A Systematic Review of the Literature on the Toxicity Caused by Diapers and Pads
Abstract
Abstract Views: 649
If the chemicals produced by organism due to metabolic activities is harmful to other organisms, then it is considered toxic and is generally known as a toxin. According to previously published studies, diapers and sanitary pads are a hotbed for chemical substances as well as toxins. For this reason, it is important to raise awareness about the negative impact of using hygiene products. This study determined that these products have lethal disease promoter components/harmful chemical substances and irritants, such as superabsorbents, leak-proof absorbents, and fragrances to enhance the quality of the product. It also overviewed the health issues, caused by careless use of diapers and pads, such as respiratory tract infections (RTIs), urinary tract infections (UTIs), infertility, testicular cancer, and chronic rash. The use of these products also results in environmental degradation due to the improper disposal and handling as well as the non-decomposable nature of the products. They are also known to release dangerous chemicals such as phthalates and volatile organic chemicals (VOCs). Hence, reusable cloth diapers and pads are the best options amongst feasible alternatives, since they have no harmful chemical or plastic materials. It is recommended that diapers and pads that are prepared from bamboo fibre, banana fibre, water hyacinth, or sea sponges should be promoted and commercialized since they are biodegradable.
Downloads
References
Rhonda Donahue, The Pollution Inside You: What Is Your Body Dying to Say? Safe goods; 2009. 36 Department of Life Sciences Volume 4 Issue 1, 2022
Naz et al.
Jon Rosenberg MD, Mark Nicas, MS, MPH Yo Yomashiro – University of California, Davis 3. Sheil D. Forests, atmospheric water and an uncertain future: the new biology of the global water cycle. Forest Ecosyst. 2018;5(1):1-22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-0180138-y 4. John K, Reddy PR, Reddy KH, Sudhakar P, Reddy NE. Studies on genetic variability for morphological, water use efficiency, yield and yield traits in early segregating generation of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L). Int J Biodivers Conserv. 2012;4(13):44652. https://doi.org/10.5897/ IJBC11.200 5. Mburu A, Kinyanjui J. Development of a highly adsorbemt and antibacteria l biodegradable sanitary pad from bamboo. InInternational Conference Nationa l Council for Science and Technology, 2013 (Vol. 2). 6. Scott L, Steinfield L, Dolan C, Dopson S. Sanitary pad: acceptability and sustainability study. 2013; University of Oxford. 7. Ishii S, Katagiri R, Minobe Y, et al. Investigation of the amount of transdermal exposure of newborn babies to phthalates in paper diapers and certification of the safety of paper diapers. Regulat Toxicol Pharmacol. 2015;73(1):85-92. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.yrtph.2015.06.010 8. Dyer D. Seven decades of disposable diapers: a record of continuous innovation and expanding benefit. http://www.edana.org/docs/defaultsource/default-documentlibrary/seven-decades-of-disposablediapers.pdf?sfvrsn=2 Published
August 2005. Accessed February 8, 2017 9. Felter SP, Carr AN, Zhu T, Kirsch T, Niu G. Safety evaluation for ingredients used in baby care products: Consideration of diaper rash. Regulat Toxicol Pharmacol. 2017;90:214-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.0 9.011 10. Dey S, Kenneally D, Odio M, Hatzopoulos I. Modern diaper performance: construction, materials, and safety review. Int J Dermatol. 2016;55:18-20. https://doi.org/10. 1111/ijd.13333 11. Kim S. Reviewing the Korean episodes of environmental chemicals in summer 2017. Korean J Public Health. 54(2);2017:3–12. 