Human Rights and the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence – Assessing and Enhancing Pakistan’s National AI Policy with an Insight into Global Perspectives
Abstract
Abstract Views: 0
This research explores the complex interplay between Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) and human rights. It starts by defining GAI and establishing the intrinsic importance of human rights protection in the face of such technological advancements. On one hand, it explores the potential positive effects, including improved healthcare outcomes, reduced discrimination, and increased access to education. On the other hand, it critically examines the negative consequences, such as privacy concerns arising from data collection and use, and the potential for bias and discrimination set within algorithms. To substantiate these theoretical explorations, the paper incorporates two compelling case studies: the controversial use of AI in hiring practices and predictive policing in the United States. These instances provide concrete illustrations of how GAI interacts with human rights in varied contexts. The focus is next shifted to the legal framework developed by the United States of America, the European Union, China, and Pakistan for the deployment of GAI and their relevant scopes. Pakistan’s National AI policy primarily focuses on the ways through which GAI can be used, while delaying ethical considerations, and human rights concerns. Informed by these analyses, the study recommends modifying the National AI policy of Pakistan and enacting it as soon as possible to mitigate the negative effects of GAI and maximise its potential to benefit Pakistan and humanity. This research employs a doctrinal research methodology.
Downloads
References
Abid, F. (2024, April 6). Pakistan’s draft artificial intelligence (AI) policy: Strengths, weaknesses, and implementation challenges. Strafasia. https://strafasia.com/pakistans-draft-artificial-intelligence-ai-policy-strengths-weaknesses-and-implementation-challenges/
Australian Human Rights Commission. (n.d.). An introduction to human rights. Retrieved December 20, 2024, from https://humanrights.gov.au/our-work/education/introduction-human-rights
Black, J. S., & van Esch, P. (2020). AI-enabled recruiting: What is it and how should a manager use it? Business Horizons, 63(2), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2019.12.001
Cataleta, M. S. (2020). Human artificial intelligence: The fragility of human rights facing AI. East–West Center.
China Law Translate. (2022a). Provisions on the Administration of deep synthesis of internet information services. https://www.chinalawtranslate.com/en/deep-synthesis/
China Law Translate. (2022b, April 1). Provisions on the management of algorithmic recommendations for internet information services. https://www.chinalawtranslate.com/en/algorithms/
China Law Translate. (2023). Interim measures for the management of generative AI services. https://www.chinalawtranslate.com/en/generative-ai-interim/
Choi, J., & Lu, L. (2024). Embracing AI at workplace: Navigating the challenges and practical implications for employers. DLA Piper. https://www.dlapiper.com/en/insights/publications/2024/12/embracing-ai-at-workplace-navigating-the-challenges-and-practical-implications-for-employers
Council of Europe Portal. (n.d.). What are human rights? Retrieved February 17, 2024 from, https://www.coe.int/en/web/compass/what-are-human-rights-
Deloitte. (n.d.). Surveillance and predictive policing through AI. Retrieved February 17, 2024 from, https://www.deloitte.com/global/en/Industries/government-public/perspectives/urban-future-with-a-purpose/surveillance-and-predictive-policing-through-ai.html
European Commission. (2019, April 8). Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai
European Parliament. (2023, August 6). EU AI Act: First regulation on artificial intelligence. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/headlines/society/20230601STO93804/eu-ai-act-first-regulation-on-artificial-intelligence
European Union Artificial Intelligence Act. (n.d.). Implementation timeline. Retrieved December 17, 2024, from https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/implementation-timeline/
Fair Trials. (2024, March 13). Partial ban on predictive policing included in final EU AI Act. https://www.fairtrials.org/articles/news/partial-ban-on-predictive-policing-included-in-final-eu-ai-act/
Falk, R. (2004). Is this the end of Globalization? Slate Group, LLC.
Ferguson, A. G. (2017). The rise of big data policing: Surveillance, race, and the future of law enforcement. New York University Press.
Fisher Phillips. (2025, March 27). AI screening systems face fresh scrutiny: 6 key takeaways from claims filed against hiring technology company. https://www.fisherphillips.com/en/news-insights/ai-screening-systems-face-fresh-scrutiny-6-key-takeaways-from-claims-filed-against-hiring-technology-company.html
General Data Protection Regulation, Regulation. (2018). https://gdpr-info.eu/
Glazko, K., Mohammed, Y., Kosa, B., Potluri, V., & Mankoff, J. (2024, June 3–6). Identifying and improving disability bias in GPT-based resume screening [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Google Public Policy. (2024, September 2). An AI opportunity agenda for Pakistan. https://publicpolicy.google/resources/pakistan_ai_ opportunity_agenda_en.pdf
Government of Pakistan. (2022). Draft national artificial intelligence policy 2022. https://moitt.gov.pk/SiteImage/Misc/files/National%20AI %20Policy%20Consultation%20Draft%20V1.pdf
Governor of California. (2025, September 29). Governor Newsom signs SB 53, advancing California’s world-leading artificial intelligence industry. https://www.gov.ca.gov/2025/09/29/governor-newsom-signs-sb-53-advancing-californias-world-leading-artificial-intelligence-industry/
Hall, P. L. (2013). The importance of human rights. British Medical Journal, 329, Article e0410351. https://doi.org/10.1136/sbmj.0410351
Hofmann, P., & Urbach, N. (2021, January 5–8). Innovating with artificial intelligence: Capturing the constructive functional capabilities of deep generative learning [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Virtual Conference.
