Evaluation of Learning Outcomes: A Case Study of Secondary Level Compulsory English Textbooks of the Punjab Board, Pakistan
Abstract
Abstract Views: 778
This study examines the learning outcomes of selected English textbooks at the cognitive level. The aim of the present study is to explore the levels of criticality in the learning outcomes of compulsory English textbooks (Grade 6-10) published by the Punjab Board, based on which their activities and exercises are designed. Learning outcomes of compulsory English textbooks (Grade 6-10) were analyzed following the Critical Thinking Evaluation Model (CTEM). Post-use evaluation of the learning outcome of compulsory English textbooks (Grade 6-10) has not been carried out yet. To fill this gap, selected English textbooks were evaluated in terms of their critical thinking skills based learning outcomes. The evaluated textbooks were selected through stratified sampling. A mixed-method approach including both qualitative and quantitative data analysis was used to make findings more reliable and valid. Exploratory research design was adopted to explore the levels of criticality in compulsory English textbooks (Grade 6-10). The totality of results showed that the ‘implementation’ level of CTEM was the most frequent among the learning outcomes. The second most frequent level of criticality was ‘background knowledge’ and the third most frequent was ‘apprehension’. ‘Anatomization’ and ‘creativity’ levels of criticality appeared less frequently among the learning outcomes of compulsory English textbooks, while the ‘conceptualization’ level of CTEM was the least frequent. It was found that the learning outcomes of compulsory English textbooks (Grade 6-10) were not designed to enhance critical evaluation and self-directed learning. The results are beneficial for textbook designers, textbook evaluators, examiners, paper setters, teachers, students, and teacher trainers. This study contributes to the development of the English language teaching system in public schools.
Keywords: CTEM (Critical Thinking Evaluation Model), English textbooks, learning outcomes
Downloads
References
Azizi, M. 2012. Critical Thinking in General English Coursebooks Taught in Iranian Universities. Journal of Language, Culture, and Translation (LCT), 15-36.
Badawy, M., El-Aziz, A. A., and Hefny, H. A. 2016. Analysis of learning objectives for higher education textbooks using text mining. 2016 12th International Computer Engineering Conference (ICENCO). doi:10.1109/icenco.2016.7856469
Bloom’s Taxonomy: The Ultimate Guide. 2018. Retrieved from Top Hat Blog: https://tophat.com/blog/blooms-taxonomy-ultimate-guide
Fatima, G., Shah, S. K., and Sultan, H. 2015. Textbooks Analysis and Evaluation of 7th and 8th Grade in Pakistani Context. International Journal of Language Teaching, 79-97.
Hutchinson, T. and Torres, E. 1994. The textbook as agent of change. English Language Teaching Journal. 48 (2), 315-328.
Hinchman, K. A. 2002. How teachers use the textbook: Lessons from three secondary school classrooms. English Language Teaching Journal. 48 (2), 304-315.
Rahmawati, L. 2018. A Content Analysis of English Textbook 'Primary English as a Second Language'(Master's thesis, Sunan Ampel State Islamic University Surabaya) (pp. 1-54). Surabaya: Sunan Ampel State Islamic University.
Skowronski, K. 2000. Textbooks use and classroom practices: A close look at one classroom. English Language Teaching Journal. 2 (2), 546-575.
Teaching Commons. (2019). Retrieved from Stanford University: https://teachingcommons.stanford.edu/resources/course-preparation-resources/creating-syllabus
Teaching Tip: The Fink Think. 2013. Retrieved from https://www.vaniercollege.qc.ca/pdo/2013/02/teaching-tip-the-fink-think
Tomlinson, B. 1998. Materials development in language teaching. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