12. Kim HY, Lee JD, Kim JY, Lee JY, Bae ON, Choi YK, Baek E, Kang S, Min C, Seo K, Choi K. Risk assessment of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) detected in sanitary pads. J Toxicol Environ Health, Part A. 2019;82(11):678-95. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/15287394.2019.1642607 13. Umachitra G. Disposable baby diaper-a threat to the health and environment. J Environl Sci Eng. 2012;54(3):44752. 14. Dermal Sensitization Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) for Fragrance Ingredients. Technical Dossier; 2008. www.ifraorg.org/view_document. aspx?docId=22180 15. Alberta L, Sweeney SM, Wiss K. Diaper dye dermatitis. Pediatrics. 2005;116(3):e450-2. 16. Evans EB, Helmes CT, Kirsch T, Ruble KM. Colors in disposable
BioScientific Review Volume 4 Issue 1, 2022
A Systematic Review of the Literature… diapers addressing myths. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2014;53(9suppl):20S-22S. 17. Evans EB, Helmes CT, Kirsch T, Ruble KM. Colors in disposable diapers: addressing myths. Clin Pediatrics. 2014;53(9_suppl):20S-2S. https://doi.org/10.1177/000992281454 0379 18. Umachitra G, Bhaarathidhurai. Disposable baby diaper--a threat to the health and environment. J Environ Sci Eng. 2012;54:447-52. 19. Baisley K, Changalucha J, Weiss HA, Mugeye K, Everett D, Hambleton I. Bacterial vaginosis in female facility workers in north-western Tanzania: prevalence and risk factors. Sex Transm Infect. 2009;85:370–375. https://doi.org/10. 1136/sti.2008.035543 20. Balamurugan SS, Bendigeri N.Community-based study of reproductive tract infections among women of the reproductive age group in the urban health training center area in hubli, karnataka. Indian J Community Med. 2012;37:34–38. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-0218. 94020 21. Groen S .The course of recurrent urinary tract infections in non-pregnant women of childbearing age, the consequences for daily life and the ideas of the patients. Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Geneeskunde. 2005;149:1048–1051. 22. Zimmerer RE, Lawson KD, Calvert CJ. The effects of wearing diapers on skin. Pediatric Dermatol. 1986;3(2):95-101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1470. 1986.tb00497.x 23. Wambiu KE, Muchiri J, Makindi S. Soiled diapers disposal practices among caregivers in poor and middleincome urban setting. Int J Sci Res Pub. 2015;5(10):1-10. 24. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). Toxicological review of acetone (CAS No. 67-64-1) In support of summary information on the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS), National Center for Environmental Assessment, Washington, D.C.; 2003a. 25. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). Toxicological review of 1,2Dichlorobenzene (CAS No.95-50-1) In support of summary information on the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS), National Center for Environmental Assessment, Washington, D.C.; 1989b. 26. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). Toxicological review of Methyl ethyl ketone (Butanone) (CAS No.78-93-3) In support of summary information on the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS), National Center for Environmental Assessment, Washington, D.C. 2003b. 27. DEQ (Department of Environmental Quality, State of Oregon). Chemical Update Worksheet. Bromodichloromethane (CAS No.7527-4), Oregon Portland, OR.; 2015a. 28. World Health Organization. Concise interna-tional chemical assessment document 64. Butyl Acetates (CAS No.123-86-4). International Programme on Chemical Safety, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland; 2005. 29. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). Provisional Peer-Reviewed Toxicity Values for n-Butylbenzene 38 Department of Life Sciences Volume 4 Issue 1, 2022
Naz et al.
