Political leaders frequently engage with the masses to fulfil their political agendas. For this purpose, language serves as a vital tool in the hands of the politicians. This fact is mostly noticeable in the political speeches made on various public forums. Taking into account the significance of such speeches for moving the masses in their favour, the current study carries out a critical discourse analysis of the speeches of the prominent politician and the current Prime Minister Imran Khan. The aim is to to unveil ideological underpinnings of the political rhetoric and speeches of the said politician, The researchers selected three speeches of the said politician delivered during three different political eras inlcuding the protest era, pre-election era, and the post-election era. These eras were categorized following the stratified sampling technique.These speeches were analyzed using van Dijk’s (1993) socio-cognitive approach. The analysis focused on the use of certain strategies such as mind control, rhetoric art, argumentative move, emotional attachment and historical distortion. The results attributed Imran Khan’s rise to the position of the Prime Minister to the strategic and manipulative political discourse made in his speeches. His primary focus remained on controlling the mind of the youth, which was achieved through the use of the above mentioned strategies in multiple ways. This research is significant as it creates awareness and consciousness in the public regarding the rhetorical strategies adopted by political leaders such as Imran Khan to exercise mind control and mould public opinion in their favour.
Batstone, R. 1995. Grammar in Discourse: Attitude and Deniability. In G. Cook and B Seidlhofer, (eds.) Principle & Practice in Applied Linguistics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 197-213.
Biography.com Editors, Imran Khan Biography,https://www.biography.com/people/imran-khan- 9349193
Fairclough, N. 1989. Language and Power, London: Longman.
Fairclough, N. 1992. Discourse and Social Change, London: Polity Press.
Fairclough, N. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis, London: Longman.
Fortenbaugh , W. (2018). Aristotle on Persuasion Through Character. A Journal of the History of Rhetoric, Vol. 10, No. 3 (Summer 1992), pp. 207-244. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/rh.19126.96.36.199
Horváth, J. (2011). Critical discourse analysis of Obama's political discourse. Retrieved from http://www.pulib.sk/elpub2/FF/Ferencik2/pdf_doc/6.pdf
Luke, A. (1997). Theory and practice in critical science discourse. In L. Saha (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the sociology of education (pp. 50-56). NY: Pergamon.Retrievedfrom http://pages.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/kellner/ed270/Luke/SAHA6.html
Memon, N. Ali, B. Faraz, B . Illahi, G. (2014). Critical Analysis of Political Discourse: A Study of Benazir Bhutto's Last Speech. Balochistan Journal of Linguistics.
Triadafilos , T. (2018).Politics, Speech, and the Art of Persuasion: Toward an Aristotelian Conception of the Public Sphere. The Journal of Politics, Vol. 61, No. 3 (Aug., 1999), pp. 741-757. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2647826
van Dijk, T. A. (1993). “Principles of critical discourse analysis”. Discourse and society 4.2 , 249-283.
van Dijk, T.A. (1977). Current Trends in Text linguistics (Berlin/Newyork: De Gruyter).
van Dijk, T. A. (1997). What is political discourse analysis. Belgian journal of linguistics,
Wang, J. (2010). A critical discourse analysis of Barack Obama‘s speeches. Journal of Language Teaching and Research. 1(3). 254-261.
Wang, J. (2010). A critical discourse analysis of Barack Obama speeches. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 254-261 doi:10.4304/jltr.1.3.254-261
Wodak, R. & Micheal, M. (Eds).(2009). Methods of critical discourse analysis. Sage
Imran Khan. (2019, Jan 24). Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/biography/Imran-Khan