Construal Operations: An Analysis of the Political Discourse regarding COVID-19

Tanzeela  Waqar

doi:10.32350/jcct.62.05

Tanzeela Waqar International Islamic University Islamabad

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32350/jcct.62.05

Keywords: COVID -19, CL-CDA, gender, political discourse

Abstract

Abstract Views: 0

Women are underrepresented in high positions in many fields. Taking the example of politics, this unequal social representation may have an impact on the discourses of the relevant sexes in choosing a specific discourse type as an effect of power. The COVID-19 pandemic required political leaders to communicate to their nations directly through official speeches to make them conversant about the day-to-day varying situation. The speeches of the leaders during the catastrophe may reveal their manifested gender. The aim of the research is to explore how they position or are positioned as leaders in the conventions of the political discourse differently. The research takes on Fairclough’s (2015) notion of power behind discourse to explore the dynamic relationship of power, discourse and gender. As far as methodological framework is concerned, cognitive linguistic-critical discourse analysis is employed to analyze the qualitative data which includes political speeches of different leaders. The data analysis reveals that male leaders do not change their conventional discourse pattern. It is the females who keep on changing linguistic techniques to communicate effectively keeping in view the demand of the situation. The implication of the study is that the reader will be assisted in examining how language that deviates from known and customary patterns can build new ways of reality. The study's considerable focus is on the discursive construction of gender representation in political discourse which will help understand that language is a rich resource to develop and shape their unique identities

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aldrich, A. S., & Lotito, N. J. (2020). Pandemic performance: Women leaders in the Covid-19 crisis. Politics & Gender, 16(4), 960–967. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X20000549
Anwar, A., Malik, M., Raees, V., & Anwar, A. (2020). Role of mass media and public health communications in the COVID-19 pandemic. Cureus, 12(9), Article e10453. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1045
Bishop, K. M., & Wahlsten, D. (1997). Sex differences in the human corpus callosum: myth or reality? Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 21(5), 581–601.
Blommaert, J., & Bulcaen, C. (2000). Critical discourse analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology, 29(1), 447–466. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.447
Carli, L. L., & Eagly, A. H. (2016). Women face a labyrinth: An examination of metaphors for women leaders. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 31(8), 514–527. https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-02-2015-0007
Dada, S., Ashworth, H. C., Bewa, M. J., & Dhatt, R. (2021). Words matter: Political and gender analysis of speeches made by heads of government during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMJ Global Health, 6(1), Article e003910.
Fairclough, N. (2015). Language and power. Routledge.
French, E. (2001). Approaches to equity management and their relationship to women in management. British Journal of Management, 12(4), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00210
Gulzar, K., Khan, S. A., Khan, I. U., Khan, S., & Amina, S. (2021). An analysis of war language in covid 19 speeches: A comparative study. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 9(3), 1399–1412. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2021.93139
Hall, K., Borba, R., & Hiramoto, M. (2021). Language and gender. In J. Stanlaw (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of linguistic anthropology (pp. 892–912). Wiley Blackwell.
Hart, C. (2011). Moving beyond metaphor in the cognitive linguistic approach to CDA. In C. Hart (Ed.), Critical discourse studies in context and cognition (pp. 171–192). John Benjamins Publishing.
Hart, C. (2013). Event-construal in press reports of violence in two recent political protests: A cognitive linguistic approach to CDA. Journal of Language and Politics, 12(3), 400–423. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.12.3.05har
Hart, C. (2015). Cognitive linguistics and critical discourse analysis. In E. Dabrowska & D. Divjak (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics. De Gruyter Mouton.
Hart, C. (2016). The visual basis of linguistic meaning and its implications for critical discourse studies: Integrating cognitive linguistic and multimodal methods. Discourse & Society, 27(3), 335–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926516630896
Hart, C. (2017). Metaphor and intertextuality in media framings of the (1984–1985) British Miners’ strike: A multimodal analysis. Discourse & Communication, 11(1), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481316683291
Hart, C. (2018). ‘Riots engulfed the city’: An experimental study investigating the legitimating effects of fire metaphors in discourses of disorder. Discourse & Society, 29(3), 279–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926517734663
Hart, C. (2019). Metaphor and the (1984–85) Miners’ Strike: A multimodal analysis. In C. Hart & D. Kelsey (Eds.), Discourses of disorder: Riots, strikes and protests in the media (pp. 133–153). Edinburgh University Press.
Hart, C. (2020a). Cognitive linguistic and experimental methods in critical discourse studies. In A. De Fina & A. Georgakopoulou (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of discourse studies (pp. 186–212). Cambridge University Press.

