Roasting Videos: A YouTube-based Vernacular Discourse
Abstract
Abstract Views: 417This research endeavors to investigate the impact of a novel genre, that is, roasting. It also aims to know how this YouTube discourse finds its way into the vernacular discourse in the Pakistani context. The researchers selected two highly subscribed Pakistani YouTube channels, that is, KhujLee Family and CBA-Arslan Naseer. Using the purposive sampling technique two videos from each channel were selected, which made a total of four videos selected as sample. The researchers meticulously observed the trending section of YouTube with the purpose to select far reaching roasting videos of the aforementioned channels. This phenomenological research employed the Interactive Alignment Model as its theoretical framework. The conclusions suggested that conversation designs are the outcomes of addressee feedback and penetrate the vernacular discourse (Chiarello & Clark, 2012), casting a deep impact on its viewers particularly in terms of desensitization. The findings further explicated that desensitization has amplified because of the consumption and reciprocation of such content by the receivers, courtesy of the participatory culture of YouTube. This allows the viewers to not only enjoy roasting videos but also to imitate the abusive vocabulary used as punch line, mostly in Punjabi. The participation of viewers was observed through the comment section of the selected videos, advocating the consequent desensitization of the vernacular discourse. Subsequently, the study implies that the creation and dissemination of the roasting content can be achieved in a responsible manner by decreasing the use of curse words.
Keywords: CBA-Arslan Naseer channel, desensitization, Interactive Alignment Model, Khujlee Family channel, participatory culture, roasting videos, trending section, vernacular discourse, YouTubeDownloads
References
Blazeski, A., Lowenthal, J., Wang, Y., Teuben, R., Zhu, R., Gerecht, S., Tomaselli, G., & Tung, L. J. (2019). Engineered heart slice model of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy using plakophilin-2 mutant myocytes. Tissue Engineering Part A, 25(9-10), 725−735. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2018.0272 Burgess, J., & Green, J. (2018). YouTube: Online video and participatory culture. John Wiley & Sons.
Chiarello, C. (2012). Right hemisphere contributions to lexical semantics. Springer Science & Business Media.
Clark, J. (2012). Language, sex and social structure: Analyzing discourses of sexuality. Palgrave Macmillan.
Ellington, T. N. (2014). Bloggers, vloggers, and virtual sorority: A means of support for African American women wearing natural hair. Journalism and Mass Communication, 4(9), 552−564.
Gann, T. M. (2012). Toward a comprehensive theory of audience design (Doctoral dissertation, UC Riverside). Timothy Matthew Gann.
Goldberg, A. E. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford University Press. Guo, L., & Lee, L. (2013). The critique of YouTube-based vernacular discourse: A case study of YouTube's Asian community. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 30(5), 391−406. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 15295036.2012.755048
Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence Culture: where old and new media collide. New York University Press.
Jenkins, H. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century (p. 145). The MIT Press.
Kafai, Y. B., & Peppler, K. A. (2011). Youth, technology, and DIY: Developing participatory competencies in creative media production. Review of Research in Education, 35(1), 89−119. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X10383211
Merchant, G. (2009). Web 2.0, new literacies, and the idea of learning through participation. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 8(3), 107−122.
Molyneaux, H., O’Donnell, S., Gibson, K., & Singer, J. (2008). Exploring the gender divide on YouTube: An analysis of the creation and reception of vlogs. American Communication Journal, 10(2), 1−14.
Ohiagu, O. P., & Okorie, V. O. (2014). Social media: Shaping and transmitting popular culture. Covenant Journal of Communication, 2(1), 93−108.
Ono, K. A., & Sloop, J. M. (1995). The critique of vernacular discourse. Communications Monographs, 62(1), 19−46. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759509376346
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2004). The interactive-alignment model: Developments and refinements. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(2), 212-2015.
Williams, B. (2008). “What South Park character are you? popular culture, literacy, and online performances of identity. Computers and Composition, 25(1), 24−39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2007.09.005
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.