Corruption Free Public Service as a Fundamental Right: A Solution to Endemic Corruption in Pakistan
Abstract
Abstract Views: 0
Corruption is a global phenomenon that weakens trust in institutions and affects socio-economic progress. Even after all the anti-corruption efforts, it is still rampant. This paper suggests a new solution: introducing corruption-free public service as a fundamental right enshrined in the constitution. Pakistan has been taken as a case study, where corruption is widespread despite various laws and anti-corruption organisations. The magnitude of corruption and the failure of the anticorruption measures have been highlighted with the help of credible data. It argues for reevaluating the social contract between the state and citizens, advocating for elevating corruption-free public service as a fundamental right. This proposed right could transform administrative culture and governance by empowering citizens and fostering accountability. This right protects citizens from corrupt practices, and the government would be responsible for its enforcement. Additionally, it could spark a societal shift towards zero tolerance for corruption, creating a broad-based anticorruption coalition. While not a cure-all, this fundamental right offers a promising path for driving systemic and behavioural change, paving the way for greater integrity and transparency in governance.
Downloads
References
Ali, M., Muliyono, A., & Nurhidayat, S. (2023). The application of a human rights approach toward crimes of corruption: Analysing anticorruption regulations and judicial decisions. Laws, 12(4), Article e68. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws12040068
African Union. (2003). African Union convention on preventing and combating corruption. https://au.int/en/treaties/african-union-convention-preventing-and-combating-corruption
Asian Regional Integration Center. (2001). ADB-OECD anti-corruption initiative for Asia and the Pacific. https://aric.adb.org/initiative/adb-oecd-anti-corruption-initiative-for-asia-and-the-pacific
Bazie, P., Thiombiano, N., & Maiga, E. W. H. (2023). Fighting corruption in developing countries to meet the challenge of human capital development: Evidence from Sub-Saharan African countries. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15, 6780–6801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01330-9
Becker, G. S., & Stigler, G. J. (1974). Law enforcement, malfeasance, and compensation of enforcers. The Journal of Legal Studies, 3(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1086/467507
Beesley, C., & Hawkins, D. (2022). Corruption, institutional trust and political engagement in Peru. World Development, 151, Article e105743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105743
Bello Villarino, J. (2022). Middle point, end of the road or just the beginning? Anticorruption efforts, failures and promises at the United Nations. In E. Wet & K. M. Scherr (Eds.), Max planck yearbook of United Nations Law (pp. 26–53). Brill.
Brankov, T. P., & Tanjević, N. (2013). Corruption in the land sector. Economics of Agriculture, 60(2), 365–377.
Capasso, S., Goel, R. K., & Saunoris, J. W. (2019). Is it the gums, teeth or the bite? Effectiveness of dimensions of enforcement in curbing corruption. Economics of Governance, 20(4), 329–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-019-00228-0
Dixit, A. K. (2016). Corruption: Demand-side and supply-side solutions. In S. Mahendra Dev & P. G. Babu (Eds.), Development in India (pp. 57–68). Springer.
Fritzen, S. (2005). Beyond "political will": How institutional context shapes the implementation of anticorruption policies. Policy and Society, 24(3), 79–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1449-4035(05)70061-8
Government of Pakistan. (2002). National anticorruption strategy (NACS). https://baselgovernance.org/sites/default/files/2020-04/pakistan_national_ac_strategy_endorsing_ips_2002.pdf
Hussain, F., & Riaz, A. (2012). Corruption in the public organizations of Pakistan: Perceptual views of university students. The Journal of Commerce, 4(1), 62–71
James, S., & Prallathadka, H. (2025). Law as an instrument of social change. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research, 12(2), 613–623.
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2024). The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and 2024 Update. The World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/4649907e-8902-4e74-a7ed-0e205e5e7919
Khan, M., Andreoni, A., & Roy, P. (2019). Anticorruption in adverse contexts: Strategies for improving implementation (Working Paper No. 013). ACE Research Consortium. https://ace.soas.ac.uk/publication/anti-corruption-in-adverse-contexts-strategies-for-improving-implementation/
Klein-Haarhuis, C. M., & Leeuw, F. L. (2004). Fighting governmental corruption: The new World Bank programme evaluated. Journal of International Development, 16(4), 547–561. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.1077
Kumar, P. (2019). Anticorruption measures in India: A democratic assessment. Asian Journal of Public Affairs, 11(2), Article e20191. http://dx.doi.org/10.18003/ajpa.20191
Labik-Amanquandor, T. D. (2024). Limitations of the international approach to anticorruption: A systematic review of South Africa's compelling case of failing anticorruption. Crime, Law and Social Change, 82, 493–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-024-10152-y
Li, L., Lien, D., Wu, Y., & Zhao, Y. (2017). Enforcement and political power in anticorruption—Evidence from China. World Development, 98, 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.04.015
Luna-Pla, L., & Nicolás-Carlock, J. R. (2020). Corruption and complexity: A scientific framework for the analysis of corruption networks. Applied Network Science, 5(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41109-020-00258-2
Marquette, H., & Peiffer, C. (2018). Grappling with the “real politics” of systemic corruption: Theoretical debates versus “real-world” functions. Governance, 31(3), 499–514. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12311
Martuscelli, A. (2020). The economics of China’s engagement with Africa: What is the empirical evidence? Development Policy Review, 38(3), 285–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12456
Muhumuza, W. (2016). The politics of anticorruption reforms and reversals in Uganda’s changing political terrain. Economic and Political Studies, 4(1), 62–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/20954816.2016.1152095
National Accountability Bureau. (2013). National Accountability Bureau annual report 2013. Government of Pakistan. https://nab.gov.pk/
