Faskh Law Reformulation in Malaysia: A Critical Examination of Terengganu Sharia Court Case

Keywords: contemporary legal reforms, Faskh, family law, Maqāṣid al-Sharīʻa, Terengganu Sharia Court

Abstract

Abstract Views: 0

This research aimed to discuss the impact of drug addiction and domestic violence as prominent reasons for the pronouncement of faskh (annulment) in the Terengganu Sharia Court, Malaysia as observed in decisions 11003-014-0372-2010 and 11300-014-0011-2011. The decisions are unprecedented ijtihad of the Judges because the reasons are not found in almost all classical schools of fiqh and the most credible relevant literature. The reasons also remain unclear and have not been addressed by contemporary fiqh scholars from the perspective of maqaṣid al-sharīʻa. Therefore, this research examined how drug addiction and domestic violence became legitimate reasons for faskh and explored the implication for the contemporary reformulation of Islamic family law discourse. This study employed a qualitative theoretical framework for maqāṣid al-sharīʻa analysis that developed based on the contributions of Abū Ḥāmid al-Ghazālī and Abū Isḥāq al-Shāṭibī. The results showed that the addiction of the husband to drugs and instances of domestic violence could be the legitimate reasons for faskh synthesized within the maqāṣid framework to protect (ḥifẓ) religion (al-dīn), soul (al-nafs), mind (al-ʻaql), descendent (al-nasl), and wealth (al-māl). It was further observed that maqāṣid successfully reformed the classical fiqh on faskh based on contemporary social behaviours. The two primary contributions of this research included the (1) provision of empirical evidence related to the adaptability of Islamic law that leads to contemporary social challenges, and (2) the development of a theoretical framework for further legal reforms in the Islamic family law, which are capable of maintaining fidelity to maqāṣid al-sharīʻa principles while addressing modern societal changes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbasi, Muhammad Zubair. “Judicial Ijtihād as a Tool for Legal Reform: Extending Women’s Right to Divorce under Islamic Law in Pakistan.” Islamic Law and Society 24, no. 4 (2017): 384–411, https://doi.org/10.1163/15685195-00244P04

Abdullah, Raihanah. “Reasons to Dissolve a Marriage through Fasakh.” Syariah Journal 1, no. 5 (1997).

ʻĀbidīn, Ibn. Radd Al-Mukhtār [The Answer to the Baffled]. Vol. 4. Dār ʻĀlam al-Kutub, 2003.

Al-Āmidī. Muntahā Al-Sūl Fī ʿIlm Al-Uṣūl [The Utmost Aspiration in the Science of Uṣūl]. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah, 2003.

Al‐Ansari, Basma., Anne‐Marie Thow, Carolyn A Day, and Katherine M Conigrave. “Extent of Alcohol Prohibition in Civil Policy in Muslim Majority Countries: The Impact of Globalization.” Addiction 111, no. 10 (2016): 1703–13, https://doi.org/10.1111/add.13159

Alashti, Zahra Farhadi., and Abdolreza Javan Jafari Bojnordi. “Islam and Iran’s Post-Revolution War on Drugs: A Durkheimian Analysis.” Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies 11, no. 2 (2021): 327–50, https://doi.org/10.18326/ijims.v11i2.327-350

Anas, Mālik Ibn. Al-Muwaṭṭaʼ [The Well-Trodden Path]. Edited by Muḥammad Fu’ād ʻAbd al-Bāqī. Beirut: Dār Iḥyāʼ li al-Turāth al-ʻArabī, 1985.

Ashur, Amir. “Protecting the Wife’s Rights in Marriage as Reflected in Pre‐Nuptials and Marriage Contracts from the Cairo Genizah and Parallel Arabic Sources.” Religion Compass 6, no. 8 (2012): 381–89, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8171.2012.00359.x

Bakr, Taqī al-Dīn Abī. Kifāyat Al-Akhyār Fī Ḥall Ghāyat Al-Ikhtiṣār [Sufficiency for the Virtuous: A Commentary on “The Ultimate Summary”]. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʻIlmiyyah, 2001.

Al-Bakrī, ʻUthmān ibn Shaṭā. Iʻānat Al-Ṭālibīn [The Assistance of Students]. Vol. 4. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, 1993.

Blackburn, Susan. Women and the State in Modern Indonesia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.

Clutterbuck, Richard. Terrorism, Drugs & Crime in Europe after 1992. New York: Routledge, 2013.

