PRISM: A Framework for Preprocessing Impact Analysis in Machine Learning via Signature-based Modeling

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32350.umt-air.61.01

Keywords:

Machine Learning, Data Preprocessing, Behavioral Modeling, Preprocessing Signature Tensor (PST), Preprocessing Impact Vector (PIV)

Abstract

The quality and transformation of input data are crucial for Machine Learning (ML) performance, along with the model architecture. Data Preprocessing (DP) is an important factor in the learning outcome. However, it has been hardly addressed as a formally modeled transformation process. The current study argued for a new analytical framework known as PRISM (Preprocessing Impact Signature Modeling). Preprocessing can be systematically described as behavioral transformation operators that impact the process of model learning over datasets and algorithms. PRISM gives a structured interpretation of behavioral differences not only based on the differences in performance after preprocessing but also on two constructs: Preprocessing Impact Vector (PIV) and Preprocessing Signature Tensor (PST). The PIV provides performance differences in several performance measures, and the PST further extends these differences between sets of models and datasets for comparative and multi-dimensional analysis. It is evaluated on six real-world datasets, including classification and regression problems, with different ML models, such as linear models, tree-based models, ensemble models, and distance-based models. Experimental results show that there is no simple, uniform, and performance-driven preprocessing effect instead, there are structured, model-dependent, and dataset sensitive patterns. Tree-based models are insensitive to preprocessing transformations, while distance-based models are quite sensitive. Moreover, preprocessing is more consistently successful in stabilization of the model than in absolute accuracy gains, especially in the case of noise and data heterogeneity. PRISM offers an interpretable, scale-invariant, and scalable analytical framework for understanding the behavior of preprocessing in ML systems. The proposed approach moves towards a more principled and data-driven approach for preprocessing analysis and designing ML pipelines.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
0

References

[1] R. Barouki et al., “The COVID-19 pandemic and global environmental change: Emerging research needs,” Environ. Int., vol. 146, art. no. 106272, Jan. 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.envint.2020.106272.

[2] Z. Hammoudeh and D. Lowd, “Training data influence analysis and estimation: A survey,” Mach. Learn., vol. 113, pp. 2351–2403, March 2024, https:// doi.org/10.1007/s10994-023-06495-7.

[3] P. Koukaras and C. Tjortjis, “Data preprocessing and feature engineering for data mining: Techniques, tools, and best practices,” AI, vol. 6, no. 10, art. no. 257, Oct. 2025, https://doi.org/10.3390/ai6100257.

[4] A. A. A. Fernandes, M. Koehler, N. Konstantinou, P. Pankin, N. W. Paton, and R. Sakellariou, “Data preparation: A technological perspective and review,” SN Comput. Sci., vol. 4, art. no. 425, Jun. 2023, https://doi.org /10.1007/s42979-023-01828-8.

[5] T. Emmanuel, T. Maupong, D. Mpoeleng, T. Semong, B. Mphago, and O. Tabona, “A survey on missing data in machine learning,” J. Big Data, vol. 8, art. no. 140, Oct. 2021, https:// doi.org/10.1186/s40537-021-00516-9.

[6] W. M. Hameed and N. A. Ali, “Missing value imputation techniques: A survey,” UHD J. Sci. Technol., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 72–81, Mar. 2023, https://doi.org/10.21928/uhdjst.v7n1y2023.pp72-81.

[7] A. D. Călin, A. M. Coroiu, and H. B. Mureşan, “Analysis of preprocessing techniques for missing data in the prediction of sunflower yield in response to the effects of climate change,” Appl. Sci., vol. 13, no. 13, art. no. 7415, Jun. 2023, https://doi.org/ 10.3390/app13137415.

[8] V. G. Biju, A.-M. Schmitt, and B. Engelmann, “Assessing the influence of sensor-induced noise on machine-learning-based changeover detection in CNC machines,” Sensors, vol. 24, no. 2, art. no. 330, Jan. 2024, https://doi.org/10.3390/s24020330.

[9] M. Usmani, Z. A. Memon, A. Zulfiqar, and R. Qureshi, “Preptimize: Automation of time series data preprocessing and forecasting,” Algorithms, vol. 17, no. 8, art. no. 332, Aug. 2024, https://doi.org/10.3390/ a17080332.

[10] C. Sancricca, G. Siracusa, and C. Cappiello, “Enhancing data preparation: Insights from a time series case study,” J. Intell. Inf. Syst., vol. 62, pp. 1503–1530, Dec. 2024, https://doi. org/10.1007/s10844-024-00867-8.

[11] K. Berahmand, F. Daneshfar, E. S. Salehi, Y. Li, and Y. Xu, “Autoencoders and their applications in machine learning: A survey,” Artif. Intell. Rev., vol. 57, no. 2, art. no. 28, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-023-10662-6.

[12] I. D. Lopez-Miguel, “Survey on preprocessing techniques for big data projects,” in Proc. 4th XoveTIC Conf., A Coruña, Spain, 2021, vol. 7, no. 1, art. no. 14, https://doi.org/ 10.3390/engproc2021007014.

[13] P. Kamencay, P. Hockicko, and R. Hudec, “Sensors data processing using machine learning,” Sensors, vol. 24, no. 5, art. no. 1694, Mar. 2024, https://doi.org/10.3390/s24051694.

[14] S. Dai and F. Meng, “Addressing modern and practical challenges in machine learning: A survey of online federated and transfer learning,” Appl. Intell., vol. 53, pp. 11045–11072, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-022-04065-3.

[15] H.-J. Park, Y.-S. Koo, H.-Y. Yang, Y.-S. Han, and C.-S. Nam, “Study on data preprocessing for machine learning based on semiconductor manufacturing processes,” Sensors, vol. 24, no. 17, art. no. 5461, Aug. 2024, https://doi.org/10.3390/s 24175461.

[16] J. N. M. Dahj and K. A. Ogudo, “Machine learning-based imputation approach with dynamic feature extraction for wireless RAN performance data preprocessing,” Symmetry, vol. 15, no. 6, art. no. 1161, May 2023, https://doi.org/10.3390 /sym15061161.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-08

How to Cite

SHABBIR, A. B., & Amber, K. (2026). PRISM: A Framework for Preprocessing Impact Analysis in Machine Learning via Signature-based Modeling. UMT Artificial Intelligence Review, 6(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.32350.umt-air.61.01

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.