A Critical Analysis of the Claim that Absolute Juristic Interpretation (Ijtihād) Has Ended
Abstract
Abstract Views: 176
This article critically analyzes the dominant opinion prevailing regarding the foundation of Islamic jurisprudence (uṣūl al-fiqh) which states that absolute independent juristic interpretation (al-ijtihād al-muṭlaq al-mustaqill) is no longer possible. Therefore, based on the belief that this level of interpretation requires the creation of a unique method for deriving legal rules (istinbāṭ), a method that arguably ended with the founders of the primary schools of law. This research inspects a new interpretive method which was not developed by late scholars. Consequently, the article uses legal reasoning as an interpretive method to criticize the previous opinions regarding Islamic Jurisprudence by using both textual and rational evidence. For instance, the preservation of religion and the continued renewal of convenient sources requires scholars to reach the highest level of interpretation (ijtihād). In addition, a connection to the legal reality of the time and rulings were necessary to adapt them, an issue dependent upon direct derivation of rulings from religious texts or the freedom to implement secondary forms of evidence. Therefore, this research concludes that the founders of the traditional law schools did not develop their foundations independently. Instead, they did so through constructive investigation and analysis. Their interpretations conformed to the Prophet’s (SAW) Companions. Such a process continued and future independent scholars followed their footsteps. In addition, the legal reality in every age saw the rise of individuals who positively impacted the renewal of the foundations of jurisprudence by interpreting Prophetic hadīth which required advanced interpretative skills.
Keywords: Absolute Ijtihād, Ijtihād, Islamic law, Independent juristic reasoning, Madhāhib
Downloads
References
ʿAbd al-Raḥmān, Jalāl al-Dīn. al-Ijtihād: Ḍawābiṭuhu wa Aḥkāmuhu. Cairo: Dār al-Ṭibāʿa al-Ḥadītha, 1986.
Abū Dāwūd, Sulaymān b. al-Ashʿath. al-Sunan. Beirut: Dār al-Risāla, 2009.
al-Āmidī, Sayf al-Dīn. al-Iḥkām fī Uṣūl al-Aḥkām. Cairo: Dār al-Maʿārif, 1982.
al-ʿAmrī, Nādia. al-Ijtihād fi’l-Islām. Beirut: Mu’assassat al-Risāla, 2003.
al-Birrī, Zakariyya. “al-Ijtihād fī’l-Sharīʿa al-Islāmiyya,” Conference Proceedings: al-Fiqh al-Islāmī. Riyadh: Imam Muhammad b. Sa’ud Islamic University, 1980.
al-Būṭī, Muḥammad Saʿīd Ramaḍān, “al-Ijtihād fī’l-Sharīʿa al-Islāmiyya,” Conference Proceedings: al-Ijtihād fī’l-Islām. Oman: Wizārat al-Awqāf, 2012.
al-Dehlawī, Shāh Walī Allāh. Ḥujjat Allāh al-Bāligha. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 1995.
— ʿIqd al-Jīd fī Ahkām al-Ijtihād wa’l-Taqlīd. NA.
al-Dimashqī, Ibn Badrān. al-Madkhal ila Madhhab al-Imām Aḥmad. Beirut: Mu’assassat al-Risāla, 1981.
al-Dusūqī, Muḥammad. al-Ijtihād wa’l-Taqlīd fī’l-Sharīʿa al-Islāmiyya. Doha: Dār al-Thaqāfa, 1987.
al-Ghazālī, Muḥammad. al-Mustaṣfa. Riyadh: Dār al-Faḍīla, 2013.
Hallaq, Wael. “Was the Gate of Ijtihad Closed?” International Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 16:1 (March 1984): 3-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020743800027598
al-Ḥanbalī, Aḥmad b. Ḥamdān. Ṣifat al-Fatwa wa’l-Muftī wa’l-Mustaftī. Beirut: al-Maktab al-Islāmī, 1960.