Hart, C. (2020b). Cognitive linguistic critical discourse analysis. In C. Hart. (Ed.), Researching Discourse: A student guide (pp. 97–123). Routledge.
Holmes, J. (2005). Power and discourse at work: Is gender relevant? In M. M. Lazar (Ed.), Feminist critical discourse analysis: Gender, power and ideology in discourse (pp. 31–60). Palgrave Macmillan.
Johnson, C., & Williams, B. (2020). Gender and political leadership in a time of COVID. Politics & Gender, 16(4), 943–950. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X2000029X
Julios-Costa, M. (2017). The age of crime: A cognitive-linguistic critical discourse study of media representations and semantic framings of youth offenders in the Uruguayan media. Discourse & Communication, 11(4), 362–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481317707378
Khayyam, U., & Tahir, F. (2019). Female political power and the complexity of social barriers in Pakistan. NUST Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 5(2), 153–175.
Khelghat-Doost, H., & Sibly, S. (2020). The impact of patriarchy on women’s political participation. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(3), 396–409.
Lakoff, R. (1973). Language and woman's place. Language in Society, 2(1), 45–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500000051
Lazar, M. M. (2007). Feminist critical discourse analysis: Articulating a feminist discourse praxis. Critical discourse studies, 4(2), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900701464816
Mandl, B. J., & Reis, B. Y. (2022). The language of crisis: spatiotemporal effects of COVID-19 pandemic dynamics on health crisis communications by political leaders. NPJ Digital Medicine, 5(1), Article e1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-021-00554-w
McDowell, J. M., Singell, L. D., Jr., & Ziliak, J. P. (2001). Gender and promotion in the economics profession. ILR Review, 54(2), 224–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/001979390105400202
Mertens, D. M. (2007). Transformative paradigm: Mixed methods and social justice. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(3), 212–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689807302811
Montiel, C. J., Uyheng, J., & Paz, E. D. (2021). The language of pandemic leaderships: Mapping political rhetoric during the COVID‐19 outbreak. Political Psychology, 42(5), 747–766. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12753
Olimat, S. N. (2020). Words as powerful weapons: Dysphemism in Trump's Covid-19 Speeches. 3L: Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 26(3), 17–29. http://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2020-2603-02
Parmanand, S. (2022). Macho populists versus COVID: Comparing political masculinities. European Journal of Women's Studies, 29(1), 43S–59S. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505068221092871
Piazza, K. S., & Diaz, G. (2020). Light in the midst of chaos: COVID-19 and female political representation. World Development, 136, Article e105125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105125
Rudwick, S., Sijadu, Z., & Turner, I. (2021). Politics of language in COVID-19: Multilingual perspectives from South Africa. Politikon, 48(2), 242–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/02589346.2021.1917206
Sealey, A. (2020). Introduction to discourse: Definitions, debates, and decisions. In C. Hart. (Ed.), Researching Discourse: A student guide (pp. 6–18). Routledge.
van Dijk, T. A. (2009). Critical discourse studies: A sociocognitive approach. In J. Angermuller, D. Maingueneau, & R. Wodak. (Eds.), The discourse studies reader: Main currents in theory and analysis (pp. 389–399). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Wodak, R. (2001). The discourse-historical approach. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 63–94). Sage Publisher.
Yarchi, M., & Hershman-Shitrit, M. (2023). Leaders’ rhetoric during crisis: Gender differences in leaders’ communication during the COVID-19 pandemic crisis. The Journal of International Communication, 29(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13216597.2022.2122531
Zoon, A. (2019). Analysing multiple identities in the workplace discourse: A gender based study [Doctoral dissertation, NUML, University]. NUML Online Research Repository. https://norr.numl.edu.pk/attachments/4_1640672448_83d858f200.PDF