Illuminating the Shadows: A Qur’ānic Theodicy on the Problem of Evil
Abstract

The problem of evil has been recognized as one of the most substantial challenges to the rational plausibility of theism, necessitating a range of theodicies across various religions. Many philosophers, in their attempts to address this problem, have compromised specific divine attributes, which has led to concerns regarding theological coherence. The Qurʾān offers a unique theodicy framework that has drawn considerable interest from theologians, especially those from Ashʿarite, Muʿtazilite, and mystical traditions. Applying a mixed-methodology approach that combines textual and thematic analysis of Qur’ānic discourse with a critical review of classical theodicies, this study evaluates the Qur’ānic theodicy on moral and natural evil, examining how it maintains the coherence of divine omnipotence, omniscience, and omnibenevolence in the presence of evil. The results show that the Qurʾān promotes a multifaceted theodicy that preserves the integrity of divine attributes while avoiding conceptual compromises, recognizing God's foreknowledge, middle knowledge, omnipotence, and omnibenevolence, and sees no contradiction between God and the presence of evil. The Qurʾān also addresses natural evil, and integrates it into its teleological framework, justifying each event in the light of the broader divine scheme. Therefore, it is argued that the Qurʾānic theodicy is a methodical and logical framework that makes a distinctive contribution to the ongoing discussion of the problem of evil, in addition to setting it apart from other theodicies.
Downloads
References
Abd al-Jabbār ibn Aḥmad. Kitāb al-Mughnī fī Abwāb al-Tawḥīd wa al-ʿAdl [The Book of the Sufficient in the Chapters of Divine Unity and Justice]. Edited by S. M. Rabab and A. ibn al-Ḥusayn Abū Hāshim. Beirut: Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī, 2001.
Abū Manṣūr al-Māturīdī. Kitāb al-Tawḥīd [The Book of Divine Unity]. Edited by Fathallah Khalif. Beirut: Dār al-Mashriq, 1970.
Adams, Marilyn McCord. “Redemptive Suffering: A Christian Solution to the Problem of Evil.” In The Problem of Evil, edited by Michael L. Peterson, 168–194. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1992.
Aḥmad ibn Ḥanbal. Musnad. Beirut: Mu’assasah al-Risālah, 1991.
Al-Ashʿarī, Abū al-Ḥasan ʿAlī ibn Ismāʿīl. Al-Ibānah ʿan Uṣūl al-Diyāna [The Clarification of the Fundamentals of the Religion]. Edited by A. bin ʿAbdullāh al-ʿUsaymī. Riyadh: Dār al-Faḍīla, 2011.
Al-Ashʿarī, Abū al-Ḥasan. Maqālāt al-Islāmiyyīn wa-ikhtilāf al-Muṣallīn [The Doctrines of the Muslims and the Differences among the Worshippers]. Edited by H. Ritter. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag, 1980.
Alston, William P. “The Inductive Argument from Evil and the Human Cognitive Condition.” Philosophical Perspectives 5 (1991): 29–67.
Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Theologica. Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province. London: Burns, Oates & Washbourne, 1911. (Original work published ca. 1274).
Augustine. The City of God. Translated by Marcus Dods. New York: The Modern Library, 2000.
Al-Bukhārī, Muḥammad ibn Ismāʿīl. Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī [The Authentic Collection of al-Bukhārī]. Riyadh: Dār al-Faḍīla, 1999.
Calvin, John. Institutes of the Christian Religion. Translated by Henry Beveridge. Peabody: Hendrickson Publishers, 2022.
Chittick, William C. The Sufi Doctrine of Rumi. Bloomington, IN: World Wisdom, 2005.
Christlieb, Tobias. “Which Theisms Face an Evidential Problem of Evil?” Faith and Philosophy: Journal of the Society of Christian Philosophers 9, no. 1 (1992): Article 3. https://doi.org/10.5840/faithphil1992912.