Contreras, Christopher., and John R Hipp. “Drugs, Crime, Space, and Time: A Spatiotemporal Examination of Drug Activity and Crime Rates.” Justice Quarterly 37, no. 2 (2020): 187–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2018.1515318

Dāwud, Abū. Sunan Abī Dāwud [Sunan of Abī Dāwud]. Vol. 1. Cairo: Musṭafā al-Bābī al-Ḥalabī, 1952.

Deuraseh, Nurdeen. “Is Imbibing Al-Khamr (Intoxicating Drink) for Medical Purposes Permissible by Islamic Law?” Arab Law Quarterly 18, no. 3 (2003): 355–64. https://doi.org/10.1163/0268055032342749

Al-Ghazālī, Abū Ḥāmid. Al-Mustaṣfā Min ʿIlm Al-Uṣūl [The Essentials of the Science of Uṣūl]. Cairo: al-Maktabah al-Tawfīqiyyah, 2010.

—. Shifāʾal-Ghalīl Fī Bayān Al-Shabah Wa Al-Mukhīl Wa Masālik Al-Taʿlīl [The Quenching of Thirst: An Exposition on Ambiguities, Analogies, and Methods of Legal Reasoning]. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah, 1999.

Griffith, Ivelaw Lloyd. Challenged Sovereignty: The Impact of Drugs, Crime, Terrorism, and Cyber Threats in the Caribbean. University of Illinois Press, 2024.

Hanson, Glen R., Peter J Venturelli, and Peter Platteborze. Drugs and Society. Burlington: Jones and Bartlett Learning, 2024.

Al-Ḥasan, Abū Khayr Nūr. Fatḥ Al-ʻAllam Li Sharḥ Bulūgh Al-Marām [The Opening of Knowledge for the Explanation of Bulūgh Al-Marām]. Vol.2. Beirut: Dār Ṣādir, n.d.

Hilālī, Saʻd al-Dīn Musʻad. Al-Thalāthūnāt Fī Al-Qaḍāyā Al-Fiqhiyyah Al-Muʻāṣirah [Thirty Contemporary Issues in Islamic Jurisprudence]. Cairo: Dār al-Kutub al-Miṣriyyah, 2010.

Al-Ḥuṣarī, Aḥmad. Al-Aḥwāl Al-Shakhṣiyyah [The Islamic Family Law]. Cairo: Maktabah al-Kulliyat al-Aẓhariyyah, 1968.

Al-Isfahānī, Aḥmad. Bayān Al-Mukhtaṣar Fī ʿIlmay Al-Uṣūl Wa Al-Jadal [The Explanation of the Compendium in the Sciences of Uṣūl and Dialectics]. Vol. 2. Cairo: Dār al-Ḥadīth, 2006.

Al-Jawziyyah, Ibn Qayyim. Zād Al-Maʻād [Sustenance for the Journey to the Afterlife]. Vol. 5. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʻIlmiyyah, 1998.

Al-Jāzirī, ʻAbd al-Raḥmān. Al-Fiqh ‘Alā Madhāhib Al-Arbaʻah [The Islamic Jurisprudence According to the Four Schools]. Vol. 4. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al -ʻIlmiyyah, 1971.

Al-Juwaynī. Al-Burhān Fī Uṣūl Al-Fiqh [The Decisive Argument Foundations of Islamic Legal Theory] Vol. 2. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah, 1997.

Khallaf, ʻAbd al-Wahhab. Aḥkām Al-Aḥwāl Al-Shakṣiyyah Fī Al-Sharīʻah Al-Islāmiyyah [Personal Status Regulations in Islamic Law]. Kuwait: Dār al-Qalam, 1990.

Al-Khin, Musṭafā Saʻīd. Al-Fiqh Al-Manhajī ʻAlā Madhhab Al-Shāfiʻī [Methodological Jurisprudence According to the Shafi'i School]. Vol. 4. Beirut: Dār al-Qalam, 1992.

Mahklūf, Muḥammad Ḥasanīn. Fatāwā Al-Sharʻiyyah Wa al-Buḥūth Al-ʻIlmiyya [Juridical Fatwas and Scientific Research]. Cairo: Dār al-Kitāb al-ʻArabī bi Miṣr, 1951.

Manẓūr, Ibn. Lisan Al-ʻArab [The Arabic Lexicon]. Vol. 3. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, 1994.