Ḥasūna, ʿĀrif. “Mada Wujūd al-Mujtahid al-Muṭlaq al-Mustaqill wa’l-Muntasab fī Hādhā al-ʿAṣr,” Jordanian Journal of Islamic Studies 5:3 (2009): 130-150.
Ibn al-Athīr, al-Mubārak. Jāmiʿ al-Uṣūl fī Aḥādith al-Rusūl. Qatar: Wizārat al-Awqāf, 2012.
Ibn Ḥusayn, Muḥammad ʿAlī. Tahdhīb al-Furūq. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 1989.
Ibn al-Najjār, Muḥammad. Sharḥ al-Kawkab al-Munīr. Saudi Arabia, Maktabat ʿUbaykān, 2009.
Ibn Rushd, Muḥammad. Bidāyat al-Mujtahid wa Nihāyat al-Muqtaṣid. Beirut: Dār Ibn Ḥazm, 1995.
Ibn al-Shaykh, Muḥammad al-Amīn. al-Ijtihād bayn Musawwaghāt al-Inqiṭāʿ wa Ḍawābiṭ al-Istimrār. Dubai: Dār al-Buḥūth lil-Dirāsāt al-Islāmiyya wa Iḥyā’ al-Turāth, 2003.
Ibn Taymiyya, Ahmad. al-Istiqāma. Riyadh: Imam Muhammad b. Sa’ud Islamic University, 1991.
Idris, Abd. Rasyid and Basri Ibrahim. “Analysis for Claim that Door of Ijtihad is Closed in Muslim Community.” International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 10:9 (2020): 898-911. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v10-i9/7883
Khuḍrī, al-Sayyid, al-Ijtihād fīma lā Naṣṣ fīhi. Riyadh: Maktabat al-Ḥaramayn, 1983.
al-Mālikī, Muḥammad b. Ḥusayn. Tahdhīb al-Furūq wa’l-Qawāʿid al-Suniyya fī’l-Asrār al-Fiqhiyya. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 1989.
al-Najjār, ʿAbd al-Majīd. Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿa bi Abʿād Jadīda. Beirut: Dār al-Gharb al-Islāmī, 2006.
al-Raysūnī, Quṭub. al-Tajdīd al-Uṣūlī ʿind al-Shāṭibī. Saudi Arabia: Dār al-Maymān, 2018.
al-Ṣanʿānī, Muḥammad. Irshād al-Nuqqād ila Taysīr al-Ijtihād. Beirut: Mu’assassat al-Rayān, 1992.
—. Iyqāẓ al-Wisnān fī’l-ʿAmal bil-Ḥadīth wa’l-Qur’ān. Beirut: Dār al-Kitāb al-Libnānī, 1968.
al-Shawkāni, Muḥammad. Irshād al-Fuhul. NA.
al-Subkī, Tāj al-Dīn. Jamʿ al-Jawāmiʿ. Cairo: Muṣṭafa al-Bābī al-Ḥalabī, 1937.
al-Suyūṭī, ʿAbd al-Raḥmān b. Abī Bakr. al-Radd ʿala Man Akhlada ila al-Arḍ wa Jahal an al-Ijtihād fī kul ʿAṣr Farḍ. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 1983.
—. Taqrīr al-Istinād fī Tafsīr al-Ijtihād. Alexandria: Dār al-Daʿwa, 1983.
al-Zarkashī, Muḥammad. al-Baḥr al-Muḥīṭ. Kuwait: Wizārat al-Awqāf, 2010.
al-Zarqā’, Muṣṭafa. “al-Ijtihād wa Dawr al-Faqīh fī Ḥall al-Mushkilāt,” Majallat al-Dirāsāt al-Islāmiyya 20:4 (1405): 45-70.
al-Zuḥaylī, Wahba. “al-Ijtihād fī’l-Sharīʿa al-Islāmiyya,” Conference Proceedings: al-Fiqh al-Islāmī. Riyadh: Imam Muhammad b. Sa’ud Islamic University, 1980.
Copyright (c) 2022 Moath Alnaief, kotb Rissouni
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
.png){kind=icon}
