Securitization of US-CHINA Relations: A Catalyst for Confrontation
Abstract
Abstract Views: 0
Securitization theory, an emerging perspective in the contemporary international system where states view their relations with other states through this theoretical framework. This theory explains how one state shape a non-security issue into a security issue. The United States for the past few years has been portraying China as an existential threat to its vital national interest and the interests of the global community at large. This threat perception and cold war mentality have been portrayed at all levels and in every discourse, with some intellectuals trying to link this to the ‘Thucydides Trap’. The study uses qualitative research methodology, relying on secondary data from different articles, book journals, interview transcripts, and other important sources. Discourse analysis has been used to analyze secondary data. The purpose of this paper is to understand and comprehend how this relationship has been securitized, evolving from engagement to confrontation. The study also seeks to determine whether such construction of China’s image is empirically justifiable or is merely based on rhetoric and propaganda to contain its rise. Furthermore, it explores how the potential of securitization can increase the intensity of already deteriorating relations between the US and China toward confrontation. To sum up, the importance of securitization and its impact on the dynamics between the two nations has been thoroughly discussed.
Downloads
References
Allison, G. (2017). China vs. America: Managing the next clash of civilizations. Foreign Affairs, 96(5), 80–89.
Allison, G. (2018). For war: Can America and China Escape Thucydides’s trap? Mariner Books.
Atlantic Council. (2021). Putting it all together: The content of an effective US China strategy. In The longer telegram: Toward a new American China Strategy (pp. 68–77). Atlantic Council. http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep30712.6
Baldwin, D. A. (1997). The concept of security. Review of International Studies, 23(1), 5–26.
Balzacq, T. (2019). Securitization theory: Past, present, and future. Polity, 51(2), 331–348. https://doi.org/10.1086/701884
Balzacq, T. (Ed.). (2011). Securitization theory: How security problems emerge and dissolve. Routledge.
Buzan, B. (1983). People, states and fear: National security problem in international relations. Transasia Publishers.
Chang, J. H.-Y. (2000). China-US relations: The past as looking glass. American Studies International, 38(2), 62–79. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41279770
DeLisle, J., & Goldstein, A. (Eds.). (2021). After engagement: Dilemmas in US-China security relations. Brookings Institution Press.
Floyd, R. (2011). Can securitization theory be used in normative analysis? Towards a just securitization theory. Security Dialogue, 42(4-5), 427–439. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010611418712
Floyd, R., & Croft, S. (2011). European non-traditional security theory: From theory to practice. Geopolitics, History and International Relations, 3(2), 152–179
Friedberg, A. L. (1993). Ripe for rivalry: Prospects for peace in a multipolar Asia. International Security, 18(3), 5–33.
Goldstein, A. (1997). Great expectations: Interpreting China's arrival. International Security, 22(3), 36–73. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec.22.3.36
Hipp, S. D. (2012). Constructive engagement: Ronald Reagan's problematic policy of appeasement with South Africa. Georgetown University.
Hodgson, G. (2009). The myth of American exceptionalism. Yale University Press.
Holbraad, M., & Pedersen, M. A. (2012). Revolutionary securitization: An anthropological extension of securitization theory. International Theory, 4(2), 165–197. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971912000061
Kang, D. C. (2022). Still getting Asia wrong: No “Contain China” coalition exists. The Washington Quarterly, 45(4), 79–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2022.2148918
Li, C. (2021). Middle class Shanghai: Reshaping US-China engagement. Brookings Institution Press.
Lieberthal, K., & Jisi, W. (2012). Addressing US-China strategic distrust (Vol. 4). Brookings.
McCusker, E. (2022). Defense budget transparency and the cost of military capability. American Enterprise Institute.
Mearsheimer, J. J. (2018). The great delusion: Liberal dreams and international realities. Yale University Press.
Mahbubani, K. (2020). Has China won?: the Chinese challenge to American primacy. Hachette UK.
Medeiros, E. S. (2019). The changing fundamentals of US-China relations. The Washington Quarterly, 42(3), 93–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2019.1666355
Nyman, J. (2023). Securitization. In P. D Williams & M. McDonald (Eds.), Security studies (4th ed., pp. 115–130). Routledge.
Overholt, W. H. (1994). The rise of China's economy. Business Economics, 29(2), 29–34.
Pal, D. (2021, October 13). China’s influence in South Asia: Vulnerabilities and resilience in four countries. Policy Commons. https://policycommons.net/artifacts/1850258/chinas-influence-in-south-asia/2596973/
Panda, D. (1997). The United States and China: Towards a rapprochement. Indian Journal of Asian Affairs, 10(2), 43–68.
Rasheed, Z. (2020, November 25). What is The Quad and can it counter China’s rise. Al Jazeera. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/11/25/what-is-the-quad-can-us-india-japan-and-australia-deter-china
Resnick, E. (2001). Defining engagement. Journal of International Affairs, 54(2), 551–566.
Rudd, K. (2022). The avoidable war: The dangers of a catastrophic Conflict between the US and Xi Jinping’s China. Public Affairs.
Samuel, P. (1996). Huntington, The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. Simon & Schuster.
Sempa, F. P. (2022). Nixon and China:50 years later. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2022/02/nixon-and-china-50-years-later/
Shah, A. R. (2023). Revisiting China threat: The US’securitization of the ‘Belt and Road Initiative’. Chinese Political Science Review, 8, 84–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-021-00179-0
Song, W. (2015). Securitization of the" China Threat" discourse: A poststructuralist account. China Review, 15(1), 145–169.
Swaine, M. D. (2021, April 21). China doesn’t pose an existential threat to America. Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/04/21/china-existential-threat-america/
Taureck, R. (2006). Securitization theory and securitization studies. Journal of International Relations and Development, 9, 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jird.1800072
Thurston, A. (2021). Engaging China: Fifty years of Sino-American relations. Columbia University Press.
Tucker, N. B. (1998). A precarious balance: Clinton and China. Current History, 97(620), 243–249.
Turcsányi, R., & Qiaoan, R. (2020). Friends or foes? How diverging views of communist past undermine the China-CEE ‘16+ 1 platform’. Asia Europe Journal, 18(3), 397–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-019-00550-6
US-China Economic, and Security Review Commission. (2019). 2019 Report to congress of the U.S.-China economic and security review commission executive summary and recommendations. https://bookstore.gpo.gov/products/2019-report-congress-us-china-economic-and-security-review-commission-executive-summary-and
Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics. International Organization, 46(2), 391–425. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027764
Williams, M. C. (2010). The continuing evolution of securitization theory. In T. Balzacq (Ed.), Securitization theory: How security problems emerge and dissolve (pp. 226–236). Routledge.
Wong, E., & Myers, S. L. (2020, December 8). Officials push US-China relations toward point of no return. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/25/world/asia/us-china-trump-xi.html
Copyright (c) 2023 Fahad Ahmad
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
