The Role of Interior Spatial Connectivity in Museum Visitor Experience: A Space Syntax Investigation

Fatima -tu-Zuhra

doi:10.32350/jdt.51.01

Fatima -tu-Zuhra University of South Asia, Lahore, Pakistan https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1545-1890

Keywords: Museum Design, Space Syntax, Visitor Movement, DepthmapX, Spatial Connectivity, Heritage Conservation, Peshawar Museum

Abstract

Abstract Views: 0

Interior spatial connectivity is a crucial defining factor of the visitor experience in museums, affecting movement patterns, wayfinding, and exhibit interaction. This study investigates how spatial layout affects
visitor interaction at the Peshawar Museum, a heritage site famous for its Gandhara art collection. Space Syntax theory is employed through DepthmapX software to analyze the spatial parameters of integration,
visibility and connectivity and their effect on the facilitation or obstruction of visitor flow across different spaces. The results show that highly integrated spaces such as the Main Hall promote visitor interaction while
segregated spaces are less engaged, causing limited interaction with some exhibits. This is supported by agent-based simulations showing a direct effect of spatial visibility on foot traffic patterns. On the basis of this study, non-intrusive design propositions such as an agile wayfinding system, redistribution of exhibits, and digital navigation enhancements are to be investigated in order to improve circulation without compromising the architectural integrity of the museum. This study contributes to the limited number of spatial connectivity studies in South Asian heritage museums and provides a replicable framework for using evidence-based spatial interventions to enhance visitor experience

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

B. Hillier and J. Hanson, The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1984.

Y. Zou, H. Xiao, and Y. Yang, “Constructing identity in space and place: Semiotic and discourse analyses of museum tourism,” Tour. Manag., vol. 93, Oct. 2022, Art. no. 104608, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2022.104608.

T. Varoudis, “DepthmapX – Open source multi-platform spatial network analysis software,” GitHub Repository, 2012. [Online]. Available: http://varoudis.github.io/depthmapX/

J. Peponis and J. Wineman, “Spatial structure of environment and behavior,” in Handbook of Environmental Psychology, R. Bechtel and A. Churchman, Eds. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, 2002.

B. Hillier, “Space is the machine,” Design Studies, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 291–314, 1997, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(97)89854-7.

A. Turner, A. Penn, and B. Hillier, “An algorithmic definition of the axial map,” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 425–444, June 2005, doi: https://doi.org/10.1068/b31097.

C. Li and S. Psarra, “A comparative study of graph structures, traversability, movement and exhibition strategy in museums during COVID-19,” in Proc. 13th Space Synt. Symp., 2022.

K. Tzortzi, “Building and exhibition layout: Sainsbury Wing compared with Castelvecchio,” Architec. Res. Quart., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 128–140, June 2005, doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1359135504000168.

J. Peponis, R. Burdett, and J. Hanson, “Space syntax: A different urban perspective,” Architect. Res. Quart., vol. 178, pp. 47–63, 1983.

J. Peponis and J. Wineman, “Spatial structures of environment and behavior,” in Environmental Psychology, P. Bechtel and A. Churchman, Eds. New York, NY, USA: Wiley, 2001.

N. Sehrai and M. Waqar, “The Peshawar Museum in retrospect,” J. Asian Civiliz., vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 237–260, 2020.

S. M. Jaffar, A. Salīm, M. Ẓiyāʾuddīn, and G. H. Ikaiḍamī, Views and Reviews on the Peshawar Museum: With Illustrations. Peshawar, Pakistan: Gandhara Hindko Academy, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.com.pk/books?id=aFdrzwEACAAJ

S. C. Bitgood, “Environmental psychology in museums, zoos, and other exhibition centers,” in Handbook of Environmental Psychology, R. Bechtel and A. Churchman, Eds. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, 2002, pp. 461–480.

J. H. Falk and L. D. Dierking, Museum Experience Revisited. Walnut Creek, CA, USA: Left Coast Press, 2013.

E. King, M. P. Smith, P. F. Wilson, J. Stott, and M. A. Williams, “Creating meaningful museums: A model for museum exhibition user experience,” Visitor Stud., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 59–81, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10645578.2022.2129944.

J. Wineman and J. Peponis, “Constructing spatial meaning: Spatial affordances in museum design,” Environ. Beh., vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 86–109, Jan. 2010, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916509335534.

A. Turner, M. Doxa, D. O’Sullivan, and A. Penn, “From isovists to visibility graphs: A methodology for the analysis of architectural space,” Environ. Plan. B: Plan. Des., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 103–121, Feb. 2001, doi: https://doi.org/10.1068/b2684.

M. Yang, X. Liu, L. Zhang, W. Chen, and J. Li, “Framework of personalized layout for a museum exhibition hall,” Multimed. Tools Appl., vol. 83, no. 8, pp. 24563–24587, 2024, doI; https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-16307-8.

M. Zaman, A. Jalil, Q. Asghar, and F. Javeed, “Space syntax methodology and architectural design: Case study of Department of Architecture, University of Engineering and Technology Lahore,” J. Res. Architec. Plan., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 25–30, 2021.

T. Varoudis, A. G. Swenson, S. D. Kirkton, and J. S. Waters, “Exploring nest structures of acorn-dwelling ants with X-ray microtomography and surface-based three-dimensional visibility graph analysis,” Philosoph. Transac. Royal Soc. B: Biol. Sci., vol. 373, no. 1753, Aug. 2018, Art. no. 20170237, doi: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0237.