Masyarakat, Kementerian Pembangunan Wanita Keluarga dan. Garis Panduan Pengedalian Kes Keganasan Rumah Tangga [Domestic Violence Case Handling Guidelines]. Selangor: Putrajaya, 2017.

Al-Māwardī. Al-Ḥāwī Al-Kabīr [The Comprehensive Collection]. Vol. 9. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʻIlmiyyah, 1994.

Menard, Scott., Sharon Mihalic, and David Huizinga. “Drugs and Crime Revisited.” Justice Quarterly 18, no. 2 (2001): 269–99, https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820100094901

Narkotika, Pusat Biro. Kekal Bebas Dari Dadah: Panduan Untuk Ibu Bapa Bagi Pemulihan Anak Dari Penyalahgunaan Dadah [Staying Drug Free: A Parent's Guide to Child Recovery From Drug Abuse]. Singapura: Central Narcotics Bureau, 2015.

Al-Qāhirī, Abū Muḥammad al-Fayūmī. Fatḥ Al-Qarīb Al-Mujīb ‘Alā Al-Targhīb Wa Al-Tarhīb Li Al-Imām Al-Mundhirī [The Accessible Explanation of “Encouragement and Warning” by Imam Al-Mundhirī]. Edited by Muḥammad Isḥāq Muḥammad Āli Ibrāhīm. Riyāḍ: Maktabah Dār al-Salām, 2018.

Al-Rāzī. Al-Maḥṣūl Fī ʿIlm Uṣūl Al-Fiqh [The Collected Essentials of Foundations of Uṣūl Al-Fiqh]. Vol. 3. Cairo: Dār al-Salām, 2011.

Sābiq, Sayyid. Fiqh Al-Sunnah. Vol. 4. Kuala Lumpur: Al-Hidayah Publication, 2009.

Seddon, Toby. “Drugs, Crime and Social Exclusion: Social Context and Social Theory in British Drugs–Crime Research.” British Journal of Criminology 46, no. 4 (2006): 680–703. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azi079

Shaham, Roh. “Judicial Divorce at the Wife’s Initiative: The Sharīʻa Courts of Egypt, 1920-1955.” Islamic Law and Society 1, no. 2 (1994): 217–57. https://doi.org/10.1163/156851994X00048

Al-Shāṭibī. Al-Muwāfaqāt Fī Uṣūl Al-Sharīʿah [The Harmonization in the Foundations of Sharīʿah]. Edited by Vol. IV ʿAbd Allāh al-Darrāz. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah, 2005.

Al-Sibāʻī, Musṭafā. Al-Marʻah Bayn Al-Fiqh wa Al-Qānūn [The Status of Women in Fiqh and Legal Systems) Damascus: al-Maktabah al-Islāmiyyah, 1962.

Al-Suyūṭī, Jalāl al-Dīn. Al-Ashbāh Wa Al-Naẓā’ir [Similarities and Analogies]. Riyāḍ: Maktabah al-Mukarramah, 1998.

ʻUmar, Sulayman Ibn. Ḥāshiyyat Al-Jamal ʻAlā Sharḥ Al-Manhāj [The Marginalia of Al-Jamal on the Explanation of Al-Manhaj]. Vol. 7. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʻIlmiyyah, 1971.

Zahrah, Abū. Al-Aḥwāl Al-Shakhṣiyyah [The Islamic Family Law]. Cairo: Dār al-Fikr al-ʻArabī, 1957.

Zakaria, Ezarina., and Fauziah Ibrahim. “Drug Abuse Impact on Early Phases of Marriage (1 to 5 Years): Exploring the Drug Addicted Wives Experiences.” International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 12, no. 10 (2022): 1651–61, 10.6007/IJARBSS/v12-i10/15381

Al-Zuḥaylī, Wahbah. Al-Fiqh Al-Islāmī Wa Adillatuhu [The Islamic Jurisprudence and Its Sources of Proof). Damascus: Dār al-Fikr, 1984.

Published
2024-12-24
How to Cite
Al Idrusiah, Rahmi Hidayati, Edi Kurniawan, Dody Sulistio, and Mohammad Syafiq. 2024. “Faskh Law Reformulation in Malaysia: A Critical Examination of Terengganu Sharia Court Case”. Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization 14 (2), 303-20. https://doi.org/10.32350/jitc.142.18.
Section
Articles