A Case Study on the Failure of International Human Rights Law to Protect Minority-Belief Students in Educational Institutions
Abstract
Abstract Views: 0
This article critically examines the shortcomings in human rights law that hinder the protection of Freedom of Religion or Belief (FoRB) for students of minority beliefs in educational institutions. While international legal frameworks, such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and the European Convention on Human Rights, nominally protect these freedoms, their practical realization remains different. Case analyses and judgments, including Lautsi and Others v. Italy (2011) and Osmanoğlu and Kocabaş v. Switzerland (2017), have revealed systemic failures such as discriminatory policies and inadequate approaches to accommodate religious practices. This research emphasizes that curricula reflect dominant cultural narratives while marginalizing students from minority belief systems through biased curricula, restrictive dress codes, and a lack of grievance mechanisms. Moreover, opt-out provisions meant to honor religious diversity often stigmatize minority students and do not provide for non-believers. This research recommends the introduction of inclusive curricula, Opt-out possibilities, opt-in approaches to religious education, and robust accountability systems to uphold FoRB protections. To address this issue, this study proposes that a transnational, multi-stakeholder process involving governments, religious scholars, education sectors, and international agencies. Such collaboration is essential to promote fair access to FoRB for all students in ways that encourage pluralism and social cohesion.
Downloads
References
African Court. (1981). African charter on human and peoples' rights. https://www.african-court.org/wpafc/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/AFRICAN-BANJUL-CHARTER-ON-HUMAN-AND-PEOPLES-RIGHTS.pdf
African Union International. (1990). African charter on the rights and welfare of the child. https://au.int/sites/default/files/documents/30913-doc-acrwc-en.pdf
Ahmed and Others v. the United Kingdom, ECHR ___ (1998).
Akande, R. (2022). Neutralizing secularism: Religious antiliberalism and the twentieth-century global ecumenical project. Journal of Law and Religion, 37(2), 284–316. https://doi.org/10.1017/jlr.2022.18
Ali, F. (2013). Students’ Religious Liberty: Religious Attire and Symbols in American Public Schools. Rutgers Journal of Law & Religion, 15, 1–46.
Altıparmak, K. (2013). Execution of the Judgment of Hasan Ve Eylem Zengin/Turkey. Capacity Development Association. http://aihmiz.org.tr/13062023/files/01_Hasan_ve_Eylem_Zengin_Report_EN.pdf
Berner, A. (2024). Pluralism and the culture of education in the United States. Peabody Journal of Education, 99(5), 557–565. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2024.2407247
Bertrand, R. (2015). The limits of secularization through education. Nordic Journal of Religion and Society, 17(1), 1–43.
Bowers, J. (2021). Accommodating difference; How is religious freedom protected when it clashes with other rights; Is reasonable accommodation the key to levelling the field? Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 10(2), 275–297. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwab008
Bretscher, F. (2017, March 30). Osmanoğlu and Kocabaş v. Switzerland: A Swiss perspective. Strasbourg Observers: https://strasbourgobservers.com/2017/03/30/osmanoglu-and-kocabas-v-switzerland-a-swiss-perspective/
Brown, G. (2016). The universal declaration of human rights in the 21st century: A living document in a changing world. Open Book Publishers.
Campbell and Cosens v. The United Kingdom, ECHR. ___ (1982).
Council of Europe. (2015). Guide to article 2 of protocol no. 1: Right to education. https://www.right-to-education.org/sites/right-to-education.org/files/resource-attachments/ECHR_Guide_Art_2_Protocol_1_ENG_0.pdf
Council of Europe. (2020, August 31). Guide on Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights - Freedom of thought, conscience and religion. Refworld: https://www.refworld.org/jurisprudence/caselawcomp/echr/2020/en/123527
Donoghue, S. (2021). ‘It's No Big Deal’: The perspectives and practices of primary school principals catering for children opted-out of religious instruction in Irish Catholic primary schools [Master's thesis, Trinity College Dublin]. Trinity College Dublin. https://www.tara.tcd.ie/items/c83bc5cb-c874-437f-b07f-68b7a5224537
Eden, C. A., Onyebuchi, N. C., & Adeniyi, I. S. (2024). Cultural competence in education: strategies for fostering inclusivity and diversity awareness. International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences, 6(3), 383–392. https://doi.org/10.51594/ijarss. v6i3.895
Evans, C. (2008). Religious education in public schools: An international human rights perspective. Human Rights Law Review, 8(3), 449–473. https://doi.org/10.1093/HRLR/NGN020
Eweida and Others v. the United Kingdom ___ SC 2013.
Fabio, A.D. (January 01, 2024). Religion and the European Human Rights Standards. Human Rights Centre. https://unipd-centrodirittiumani.it/en/topics/religion-and-the-european-human-rights-standards-1
Folgerø and Others v. Norway, ECHR. ___ (2007)
Garahan, S. (2017). Osmanoğlu and Kocabaş v Switzerland: Application no 29086/12: European Court of Human Rights (Third Section): López Guerra, President, Jäderblom, Keller, Lubarda, Pastor Vilanova, Poláčková, Serghides JJ: 10 January 2017. Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 6(2), 425–426. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwx016
Girvan, E. J. (2020). Towards a problem-solving approach to addressing racial disparities in school discipline under anti-discrimination law. University of Memphis Law Review, 50, 1–84.
