Foundations of the Descriptive Study of Religions in Muslim History: A Conceptual Analysis.
Abstract
Abstract Views: 457
The classical Muslim scholarly tradition produced an assortment of literature on different religions including a considerable number of descriptive studies, a phenomenon that leaves imposing questions. Most importantly, how a pre-modern civilization was able to generate a tradition of descriptive scholarship on different religions in the absence of conditions such as the western modernity that supposedly factored the emergence of the modern academic study of religion needs to be explored. The current paper ventures to answer this question. It argues that certain features of the Qur’ānic worldview, such as the repeated invitation to observe the signs of God in time and space through travel in the land/across the world and to ponder upon the history of various nations coupled with the exhortation to use reason generated curiosity about different civilizations of the world as well as their religious heritage. Moreover, the Qur’ānic view of the universality of the religious phenomenon as a divine plan also encouraged a sober disposition towards religious others in cases under discussion. On the other hand, the meticulous historiographical techniques and methods for the interpretation of texts developed by Muslim historians, theologians, and jurists afforded the needed methodological apparatus for the said undertaking. The current paper further concludes that the same epistemology and methodological foundations can be appropriated according to/keeping in view the needs of the time to promote a credible study of religion/s in contemporary Muslim societies
Downloads
References
Aasi, Ghulam Haider. Muslim Understanding of Other Religions: A Study of Ibn Ḥazm's Kitāb al-Faṣl fi al-Milal wa al-Ahwā' wa al-Niḥal. Islamabad: International Institute of Islamic Thought, 2014.
—. “The Qur’ ān and Other Religious Traditions.” Hamdard Islamicus 9, no. 2 (1986): 65-91.
Abū al-Ma‘ālī, Muḥammad ibn ‘Ubayd Allah. Bayān al-Adyān. Tehran: Mauqūfāt-i Maḥmūd Afshār Yazdī, 1957.
Aḥmad, Abū al-Ḥasn ‘Alī ibn. Asbāb al-Nuzūl. Jeddah: Dār al-Qiblah li al-Thaqāfah al-Islāmiyyah, 1986.
Ahmad, Mahmud et al. “Ibn Hazm on Christianity: An Analysis to His Religious Approaches.” World Journal of Islamic History and Civilization 1, no. 2 (2011): 242-43.
Akram, Muhammad. “The Other Within and the Self Without: Muslim and Western Traditions in the Study of Religion.” PhD diss., University of Erfurt, 2013.
Ansari, Zafar Ishaq. “Foreword.” In Muslim Understanding of Other Religions: A Study of Ibn Ḥazm’s Kitāb al-Faṣl fi al-Milal wa al-Ahwā’ wa al-Niḥal, edited by Ghulam Haider Aasi. Islamabad: International Institute of Islamic Thought 2014.
Beyer, Peter. “Glocalization of Religions: Plural Authenticities at the Centres and at the Margins.” In Sufis in Western Society Global Networking and Locality, edited by Ron Geaves Markus, Dressler, Gritt Klinkhammer, 13-25. London: Routledge, 2009.
al-Bīrūnī, Abū Rayhān Muhammad ibn Ahmad. Albernuni’s India. Translated by Edward C. Sachau. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner and Co. Ltd., 1910.
Brodeur, Patrice Claude. “From an Islamic Heresiography to an Islamic History of Religions: Modern Arab Muslim Literature on Religious Others' with Special Reference to Three Egyptian Authors.” PhD diss., Harvard University, 1999.
al-Dhelawī, Shāh Walī Allāh. AI-Fawz al-Kabīr fī ‘Ilm al-Tafsīr. Translated by Rashīd Aḥmad. Lahore: Idārah-i-Islāmīyyāt, 1982.
Ernst, Carl W. “Bayān al-Adyān.” In Perso-Indica. An Analytical Survey of Persian Works on Indian Learned Traditions, edited by Fabrizio Speziale and Carl W. Ernst (2015), http://www.perso-indica.net/work/bayan_al-adyan, (accessed 09 August 2020).
al-Ghazālī, Muhammad ibn Muhammad. Al-Radd al-Jamīl li Ilāhiyyat al-Masīḥ bi Ṣarīh al-Injīl. Cairo: Dār al-Hidāyah, 1986.
—. Tahāfat al-Falāsifah. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmīyyah, 2000.
—. Maqāsid al-Falāsifah. Cairo: Dār al-Ma‘ārif, 1960.
Graham, William A. “Qur'ān as Spoken Word: An Islamic Contribution to the Understanding of Scripture, ” In Approaches to Islam in Religious Studies, edited by Richard C. Martin, 23-40, Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1985.
