Islamic Principles to Combat Radicalization in Academia: An Exploratory Study in Pakistani Context

Keywords: Islamic Principles, Factors of Radicalization, Academia, Religious Pluralism, HEIs

Abstract

Abstract Views: 121

Pakistan’s geopolitical location and events like the Afghan Jihād, 9/11, and the War on Terror have adversely affected our social, religious, and geopolitical realms. Numerous perpetrators are engaged in violent extremism due to their exclusive interpretations of Islamic injunctions, which mainly deviate from the basic Islamic principles. These developments in our region have given rise to the phenomenon of radicalization in the socio-religious and political spheres. Unfortunately, this radicalization has infused the higher education sector and threatened Pakistan’s security and safety. According to this study, ‘radicalization’ is a process in which people or groups adopt extreme social, religious, and political views to discredit or reject others’ coexisting and contemporary ideologies. The status quo, the delicate law & order situation, and developing trends and ideas at the societal level further lead to polarization and division. This paper aims to identify numerous adherents’of radicalization in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs). It also explains the central concept of theological radicalization and how genuine Islamic principles combat these misconceptions. Analytical and exploratory research methodology has been adopted for this study. This research concludes that by adopting the Islamic principles of Waṣatīyyah (Moderation and the Middle Path) and ‘Ilm-al-Eḥsān (to do beautiful things or Excellence) one could lead a successful life as ordained by Allah. A reversal of the rise of radicalism and extremism is possible with the help of moderates and reformers in society and academia to incorporate Islamic socio-religious norms and values. This paper recommends that academia and society must adopt moderation, diversity, and pluralism grounded in Islamic teaching to curb radicalism.

Keywords: Combating radicalization, Islamic principles, Pakistani academia, Religious modesty

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

'Abd Allah, Muhammad Ba Karim Muhammad Ba. Wasattiyyah Ahl al-Sunnah Bayna al-Firaq. Riyad: Dar al-Rayah Ii al-Nashr wa al-Tawzi', 1415 AH.

Abdullah, Nauman A., and Muhammad Saeed. “Extremism in education in Pakistan: University Teachers’ Thoughts.” Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences (JFES) 49, no. 2 (2016): 55-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1501/Egifak_0000001383

Ahmad, Muhammad Asham bin. “Moderation in Islam: A Conceptual Analysis of Wasatiyyah.” TAFHIM: IKIM Journal of Islam and the Contemporary World 4 (2011): 29-46.

Ahmed, Zahid Shahab., and Jafri, Qamar Abbas. “Drivers of Violent Extremism in Higher Education Institutions of Pakistan.” Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict 13, no. 3 (2020): 230-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/17467586.2020.1821068 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17467586.2020.1821068

Ali, Mohamed Bin. “Al-Walā’ Wal Barā, in Wahhabism: From a Tool to Fight Shirk to Takfir of Muslim Leaders.” Journal of Islamic Studies and Culture 7, no 1 (2019): 1-16. https://doi.org/10.15640/jisc.v7n1a3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15640/jisc.v7n1a3

Bayhaqi, Ahmad bin Al Husain, Al Jamea Le Shuab-el-Iman. Al-Riyadh: Maktabat ur Rushd Lin Nashr wal Tawzea, 2003.

Būkhārī, Muḥammad Bin Isma‘īl. Ṣaḥiḥ Al-Būkhārī. Riyadh: Dār us-Salām, 1997.

Burhanuddin, S., and Abbas Arfan. “The Fundamental Principles of Tolerance (Al-Tasâmuh) in Worship and Public Affairs under Islamic Perspective.” SCITEPRESS -Science and Technology Publications, (2020): 1-7, Doi: 10.5220/0009923711261132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5220/0009923711261132

Ibn al-Mubārak, Abdullāh al-Marwazī. al Zuhd wa al-Raqa'iq. Al-Riyadh: Dār al-Mi’raj ad-Dawliyyah, 1995.

Ibn Faris, Abu al-Husayn., Ahmad bin Zakaria. Mu'jam Maqayis al-Lughah. vol. 2. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-'Ilmiyyah, 1999/1420.

Ibn Hanbal, Ahmad. Musnad Ahmad. Al-Qahira: Dar ul-Hadith, 1995.

Ibn Mājjah, Muhammad bin Yazīd. Sunan Ibn Mājjah .Riyadh: Darussalam, 2008.

Khan, Dilawar., and Hafeez Ullah Khan. “Radicalization and Divergent Education System in Pakistan Challenges and Future Prospects.” National Defence University Journal 32 and no. 1 (2018): 234. https://www.prdb.pk/article/-8237

Khan, Muhammad Kalim Ullah, and Zahoor Ullah Al-Azhari. “Radicalization and Academia.” Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization 9, no. 1 (2019): 165-176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32350/jitc.91.11

Naquib al-Attas, Syed Muhammad. Islam and Secularism. Kuala Lumpur: ABIM, 1978; report, Kuala Lumpur: ISTAC, 1993. https://libraryoflights.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/islam-and-secularism-attas.pdf

Nisāi,’ Aḥmad bin Shua‘īb. Sunan an Nisā’i. Riyadh: Dār us-Salām, 2003.

Qaradawī, Yusuf. Al-Imam al-Ghazali bayn Madhihi wa Naqidihi. Beirut: Mu’assasah al-Risalah, 1994.

Qushyrī, Muslim bin Hajjaj. Sahīh Muslim. Lahore: Idarah Islamiat, 2007.

Rahimullah, Riyad Hosain., Stephen Larmar, and Mohammad Abdullah. “Understanding Violent Radicalization amongst Muslims: A Review of the Literature.” Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Science 1, no. 1 (2013): 19-35.

Rana, Muhammad Amir. “Litterateurs’ Response to Extremism in Pakistan.” Islamabad: PIPS, 2010): 23-30.http://www.pakpips.com/web/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/120.pdf

Rathore, Mujtaba., and Abdul Basit. “Trends and Patterns of Radicalization in Pakistan.” Conflict and Peace Studies 3, no. 2 (2010): 15-32. http://www.pakpips.com/web/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/131.pdf

Razi, Naseem. “Theological Extremism and its Effects: Pakistan Perspective.” Journal of Social Science for Policy Implications 2, no. 4, (2014): 59-72. http://jsspi.com/journals/jsspi/Vol_2_No_4_December_2014/4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15640/jsspi.v2n4a4

Tirmidhī , Abū ‘Īsa’ Muḥammad ibn Īsa, Jām‘i al Tirmidhī. Rīyāḍh: Dār-us-Salām, 2007.

Published
2022-12-13
How to Cite
Shah, Samina Batool, and Riaz Ahmad Saeed. 2022. “Islamic Principles to Combat Radicalization in Academia: An Exploratory Study in Pakistani Context”. Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization 12 (2), 255-70. https://doi.org/10.32350/jitc.122.18.
Section
Articles