Chowdhury, Safaruk Zaman. “Explaining Evil in the Biosphere: Assessing Some Evolutionary Theodicies for Muslim Theists.” Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 57, no. 2 (2022): 393–417, https://doi.org/10.1111/zygo.12775.
Davies, Brian. The Reality of God and the Problem of Evil. London: Continuum International Publishing Group, 2006.
Draper, Paul. “The Limitations of Pure Skeptical Theism.” Res Philosophica 90, no. 1 (2013): 97–111.
Ghazālī, Abū Ḥāmid. Maqāṣid al-Falāsifah [The Intentions of the Philosophers]. Edited by S. Dunyā. Beirut: Dār al-Maʿārif, 1980.
Ghazālī, Abū Ḥāmid. Iḥyāʾ ʿUlūm al-Dīn [The Revival of the Religious Sciences]. Translated by F. Karim. Vol. 4. Kuala Lumpur: Islamic Book Trust, 2011.
Ghazālī, Abū Ḥāmid. Al-Ḥikmah fī Makhluqāt Allāh [Wisdom in God’s Creation]. Edited by A. M. Shākir. Beirut: Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī, n.d.
Ghazālī, Muḥammad al-. Al-Maqṣad al-Asnā fī Sharḥ Asmāʾ Allāh al-Ḥusnā [The Noblest Aim in the Explanation of the Beautiful Names of God]. Edited by A. ibn Ibrāhīm al-Ḥifnī. Dar al-Falah, n.d.
Hartshorne, Charles. Omnipotence and Other Theological Mistakes. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1984.
Haq, Zia ul. “Modern Western Thought and Islamic Reformism: Intellectual Challenges, Prior Discourse, and Future Prospects.” Religions 14, no. 3 (2023): 308, https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14030308.
Al-Ḥasan al-Baṣrī. Al-ʿUlamāʾ wa al-Mufakkirūn [The Scholars and Theologians]. Edied by M. ʿAmāra. 2nd ed. Cairo: Dār Aʿlam al-Kutub, 1988.
Hick, John. Evil and the God of Love. New York: Harper & Row, 1966.
Hume, David. Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion and Other Writings. Edited by C. D. Coleman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. First published 1779. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808449.
Al-Ījī, ʿAḍud ad-Dīn. Al-Mawāqif fī ʿIlm al-Kalām [Opinions in the Science of Theology]. Edited by M. Badawi. Vol. VIII. Beirut: Maktabah al-Rushd, 1999.
Jahangiri, Mona. “Divine Providence and the Problem of Evil in Ibn Sīnā and Mullā Ṣadrā.” Religions 14, no. 8 (2023): 1047, https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14081047.
John Paul II. Salvifici Doloris: On the Christian Meaning of Human Suffering. Vatican.va. Retrieved January 12, 2024. https://www.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/apost_letters/1984/documents/hf_jp-ii_apl_11021984_salvifici-doloris.html.
Kant, Immanuel. “On the Miscarriage of All Philosophical Trials in Theodicy.” In Religion and Rational Theology, edited by A. W. Wood and G. di Giovanni, 17–30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Keller, James A. “The Problem of Evil and the Attributes of God.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 26 (1989): 155–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00142861.
Keltz, Kyle. Thomism and the Problem of Animal Suffering. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock Publishers, 2020.
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. Essays on Theodicy: On the Goodness of God, the Freedom of Man, and the Origin of Evil. Translated by E. M. Huggard. New York: Garland Publishing, 1985.
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. Theodicy: Essays on the Goodness of God, the Freedom of Man, and the Origin of Evil. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 2015.
Mackie, J. L. “Evil and Omnipotence.” Mind 64, no. 254 (1955): 200–212. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LXIV.254.200.