Ibn Taymiyyah, Ahmad ibn ‘Abd al-‘Alīm. Al-Jawāb al-Saḥīḥ li man Baddala Dīn al-Masīḥ. Riyadh: Dār al-'Āṣimah, 1992.
—. Muqaddimah fī ‘Usūl al-Tafsīr. Lahore: Al-Maktabah al-‘Ilmīyyah, n.d.
Iqbal, Muhammad. Reconstruction of Religious Thought in Islam. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2012.
Klein, Wassilios. Abu Reyhan Biruni Und Die Religionen. Eine Interkulturelle Perspective. Nordhausen: Traugott Bautz, 2005.
al-Kalbī, Hishām ibn. Kitāb al-Aṣnām. Translated by Nabih Amin Faris, Princeton Oriental Studies. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1952.
Kippenberg, Hans G. Discovering Religious History in the Modern Age. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002.
Koshul, Basit Bilal. “Studying the Western Other, Understanding the Islamic Self: A Qur’ānically Reasoned Perspective.” Iqbal Review: Journal of the Iqbal Academy Pakistan 46, no. 2 & 4 (2005): 149-74.
Martin, Richard C. “Understanding the Qur’ān in Text and Context.” History of Religions 21, no. 4 (1982): 361-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/462906
McAuliffe, Jane Dammen. “Christians in the Qur’ān and Tafsīr.” In Muslim Perceptions of Other Religions: A Historical Survey, edited by Jacques Waardenburg. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999, 105-21.
al-Nadīm, Abū al-Faraj Muhammad ibn Isḥāq. Kitāb al-Fihrist. Karachi: Nūr Muhammad Kārkhāna Tijārat-e-Kutb, 1971.
al-Nashshār, ‘Alī Sāmī. Nash’at al-Fikr al-Falsafī fī al-Islām. Cairo: Dār al-Ma‘ārif, 1995.
Nasr, Seyyed Hossein. “The Qur'ān and Hadīth as Source and Inspiration of Islamic Philosophy.” In Encyclopaedia of Islamic Philosophy: Part 1. Lahore: Sohail Academy, 2002.
Nu‘mānī, Shiblī. ‘Ilm al-Kalām aur al-Kalām. Karachi: Nafīs Academy, 1979.
Preus, Samuel. Explaining Religion: Criticism and Theory from Bodin to Freud. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1987.
Rippin, Andrew. “The Exegetical Genre “Asbāb al-Nuzūl”: A Bibliographical and Terminological Survey.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 48, no. 1 (1985):1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0041977X00026926
al-Saḥaybānī, Muahmmad ibn Nāsir. Manhaj al- Shahrastānī fī Kitābhī al-Milal wa al-Niḥal: ‘Arḍ wa Taqwīm. Riyyadh: Dār al-Waṭan, 1992.
al-Shāfi‘ī, Ḥasan Maḥmoud. Al-Madkhal ila Dirāsat ‘Ilm al-Kalām. Karachi: Idārat al-Qur’ān wa al-‘Ulūm al-Islāmīyyah, 1988.
al-Shahrastānī, ‘Abd al-Karīm, Al-Milal wa al-Niḥal. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, n.d.
al-Shawkānī, Muhammad ibn Ali. Fatḥ al-Qadīr: Al-Jāmi‘ Bayna Fannay al-Riwāyah wa al-Dirāyah min ‘Ilm al-Tafsīr. Beirut: Dār al-Ma‘rifah, 2007.
Sellheim, Rudolf., and Mohsen Zakeri, François de Blois, Werner Sundermann. “Fehrest.” In Encyclopaedia Iranica 2012, https://iranicaonline.org/articles/fehrest, (accessed 10-Aug-2020).
Sheth, Sudev. “Manuscript Variations of Dabistān-i Mazāhib and Writing Histories of Religion in Mughal India Histories of Religion in Mughal India,” Manuscript Studies 4, no.1 (2019): 19-41, https://repository.upenn.edu/mss_sims/vol4/iss1/2 (accessed 10 August). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/mns.2019.0010
Steigerwald, Diana. “Al-Shahrastānī,” in Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://iep.utm.edu/shahras/ (accessed 10-Aug-2020).
Waardenburg, Jacques. Muslim Perceptions of Other Religions: A Historical Survey. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
al-Wāhidī, Abū al-Ḥasan ‘Alī ibn Aḥmad. Asbāb al-Nuzūl. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmīyyah, 1991.
Zaydān, Abd al-Karīm. Al-Wajīz fī Usūl al-Fiqh. Beirut: Mu’assasat al-Risālah, 1987.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
.png){kind=icon}
