Current Trends of Muslim Academia in Comparative Religions
Abstract
Abstract Views: 200Throughout the history of the study of religion or religions, many scholars had emerged and contributed to this vocation. Many international scholars; be them from the east and west, Muslims or non-Muslims; recognize Muslim scholarship in Religionswissenschaft (Religious Studies). In sum, comparative study of religions is regarded as one of the great contributions of Muslim’s civilization to mankind’s intellectual progress. Nevertheless, when referring to the popular works of Muslim scholars in this discipline, most people will refer to only some treatises with negligence to the great bulk of Muslim Heritage in Religionswissenschaft. Many approaches and styles are found in purposive treatises by Muslims in the field of Religionswissenschaft. Some of them are descriptive in nature; some are disputative, polemical and apologetic, which involve defending, refuting, and extensive criticism; while some others are analytical, involving serious studies of certain aspects of other religions. The treatises produced by Muslim scholars on other religions are not necessarily limited only to one particular style, for some of them employ different approaches. But despite of such a rich heritage Muslim thought in context of religious studies is currently stagnant. Main stream text and approaches in Muslim academia revolves largely around whether savage refutation or apologetic. Contemporary researches stands far away from the modern approaches and theories known in field of Religious Studies like those of Polymethodic Studies, Methodological Neutralism, Ethnographic approaches. The paper intends to explain the problem and suggest Muslim academia what steps to take, by presenting the analysis of its current trends and Muslim heritage in the field, to move forward in thought process in the field of Religious Studies coping up with the contemporary theories in academic as well as social context.
Downloads
References
Institution Press, 2010.
Albert, Iskandar. “Al-Rāzī.” Encyclopedia of the History of Science, Technology,
and Medicine in Non-Western Cultures (2nd ed.). Springer (2006): 155–156.
Christine, Schirrmacher. “The Influence of German Biblical Criticism on Muslim
Apologetics in the 19th Century.” Contra Mundum, 1997.
Dariusz, Dziewanski. “Remembering the life of Sheikh Ahmed Deedat.” Aljazeera,
Accessed August 8, 2015.
Dimitri, Gutas. Avicenna and the Aristotelian Tradition, Introduction to Readings.
Avicenna’s Philosophical Works. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1988.
Eric, J. Sharpe. Comparative Religion: A History. New York: Charles Scribner's
Sons, 1975.
Guillaume, Alfred. Edited and translated, “Introduction” to The Summa Philosophiae
of al-Shahrastānī's Kitāb Nihāyat al-Iqdām ilm-al-Kalām. Oxford: Oxford
University Press, 1934.
Hitti, Philip K. History of the Arabs from Earliest to the Present. London: The
Macmillan Press, 1974.
Lawrence, Bruce B. “Al- Biruni’s Approach to the Comparative Study of Indian
Culture.” in Biruni Symposium. Calcutta: Iran Society, (1951): 27-47.
Muhammad, Shafiq. Growth of Islamic thought in North America: Focus on Isma'il
Raji al Faruqi. Beltsville, MD: Amana Publications, 1994.
Neaz Ahmad, Syed. “Justice, Peace and Unity: The Cornerstone of Islam,” Saudi
Gazette. 31 March 2008. Accessed August 8, 2011
6archiveissuedate%3D31/03/2008>.
Oxtoby, Willard G. and Amir Hussain. World Religions: Eastern Tradition. Canada:
Oxford University Press, 2014
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.