Hunkenschroer, A. L., & Kriebitz, A. (2022). Is AI recruiting (un)ethical? A human rights perspective on the use of AI for hiring. AI and Ethics, 3(1), 200–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00166-4
Illinois General Assembly. (2019). Illinois House Bill 2557, Artificial Intelligence Video Interview Act, Pub. Act 101–0260 (Ill. 2019). https://legiscan.com/IL/bill/HB2557/2019
Illinois General Assembly. (2024). Illinois House Bill 3773, 103rd General Assembly. https://legiscan.com/IL/bill/HB3773/2023
Iqbal, S. (2023, July 6). Pakistan’s draft national AI policy: Fostering responsible adoption and economic transformation. International Bar Association. Retrieved February 17, 2024, from https://www.ibanet.org/Pakistan-draft-national-ai-policy-fostering-responsible-adoption
Kaplan, J. (2016). Artificial intelligence: What everyone needs to know. Oxford University Press.
Khalid, Z. (2023, June 21). Pakistan’s draft national AI policy is a hodgepodge of technospeak. Centre for Strategic and Contemporary Research. https://cscr.pk/explore/themes/politics-governance/pakistans-draft-national-ai-policy-is-a-hodgepodge-of-technospeak/
Köchling, A., & Wehner, M. C. (2020). Discriminated by an algorithm: A systematic review of discrimination and fairness by algorithmic decision-making in the context of HR recruitment and HR development. Business Research, 13(3), 800–821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-020-00134-w
Law and the Workplace. (2021). Local laws of the City of New York for the year 2021. https://www.lawandtheworkplace.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/29/2023/03/Local-Law-144.pdf
Legiscan. (2025). California Senate Bill No. 53, Transparency in frontier artificial intelligence Act, Cal. S.B. 53. https://legiscan.com/CA/text/SB53/id/3271094
Marr, B. (2023, July 24). The difference between generative AI and traditional AI: An easy explanation for anyone. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2023/07/24/the-difference-between-generative-ai-and-traditional-ai-an-easy-explanation-for-anyone/?sh=17592539508a
Mobley v. Workday, Inc., No. 3:23–cv–00770 N.D. Cal.___(2023). https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/66831340/mobley-v-workday-inc/
Obioha, I. M. (2021). Predictive policing and crime control in the United States of America and Europe: Trends in a decade of research and the future of predictive policing. Social Sciences, 10(7), 234–247.
Orend, B. (2002). Human rights: Concept and context. Broadview Press.
Rane, N., Choudhary, S., & Rane, J. (2023). Integrating ChatGPT, Bard, and leading-edge generative artificial intelligence in architectural design and engineering: Applications, framework, and challenges. International Journal of Architecture and Planning, 3(2), 92–124. https://doi.org/10.51483/ijarp.3.2.2023.92-124
Renteln, A. D. (1988). The concept of human rights. Anthropos, 83(4–6), 343–364.
Risse, S. L. (2019). The future impact of artificial intelligence on humans and human rights. Ethics and International Affairs, 33(2), 141–158.
Robb, D. (2023, June 29). Generative AI vs. machine learning. eWEEK. https://www.eweek.com/artificial-intelligence/generative-ai-vs-machine-learning
Rodrigues, R. (2020). Legal and human rights issues of AI: Gaps, challenges, and vulnerabilities. Journal of Responsible Technology, 4, Article e00145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrt.2020.100005
Salman, A., & Asfandyar, M. (2023). Policy analysis decoding Pakistan’s National AI Policy chair, economic security. Islamabad Policy Research Institute. https://ipripak.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Policy-Analysis_Decoding-AI-Policy-2023.pdf
Starbeck, M. (2022). Artificial intelligence and predictive policing: Risks and challenges. EUCPN. https://www.eucpn.org/document/recommendation-paper-artificial-intelligence-and-predictive-policing-risks-and-challenges
State v. Loomis, 881 N.W.2d 749___ (2016). https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-130/state-v-loomis/
Stevenson, T., Kennedy, A., & Jackson, I. (2024). What does the EU AI Act mean for employers? Clifford Chance. https://www.cliffordchance.com/briefings/2024/08/what-does-the-eu-ai-act-mean-for-employers-.html
Tai, M. C.-T. (2020). The impact of artificial intelligence on human society and bioethics. Tzu Chi Medical Journal, 32(4), 339–343. https://doi.org/10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_71_20
Tennessee House Bill 2091, Ensuring Likeness, Voice, and Image Security Act of 2024. (2024). LegiScan. https://legiscan.com/TN/text/HB2091/id/2913233
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2023, September 11). iTutorGroup to pay $365,000 to settle EEOC discriminatory hiring suit. US EEOC. https://www.eeoc.gov/newsroom/itutorgroup-pay-365000-settle-eeoc-discriminatory-hiring-suit
Uber B.V. v. Driver 1, Driver 2 & Driver 3, Case C/13/73851 KG ZA 23-780 (Amsterdam Dist. Ct. Oct. 5, 2023).
van der Zant, T., Kouw, M., & Schomaker, L. (2013). Generative artificial intelligence. In V. C. Müller (Ed.), Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics (Vol. 5, pp. 113–132). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31674-6_8
Weston, B. H. (1984). Human rights. Human Rights Quarterly, 6(3), 257–283.
Woodiwiss, A. (2005). Human rights. Routledge.
Yang, F. (2019). Predictive policing in the United States. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice. https://oxfordre.com/criminology/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264079.001.0001/acrefore-9780190264079-e-508
Copyright (c) 2025 Hina Qayyum, Mehr-un-Nisa, Shizza Khan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
LPR follow an open-access publishing policy and full text of all published articles is available free, immediately upon publication of an issue. The journal’s contents are published and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0) license. Thus, the work submitted to the journal implies that it is original, unpublished work of the authors (neither published previously nor accepted/under consideration for publication elsewhere). On acceptance of a manuscript for publication, a corresponding author on the behalf of all co-authors of the manuscript will sign and submit a completed the Copyright and Author Consent Form.
