Low Preference Towards the Use of Public Transport: A Case Study of Females of Lahore

  • Zarafshan Ali University of Management and Technology
  • Muhammad Bilawal Azam University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan
Keywords: public transport,, private vehicles,, harassment and safety,, transport preference,, overcrowding

Abstract

Abstract Views: 0

This study delves into the underlying reasons why women in Lahore prefer private vehicles over public transport, despite the latter being available. Comfort stands out as a major factor; private vehicles provide a level of comfort and security that public transport doesn't seem to. These factors collectively contribute to females’ reluctance to use public transportation. The research identifies a few other interlinked issues that reinforce this trend. First, the inadequacy of public transport infrastructure suggests compelling hurdles for women. Second, concerns about harassment and safety instigate women's choice to avoid public transportation. Last, the shortage of public vehicles, which leads to overcrowding and unreliable service, further deters female passengers from using public transport. The quantitative methodology is used to understand the gravity of this issue through surveys. The sample for this study is 384 females from Lahore. For analysis, the research uses descriptive statistics, along with more advanced techniques such as regression analysis, hypothesis testing, and ANOVA, to explore the relationship between dependent and independent variables and to validate the study's hypotheses. The analysis was conducted using SPSS software. The study concludes by proposing approaches to address the challenges identified, suggesting potential solutions to improve public transport services for females in Lahore.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Advance Public Transport. (2024). Global economic outlook 2024 taking the pulse of the public transport sector. https://www.uitp.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2025/08/20241008_Economic-Outlook-2024_WEB.pdf

Aguero, J. R., Takayesu, E., Novosel, D., & Masiello, R. (2017). Modernizing the grid: Challenges and opportunities for a sustainable future. IEEE Power and Energy Magazine, 15(3), 74–83.

Ali, S. M. A., & Naz, N. (2016). Experiencing street harassment and fear of victimization. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 55(1), 41–51.

Anwar, A. M. (2009). Paradox between public transport and private car as a modal choice in policy formulation. Journal of Bangladesh Institute of Planners, 2(2), 71–77.

Asian Development Bank. (2015). Policy brief: A safe public transportation environment for women and girls. https://www.adb.org/publications/policy-brief-safe-public-transportation-environment-women-and-girls

Berg, J., & Ihlström, J. (2019). The importance of public transport for mobility and everyday activities among rural residents. Social Sciences, 8(2), Article e58. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8020058

Ceccato, V., & Newton, A. (2015). Safety and security in transit environments: An interdisciplinary approach. Springer.

Cox, S. (2010). Losing our cool: Uncomfortable truths about our air-conditioned world (and finding new ways to get through the summer). The New Press.

Cox, T., Houdmont, J., & Griffiths, A. (2006). Rail passenger crowding, stress, health and safety in Britain. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 40(3), 244–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2005.07.001

Davis, K., & Shaw, K. (2021). Women Driven Mobility: Rethinking the Way the World Moves. SAE International.

Downs, A. (2005). Still stuck in traffic: Coping with peak-hour traffic congestion. Rowman & Littlefield.

Ebrahim, Z., Lorinc, J., Reid, D., & Woo, L. (Eds.). (2025). Messy cities: Why we can't plan everything. Coach House Books.

Field, M. J., & Jette, A. M. (2007). Transportation patterns and problems of people with disabilities. In M. J. Field & A. M. Jette (Eds.), The future of disability in America (pp. 519–560). National Academies Press (US).

Fowler, F. J. (2013). Survey research methods (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Gutfreund, O. D. (2004). Twentieth-century sprawl: Highways and the reshaping of the American landscape. Oxford University Press.

Heraa, N. A. S. I. M. (2013). Transportation system of Karachi, Pakistan [Master’s thesis, Ritsumeikan Asia Pacific University]. https://www.scribd.com/document/477367352/51211610

James, B. V., & Shete, S. (2023). A comparative study of the operation and administration of freight trains in Indian railways and Canadian railways. Madhya Pradesh Journal of Social Sciences, 28(2), 1–8.

Jing, Q. L., Liu, H. Z., Yu, W. Q., & He, X. (2022). The impact of public transportation on carbon emissions—from the perspective of energy consumption. Sustainability, 14(10), Article e6248. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106248

Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607–610.

Lombardi, D. B., & Ciceri, M. R. (2021). Dealing with feeling crowded on public transport: The potential role of design. Environment and Behavior, 53(4), 339–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916519879773

Loukaitou-Sideris, A. (2014). Fear and safety in transit environments from the women’s perspective. Security Journal, 27(2), 242–256. https://doi.org/10.1057/sj.2014.9

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Miller, P., de Barros, A. G., Kattan, L., & Wirasinghe, S. C. (2016). Public transportation and sustainability: A review. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 20(3), 1076–1083. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-0705-0

Power, A. (2012). Social inequality, disadvantaged neighbourhoods and transport deprivation: an assessment of the historical influence of housing policies. Journal of Transport Geography, 21, 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.01.016

Sahu, P. K., Sharma, G., & Guharoy, A. (2018). Commuter travel cost estimation at different levels of crowding in a suburban rail system: a case study of Mumbai. Public Transport, 10(3), 379–398.

Siang, G. W., Sulong, A., & Yusof, R. N. A. R. (2025). Urban mobility, tourism, and liveability in penang: anticipated benefits of the proposed Light Rail Transit (LRT) System. Journal of Humanistic, Management and Social Science Review, 2(1), 1–7.

Simkus, J. (2023, July 31). Pilot study in research: Definition & examples. Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/pilot-studies.html

Tabassum, S., Tanaka, S., Nakamura, F., & Ryo, A. (2017). Feeder network design for mass transit system in developing countries (case study of Lahore, Pakistan). Transportation Research Procedia, 25, 3129–3146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.343

Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd

Vanier, C., & d’Arbois de Jubainville, H. (2017). Feeling unsafe in public transportation: A profile analysis of female users in the Parisian region. Crime Prevention and Community Safety, 19(3), 251–263.

Wang, J., Liu, C., Wu, Z., Liao, R., Li, G., & Lu, H. (2025). The roadmap and strategy for prioritizing the development of public transport in China. Multimodal Transportation, 4(1), Article e100184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.multra.2024.100184

Zhang, L., Yuan, J., Gao, X., & Jiang, D. (2021). Public transportation development decision-making under public participation: A large-scale group decision-making method based on fuzzy preference relations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 172, Article e121020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121020

Published
2025-12-10
How to Cite
Ali, Z., & Azam, M. B. (2025). Low Preference Towards the Use of Public Transport: A Case Study of Females of Lahore. Governance and Society Review, 4(2), 107-132. https://doi.org/10.32350/gsr.42.05
Section
Articles