pp. 105–131). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Titi, C. (2024). Investment treaty arbitration caught in the public-private law divide. Michigan Journal of International Law, 45(3), Article e441. https://doi.org/10.36642/mjil.45.3.investment
Trans-Lex Law Research. (n.d.). ARAMCO-Award, ILR 1963, at 117 et seq. Retrieved June 24, 2024, from https://www.trans-lex.org/260800
Trevisan, F., Gaicio-Fievez, A. H., & Mastragostino, F. (2025). Sovereign immunity as an obstacle to enforcement: The Luxembourg approach. Journal of International Arbitration, 42(1), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.54648/joia2025009
United Nations. (2005). United Nations convention on jurisdictional immunities of states and their property. https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conventions/4_1_2004.pdf
van Zelst, B., & Masumy, N. (2024). The concept of arbitrability under the New York convention: The quest for comprehensive reform. Journal of International Arbitration, 41(3), 345–370. https://doi.org/10.54648/joia2024016
Viterbo, A. (2024). International decisions. American Journal of International Law, 118(1), 145–154.
Waincymer, J. (2023). Much ado about… The law of the arbitration agreement: Who wants to know and for what legitimate purpose? Journal of International Arbitration, 40(4), 361–434. https://doi.org/10.54648/joia2023016
Walton, B. A. (2024). Immunities. In S. G. Hauck, R. Kunz, & M. Milas (Eds.), Public international law (pp. 357–376). Routledge.
Wells, L. T., & Ahmed, R. (2007). Making foreign investment safe: property rights and national sovereignty. Oxford University Press.
Yoon, K. (2023). When the sovereign contracts: Troubling the public/private distinction in international law. The Yale Law Journal, 133(6), 2101–2164.
Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Salman Shafiq
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
LPR follow an open-access publishing policy and full text of all published articles is available free, immediately upon publication of an issue. The journal’s contents are published and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0) license. Thus, the work submitted to the journal implies that it is original, unpublished work of the authors (neither published previously nor accepted/under consideration for publication elsewhere). On acceptance of a manuscript for publication, a corresponding author on the behalf of all co-authors of the manuscript will sign and submit a completed the Copyright and Author Consent Form.
