ICTs for Climate Resilience and Rural Development in Pakistan: Bridging Digital Divides for Inclusive Innovation

Keywords: ICTs, climate resilience, digital exclusion, glacial melt, participatory adaptation, Chitral, Gilgit-Baltistan, diffusion of innovations, technology acceptance model, inclusive innovation, climate communication

Abstract

Abstract Views: 0

Escalating climate risks in Pakistan’s high-altitude glacier regions increasingly test the adaptive capacities of rural communities. Yet the contribution of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) to these efforts seems to remain uneven and contingent. On the other hand, ICTs in the valleys of Chitral and Gilgit-Baltistan (GB) bring forth far from straightforward solutions. Rather, their value seems to depend on how residents are likely to negotiate infrastructural fragility, gendered digital inequalities, and fragmented institutional support. This qualitative case study draws on 26 semi-structured interviews and 04 gender-segregated focus group discussions. It is further complemented by field observations conducted over a six-month period. Participants were recruited through purposive and community-mediated sampling to ensure the inclusion of elderly, women, youth, and locally embedded knowledge holders. Thematic analysis, informed by Diffusion of Innovations (DOI) and Technology Acceptance Model (TAM3), guided the interpretation of how ICTs are adopted, questioned, or resisted. Findings seem to indicate that media technology tools such as satellite-based telemetry, Short Message Service (SMS) alerts, and Community-Based Flood Early Warning Systems (CBFEWS) may enhance anticipatory governance. Yet their uptake appears to remain constrained by low digital literacy, unstable connectivity, and socio-cultural norms that limit, particularly elderly women’s, access to technology. Respondents seem to repeatedly emphasized the decisive influence of Community Trust Networks, local religious leaders, teachers, and youth volunteers on whether ICTs are perceived as credible or usable. Comparative accounts further seem to suggest that ICTs gain legitimacy when co-designed with local actors when they are translated into vernacular forms, and supported through inclusive community-based training architectures. Whereas, top-down technology deployment, by contrast, tends to widen digital divides rather than bridge them. The study therefore, likely reframes ICTs as socially embedded infrastructures whose climate-resilience potential depends on relational trust, and gender-sensitive design. Moreover, sustained local capacity-building insights that may hold relevance across the wider Global South appear as a pivot point in this study.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adger, W. N. (2006). Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 268–281.

Adger, W. N., Dessai, S., Goulden, M., Hulme, M., Lorenzoni, I., Nelson, D. R., Naess, L. O., Wolf, J., & Wreford, A. (2008). Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change? Climatic Change, 93(3–4), 335–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-008-9520-z.

Ajani, E. N., & van der Geest, K. (2021). Climate change communication and adaptation strategies in rural communities. Journal of Rural Studies, 80, 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.03.005

Akram, M. (2023). Digitalisation and women in Pakistan. National Commission on the Status of Women & United Nations Development Programme (NCSW & UNDP) Pakistan. https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/2023-07/digitalisation_women_in_pakistan_-_ncsw_report_2023.pdf

Alam, S. M., Rahman, M., & Adnan, H. (2018). The role of ICTs in climate-resilient agricultural practices in the Global South. Sustainable Development Review, 12(2), 65–79.

Allan, R. P., Arias, P. A., Berger, S., Canadell, J. G., Cassou, C., Chen, D., Cherchi, A., Connors, S. L., Coppola, E., & Cruz, F. A. (2023). Climate change 2021: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press.

Ateeq, A., Al-refaei, A. A., Alzoraiki, M., Milhem, M., & Ali, S. A. (2024). Digitalization and its impact on HRM: leveraging ICT for efficient workforce management. In B. Awwad (Ed.), The AI revolution: Driving business innovation and research (pp. 551–558). Springer Nature Switzerland.

