Words in Mental Lexicon: A Comparative Analysis of Word Association (WA) Responses of Pakistani L1 and Afghan L2 Speakers of Urdu
Abstract
Abstract Views: 49Vocabulary acquisition in both L1 and L2 has depended on the opinion of associative language learning to help recognize and elucidate the procedures of lexical acquisition and development in the mind of language learners. To date, L2 studies in this area have delivered relatively controversial findings. The current study revisited certain corresponding issues in order to gain insight into the restoration of words in the mental lexicon. Moreover, it also strived to understand the relationship between lexical development and the process of word association (WA). To better understand the relationship between lexical meaning and mental lexicon, this study explored and compared the word associations of a group of Afghan Urdu speakers and a group of Urdu native speakers. It aimed to understand how mental links are developed between lexical items in the mental lexicon, a process commonly believed to partially support vocabulary acquisition. The findings revealed that paradigmatic relations created by L2 learners are dominant in their data sets, while syntagmatic relations are leading in L1 data sets. The findings support general trends in this area of research, that is, learning of Urdu language in Pakistan by foreigners. Moreover, the findings further highlight the importance of lexical associative processes employed in second language acquisition. To conclude, the study contributes to WA research, the description of mental lexicon, and L2 language learning and teaching.
Downloads
References
Asgari, E., & Chappelier, J. C. (2013). Linguistic resources and topic models for the analysis of persian poems (Paper presentation). Proceedings of the workshop on computational linguistics for literature, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Çetikaya, F. Ç., Sönmez, M., & Topçam, A. B. (2020). A formative assessment example: Word association test. International Education Studies, 13(8), 103-117.
Derman, A., & Eilks, I. (2016). Using a word association test for the assessment of high school students' cognitive structures on dissolution. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(4), 902-913. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RP00084C
Fitzpatrick, M. C., Weltzin, J. F., Sanders, N. J., & Dunn, R. R. (2007). The biogeography of prediction error: Why does the introduced range of the fire ant over‐predict its native range? Global Ecology and Biogeography, 16(1), 24-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2006.00258.x
Fitzpatrick, T., & Thwaites, P. (2020). Word association research and the L2 lexicon. Language Teaching, 53(3), 237-274. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444820000105
Harrison, S. V. (2015). Word association: Exploring the L2 mental lexicon of Korean EFL learners. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, 461, 8-37.
Jiang, N. (2000). Lexical representation and development in a second language. Applied Linguistics, 21(1), 47-77. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.1.47
Khazaeenezhad, B., & Alibabaee, A. (2013). Investigating the role of L2 language proficiency in word association behavior of L2 learners: A case of Iranian EFL learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(1), 108-115. https://doi.oeg/10.4304/tpls.3.1.108-115
Lu, X., & Lim, J. (2019). Korean EFL learners' L2 mental lexicon: Vocabulary size and word association types. English Teaching, 7(4), 131-151.
Ly, T. H., & Jung, C. K. (2013). An exploration of the mental lexicon of Korean EFL learners., 6(2), 3-28.
Marzban, A., Bagheri, M. S., Sadighi, F., & Rassaei, E. (2019). Probing into native and nonnative students’ mental lexicon: A case of word association comparison. Psycholinguistics, 25(2), 197-213. https://doi.org/10.31470/2309-1797-2019-25-2-197-213
McCarthy, M. (1990). Vocabulary. Oxford University Press.
Meara, P. (2009). Connected words: Word associations and second language vocabulary acquisition (Vol. 24). John Benjamins Publishing.
Moon, R. (1997). Vocabulary connections: Multi-word items in English. Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy, 40-63.
Nekah, S. M. A., Akhlaghi, E., & Ebrahimi, S. (2013). An assessment of lexical sense relations based on word association test. European Scientific Journal, 9(11), 383-399.
Passand, F. G. S. H. (2015). The study of Iranian EFL learners' mental lexicon through word association tests. Journal of Educational, Health and Community Psychology, 4(2), 105-118.
Pranoto, B. E., & Afrilita, L. K. (2019). The organization of words in mental lexicon: Evidence from word association test. Teknosastik, 16(1), 26-33.
Prihatini, A. (2020). Word association and its function at the constituent understanding on the language learning. KnE Social Sciences, 4(4), 18-25. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v4i4.646
Roux, P. W. (2013). Words in the mind: Exploring the relationship between word association and lexical development. Polyglossia, 24(8), 80-91.
Seguin, M. (2017). Exploration of the relationship between word-association and learners’ lexical development with a focus on American L1 and Croatian L2 speakers. Explorations in English Language and Linguistics, 3(2), 80-101.
Wendari, T., & Zaim, M. (2021, September). Classifying word association test (WAT) response in song study at students senior high school 1 Sungai Aur. 8th International Conference on English Language and Teaching (ICOELT-8 2020) (pp. 68-71). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210914.013
Wharton, C. P. (2010). Changing associations: The effect of direct vocabulary instruction on the word associations of Japanese college students [Master thesis, University of Birmingham].
Wilkins, D. A. (1972). Linguistics in language teaching (Vol. 111). Edward Arnold.
Xiang, L., & Nam, H. (2022). L1 mediation in Chinese English learners’ mental lexicon: Evidence from word association tests. Language Teaching Research, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211066017
Zhang, X., & Nannan, L. I. U. (2014). Exploring the second language mental lexicon with word association tests. Cross-Cultural Communication, 10(4), 143-148.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.