Madelung, Wilferd. “Theology.” In The Cambridge Companion to Classical Islamic Theology, edited by T. Winter, 31. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
Al-Makkī, Abū Ṭālib. Qūt al-Qulūb fī Muʿāmalah al-Maḥbūb wa Waṣf Ṭarīq al-Murīd ilā Maqām al-Tawḥīd [The Nourishment of Hearts in Dealing with the Beloved and Describing the Path of the Seeker to the Station of Divine Unity]. 1st ed. 2 vols. Beirut: Maktabah al-Rushd, n.d.
McCloskey, H. J. “God and Evil.” The Philosophical Quarterly (1950-) 10, no. 39 (1960): 97–114, https://doi.org/10.2307/2960059.
McKay, Nicholas. “A New Aesthetic Argument for Theism.” Faith and Philosophy: Journal of the Society of Christian Philosophers 40, no. 2 (2023): 221–242.
Merriam-Webster. “Evil.” Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary. Retrieved January 17, 2025, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/evil.
Mesle, C. Robert. John Hick’s Theodicy: A Process Humanist Critique. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 1991.
Mill, John Stuart. On Liberty. Edited by D. Spitz. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1974. (Original work published 1859).
Nursi, Said. The Words. Translated by Şükran Vahide. Istanbul: Sozler Publications, 2004.
Ormsby, Eric L. Theodicy in Islamic Thought: The Dispute over Ghazālī’s Best of All Possible Worlds. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014.
Pinnock, Clark H. Most Moved Mover: A Theology of God's Openness. Carlisle: Paternoster Press; Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2001.
Piper, John., Justin Taylor, and Paul K. Helseth, eds. Beyond the Bounds: Open Theism and the Undermining of Biblical Christianity. Wheaton: Crossway, 2003.
Plantinga, Alvin. God, Freedom, and Evil. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1974.
Raeder, Linda C. John Stuart Mill and the Religion of Humanity. Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 2002.
Rouzati, Nasrin. Notion of Divine Trial in the Qurʾān: A Critical Analysis and Reappraisal of the Balā Narratives. PhD diss., Durham University, 2013.
Rowe, William L. “The Problem of Evil and Some Varieties of Atheism.” American Philosophical Quarterly 16, no. 4 (1979): 335–341.
Rowe, William L. “Evil and Theodicy.” Philosophical Topics 16, no. 2 (1988): 119–132.
Schopenhauer, Arthur. The World as Will and Representation. Translated by E. F. J. Payne. Vol. 2. Aegitas, 2016.
Sennett, James F. “The Inscrutable Evil Defense Against the Inductive Argument from Evil.” Faith and Philosophy: Journal of the Society of Christian Philosophers 10, no. 2 (1993): Article 6. https://doi.org/10.5840/faithphil199310220.
Shahrastānī, Muḥammad ibn ʿAbd al-Karīm. Al-Milal wa al-Niḥal [The Book of Sects and Creeds]. Edited and translated by W. Cureton. Beirut: Dar al-Falah, 1984.
Shariati, Ali. Martyrdom: Arise and Bear Witness. Translated by Ali A. Behzadnia and Najla Denny. Houston: Free Islamic Literatures, 1980.
Suyūṭī, Jalāl al-Dīn. Tashyeed al-Arkan fi Laysa fi al-Imkan Abdaʿ Mimma Kan [Establishing the Pillars of "There is Nothing More Excellent in Possibility than What Exists"]. Manuscript. Princeton University Library, n.d.
Swinburne, Richard. The Existence of God. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
Voltaire. Candide: Or Optimism. Translated by Theo Cuffe. London: Penguin Classics, 2005.
Wang, Hui, and Yanan Zhang. “The Role of Social Support in Post-Traumatic Growth among University Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Frontiers in Psychology 13 (2022): Article 1060150, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1060150.
Whitehead, Alfred North. Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology. Edited by David Ray Griffin and Donald W. Sherburne. New York: Free Press, 1978.
Wykstra, Stephen J. “The Humean Obstacle to Evidential Arguments from Suffering: On Avoiding the Evils of ‘Appearance.’” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 16, no. 2 (1984): 73–93.

Copyright (c) 2025 Zia ul Haq

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.