Bonke, J., Falster, S., & Yuan, Z. (2018). The impact of ICTs on rural livelihoods: Evidence from developing economies. Journal of Development Studies, 54(5), 723–736. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2018.1430761

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Cheong, P. H., Fisher, R., & McGuire, R. (2023). Digital transformations in rural resilience: ICT innovations for climate adaptation. Journal of Climate Communication, 45(3), 567–584.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2017). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Drechsel, P., Qadir, M., & Galibourg, D. (2022). The WHO guidelines for safe wastewater use in agriculture: A review of implementation challenges and possible solutions in the global south. Water, 14(6), Article e864. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14060864

GSMA. (2023). Annual report 2023. GSMA. https://www.gsma.org/about-us/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/GSMA_Annual-report-2023_Final_web.pdf

Inoue, Y. (2020). Satellite- and drone-based remote sensing of crops and soils for smart farming – A review. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 66(6), 798–810. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2020.1738899

Kaila, H., & Tarp, F. (2019). Can the internet improve agricultural production? Evidence from Vietnam. Agricultural Economics, 50(6), 675–691.

Kamal, S., & Bablu, R. (2023). Mobile applications empowering smallholder farmers: An analysis of the impact on agricultural development. Journal of Agricultural Innovation, 8, 36–52.

Kumar, S. P., Subeesh, A., Jyoti, B., & Mehta, C. R. (2023). Applications of drones in smart agriculture. In K. Pakeerathan (Ed.), Smart agriculture for developing nations: Advanced technologies and societal change (pp. 33–48). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8738-0_3

Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y

Rahman, M., Alam, M., & Sarker, R. (2021). Challenges in ICT adoption for climate resilience in rural communities. Technology and Society Review, 39(5), 412–430.

Rasul, G., Muhammad, S., Hussain, A., Ismail M., & Shrestha, M. S. (2020). Climate change and the increasing risk of hazards in Chitral, Pakistan. ICIMOD. https://www.icimod.org/article/climate-change-and-the-increasing-risk-of-hazards-in-chitral-pakistan

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.

Saddique, N., Jehanzaib, M., Sarwar, A., Ahmed, E., Muzammil, M., Khan, M. I., Faheem, M. A., Buttar, N. A., Ali, S., & Bernhofer, C. (2022). A systematic review on farmers’ adaptation strategies in Pakistan toward climate change. Atmosphere, 13(8), Article e1280. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13081280

Sarhad Rural Support Programme. (2024). Annual review 2023–24. SRSP. https://srsp.org.pk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Annual-Review-2023-24.pdf

Tang, J., Wang, J., & Feng, X. (2024). Early warning systems and farmers’ adaptation to extreme weather: Empirical evidence from the North China Plain. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 29, Article e86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-024-10183-9

Twumasi, M. A., Jiang, Y., Ameyaw, B., Danquah, F. O., & Acheampong, M. O. (2021). Internet use and farm households’ food and nutrition security nexus: Evidence from Ghana. Review of Development Economics, 25(3), 1417–1435. https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.13025

UN Women. (2024). Research Brief: Women, peace and digital (in)security in South-East Asia: Reflections on diverse experiences in the digital sphere. https://asiapacific.unwomen.org/sites/default/files/2024-10/un-women_digital_insecurity_2024-c.pdf

United Nations Development Programme Pakistan. (2025). Glacial Lake Outburst Flood (GLOF) II project brief: Scaling up of glacial lake outburst flood risk reduction in Northern Pakistan. https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/2025-09/glof-ii-project-brief.pdf

United Nations Development Programme Pakistan. (2023). Annual Performance Report 2022: Scaling-up of Glacial Lake Outburst Flood (GLOF-II) risk reduction in Northern Pakistan (PIMS 5660). United Nations Development Programme.

Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x

Zheng, H., & Ma, W. (2024). Economic benefits of internet use for smallholder wheat farmers. Applied Economics, 56(4), 398–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2023.2167928

Published
2025-12-11
How to Cite
Riaz, S., & Shahzad, F. (2025). ICTs for Climate Resilience and Rural Development in Pakistan: Bridging Digital Divides for Inclusive Innovation. Media and Communication Review, 5(2), 237-263. Retrieved from https://journals.umt.edu.pk/index.php/MCR/article/view/7305
Section
Articles