Noor-ul-Ain, & Hussain, F. (2020). Fighting governmental corruption in Pakistan: An evaluation of anticorruption strategies. Croatian and Comparative Public Administration, 20(3), 439–468. https://doi.org/10.31297/hkju.20.3.2
OECD. (1997). Convention on combating bribery of foreign public officials in international business transactions. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2011/03/convention-on-combating-bribery-of-foreign-public-officials-in-international-business-transactions_037f7856/2bfa620e-en.pdf
O’Leary, Z. (2014). The essential guide to doing your research project (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Ogola, H. Y., Kung’u, D. M., & Nassiuma, B. K. (2021). Public trust and service delivery in the National Police Service, Nairobi County, Kenya. Social Sciences, 10(6), 251–260. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20211006.11
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2024). Anticorruption and integrity. https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/policy-issues/anti-corruption-and-integrity.html
Owusu, E. K., Chan, A. P. C., & Hosseini, M. R. (2020). Impacts of anticorruption barriers on the efficacy of anticorruption measures in infrastructure projects: Implications for sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 246, Article e119078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119078
Pakistan Institute of Legislative Development and Transparency. (2015). Accountability structures: A comparative analysis. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2592040
Persson, A., Rothstein, B., & Teorell, J. (2013). Why anticorruption reforms fail—Systemic corruption as a collective action problem. Governance, 26(3), 449–471. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01604.x
Quah, J. S. T. (2021). Breaking the cycle of failure in combating corruption in Asian countries. Public Administration and Policy: An Asia-Pacific Journal, 24(2), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAP-05-2021-0034
Shehla Zia v. WAPDA, P.L.D. 1994 S.C. 693___(2025). https://elaw.org/resource/zia-v-wapda-p-l-d-1994-supreme-court-693
Smidova, Z., Cavaciuti, A., & Johnsøn, J. (2022, August). Anticorruption and public integrity strategies: Insights from new OECD indicators. OECD Publishing.
Song, C., Chang, C., & Gong, Q. (2020). Economic growth, corruption, and financial development: Global evidence. Economic Modelling, 94, 822–830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2020.02.022
Supreme Court of Pakistan. (2010). NRO judgement (C.P. No. 76 to 80 of 2007, 59/2009 & C.A. 1094 of 2009). https://www.supremecourt.gov.pk/downloads_judgements/NRO_Judgment.pdf
Supreme Court of Pakistan. (n.d.). Human rights cell. Retrieved July 22, 2025, from https://www.supremecourt.gov.pk/human-rights-cell/
Transparency International. (2017). Global corruption barometer 2017. https://www.transparency.org/en/gcb/asia-pacific/asia-pacific-2017/results/aus
Transparency International. (2023). Corruption perceptions index 2023. https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2023
Transparency International. (n.d.). What is corruption? Retrieved July 22, 2025, from https://www.transparency.org/en/what-is-corruption
Transparency International Pakistan. (2023). National corruption perception survey 2023. Transparency International Pakistan.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (n.d.). UNCAC signature and ratification status. Retrieved July 22, 2025, from https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/corruption/ratification-status.html
United Nations. (2000). United Nations convention against transnational organized crime. https://treaties.un.org/pages/viewdetails.aspx?src=treaty&mtdsg_no=xviii-12&chapter=18&clang=_en
Vian, T., Agnew, B., & McInnes, K. (2022). Whistleblowing as an anticorruption strategy in health and pharmaceutical organisations in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review. Global Health Action, 15(1), Article e2140494. https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2022.2140494
Villeneuve, J.-P., Mugellini, G., & Heide, M. (2020). International anticorruption initiatives: A classification of policy interventions. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 26, 431–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-019-09410-w
Viswanathan, V. N. (2012). Corruption and human rights. Allied Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
Vittal, N. (2001). Ethics in public administration: Classical insights and current practices. Journal of Human Values, 7(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/097168580100700102
Vittal, N. (2003). Corruption in India: The roadblock to national prosperity. Academic Foundation.
Voigt, L., & Thornton, W. E. (2015). Disaster-related human rights violations and corruption. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(10), 1292–1313. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764215591185
World Bank. (2023). Control of corruption: Percentile rank - South Asia. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/CC.PER.RNK?locations=8S
World Bank. (2022). World Bank enterprise survey 2022. https://microdata.worldbank.org/index.php/catalog/6461
World Bank. (1997, September 30). Helping countries combat corruption: The role of the World Bank. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/799831538245192753/Helping-countries-combat-corruption-the-role-of-the-World-Bank
World Economic Forum. (2017, September 26). The global competitiveness report 2017–2018. The Global Competitiveness and Benchmarking Network. https://www.weforum.org/publications/the-global-competitiveness-report-2017-2018/
World Economic Forum. (2019, October 8). The global competitiveness report 2019. The Global Competitiveness and Benchmarking Network. https://www.weforum.org/publications/how-to-end-a-decade-of-lost-productivity-growth/
Copyright (c) 2025 Fiaz Hussain, Sarfraz Hussain Ansari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
LPR follow an open-access publishing policy and full text of all published articles is available free, immediately upon publication of an issue. The journal’s contents are published and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0) license. Thus, the work submitted to the journal implies that it is original, unpublished work of the authors (neither published previously nor accepted/under consideration for publication elsewhere). On acceptance of a manuscript for publication, a corresponding author on the behalf of all co-authors of the manuscript will sign and submit a completed the Copyright and Author Consent Form.
