A Minimalist Perspective of Interrogatives in the Punjabi Language
Abstract
Abstract Views: 0
Chomsky’s Theory of Universal Grammar (UG) (1993, 1995) incorporates some universal principles for grammatical descriptions of all possible human languages. It is because all aspects of human languages may not be universal; this theory also offers some parameters through which languages may vary from one to another. The Minimalist Program (MP) (Chomsky, 1993) as a part of UG follows minimalist principles such as the principle of economy, the principle of uniformity, and the search for simplicity, which guide the creation of grammatical rules and representations. The current study analysed the interrogative sentences in Punjabi to determine the similarities between Punjabi and English by using the Minimalist Program (MP) as a theoretical framework. Almost all Punjabi dialects or Standard Punjabi published in the academic context provide many ways to express interrogation. Two common types of interrogative sentences analysed here include yes-no questions and wh-questions which are also called k-questions in Punjabi because they start with a k sound, for instance, kitthe (where), kinj (how), kaunN (why), kii (what), etc, have been analysed. The analysis showed that there is no obligatory movement, either in the case of yes-no questions or in wh-movement in Punjabi, such as in English. Similarly, unlike English, there is neither the movement of auxiliaries nor of any other word in any interrogative sentence. Furthermore, the study concluded that the analysis of the Punjabi language through minimalism is possible and, therefore, it is implied that Punjabi follows the proposed principle of Universal Grammar.
Downloads
References
Bauer, L. (2007). Linguistics student’s handbook. Edinburgh University Press.
Bhatia, T. (1993). Punjabi. Routledge.
Bhardwaj, A., Garg, S., Sondhi, S. K., & Taneja, D. S. (2012). Nitrate contamination of shallow aquifer groundwater in the central districts of Punjab, India. Journal of Environmental Science & Engineering, 54(1), 90–97.
Carnie, A. (2021). Syntax: A generative introduction (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Chomsky, N. (1982). Some concepts and consequences of the theory of government and binding. The MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (1993). A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In K. L. Hale & S. J. Keyser (Eds.), The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger. (pp.1–52). The MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. The MIT Press.
Chomsky, N., Gallego, Á. J., & Ott, D. (2019). Generative grammar and the faculty of language: Insights, questions, and challenges [Special Issue]. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 229–261. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.288
Chomsky, N. (2008). On phases. In R. Freidin, C. P. Otero & M. L. Zubizarreta (Eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud (pp. 133–164). The MIT Press.
Dayal, V., & Mahajan, A. (2004). Clause structure in South Asian languages. Spinger.
Eberhard, D. M., Gary F. S., & Charles D. F. (Eds.). (2021). Ethnologue: Languages of the World. (24th ed.). SIL International.
Evans, N., & Levinson, S. C. (2009). With diversity in mind: Freeing the language sciences from Universal Grammar. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(5), 472–492. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X09990525
Freidin, R., & Lasnik, H. (2011). Some roots of minimalism in generative grammar. In C. Boeckx (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic minimalism (pp. 1–26). Oxford University Press.
Gargesh, R. (2020). South Asian Englishes. In C. L. Nelson, Z. G. Proshina & D. R. Davis. (Eds.), The handbook of world Englishes, (2nd ed., pp. 105–134). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Graf, T., & Kostyszyn, K. (2021). Multiple wh-movement is not special: The subregular complexity of persistent features in Minimalist grammars. Proceedings of the Society for Computation in Linguistics, 4(1), 275–285. https://doi.org/10.7275/2dfv-v219
Hinzen, W., & Sheehan, M. (2017). The philosophy of universal grammar. In I. G. Roberts (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of universal grammar. (pp. 37–60). Oxford University Press.
Kamran, U., & Saghir, S. (2019). Phonology, morphology, and syntax interfaces in Pakistani languages. Global Language Review, 4(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.31703/glr.2019(IV-I).05
Khan, A. R., & Kausar, G. (2019). A minimalist comparison of Punjabi and English. Journal of the Research Society of Pakistan, 56(2), 1–8.
Khan, A. R., & Kausar, G. (2021). Case valuation in transitive clauses: A comparative study of Punjabi and English syntax. Linguistics and Literature Review, 7(1), 1–15.
Khan, A. R., Kausar, G., & Khan, A. (2019). Construction of maximal projections: A comparative minimalist study of Punjabi and English. The Discourse, 5(2), 261–271.
Kiani, Z., Khan, A. Q., & Bukhari, N. H. (2011). Bilabial assimilation in Urdu: An acoustic analysis. Language in India, 11(4), 173–185.
Landau, I. (2007). EPP extensions. Linguistic Inquiry, 38(3), 485–523. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2007.38.3.485
Language Resource Center. (2017, August 15). Language profile: Punjabi. https://lrclangbank.wordpress.com/2017/08/15/language-profile-punjabi/
Lasnik, H. (2002). The minimalist program in syntax. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(10), 432–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01977-0
Mann, G. S., Sing, G. Shah, A., Schreffler, G., & Murphy, A. (2011). An introduction to Punjabi: grammar, conversation and literature. Publication Bureau, Punjabi University, Patiala.
Mendívil-Giró, J. L. (2018). Is universal grammar ready for retirement? A short review of a longstanding misinterpretation. Journal of Linguistics, 54(4), 859–888. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226718000166
Nayudu, A. (2008). Issues in the syntax of Marathi: A minimalist approach [Doctoral dissertation, Durham University]. Ethos e-Theses Online Service. https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.445813
Ott, D. (2019). The minimalist program, by Noam Chomsky, and: Aspects of the theory of syntax, by Noam Chomsky. The Canadian Journal of Linguistics/La revue canadienne de linguistique, 64(3), 559–564.
Radford, A. (2009). Analysing English sentences: A minimalist approach. Cambridge University Press.
Roberts, I. (2019). Diachronic and comparative syntax. Routledge.
Shackle, C. (2017). Punjabi language. Encyclopædia Britannica.
Sharma, S. K., & Mittal, M. (2019). Syntactic analysis of participial-type complex sentence in Punjabi language. In A. K. Luhach, K. B. G. Hawari, I. C. Mihai, P. A. Hsiung & R. B. Mishra (Eds.), Smart computational Strategies: Theoretical and practical aspects. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6295-8_10
Stockwell, R. P., Schachter, P., & Partee, B. H. (1973). The major syntactic structures of English. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Tahir, N. (2020). Infinite verb effect on subject marking in standard Urdu and Punjabi Urdu: A comparative study. Aligarh Journal of Linguistics, 139-189.
Yule, H., Burnell, A. C., & Crooke, W. (2013). Hobson-Jobson: A glossary of colloquial Anglo-Indian words and phrases, and of kindred terms, etymological, historical, geographical and discursive. New Age Books.
Zwart, J. W. (1998). The minimalist program. Journal of Linguistics, 34(1), 213–226. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226797006889
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
