A Critical Analysis of Challenges and Washback Effects of English Language E-Assessment in Pakistan
Abstract
Abstract Views: 0
The use of information technology for assessment especially for educational purposes, is the need of the hour. The major types of e-assessment include multiple-choice tests and evaluation of problem-solving skills. The mode of e-tests is more appropriate and quicker than the outdated paper-based examinations. The application of electronic tests is challenging, especially in a teaching and learning environment. Therefore, this investigation is based on the perceptions of Pakistani students and teachers regarding e-tests along with their washback effects. In addition, the study also examines and explains the various difficulties and trials that Pakistani students face during e-assessment. The sample of the study consisted of 80 BS level English students and 20 EFL teachers from three different universities in Pakistan. Two previously designed questionnaires namely Teachers’ Perceptions and Attitudes Survey (TPAS) and Students’ Perceptions and Washback Effects Survey (SPACES) were adapted as instruments to survey the attitude of students towards e-tests. The obtained data was analysed statistically using SPSS software (IBM 23). The results revealed positive perceptions of Pakistani teachers and learners towards e-assessment. However, the findings also highlighted some negative washback effects and attitudes of the teachers towards e-exams. It is expected that the findings would help the teachers, learners, and policy developers in Pakistan to deduce better results through e-assessment.
Downloads
References
Alderson, J. C., & Wall, D. (1993). Does washback exist? Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/14.2.115
Ali, M. M., & Hamid, M. O. (2020). Teaching english to the test: Why does negative washback exist within secondary education in Bangladesh? Language Assessment Quarterly, 17(2), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2020.1717495
Allen, D. (2016). Investigating washback to the learner from the IELTS test in the Japanese tertiary context. Language testing in Asia, 6, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-016-0030-z
Bailey, K. M. (1996). Working for washback: A review of the washback concept in language testing. Language Testing, 13(3), 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229601300303
Binnahedh, I. A. (2022). E-assessment: Wash-back effects and challenges (examining students’ and teachers’ attitudes towards e-tests). Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12(1), 203–211. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1201.25
Chapelle, C., & Douglas, D. (1993). Foundations and directions for a new decade of language testing. In D. Douglas & C. Chapelle (Eds.), A new decade of language testing research selected papers from the 1990 language testing research colloquium (pp. 1–24). TESOL Publications
Cheng, L., & Curtis, A. (2004). Washback or backwash: A review of the impact of testing on teaching and learning. In L. Cheng, Y. Watanabe & A. Curtis (Eds.), Washback in language testing: Research contexts and methods (pp. 3–18). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Green, A. (2007). IELTS washback in context: Preparation for academic writing in higher education (Vol. 25). Cambridge University Press.
Green, A. (2013). Washback in language assessment. International Journal of English Studies, 13(2), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes.13.2.185891
Hughes, A. (1994). Backwash and TOEFL 2000. University of Reading.
Hughes, A. (2003). Testing for Language Teachers (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Hughes, A. (2020). Testing for language teachers. Cambridge University Press.
Hughes, J. (1989). Why functional programming matters. The Computer Journal, 32(2), 98–107. https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/32.2.98
Hung, S. T. A. (2012). A washback study on e-portfolio assessment in an english as a foreign language teacher preparation program. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(1), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2010.551756
Jiamin, X., Jinyan, L., & Tianyi, M. (2021). The washback effect of reformed CET 6 listening comprehension test. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 7(1), 70–73. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.522.2021.71.70.73
Johnson, M., & Shaw, S. (2019). What is computer-based testing washback, how can it be evaluated and how can this support practitioner research? Journal of Further and Higher Education, 43(9), 1255–1270. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2018.1471127
Khalique, H. (2007). The Urdu-English relationship and its impact on Pakistan's social development. The Annual of Urdu Studies, 22, 99–112.
Nafziger, R., Meseke, J. K., & Meseke, C. A. (2011). Collaborative testing: The effect of group formation process on overall student performance. Journal of Chiropractic Education, 25(1), 11–15. https://doi.org/10.7899/1042-5055-25.1.11
Saglam, A. L. G. (2018). Can exams change how and what teachers teach? Investigating the washback effect of a university english language proficiency test in the Turkish context. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 155–176. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.464094
Swain, M. (1985). Large-scale communicative language testing: A case study. In Y. P. Lee, A. C. Y. Fok, R. Lord & G. Low (Eds.), New directions in language testing (pp. 35–46). Pergamon Press.
Tayeb, Y. A., Aziz, M. S. A., Ismail, K., & Khan, A. B. M. A. (2014). The washback effect of the general secondary english examination (GSEE) on teaching and learning. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 14(3) 83–103. http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/GEMA-2014-1403-06
Wall, D. (1997). Impact and wash-back in language testing. In V. Edwards & D. Corson (Eds.). Encyclopedia of language and education (pp. 291–302). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Vendlinksi, T., & Stevens, R. (2002). Assessing student problem-solving skills with complex computer-based tasks. The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 1(3), 1–20.
