Wilfred Cantwell Smith’s Concept of Religion: An Islamic Appraisal

Keywords: smith’s concept of religion, unity and diversity, faith and cumulative tradition, religious pluralism, world theology

Abstract

Abstract Views: 425

In the vein of many Western scholars of comparative religions, Wilfred Smith also realizes the difficulty implicated in defining religion but he is unique in daring to call for discarding religion, arguing that the concept is inadequate. According to him, the inadequacy of the concept leads to the intellectual dilemma of the relation between many religious traditions and the One Ultimate Reality, the historical change and abiding truth, the world and God. The solution to such a dilemma is to revise the categories of intellectual discourse in the field of theology/religious studies and move towards a better alternative. These alternatives should aim to depict human religious life in a more adequate and universal way. Hence, Smith suggests splitting the esoteric and exoteric dimensions of religion and proposes for them the categories of faith and cumulative tradition respectively. Primarily, this research seeks to explore the significance of Smith’s critique of religion as well as the practicality and utility of the alternative categories i.e., faith and cumulative tradition in the modern global scenario from an Islamic perspective.

Keywords: Smith’s concept of religion, Unity and diversity, Faith and cumulative tradition, Religious pluralism, World theology

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Asad, Talal. “Reading a Modern Classic: W. C Smith’s The Meaning and End of Religion.” History of Religions, Vol. 40, no. 3 (Feb., 2001): 205-222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/463633

Aslan, Adnan. Religious Pluralism in Christian and Islamic Philosophy. Surrey: Curzon Press, 1998.

Al-Attas, Syed Muhammad Naquib. Prolegomena to the Metaphysics of Islam. Lahore: Sohail Academy, 2001.

—. Islam and Secularism. Lahore: Sohail Academy, 1998.

Bryant, M. Darrol. ed. Huston Smith: Essays on World Religion. New York: Paragon House, 1995.

Al-Bukhari, Muhammad bin Ismail. Sahih al Bukhari. Beirut: Dar al Arabia, 1985.

Cracknel, Kenneth. ed. Wilfred Cantwell Smith: A Reader. Oxford: Oneworld Publications, 2000.

Fitzgerald, Timothy. The Ideology of Religious Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.

Harrison, Victoria S. “The Pragmatics of Defining Religion in a Multi-Cultural World.”

International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, Vol. 59, No.3 (June 2006): 133-152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-006-6961-z

Heim, Mark S. Salvation: Truth and Difference in Religion. New York: Orbis Books, 1995.

Jenkins, Daniel. Religion and Coming of Age in the Honest to God Debate. London: S.C.M., I963.

Knitter, Paul.F. (ed.) The Myth of Religious Superiority A Multifaith Exploration. New York: Orbis Books Maryknoll, 2005.

Küng, Hans., Joseph Van Ess, Heinrich Van Stietencron, Heinz Bechert. Christianity and World Religions: Paths to Dialogue. New York: Orbis Books Maryknoll, 1993.

Moore, G. E. Principia Ethica. 20thed, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.

Muhammad, M. M. Deen. “Faith and Religion: Reflections on Some Ideas of Wilfred Cantwell Smith.” Hawleyyat al Jami‘a al-Islamiyyah al-Alamiyyah, 2000.

Nasr, Seyyed Hossein. ‘Response to Hans Kung’s Paper on Christian Muslim Dialogue.’ Muslim World 77 (April 1987): 96-105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-1913.1987.tb02791.x

Nasr, Seyyed Hossein. The Essential Writings of Frithjof Schuon. Lahore: Sohail Academy, 2001.

Otto, Rudolph. The Idea of the Holy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1923.

Pyle, E.H. “In Defense of Religion.” Religious Studies 3, no.1 (1967): 347-353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412500002948

Rao, K. L. Seshagiri. “Review untitled, Philosophy East and West.” 18, no. ½ (Jan. - Apr., 1968): 85-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1398040

Sharpe, Erick J. Comparative Religion: A History. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1975.

Smart, Ninian. Reflections in the Mirror of Religion. London: Macmillan Press, 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25625-9

Smith, Brain K. “Exorcising the Transcendence: Strategies for Defining Hinduism and Religion.” History of Religions 27, no.1 (Aug1987): 32-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/463098

Smith, Jonathan Z. Imagining Religion: From Babylon to Jonestown. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1982.

—. “Religion, Religions, Religious.” In Critical Terms for Religious Studies. Edited by Mark C. Taylor, Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2000.

Smith, Wilfred Cantwell. Comparative Religion: Whither--and Why? Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1959.

—. The Meaning and End of Religion: A New Approach to the Religious Traditions of Mankind. New York: Macmillan, 1963.

—. Modernization of a Traditional Society. Bombay: Asia Publishing House, 1965.

—. Questions of Religious Truth. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1967.

—. The Comparative Study of Religion. New York: Macmillan, 1972.

—. Belief and History. Charlottesville: The University Press of Virginia, 1977.

—. Faith and Belief. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979.

—. On Understanding Islam: Selected Studies. The Hague: Mouton, 1981.

—. Towards a World Theology: Faith and the Comparative History of Religion. Philadelphia: The Westminster Press, 1981.

—. What is Scripture? A Comparative Approach. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1993.

—. Patterns of Faith around the World. Oxford: One World Publications, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0262-1762(98)90904-X

—. “The Study of Religion and the Study of the Bible.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion, Vol. 39, no 2 (Jun., 1971): 131-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/XXXIX.2.131

—. “Belief: A Reply to a Response.” Numen, Vol. 27, Fasc. 2 (Dec., 1980): 247-255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156852780X00044

—. “Traditions in Contact and Change.” Proceedings of Congress of the International Association for the History of Religions, 1983.

Umar, Muhammad Suheyl. (ed.) The Religious Other: Towards A Muslim Theology of Religions in a Post-Prophetic Age. Lahore: Iqbal Academy, 2008.

Waardenburg, Jacques. Classical Approaches to the Study of Religion. Paris: Mouton and Co., 1973.

Wiggins, James B. In Praise of Religious Diversity. London and New York: Routledge, 1996.

Young, Robert D. Encounter with World Religions. Philadelphia: The Westminster Press, 1970.

Published
2021-05-05
How to Cite
Qurrat ul Ain, Ayesha. 2021. “Wilfred Cantwell Smith’s Concept of Religion: An Islamic Appraisal”. Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization 11 (1), 258-79. https://doi.org/10.32350/jitc.111.14.
Section
Articles