Investigating Functional Variation across Academic Disciplines: A Multidimensional Analysis of Research Articles
Abstract
Abstract Views: 52
The current study aims to investigate the functional variation in academic writing across six major disciplines of sciences, namely biology, physics, and computer science and of social sciences, namely linguistics, sociology, and psychology research articles. Furthermore, the current study also compares the use of language in science and social sciences research articles (RAs). For this purpose, a corpus of 300 research articles from six sub-disciplines of science and social sciences journals was compiled to conduct the analysis. A Multidimensional Analysis Tagger using version 1.3.2 was selected to tag and evaluate the RAs corpus. The triangulation research method was deployed to analyze the data quantitatively and to interpret the results qualitatively. The findings indicate that there are functional differences in the language employed in academic disciplines, particularly in terms of being informational, non-narrative, and persuasive. Likewise, comparable outcomes were noticed in dimension 3. The findings indicate that there are functional differences in the language employed in academic disciplines, particularly in terms of being informational, non-narrative, and persuasive. Likewise, comparable outcomes were noticed in dimension 3. The results may be helpful for the researchers, students of different disciplines, and teachers to spot trends across various sub-disciplines.
Downloads
References
Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analyzing genre: Language use in professional settings. Longman
Bhatia, V. K. (2002). Applied genre analysis: A multi-perspective model. Iberica, (4), 3–19.
Bhatia, V. K. (2008). Genre analysis, ESP and professional practice. English for Specific Purposes, 27(2), 161–174.
Basturkmen, H. (2012). A genre-based investigation of discussion sections of research articles in dentistry and disciplinary variation. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(2), 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.10.004
Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2009). Register, genre, and style. Cambridge University Press.
Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge University Press
Biber, D. (2015). Corpus-based and corpus-driven analyses of language variation and use. In B. Heine & H. Narrog (Eds.), The oxford handbook of linguistic analysis (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199677078.013.0008
Biber, D., & Finegan, E. (2001). Intra-textual variation within medical research articles. In S. Conrad & D. Biber (Eds.), Variation in English: Multi-dimensional studies (pp. 108–123). Longman.
Conrad, S. M. (1996). Investigating academic texts with corpus-based techniques: An example from biology. Linguistics and education, 8(3), 299–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-5898(96)90025-X
Crystal, D., & Davy, D. (1969). Investigating English style. Longman.
Crystal, D. (1991). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics. Basil Blackwell.
Egbert, J. (2015). Publication type and discipline variation in published academic writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 20(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.20.1.01egb
Finegan, E., & Biber, D. (1994). Register and social dialect variation: An integrated approach. Oxford University Press.
Friginal, E., & Hardy, J. (2013). Corpus-based sociolinguistics: A guide for students. Routledge.
Gardner, S., Biber, D., & Nesi, H. (2015, July 21–July 24). MDA perspectives on Discipline and Level in the BAWE corpus. Proceedings of Corpus Linguistics 2015, Lancaster, United Kingdom.
Gray, B. (2013). More than discipline: Uncovering multi-dimensional patterns of variation in academic research articles. Corpora, 8(2), 153–181.
Geng, Y., & Wharton, S. (2016). Evaluative language in discussion sections of doctoral theses: Similarities and differences between L1 Chinese and L1 English writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 22, 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.01.001
Hyland, K. (2016). Writing with attitude: Conveying a stance in academic texts. In Hinkel, E (Ed.), Teaching English grammar to speakers of other languages. Routledge.
Hyland, K. (2000). Developments in English for specific purposes: A multi-disciplinary approach. English for specific purposes, 19(3), 297–300.
Hardy, J. A., & Romer, U. (2013). Revealing disciplinary variation in student writing: A multi-dimensional analysis of the Michigan corpus of upper-level student papers (MICUSP). Corpora, 8(2), 183–207.
Jin, B. (2021). A multi-dimensional analysis of research article discussion sections in an engineering discipline: Corpus explorations and scientists’ perceptions. SAGE Open, 11(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244021105040
Jin, B. (2018). A multidimensional analysis of research article discussion sections in the Field of chemical engineering. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 61(3), 242–256. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpc.2018.2817002
Kaplan, R. B. (1966). Cultural thought patterns in inter‐cultural education. Language learning, 16(1‐2), 1–20
Lillis, T., & Curry, M. J. (2010). Academic writing in a global context. Routledge.
Liu, J., & Xiao, L. (2022). A multi-dimensional analysis of conclusions in research articles: Variation across disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 67, 46–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2022.04.003
Martı́nez, I. A. (2003). Aspects of theme in the method and discussion sections of biology journal articles in English. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2(2), 103–123.
Rashid, A., & Mahmood, M. A. (2019). Linguistic variations across disciplines: A multidimensional analysis of Pakistani research articles. Global Social Sciences Review, 4(1), 34–48. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(iv-i).04
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
