The Debate of Procedural versus Programmatic Secularism

Reflections from Constitutionalism in Pakistan

  • Muhammad Danyal Khan Research Fellow, Brunel University London, UK
Keywords: Constitutionalism, programmatic Secularism, procedural secularism, secular, Pakistan

Abstract

Abstract Views: 216

Basic structure of Constitution of Pakistan has always been a source of debate among the academic, parliamentary and judicial circles. The arguments are divided in secular and religious notions. The same debate is going on parallel in United Kingdom and across the world to define the domain of religion in modern constitutionalism. The author aspires to deal with the question of domain of religion in Constitutionalism of Pakistan by conducting a comparative analysis of various on-going identical debates in the United States, the United Kingdom and Egypt. The paper will aim at synthesising the debate of domain of religion in constitutionalism by defining potentials and limitations of religion in modern constitutionalism. This will be done by theoretical analysis of arguments of both parties; people who think religion as potential and the people who wish to put a limit to the role of religion in working constitutionalism. Most significantly the work will
incorporate the innovative terminological differentiation of ‘Procedural Secularism’ from ‘Programmatic Secularism’ as defined by 104th Arch Bishop of Canterbury Dr Rowan Williams in 2006.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Binder, Leonard. Religion and Politics in Pakistan. California: University of California
Press, 1961.
Brown, Nathan J. “Constitutionalism, Religion, and Education.” American Behavioural
Scientist 60, No 8. (2016): 1013-1035.
Chaudhary Tanbir Ahmad Siddiky v The Province of East Pakistan and others, Supreme
Court (PLD, 1968), 185.
“Constitutionalism.” Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. Stanford: Stanford
University, 2017.
Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan. 1956.
Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan. 1973.
Constitution of Republic of Pakistan. 1962.
Elster, John. Claus Offe, and Ulrich K. Preuss, Institutional Design in Post-Communist
Societies: Rebuilding the Ship at Sea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
1998.
Farishta v Government of Pakistan, Peshawar High Court. 1980.
Gul Hassan v Government of Pakistan. Peshawar High Court. 1979.
Haarscher, Guy. “Freedom of Religion in Context.” Brigham Young University Law
Review (2002): 269-282.
Iqbal, Walid. “Islamic Polity and the Constitutional Process.” A Quarterly Magazine for
a Discerning Readership (2013).
Jackson, Timothey P. “Theology and Law Divorced and Reconciled: Aquinas, Luther,
Rawls, and us.” In Journal of Law and Religion 31, no. 1 (2017): 71-78.
Kennedy, Charles H. “Islamization and Legal Reform in Pakistan 1979-1989.” Pacific
Affairs Vol. 63, No. 1 (1990).
Khan, Hamid. Constitutional and Political History of Pakistan. Pakistan: Oxford
University Press, 2007.
Lau, Martin William. The Role of Islam in the Legal System of Pakistan. London: Brill,
2005.
Leigh, I. “Recent Developments in Religious Liberty.” Ecclesiastical Law Journal 65,
no. 11 (2009).
Mahmood-ur-Rehnzan Faisal v Secretary, Ministry of Law, Supreme Court (PLD, 1992).
Mahmud, Ayyab. “Freedom of Religion and Religious Minorities in Pakistan: A Study of
Judicial Practice.” Fordham International Law 40, no. 1 (2013).
Mehdi, Rubya. The Islamization of the Law in Pakistan. Routledge, 2013.
Mehmood Achakzai v. Federation of Pakistan (PLD 1997 SC 426.
https://pakistanconstitutionlaw.com/p-l-d-1997-sc-426/
Motor-Cycle Crash - Helmets (Religious Exemption) Act, 1976.
Newberg, Paula R. Judging the State: Courts and Constitutional Politics in Pakistan.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
Noramn, E. Church and Society in England 1770-1970: A Historical Study. Oxford:
Clarendon Press, 1991.
Parveen, Kausar. “The Role of Opposition in Constitution Making.” Pakistan Vision 11,
no. 1 (2010).
Perry, Michael J. “Freedom of Conscience as Religious and Moral Freedom.” Accessed
November 10,
Published
2018-04-03
How to Cite
Muhammad Danyal Khan. 2018. “The Debate of Procedural Versus Programmatic Secularism”. Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization 8 (1), 60-71. https://journals.umt.edu.pk/index.php/JITC/article/view/92.
Issue
Vol 8 No 1: Spring 2018
Section
Articles

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.