Reforming Madrasa Education in Pakistan: Post 9/11 Perspectives
Abstract
Abstract Views: 343Pakistani madrasa has remained a subject of intense academic debate since the tragic events of 9/11 as they were immediately identified as one of the prime suspects. The aim of this paper is to examine the post 9/11 academic discourse on the subject of madrasa reform in Pakistan and identify the various themes presented in them. This paper also seeks to explore the missing perspective in this discourse; the perspective of ulama; the madrasa managers, about the Western demand to reform madrasa. This study is based on qualitative research methods. To evaluate the views of academia, this study relies on a systematic analysis of the post 9/11 discourse on this subject. To find out the views of ulama, in-depth interviews of leading Pakistani ulama belonging to all major schools of thought have been conducted. The study finds that many fears generated by early post 9/11 studies were rejected by the later ones. This study also finds that contrary to the common perception the leading ulama in Pakistan are open to the idea of madrasa reform but they prefer to do it
internally as an ongoing process and not due to outside pressure. This study recommends that in order to resolve the madrasa problem in Pakistan, it is imperative to take into account the ideas and concerns of ulama running them. It is also important to take them on board in the fight against the religious militancy and terrorism in Pakistan.
Downloads
References
Story Does Not Fit the Facts. Pomona College, 2011.
2. Bell, M.P. Pakistan’s Madrassas; Weapons of Mass Instruction? MS diss., Naval
Post Graduate School, California, 2007.
3. Bergen, Peter and Swati Pandey, “The Madrasa Scapegoat,” Washington Quarterly,
Spring 2006.
4. Candland, Christopher. “Religious Education and Violence in Pakistan.” (2005).
5. Chandran, Suba. “Madrasas in Pakistan”, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies
(Sep 2003).
6. Fair, Christian. The Madrassah Challenge. Washington DC: United States Institute
for Peace Press, 2008.
7. Graff, Corinne and Rebecca Winthrop. “Busting Pakistan’s Madrasa Myth.” Foreign
Policy. July1, 2010.
8. Haqqani, Hussain. “Islam’s Medieval Outposts,” Foreign Policy, Nov 1, 2002.
9. Haqqani, Irshad Ahmed. “Dini Madaris aur unka Fehm-e-Islam, Koi Tabdili
Mumkin Nahin,” (Urdu). Daily Jang, July 18, 2007.
10. Hartung, J.P. and H. Reifeld, Islamic Education, Diversity, and National Identity.
New Delhi: Sage Publications, 2006.
11. International Crisis Group Pakistan; Madrasa, Extremism and the Military. Asia
Repert No.36, (29 July, 2002).
12. Kronstadt, K. A. “Education Reform in Pakistan”, CRS Report for Congress, Dec 23,
2004.
13. Nasr, Syed Vali. The Rise of Sunni Militancy in Pakistan: the Changing Role of
Islamism and the Ulama in Society and Politics.Oxford; Oxford University Press,
2010.
14. Nayyar, A.H. “The Subtle Subversion” in The State of Curricula and Textbooks in
Pakistan, ed. A. Salim et al (SDPI, 2004).
15. Sareen, Sushant. The Jihad Factory; Pakistan’s Islamic Revolution in the Making.
New Delhi: Har Anand Publications, 2005.
16. Sikand, Yoginder. “The Indian Madaris and the Agenda of Reform, in “Islamic
Education, Diversity, and National Identity. New Delhi: Sage Publications, 2006.
17. Singer, P.W. Pakistani Madrasas; Ensuring a System of Education not Jihad.
Analysis Paper 14 Washington DC: The Brookings Institution, 2001.
18. Winthrop, Rebecca and Corinne Graff, Beyond Madrasas: Assessing the Links
between Education and Militancy in Pakistan. Working Paper 2, Brookings Centre
for Universal Education, 2010.
19. 9/11 Commission Report (2004). Final Report of the National Commission on
Terrorist Attacks upon the United States. Official Government Edition.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.