The Inevitable Contingency of Ethics on Theistic Foundations

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Muhammad Rasheed Arshad

Abstract

In this article, the author examines the dependence of ethics on theistic foundations. The Western conception is that ethics is a result of a natural evolutionary process. The Modern West has never accepted or believed in any ethical system governed by religion, and modernity has tried to establish that the universal moral principles are independent of any metaphysical context. The modernity project and rising secularization have taken charge of the field, and religious significance has gone absent from the mainstream, on account of which many challenges have occurred in moral and ethical matters. We will also examine whether Modern Western Civilization has established an ethical code independent of religion and whether we should follow the Western Model, if any. Moreover, this article examines how ethics is a cause and consequence of the development of personality, and no ethical system is ever there without any religious foundations. Human beings are built on the essence of servitude, and virtues evolve from the foundation of servitude. Another area the article focuses on is the challenges faced by the Muslims and how Modern Western Civilization made morality appears as a result of social and psychological evolution. We also study the possibility and impossibility of Good without an omniscient and omnipotent authority. The absoluteness of moral principles and values and the necessity of consciousness are also discussed in this article.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Arshad, Muhammad Rasheed. 2021. “The Inevitable Contingency of Ethics on Theistic Foundations”. Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization 11 (1). https://journals.umt.edu.pk/index.php/JITC/article/view/1019.

References

Bird, Alexander., and Emma Tobin. “Natural Kinds.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta, Spring 2018. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, 2018. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/natural-kinds/
Bommarito, Nicolas. “Modesty and Humility.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta, Winter 2018. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, 2018. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries /modesty-humility/
Corcoran, Kevin. Rethinking Human Nature: A Christian Materialist Alternative to the Soul. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Academic, 2006.
Darwall, Stephen., and Andrew Downey Orrick, Stephen Darwall. Philosophical Ethics: An Historical and Contemporary Introduction. Avalon Publishing, 1998.
Dutt, Amitava Krishna., and Charles K. Wilber. “Social Interactions and Ethical Values.” In Economics and Ethics, by Amitava Krishna Dutt and Charles K. Wilber, 79-94. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230277236_5
Jansen, Johannes J. G. The Dual Nature of Islamic Fundamentalism. Hurst, 1997.
Kitcher, Patricia. “What Is a Maxim?” Philosophical Topics 31, no. 1/2 (2003): 215-43.
McKay, Ryan., and Harvey Whitehouse. “Religion and Morality.” Psychological Bulletin 141, no. 2 (March 2015): 447-73. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038455
Nasr, Seyyed Hossein. Islam in the Modern World: Challenged by the West, Threatened by Fundamentalism, Keeping Faith with Tradition. HarperOne, 2011.
Nielsen, Kai. “Some Remarks on the Independence of Morality from Religion.” Mind 70, no. 278 (1961): 175-86.
Swinburne, Richard. “What Difference Does God Make to Morality?” In Is Goodness without God Good Enough? 151-63. Rowman and Littlefield, 2008.
Taylor, Richard. Ethics, Faith, and Reason. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1985.
Walsh, Dorothy. “Ethics and Metaphysics.” International Journal of Ethics 46, no. 4 (1936): 461-72.
Zuckerman, Phil. Society without God: What the Least Religious Nations Can Tell Us About Contentment. New York: NYU Press, 2008.