Gender Discourse of ‘Equal Opportunity’ for Male and Female in Pakistani English Textbooks

A Critical Discourse Analysis Study

  • Amina Khalid University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Arshad Ali Khan University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Sayyed Rashid Ali Shah King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia
Keywords: biasness, Critical Discourse Analysis, equal opportunity, gender, textbooks


Abstract Views: 405

The aim of the present article is to investigate the representation of male and female within the gender discourse of ‘equal opportunity’ in Pakistani English textbooks. The present study has focused on if the gender discourse of ‘equal opportunity’ resisted or supported in Pakistani English textbooks at varied educational levels and in what ways such discourse manifests gender notions in Pakistani society. The paradigm of this research is descriptive and qualitative. The corpus of the study is collected from the English textbooks of 5th, 6th and 8th classes of the Punjab Textbook Board Lahore through purposive sampling. The theoretical framework of the research is based on Critical Discourse Analysis approach. Within the paradigm of CDA, Van Leeuwen’s (2008) “Social Actor Network” model has been applied to analyze the gender representation in the text and the visuals. The results have shown that the discourse of ‘equal opportunity’ has been resisted in these textbooks as females have not been given the equal and fair representation. The findings are a vital source for the policy makers and the textbooks designers to improve the mistreated areas in future and keep in accordance with the policy of Education for All in real sense. This research is limited to the school textbooks of three levels only so further research can be done on other textbooks in future.


Download data is not yet available.


Adams, T. L. (2000). A dentist and a gentleman: Gender and the rise of dentistry in Ontario. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Baik, M. J. (1994). Language, ideology, and power: English textbooks of two Koreas (Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign).

Baghdadi, M. (2012). A comparison of gender representation in English (EFL) and Arabic (AFL) textbooks in Iran: A critical discourse analysis. (Master thesis, Department of Linguistics, California State University, LongBeach).

Blumberg, R. L. (2008). The invisible obstacle to educational equality gender bias in textbooks: Prospects. Quarterly Review of Comparative Education, 38, 345–361.

Brown, J., & Heidensohn, F. (2000). Gender and policing: Comparative perspectives. London: Macmillan.

Coates, J. (2003). Women, men and language: A sociolinguistic account of gender differences in language (3rd ed.). Edinburgh: Pearson Education.

Connell, R. W. (2005). Masculinities (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.

Crawford, K. (April, 2004). Intercultural education: The role of school text book analysis in shaping a critical discourse on nation and society. Paper presented at UK Pacific Circle Consortium 27th Annual Conference, Hong Kong.

Creswell, J. W. (2001). Research design: Qualitative & quantitative approaches. London: Sage Publication.

Esmaeili, S., & Arabmofrad, A. (2015). A critical discourse analysis of family and friends textbooks: Representation of genderism. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 4(4), 55–61.

Fairclough, N. (2001), Language and power (2nd ed.). London: Longman.

Fairclough, N., & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction: A multidisciplinary introduction (pp. 258–284). London: Sage Publications.

Firestone, C. (2000). Gender and textbooks in the pacific Rim: Similarities amidst diversity. Retrieved from studies/pdfs/coryppr1.PDF

Freeman, R., & McElhinny, B. (1996). Language and gender. In S. L. McKay & N. H. Hornberger, (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language teaching (pp.218–280). Cambridge, USA: Cambridge University Press.

Gebregeorgis, M. (2016). Gender construction through textbooks: The case of an Ethiopian primary school English textbook. Africa Education Review, 13(3–4), 119–140. DOI: 10.1080/18146627.2016.1224579

Hamdan, S. (2010). English language textbooks reflect gender bias: A case study in Jordan. Advances in Gender and Education, 2, 22–26.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). London: Arnold.

Lazar, M. (2005). Feminist CDA as political perspective and praxis. In Lazar M. M. (Ed.), Feminist critical discourse analysis: Gender, power and ideology in discourse (pp. 1–28). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Lakoff, R. (1973). Language and woman's place. Language in Society, 2(1), 45–80.

Lee, J. F. K., & Collins, P. (2010). Construction of gender: A comparison of Australian and Hong Kong English language textbooks. Journal of Gender Studies, 19(2), 121–137. DOI: 10.1080/09589231003695856

Mukundan, J., & Nimehchisalem, V. (2008). Gender representation in Malaysian secondary school English language textbooks. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching, 4(2), 155–173.

Mustapha, A. (2014). Sex roles in English language textbooks in Nigerian schools. Journal of ELT and Applied Linguistics (JELTAL), 2(2), 69–81.

Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Rogers, R., Malancharuvil, E. –B., Mosley, M., Hui, W. D., & Joseph, G. O. (2005). Critical discourse analysis in education: A review of literature. Washington: Sage Publications.

Rudy, R. M., Popova, L., & Linz, D. G. (2010). The context of current content analysis of gender roles: An introduction to a special issue. Sex Roles, 62(11–12), 705–720.–010-9807-1

Taxel, J. (1989). Children’s literature: A research proposal from the perspective of the sociology of school knowledge. In S. de Castell, A. Luke, & C. Luke (Eds.), Language, authority, and criticism: Readings in the school textbook (pp. 32–45). London, Philadelphia: Falmer Press.

Tahriri, A. B., & Moradpour, P. (2014). Gender representation in ‘Top-Notch’ series: A critical discourse analysis perspective. International Journal of Research Studies in Psychology, 3(2), 39–51.

Van Leeuwen, T. (1996). The representation of social actors in discourse. In C. R. Caldas-Coulthard & M. Coulthard (Eds.), Text and practices. London: Routledge.

Van Leeuwen, T. (2003). The representation of social actors in discourse. In C. R. Caldas-Coulthard & M. Coulthard (Eds.), Texts and practices: Readings in critical discourse analysis (pp. 32–70). London: Routledge.

Van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice new tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Waitt, G. (2010). Doing Foucauldian discourse analysis – Revealing social realities. In Hay I. (Ed.), Qualitative research methods in human geography (1st ed. pp. 217–240). Victoria: Oxford University Press.

Wodak, R., & Weiss, G. (Eds.). (2003). Introduction: Theory, interdisciplinarity and critical discourse analysis. In Gilbert Weiss & Ruth Wodak (Eds.), Critical discourse analysis: Theory and interdisciplinarity (pp. 1–34). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Wodak, R. (1997). Gender and discourse. London: Sage.

Wodak, R. (2001). What CDA is about—A summary of its history, important concepts and its developments. In R. Wodak, & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 1–13). London: Sage Publications.

How to Cite
Amina Khalid, Arshad Ali Khan, & Sayyed Rashid Ali Shah. (2019). Gender Discourse of ‘Equal Opportunity’ for Male and Female in Pakistani English Textbooks. Journal of Communication and Cultural Trends, 1(1), 77-98.