Attachment Dimensions as Moderators of the Relationship Between Partner Phubbing and Marital Satisfaction in Generation Z
Abstract
Abstract Views: 0
The current study aimed to explore the relationship between partner phubbing, attachment anxiety, attachment avoidance, and marital satisfaction in the context of Generation Z married Pakistani adults through cross-sectional correlational design. A total of 300 married individuals (18-28 years) were chosen using purposive sampling strategy. The Partner Phubbing Scale, Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised questionnaire, and Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale were used to collect the data. To analyze the data, hierarchical regression analysis, moderated mediation (PROCESS Model 5), and independent sample t-tests were used. The results indicated that marital satisfaction was negatively related to partner phubbing. The relationship between phubbing of the partner and marital satisfaction was partially mediated by attachment anxiety with attachment avoidance intensifying the relationship and was a form of moderated mediation. Conditional indirect effects also indicated that the anxiety-mediated effect was greater in increased levels of avoidance. Attachment dimensions described a substantial amount of variance in marital satisfaction but no significant gender difference was reported in partner phubbing, attachment patterns, and marital satisfaction. The results of these studies show the harmful impact of technology-related distraction and insecure attachment tendencies on the status of marital well-being among digitally connected youthful couples and indicate the necessity of awareness and preventive counseling measures.
Downloads
References
Beukeboom, C. J., & Pollmann, M. (2021). Partner phubbing: Why using your phone during interactions with your partner can be detrimental for your relationship. Computers in Human Behavior, 124, Article e106932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106932
Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Measurement of adult romantic attachment: An integrative overview. In J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46–76). The Guilford Press.
Carnelley, K. B., Hart, C. M., Vowels, L. M., & Thomas, T. T. (2025). Attachment, perceived partner phubbing, and retaliation: A daily diary study. Journal of Personality. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.70012
Carnelley, K. B., Vowels, L. M., Stanton, S. C. E., Millings, A., & Hart, C. M. (2024). Perceived partner phubbing predicts lower relationship quality but partners’ enacted phubbing does not. Computers in Human Behavior, 147, Article e107860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107860
Chotpitayasunondh, V., & Douglas, K. M. (2016). How “phubbing” becomes the norm: The antecedents and consequences of snubbing via smartphone. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.018
David, M. E., & Roberts, J. A. (2021). Investigating the impact of partner phubbing on romantic jealousy and relationship satisfaction: The moderating role of attachment anxiety. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(12), 3590–3609. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407521996454
Erzen, E., & Tasdemir, K. (2025). Attachment styles, relationship satisfaction, and well-being as predictors of phubbing behavior: A cross-sectional study among young adults in romantic relationships. Emerging Adulthood, 13(6), 1336–1346. https://doi.org/10.1177/21676968251371753
Frackowiak, M., Hilpert, P., & Russell, P. S. (2022). Partner’s perception of phubbing is more relevant than the behavior itself: A daily diary study. Computers in Human Behavior, 134, Article e107323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107323
Fraley, R. C., Waller, N. G., & Brennan, K. A. (2000). An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(2), 350–365. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.350
Han, Y., Li, X., Song, W., & He, Y. (2025). Young adult partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction: The mediating role of attachment anxiety and the moderating role of constructive conflict coping style. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, Article e1490363. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1490363
Hayes, A. F. (2018). An introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
Kanaganayagam, S. (2024). Attachment (avoidance and anxiety) in relation to marital satisfaction in couples born between 1980 and 2000 [Doctoral dissertation, Liberty University]. Scholars Crossing. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/doctoral/5459/
Kardefelt-Winther, D. (2014). A conceptual and methodological critique of Internet addiction research: Towards a model of compensatory internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 31(1), 351–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.059
McDaniel, B. T., & Coyne, S. M. (2016). “Technoference”: The interference of technology in couple relationships and implications for women’s personal and relational well-being. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5(1), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000065
McDaniel, B. T., & Drouin, M. (2019). Daily technology interruptions and emotional and relational well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 99, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.04.027
Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. Guilford Press.
Mosley, M. A., & Parker, M. (2023). The phubbing problem: A dyadic exploration of the moderating role of partner phubbing on attachment and couple satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 149, Article e107953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107953
Ni, N., Ahrari, S., Zaremohzzabieh, Z., Zarean, M., & Roslan, S. (2025). A meta-analytic study of partner phubbing and its antecedents and consequences. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, Article e1561159. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1561159
Przybylski, A. K., & Weinstein, N. (2013). Can you connect with me now? How the presence of mobile communication technology influences face-to-face conversation quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30(3), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407512453827
Rinaldi, M. R., Hardika, J., & Triastuti, R. (2025). Gen Z marriage: Loneliness as a moderator of partner phubbing and marital satisfaction. Journal Psikogenesis, 13(1), 98–112. https://doi.org/10.24854/jps.v13i1.4762
Roberts, J. A., & David, M. E. (2015). My life has become a major distraction from my cell phone: Partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction among romantic partners. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 134–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.058
Rohner, R. P. (2021). Introduction to interpersonal acceptance-rejection theory (IPARTheory) and evidence. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 6(1), Article e4. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1055
Schumm, W. R., Paff-Bergen, L. A., Hatch, R. C., Obiorah, F. C., Copeland, J. M., Meens, L. D., & Bugaighis, M. A. (1986). Concurrent and discriminant validity of the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 381–387.
Sharafat, Z., Khan, M. L., & Mehmood, T. (2025). Partner phubbing, relationship conflict, and relationship satisfaction in couples. Research Consortium Archive, 3(2), 531–554.
Shrivastav, S., Sharma, S., Chauhan, U., Panchal, L., Rana, D., & Sangwan, J. (2025). Partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction among romantic partners. In A. Mesquita & C. Sousa (Eds.), Advances in human and social aspects of technology book series (pp. 363–396). IGI Global.
Thomas, T., Carnelley, K. B., & Hart, C. M. (2022). Phubbing in romantic relationships and retaliation: A daily diary study. Computers in Human Behavior, 137, Article e107398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107398
Wang, X., & Zhao, K. (2022). Partner phubbing and marital satisfaction: The mediating roles of marital interaction and marital conflict. Social Science Computer Review, 41(4), 1126–1139. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393211072231
Wang, X., Su, M., Ren, L., Xu, H., Lai, X., He, J., Du, M., Zhao, C., Zhang, G., & Yang, X. (2025). Partner phubbing and quality of romantic relationship in emerging adults: Testing the mediation role of perceived partner responsiveness and moderation role of received social support. BMC Psychology, 13(1), Article e613. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02942-3
Wang, X., Xie, X., Wang, Y., Wang, P., & Lei, L. (2017). Partner phubbing and depression among married Chinese adults: The roles of relationship satisfaction and relationship length. Personality and Individual Differences, 110, 12–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.01.014
Wang, X., Zhao, F., & Lei, L. (2019). Partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction: Self-esteem and marital status as moderators. Current Psychology, 40(7), 3365–3375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00275-0
Yam, F. C. (2022). The relationship between partner phubbing and life satisfaction: The mediating role of relationship satisfaction and perceived romantic relationship quality. Psychological Reports, 126(1), 303–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941221144611
Zahra, S. T., Shabbir, S., & Naeem, K. (2025). Partner phubbing and marital satisfaction among Pakistani couples. Journal of Psychology, Health and Social Challenges, 3(3), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.63075/e2v1j975