Greenberg, A. (2011, March 18). European court of human rights rules that crucifixes in state schools do not violate religious freedom. Human Rights Law Centre. https://www.hrlc.org.au/case-summaries/lautsi-ors-v-italy-2011-echr-application-no-3081406-18-march-2011/
Hartikainen et al. v. Finland, UNHRC. ___ (1978).
Hasan and Eylem Zengin v. Turkey, ECHR. ___ (2009).
Hunter-Henin, M. (2019). Children’s religious freedom in state schools: Exemptions, participation and education. In J. G. Dwyer (Ed.) Oxford handbook on children and the law (pp. 581–600). Oxford Academic Press.
Hurd, E. S. (2014). Alevis under law: The politics of religious freedom in Turkey. Journal of Law and Religion, 29(3), 416–435.
Irish Statute Book. (1937). Constitution of Ireland. https://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/cons/en/html
Kjeldsen, Busk Madsen and Pedersen v. Denmark, ECHR. ___ (1976).
Lautsi and Others v. Italy ___ (2011).
Ligthart, S., Bublitz, C., Douglas, T., Forsberg, L., & Meynen, G. (2022). Rethinking the right to freedom of thought: A multidisciplinary analysis. Human Rights Law Review, 22, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngac028
Lindkvist, L. (2013). The politics of article 18: Religious liberty in the universal declaration of human rights. Humanity: An International Journal of Human Rights, Humanitarianism, and Development, 4(3), 429–447. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/hum.2013.0023.
Mambu, J. G., & Mongdong, N. M. (2023). The influence of international human rights instruments on domestic legislation: A comparative study of four countries. The Easta Journal Law and Human Rights, 1(03), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.58812/eslhr. v1i03.86
Martínez-Ariño, J., & Teinturier, S. (2019). Faith-based schools in contexts of religious diversity: An introduction. Religion & Education, 46(2), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/15507394.2019.1590941
Martínez-Torrón, J. (2012). The (Un)protection of Individual Religious Identity in the Strasbourg Case Law. Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 1(2), 63–385. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwr021
Mawhinney, A. (2007). Freedom of religion in the Irish primary school system: a failure to protect human rights? Legal Studies, 27(3), 379–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121X.2007. 00062.x
Mawhinney, A., Niens, U., Richardson, N., & Chiba, Y. (2010). Opting out of religious education: The views of young people from minority belief backgrounds. Queen’s University Belfast. https://pure.qub.ac.uk/en/publications/opting-out-of-religious-education-the-views-of-young-people-from-
McBride, J. (2021). The doctrines and methodology of interpretation of the European convention on human rights. Council of Europe. https://rm.coe.int/echr-eng-the-doctrines-and-methodology-of-interpretation-of-the-europe/1680a20aee
Moe, C. (2019). Religious symbols in public schools as teachable controversies in religious education. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 9(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.693
O’Callaghan, P., Cronin, O., Kelly, B. D., Shiner, B., Walmsley, J., & Jones, S. M. (2023). The right to freedom of thought: An interdisciplinary analysis of the UN special rapporteur’s report on freedom of thought. The International Journal of Human Rights, 28(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2023.2227100
Osmanoğlu and Kocabaş v. Switzerland, ECHR. ___ (2017). https://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2017/14.html
Puppinck, G. (2012). The case of Lautsi v. Italy: A synthesis. BYU Law Review, 3, 1-38.
R (Begum) v. Governors of Denbigh High School, UKHL. ___ (2006).
Sahin v. Turkey, App, ECHR ___ (2005).
Schlütter, B. (2019). Crucifixes in Italian Classrooms: Lautsi v Italy. European Human Rights Law Review, 6, 86–92.
Schutter, P. O. (2005, July 4). The prohibition of discrimination under European human rights law. European Union. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/c2c6eee0-3ddc-4ede-982b-c382b583ca71.
The Organization of American States. (1969). American convention on human rights. https://www.oas.org/en/iachr/mandate/basics/3.american%20convention.pdf
United Nations. (1948). Universal declaration of human rights. https://cil.nus.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/1948-Universal-Declaration-of-Human-Rights.pdf
United Nations. (1966, December 16). International covenant on economic, social and cultural rights. https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-economic-social-and-cultural-rights
United Nations. (2023). Rapporteur’s digest on freedom of religion or belief: Excerpts of the reports from 1986 to 2022 arranged by topics of the framework for communications. https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Issues/Religion/RapporteursDigestFreedomReligionBelief.pdf
Valutytė, R., & Gailiūtė, D. (2012). The exercise of religious freedom in educational institutions in the light of ECTHR jurisprudence. Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration and Economics, 2(2), 45–62.
Copyright (c) 2025 Naveed ur Rehman, Farooq Umair Niazi, Shakil Ahmad Khan, Asma Rehman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
LPR follow an open-access publishing policy and full text of all published articles is available free, immediately upon publication of an issue. The journal’s contents are published and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0) license. Thus, the work submitted to the journal implies that it is original, unpublished work of the authors (neither published previously nor accepted/under consideration for publication elsewhere). On acceptance of a manuscript for publication, a corresponding author on the behalf of all co-authors of the manuscript will sign and submit a completed the Copyright and Author Consent Form.
