Evaluating the English Language Courses for  Engineers in Pakistan Using an ESP Approach

Azhar  Pervaiz; Kaynat  KhudaDad

doi:10.32350/jcct.52.06

Azhar Pervaiz Department of English, University of Sargodha, Pakistan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4257-8738
Kaynat KhudaDad Department of English, University of Sargodha, Pakistan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4859-9476

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32350/jcct.52.06

Keywords: engineers, English, Pakistan, syllabus, syllabus design, technology

Abstract

Abstract Views: 0

The current study attempted to evaluate the English language courses taught in engineering universities for prospective engineers in Pakistan. A syllabus for any degree or certificate, especially professional degrees, provides a road map for learners. Therefore, most of the students with professional degrees including engineering, think that there is no need to waste their energy on subjects that are not directly related to their profession. Resultantly, the subject of English could not take the prime position in the engineering universities in Pakistan. Therefore, in the current study both the questionnaires and interviews were set consisting of three categories. The first category of sample comprised of 50 male and female students who have completed at least one course of English mostly from Lahore based universities. The second category of sample was taken from twenty English language teachers from other two universities in Lahore and the third category of sample was taken from twenty professional engineers in Pakistan. The study is significant as it attempted to evaluate the existing syllabus of Pakistani engineering universities as the syllabus of engineering in Pakistan is at par with the syllabuses provided by organizations of international standards, such as IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.). The results showed that the syllabus designed for engineering students was not sufficient to meet their professional needs. In this regard, the study may also be helpful for the committee of curriculum revision constituted by the Higher Education Commission (HEC), Pakistan.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amirian, Z., & Tavakoli, M. (2009). Reassessing the ESP courses offered to engineering students in Iran. English for Specific Purposes World, 8(23), 1–13.

Arnó-Macià, E., Aguilar-Pérez, M., & Tatzl, D. (2020). Engineering students' perceptions of the role of ESP courses in internationalized universities. English for Specific Purposes, 58, 58–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2019.12.001

Basturkmen, H. (2019). ESP teacher education needs. Language Teaching, 52(3), 318–330. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000398

Campion, G. C. (2016). ‘The learning never ends’: Exploring teachers’ views on the transition from General English to EAP. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 23, 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.06.003

Chaloner, B. (2006). An evaluative study on building the bridge between the training room and the workplace. Evaluation & Research in Education, 19(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500790608668323

Fortanet-Gómez, I., & Räisänen, C. A. (Eds.). (2008). ESP in European higher education: Integrating language and content (Vol. 4). John Benjamins Publishing.

Gatehouse, K. (2001). Key issues in English for specific purposes (ESP) curriculum development. The Internet TESL Journal, 7(10), 1–10.

Graves, K. (2008). The language curriculum: A social contextual perspective. Language Teaching, 41(2), 147–181. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444807004867

Hamp-Lyons, L. (2001). What Is EAP? In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning. Routledge.

Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A., (1987). English for specific purposes: A learning- centered approach. Cambridge University Press

Kiely, R., & Rea-Dickins, P. (2005). Program evaluation in language education. Springer.

Martin, I. P. (2014). English language teaching in the Philippines. World Englishes, 33(4), 472–485. https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12108

McNamara, T. (2000). Language testing. Oxford University Press.

Mostafavi, S., Mohseni, A., & Abbasian, G. R. (2021). The pedagogical efficacy of ESP courses for Iranian students of engineering from students’ and instructors’ perspectives. Asian- Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 6(1), 1–20.

Paulson, E. J., Alexander, J., & Armstrong, S. (2007). Peer review re-viewed: Investigating the juxtaposition of composition students' eye movements and peer-review processes. Research in the Teaching of English, 41(3), 304–335.

Pervaiz, A., Batool, N., & Kanwal, Z. (2017). Exploring the motivational factors among undergraduates learning english as a second language students in Pakistan: A descriptive study. Pakistan Journal of Languages and Translation Studies, 5(2017), 60–73.

Potocar, M. (2002). ESP in Slovenian secondary technical and vocational education. English for Specific Purposes World, 1(1). http://esp-world.info/Articles_1/esp.html

Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. W. (2013). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. Routledge.

Rus, D. (2020). Creative methodologies in teaching English for engineering students. Procedia Manufacturing, 46, 337–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.03.049

Salmani-Nodoushan, M. A. (2003). Text familiarity, reading tasks, and ESP test performance: A study on Iranian LEP and non-LEP university students. The reading matrix, 3(1), 1–14.

Siddiqui, S. (2007). Rethinking education in Pakistan: Perceptions, practices, and possibilities. Paramount Publishing Enterprise.

Stavropoulou, A., & Stroubouki, T. (2014). Evaluation of educational programmes-the contribution of history to modern evaluation thinking. Health Science Journal, 8(2), 193–204.

Stratton, J. (1999). Critical thinking for college students. Rowman & Littlefield.

Tehseem. T., & Batool, N. (2014). Teaching children complex syntax makes them smarter: An approach towards scaffolding. ELF Annual Research Journal, 16(2014), 69–92.

Terraschke, A., & Wahid, R. (2011). The impact of EAP study on the academic experiences of international postgraduate students in Australia. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10(3), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.05.003

Tsou, W., & Chen, F. (2014). ESP program evaluation framework: Description and application to a Taiwanese university ESP program. English for Specific Purposes, 33, 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2013.07.008

Urrieta, L. (2007). Figured worlds and education: An introduction to the special issue. The Urban Review, 39(2), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-007-0051-0

Varghese, M., Morgan, B., Johnston, B., & Johnson, K. A. (2005). Theorizing language teacher identity: Three perspectives and beyond. Journal of language, Identity, and Education, 4(1), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327701jlie0401_2

Wang, Y. C. (2015). Promoting collaborative writing through wikis: A new approach for advancing innovative and active learning in an ESP context. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(6), 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.881386

Watanabe, Y., Norris, J. M., & González-Lloret, M. (2009). Identifying and responding to evaluation needs in college foreign language programs. In J. M. Norris (Ed.), Toward useful program evaluation in college foreign language education (pp. 5–56). Natl Foreign Lg Resource Ctr.

Worthen, S., & Sanders, J. Fitzpatrick (2004). Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines. Allyn and Bacon.