Civilizational Problem or Political Crisis? Comparative Analysis of Mālek Bennabi and Syed Mawdūdī’s Approach to Renaissance
Abstract
Abstract Views: 249
After having reached the stage where Islamic civilization delivered optimum, it started declining. Nevertheless, in different epochs of Islamic history, some remarkable personalities emerged reclaiming the functionality of iḥyā; i.e., the renaissance principle. In the contemporary times, Mālek Bennabī and Syed Mawdūdī have phenomenally contributed to the Muslim renaissance discourse. Both of them have critically examined the pathology of jumūd; i.e., the tendency of stagnation in the Muslim world. Although, they identified similar causes and symptoms, nevertheless, having lived in different socio-political contexts, they came up with certain methodological differences in their approach. Both the scholars developed a systematic response suggesting a way forward--the method of renaissance. In Bennabī’s discourse, the pathology is fundamentally civilizational, i.e., crisis in the civilizational equation between man, soil and time. While in Mawdūdī’s discourse, the pathology is fundamentally political; i.e., crisis in the nature of political relation between state, society and religion. Against this backdrop, the paper aims to present following points. First, the paper presents a brief analysis of Bennabī’s civilizational approach and Mawdūdī’s political approach in order to understand their scheme of thought while engaging with the question of jumūd and iḥyā. Second, the paper juxtaposes the three key concepts namely civilization, religion, and revival used by both Bennabī and Mawdūdī in their theoretical elaborations to outline the differences and similarities in their method of analysis.
Keywords: Islam, Decline, Renaissance, Civilizational Approach, Political Approach
Downloads
References
Ahmad, Zaid., and Badrane Benlahcene. “A 20th Century Civilization Discourse: Some Notes on Malek Bennabi.” Umaran Journal of Muslim Affairs 1, no.1 (2015):1-16.
Al-Ahmar. Fulla. Sayyid Qutb and Malik Bennabi’s Thought: Comparison and Contrast. 2006. Retrieved April 8, 2020, www.hoggar.org
Barium, Fawzia. “Malik Bennabi and Intellectual Problems of the Muslim Ummah.” American Journal of Islam and Society 9, no.3 (1992): 325-337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35632/ajis.v9i3.2571
—. “Social Change as seen by Malek Bennabi.” American Journal of Islam and Society 8, no. 1 (1991):189-164.
—. “Malik Bennabi's Life and Theory of Civilization.” PhD Dissertation: University of Michigan, 1988.
Benlahcene, Badrane. “Malek Bennabi’s Concept and Interdisciplinary Approach to Civilisation.” International Journal of Arab Culture, Management and Sustainable Development 2, no. 1 (2011): 55-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJACMSD.2011.044896
—. “The Khaldunian Influence on Modern Studies in Civilization: Bennabi’s Approach to Civilization as an Example.” El-Hiwar El-Fikrie (Dialogue Intellectual), 9 (2007): 45-58.
—. The Socio-Intellectual Foundations of Malek Bennabi’s Approach to Civilization. London: IIIT, 2013.
Bennabī, Mālek. “The Conditions of the Renaissance.” Translated by Asma Rashid, Islamic Studies 36, no.4 (1997): 643-655.
—. On the Origins of Human History. Translated by Mohamed T. al-Mesawi. Kuala Lampur: The Open Press, 1998.
—. Ta’ammulāt (Contemplations). Damascus: Dār al-Fikr, 1986.
—. The Problem of Ideas in the Muslim World. Translated by Mohamed T. al-Mesawi. Petaling Jaya: Budaya Ilmu Sdn. Bhd., 1984.
—. Wijhat al-‘Alami al-Islami. Translated by A. Shahin. Damascus: Dar al-Fikr, 1959.
Bosworth, C.E. et al., Encyclopaedia of Islam (Edited). Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1991.
Jackson, Roy. Mawlana Mawdūdī and Political Islam: Authority and the Islamic State. New York: Routledge, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203848722
Jameelah, Maryam. “An Appraisal of Some Aspects of Mawlana Sayid Abu ‘Alā Mawdūdī's Life and Thought.” Islamic Quarterly 31, no.2 (1987).
Mawdūdī, S. A. A. A Short History of the Revivalist Movement in Islam. Translated by Al-Ash'ari [Tajdīd Wa Iḥya-o-Dīn]. New Delhi: Markazī Maktaba Islāmī Publishers, 2009.
—. Islāmī Riyāsat: Falsafah, Niẓam-i Kār or Usūl-i Qawānīn. [Islamic State, Philosophy, Working System and Principles and Laws]. Edited by Khurshid Ahmad. Pakistan: Islamic Publications Private Ltd, 1967)
—. Islāmī Tahdhīb Aur Uskey Usūl-o-Mubādī [Islamic Civilization: Its Principles and Foundations. Lahore: Islamic Publications Pvt. Ltd., 1996.
—. Islamic Law and Constitution. Lahore: Islamic Publications Pvt.Ltd., 2010.
—. Khuṭbāt (The Lectures). New Delhi: Markazī Maktaba Islāmī Publishers, 2005.
—. Musalmān aur Mawjūdah Siyāsī Kashmakash. [Muslims and Present Politica Conflicts] Vol. 3, New Delhi: Markazī Maktaba Islāmī Publishers, 1940.
—. Sīrat-i Sarvar-i ‘Ālam. Edited by Na’im Siddiqui and Abdul Walik Alvi. Lahore: Idara Tarjumanul Qur’an, 1978.
—. Tāḥrīk-e- Āzādi-e-Hind aur Musalmān. [Freedom of India and Muslims].Vol. 2, Lahore: Islamic Publications, 1996.
—. Taḥrīk-i Islāmī kī Ikhlāqī Bunyādian. [Ethical Foundations of the Islamic Movements]. New Delhi: Markazī Maktaba Islāmī Publishers, 2005.
—. The Four Basic Qur’ānic Terms [Qur’ān Kī Chār Bunyādī Iṣtilāhian]. Translated by Abu S’ad. Lahore: Islamic Publications Pvt. Ltd. 2009.
—. The Islamic Way of Life. Translated by Khurshid Ahmad and Khurram Murad. New Delhi: Markazī Maktaba Islāmī Publisher, 2009.
—. Towards Understanding Qur’ān (Tafhim al-Qur’ān). Vol. 1, Translated by Zafar Ishaq Ansari. Leicester: Islamic Foundation, 2010.
—. Nations Rise and Fall, Why? 2009. http://www.al-islamforall.org/Prpmohd/PRPMOHD.ASP.
Mehmood, Wajid., and Waqar Ahmad. “Mawlana Mawdūdī, Islam and Ideology.” in Al-Azhᾱr, 4, no. 1 (2018): 20-36.
Nasr, Seyyed Vali Reza. Mawdūdī and the Making of Islamic Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
Smith, Wilfred Cantwell. Islam in Modern History. New York: The New American Library, 1957.
Yusuf, Muhammad. Maududi: A Formative Phase. New Delhi: Markazī Maktaba Islāmī Publishers, 1979.
Zaman, Arshad. “Syed Abul ‘Ala Mawdūdī on Islamic Economics: A Review Article.” Islamic Studies 50, No. 3/4 (2011): 312-314.
Copyright (c) 2022 Bilal Ahmad Malik
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
.png){kind=icon}
