Where Technology Meets Islam: Towards an Islamic Perspective on Technology
Abstract
Abstract Views: 347
Technology is a pervasive phenomenon in our surroundings. Today, we rarely experience the natural world and our relationship with the world is most often technologically mediated. The long-standing view in the Islamic world toward technology seems to be taking it as an innocent tool which carries only instrumental value. If so, there would not arise any moral question concerning technology per se. Rather, everything would concern with the way it is used by individuals. This instrumentalist approach, however, is notoriously premature. Technology inherently is value-laden and accordingly calls for philosophical as well as moral evaluation. In this article, we will suggest a context for assessing technology from an Islamic point of view. To that purpose, we will unpack Heidegger’s account of technology to bring into relief an enduring problem associated with modern technology, the problem of Gestell. Our source of inspiration to accommodate Heidegger’s concern is the work of Tabātabā’i, the contemporary Muslim thinker, on theory of iʿtibārīat and also his contribution to the virtue ethics. In the end we will find that, according to Tabātabā’i, the problem of technology is rooted in deviation from the golden mean, in the wake of secularization of the world in the modern era.
Keywords: Heidegger, Islamic Technology, Iʿtibārīat, Tabātabā'i, Technology, Virtue Ethics
Downloads
References
Achterhuis, Hans. American Philosophy of Technology: The Empirical Turn. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2001.
Arzroomchilar, Ehsan. “Techno-Radicalism; an Account of Islamic Radicalism in the Technology Era”. International Journal of Cyber Warfare and Terrorism (IJCWT). 12, (1) (2022), DOI: 10.4018/IJCWT.297858 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCWT.297858
Borgmann, Albert. Technology and the Character of Contemporary Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984.
Ellul, Jacques. The Technological Society. New York: Vintage Books, 1964.
Heidegger, Martin. “The Question Concerning Technology.” In The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays, trans. W. Lovitt, 3-36. New York: Harper & Row, 1977.
Ihde, Don. Technology and the lifeworld: From Garden to Earth. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1990.
___. Expanding Hermeneutics: Visualism in Science. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1998.
___. “Forty Years in the Wilderness.” In Postphenomenology: A Critical Companion to Ihde. edited by E. Selinger, 267–290. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2006.
___. Postphenomenology and Technoscience: The Peking University lectures. New York: SUNY Press, 2009.
___. Husserl’s Missing Technologies. New York: Fordham University Press, 2016.
Klenk, Michael. “How do Technological Artefacts Embody Moral Values?” Philosophy and Technology 34, (2021): 524-544. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s13347- 020- 00401-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-020-00401-y
Medoff, Louis. Ijtihād and Renewal in Qurʾānic Hermeneutics: An Analysis of Muḥammad Ḥusayn Ṭabāṭabā’ī’s al-Mīzān fī tafsīr al-Qurʾān. Berkeley: University of California, 2007.
Olamaiekopaie, M., E. Arzroomchilar. “Tabātabā’i: Theory of Iʿtibāriyyāt and His Political Philosophy.” Acta Fakulty filozofické Západočeské univerzity v Plzni / West Bohemian Review of Social Sciences and Humanities 14 (1), (2022): 21-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24132/actaff.2022.14.1.2
Rosenberger, Robert., Peter-Paul Verbeek. “A Field Guide to Postphenomenology.” Postphenomenological Investigations: Essays on Human-Technology Relations, edited by Robert Rosenberger, Peter-Paul Verbeek, 9–41. London: Lexington Books, 2015.
Searle, John. Intentionality. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
___. Mind, Language and Society. New York: Basic Books, 1999.
Tabātabā'i, Muhammad Husayn. Al-Mizān, trans. Mohammad Baqir Moosavi. Qom: Jamee Modaresine Hozaye Elmiye, 1374 SH.
___. Risālat al-Walāya, Beirut: Dar-al-taaref al-matbou’t, 1407 AH.
___. al-Rasāʾil al-tawḥidiyya, Qom: Muʾassasat al-nashr al-islami, 1373 SH.
___. Majmūʿih-yi rasāʾil, ed. Sheikh Sabah al-Rabi’i, Qom: Baqiat, 1428 AH.
___. Usul-i Falsafa va Ravish-i Ri’alizm. Tehran: Sadra, 1391 SH.
___. Shīʿīte Islam. State university of New York Press, 1975.
Tollon, Fabio. “Artifacts and Affordances: from Designed Properties to Possibilities for Action.” AI and Society (2021). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s00146- 021- 01155-7.
Van de Poel, Ibo., and Peter Kroes. “Can Technology Embody Values?” The Moral Status of Technical Artifacts, edited by Peter Kroes, Peter-Paul Verbeek. Netherlands: Springer, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7914-3_7
Verbeek, Peter-Paul. What Things do: Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780271033228
Copyright (c) 2022 Ehsan Arzroomchilar, Maryam Olamaiekopaie
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
.png){kind=icon}