(CASRN 104-51-8), National Center for Environmental Assessment, Washington, D.C.; 2010a. 30. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Values for Nonane (CASRN 111-84-2), National Center for Environmental Assessment, Washington, D.C.; 2009d. 31. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). Toxicological review of Carbon tetrachloride (CAS No.56-235) In support of summary information on the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS), National Center for Environmental Assessment, Washington, D.C.; 2010b. 32. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane (CAS No. 630-20-6) In support of summary information on the Integrated Risk InformationSystem (IRIS), National Center for Environmental Assessment, Washington, D.C.; 1989c. 33. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Values for Nonane (CASRN 111-84-2), National Center for Environmental Assessment, Washington, D.C.; 2009d. 34. ECHA (European Chemicals Agency). Decanal (CASNo.112-31-2), Helsinki, Finland; 2009. 35. ACCVC (American Chemistry Council n-Alkane VCCEP Consortium). Voluntary children’s chemical evaluation program (VCCEP) tier 1 pilot submission on then-alkane category: Decane, undecane, dodecane (CAS Nos. 12418-5, 1120-21-4, 112-40-3). Docket Number OPPTS─00274D; 2004. 36. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Values for 1,2Dichloroethane (CASRN 107-06-2), National Center for Environmental Assessment, Washington, D.C.; 2010e. 37. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Values for 1,2Dichloropropane (CASRN 78-87-5), National Center for Environmental Assessment, Washington, D.C.; 2016a. 38. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). Chlorobenzene (CAS No. 108-90-7) In support of sum-mary information on the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS), National Center for Environmental Assessment, Washington, D.C.; 1989a. 39. ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry). ATSDR response to committee questions. To the Committee to Review the Worker and Public Health Activities Program, Atlanta, GA; 2006, February 10. 40. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). Provisional Peer-Reviewed Toxicity Values for 1,1,2Trichloroethane (CASRN 79-00-5), National Center for Environmental Assessment, Washington, D.C.; 2011. 41. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Values for Ethyl Acetate (CASRN141-78-6), National Center for Environmental Assessment, Washington, D.C.; 2013. 42. Fioruci-Fontanelli BA, Chuffa LG, Mendes LO, et al. Ethanol modulates the synthesis and catabolism of retinoic acid in the rat prostate. Reproductive Toxicol. 2015;53:1-9.
BioScientific Review Volume 4 Issue 1, 2022
A Systematic Review of the Literature… https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox. 2015.02.010 43. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Values for n-Heptane (CASRN 142-82-5), National Center for Environmental Assessment, Washington, D.C.; 2016b. 44. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Values for Hexachlorobutadiene (CASRN 87-683), National Center for Environmental Assessment, Washington, D.C.; 2007a. 45. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane (Isooctane) (CAS No. 540-84-1) In support of summary information on the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS), National Center for Environmental Assessment, Washington, D.C.; 2007b. 46. DEQ (Department of Environmental Quality, State of Oregon). CHEMICAL UPDATE WORKSHEET.1,2Dichloropropane (CAS No78-87-5), Oregon Portland, OR.; 2015d. 47. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). Toxicological review of Naphthalene (CAS No. 91-20-3) In support of summary information on the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS), National Center for Environmental Assessment, Washington, D.C.; 1998. 48. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) on Formaldehyde, National Center for Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC.; 1999.
EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). Toxicological review of Bromobenzene (CAS No. 108-86-1) In support of summary information on the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS), National Center for Environmental Assessment, Washington, D.C.; 2009a. 50. TCEQ (Texas Commission on Environmental Quality). Octane, AllIsomers (CASRN111659); 2016. 51. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Values for n-Propylbenzene (CASRN 103-65-1, National Center for Environmental Assessment, Washington, D.C.; 2009c. 52. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). Provisional Peer-Reviewed Toxicity Values for 1,1,2Trichloroethane (CASRN 79-00-5), National Center for Environmental Assessment, Washington, D.C.; 2011. 53. Health Canada. Priority Substances List Assessment Report. Trichlorobenzenes, Ottawa. Ontario; 1993. 54. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). Toxicological review o Trimethylbenzenes (CAS No. 2555113-7, 95-63-6,526-73-8, and 108-67-8) In support of summary information on the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS), National Center for Environmental Assessment, Washington, D.C.; 2016c. 55. TCEQ (Texas Commission on Environmental Quality). Bromochloromethane (CASRN 74-975). Summary of updates to the tables accompanying the Texas Risk Reduction Program (TRRP) Rule.; 2012. 40 Department of Life Sciences Volume 4 Issue 1, 2022
Naz et al.
EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Values for Bromoform (CASRN75-25-2), National Center for Environmental Assessment, Washington, D.C.; 2005. 57. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Values for Dibromochloromethane (CASRN 12448-1), National Center for Environmental Assessment, Washington, D.C.; 2009b. 58. Stenstrom TA, Seidu R, Ekane N and Zurbrugg C. Microbial Exposure and Health Assessments in Sanitation Technologies and Systems. Stockholm Environment Institute; 2011. //http://www.ecosanres.org Accessed on 23 June 2013. 59. Amarnath J. Study on the Composition of Municipal Solid Waste in Kanchipuram Municipality. Int J Appl Bioeng. 2011;5(1):40-43. 60. Ohtsu Y, Yamada R, Urasaki H, Misawa T, Popescu S, Fujita H. Development of a novel hybrid microwave-heater reactor for paperbased waste treatment. J Material Cycles Waste Manag. 2010;12(1):259. 61. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1990). Characterization of Municipal Solid Waste in the United States, EPA 530 SW-90-042. Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. 62. Meseldzija J, Poznanovic D, Frank R, Research D. Assessment of the differing environmental impacts between reusable and disposable diapers. 2013;7:1-11. 63. Meseldzija J, Poznanovic D & Frank R. Assessment of the differing environmental impacts between reusable and disposable diapers. Dufferin Research. 2013; http://www.dufferinresearch.com/inde x.php/component/docman/doc_downl oad/23- dufferin-research-whitepaper-environmental-impact-ofdiapers 64. Remigios MV. The environmental health implications of the use and disposal of disposable child diapers in Senga/Nehosho suburb in Gweru City, Zimbabwe. Global J Bio, Agric Health Sci. 2014;3(2):122-7. 65. Kroesa R. The Greenpeace guide to paper. Greenpeace Canada; 1990. 66. Personal Absorbent Products Council. Phthalates. Issues Management Communications Guide. Washington, DC: Personal Absorbent Products Council; 2003. 67. Malinauskiene L, Bruze M, Ryberg K, Zimerson E, Isaksson M. Contact allergy from disperse dyes in textiles– a review. Contact Dermatitis. 2013;68(2):65-75. https://doi.org/10. 1111/cod.12001 68. Counter SA, Buchanan LH. Mercury exposure in children: a review. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2004;198:209-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2003.11. 032 69. Boyer IJ. Toxicity of dibutyltin, tributyltin and other organotin compounds to humans and to experimental animals. Toxicol. 1989;55:253-298. 70. Carroll WF Jr, Berger TC, Borrelli FE. Characterization of emissions of dioxins and furans fromethylene
BioScientific Review Volume 4 Issue 1, 2022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37435/nbrvol4.issue1
A Systematic Review of the Literature… dichloride, vinyl chloride monomer and polyvinylchloride facilities in the United States. Consolidatedreport. Chemosphere. 2001;43:689-700. 71. Shibamoto T, Yasuhara A, Katami T. Dioxin formation from waste incineration. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2007; 190:1-41. 72. White RF, Diamond R, Proctor S, Morey C, Hu H. Residual cognitive deficits 50 years after lead poisoning during childhood. Occupational Environ Med. 1993;50:613-622. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/oem.50.7. 613 73. Swenberg JA, Moeller BC, Lu K, Rager JE, Fry RC, Starr TB. Formaldehyde carcinogenicity research: 30 years and counting for mode of action, epidemiology, and cancer risk assessment. Toxicol Pathol. 2013;41:181-189. https://doi.org/10.1177/019262331246 6459 74. Groot De AC, Flyvholm MA, Lensen G, Menné T, Coenraads PJ. Formaldehyde-releasers: relationship to formaldehyde contact allergy. Contact allergy to formaldehyde and inventory of formaldehyde-releasers. Contact Dermatitis. 2009;61:63-85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.16000536.2009.01582.x 75. US Food and Drug Administration. Parabens in cosmetics. http://www.fda.gov/Cosmetics/Product sIngredients/ Ingredients/ucm128042.htm. Accessed June 8, 2016. 76. Dhingra R, Kumar A, Kour M. Knowledge and practices related to menstruation among tribal (Gujjar)
adolescent girls. Studies Ethno-Med. 2009;3(1):43-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09735070.2009.11886336
BSR follows an open-access publishing policy and full text of all published articles is available free, immediately upon publication of an issue. The journal’s contents are published and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0) license. Thus, the work submitted to the journal implies that it is original, unpublished work of the authors (neither published previously nor accepted/under consideration for publication elsewhere). On acceptance of a manuscript for publication, a corresponding author on the behalf of all co-authors of the manuscript will sign and submit a completed the Copyright and Author Consent Form.
