Delusive Versus Genuine Human Needs: An Islamic Response to Global Resource Scarcity
Abstract
Abstract Views: 110This study looks at the issue of human needs from an Islamic perspective. Many political theorists and philosophers have tried to deal with the issue of human needs but many aspects of this issue still remain unresolved. This paper aims at looking at the issue from an Islamic perspective. In doing so, it examines the issue of human needs comparatively from western and Islamic perspectives. Then the study discusses the nature of human beings and their needs as well as the purpose behind their pursuance. The key objective of the study is to contribute in regulating the pursuance of needs. It argues that all human needs are not necessarily genuine, rather a significant number of them are delusive. To distinguish genuine needs from delusive ones, the study suggests the purpose behind the pursuance of needs as the key criterion. In doing so, the paper comes up with a model labeled Orbit of Needs. This model comprises four circles or orbits. The most central circle is of necessity, followed by comfort, beautification and exhibition. According to the model, all those needs that fall into one of the first three circles in terms of purpose are genuine, while any need which falls into the fourth circle is delusive.
Downloads
References
Distribution Efficiency of Asnaf Assistance Business Programme.” Jurnal Pengurusan, no. 40 (2014): 41–52.
Auda, Jasser. Maqāsid Al-Shari‘ah: A Beginner’s Guide. Washington DC: International Institute of Islamic Thought, 2008.
Benatar, David. Better Never to Have Been: The Harm of Coming into Existence. South Africa: Oxford University Press, 2016.
Bisogno, Paolo, and Augusto Forti, (Editors). Scientific Research and Human Needs. Rome: Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricercrue, 1981.
Nelson, Debra L., James Cambell Quick. Organizational Behavior: Science, The Real World and You. OH: South-Western Cengage Learning, 2013.
Clayton, Alderfer. The Practice of Organizational Diagnosis: Theory and Methods. UK: Oxford University Press, 2010.
Fitzgerald, Ross. (Editor). Human Needs and Politics. NSW: Pergamon Press, 2011.
Fromm, Erich. The Psychology of Normalcy. Nigeria: Lantern Books, 2010.
Maslow, Abraham. Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper and Row Publishers, 1970.
H. H, Hamsan. K.H, Anwar. I, Khaidzir. “Measurement of Self-esteem: Comparison between the Constructs of West and Islam.” International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, no. 13 (2011): 196-201.
Murray, Henry. Explorations in Personality. New York: Oxford University Press. 2008.
Yang, K. S., “Beyond Maslow’s Culture-bound Linear Theory: A Preliminary Statement of the Double-Y Model of Basic Human Needs.” Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, no. 49 (2003): 175–255.
Khalili Tirtashi, Nasrullah. “Criterion for Distinguishing Genuine Needs from Delusive Needs from Islamic Perspective.” Marifat, no. 75 (2004). 102-120.
Lamido, Abdullahi Abubakar. “Maqāsid al-Shari‘ah as a Framework for Economic Development Theorization.” International Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance Studies, no. 2 (2016): 27-49.
England, Christopher. M. Outsourcing the American Dream: Pain and Pleasure in the Era of Downsizing. New York: Writers Club Press, 2001.
Noonan, Jeff. Democratic Society and Human Needs. Canada: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2006.
Shafie Kadkani, Muhammad Reza. Guzidih Ghazaliat e Shams. Tehran: Amir Kabir, 1982: 578.
Usmani, Shafi. Islam and Music. Karachi: Maktabah Dar-ul-Uloum, 2004.
Uthmani, Muhammad Taqi. Islam aur Hamari Zindagi. Lahore: Idarah Islamiyat, 2010: 109-110.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.