Fish Diversity at Head Panjnad and its Genetic Identification by DNA Barcoding Technology
Abstract
Abstract Views: 225
This study was conducted at Head Panjnad, Pakistan to collect information about the available fish diversity. The evident fish orders found were siluriformes, anabantiformes, cypriniformes, cichliformes, osteoglossiformes, and synbranchiformes. The highest number of Hypophthalmicthys molitrix and the lowest number of Wallago attu were determined from this diversity. Simpson diversity index (D) and Shannon-Weiner index (H) were measured as 0.94938868 and 3.00940719, respectively. After the keen observation of various diversities at Head Panjnad, these fish species were selected for their COI gene and phylogenetic analysis. COI is the Cytochrome C Oxidase subunit 1 of mitrochondria (a gene sequence used in molecular investigations as a DNA barcode). The K2P (Kimura two- parameter) distances measured within species, genus, family, and order were 0.57%, 0.63%, 0.68%, and 0.77%, respectively. The K2P neighbor-joining tree was built on a commonly clustered species sequence in agreement with its taxonomic classification. The purpose was to create QR codes based on DNA sequences for accurate fish species identification. The current work concludes that COI sequencing might be used for fish species identification.
Downloads
References
Naz S, Javed M, Chatha, AMM. Investigation of acute toxicity of lead-manganese mixture to fish under laboratory conditions.
Iran J Fish Sci. 2020;19(2):934-941. https://doi.org/10.22092/IJFS.2018.117476
Patwardhan B, Warude D, Pushpangadan P, Bhatt N. Ayurveda and traditional Chinese medicine: A comparative overview. Evi Based Comple Alter Med. 2005;2(4):465-473. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093%2Fecam%2Fneh140
Rasmussen RS, Morrissey MT, Hebert PD. DNA barcoding of commercially important salmon and trout species (Oncorhynchus and Salmo) from North America. J Agri Food Chem. 2009;57(18):8379-8385. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jf901618z
Victor BC, Hanner R, Shivji M, Hyde J, Caldow C. Identification of the larval and juvenile stages of the Cubera Snapper, Lutjanus cyanoptems, using DNA barcoding. Zootaxa. 2009;2215:24-36. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.2215.1.2
Hamzah S, Yatim NI, Alias M, Ali A, Rasit N, Abuhabib A. Extraction of hydroxyapatite from fish scales and its integration with rice husk for ammonia removal in aquaculture wastewater. Ind J Chem. 2019;19(4):1019-1030. https://doi.org/10.22146/ijc.40907
Khan AM, Ali Z, Shelly SY, Ahmad Z, Mirza MR. Aliens; A catastrophe for native freshwater fish diversity in Pakistan. J Animal Plant Sci. 2011;21(2):435-440.
Hebert PD, Cywinska A, Ball SL, DeWaard JR. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc Royal Soc London B. 2003;270(1512):313-321. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.2218
Ward RD, Zemlak TS, Innes BH, Last PR. Hebert PDN. DNA Barcodig Australia sfish species. Philosoph. Transac Royal Soc B-Biolo Sci. 2005;360(1):1847-1857. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2005.1716
Landi M, Dimech M, Arculeo M, Biondo G, Martins R, Carneiro M, Carvalho GR, Brutto SL. Costa FO. DNA barcoding for species assignment: The case of Mediterranean marine fishes. Pub Lib Sci One. 2014;9(9):e106135. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106135
Ward RD, Hanner R. Hebert PD. The campaign to DNA barcode all fishes, FISH‐BOL. J Fish Biol. 2009;74(2):329-356. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2008.02080.x
Teletchey F. After 7 years and 1000 citations: Comparative assessment of the DNA barcoding and the DNA taxonomy proposals for taxonomists and non-taxonomists. Mitocho DNA. 2010;21:206-26. https://doi.org/10.3109/19401736.2010.532212
Radulovici AE, Archambault P, Dufresne F. DNA barcodes for marine biodiversity: Moving fast forward? Diversity. 2010;2:450-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/d2040450
Rafique M, Khan NU. Distribution and status of significant freshwater fishes of Pakistan. Zoolo Survey Pak. 2012;21:90-95.
Yue GH, Orban L. A simple and affordable method for high‐throughput DNA extraction from animal tissues for polymerase chain reaction. Electrophoresis. 2005;26:3081-3083. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.200410411
Ward RD, Zemlak TS, Innes BH, Last PR, Hebert PD. DNA barcoding Australia’s fish species. Philos Trans R Soc B: Biol Sci. 2005;360:1847-1857. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2005.1716
Kumar S, Tamura K, Jackobson IB, Nei M. MEGA 3.1: Integrated software for molecular evolutionary genetics analysis and sequence alignment. Brief Bioinform. 2004;5:150-163. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/5.2.150
Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Molecul Evol. 1980;16(2):111-120. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01731581
Felsinstin J. PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) version 3.50 distributed by the author. Department of Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, USA. 1993.
Magurran AE. Measuring biological diversity. John Wiley and Sons; 2003.
Thorp JH, Thoms MC, Delong MD. Theriverine ecosystem synthesis. Towards Conceptual Press; 2008.
Taylor BW, Flecker AS, Hall RO. Loss of a harvested fish species disrupts carbon flow in a diverse tropical river. Science. 2006;313(5788):833-836. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1128223
Dudgeon D. Endangered ecosystems: A review of the conservation status of tropical Asian rivers. Hydrobiologia. 2002;248(3):167-191. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00006146.
Khan A, Huq T, Salmieri S, Khan RA, Le Tien C, Riedl B. Lacroix M. Nanocrystalline cellulose (NCC) reinforced alginate based biodegradable nanocomposite film. Carbohyd Polym. 2012;90(4):1757-1763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.07.065
Sheikh M, Laghari MY, Lashari PK, Khooharo AR, Narejo NT. Current status of three major carps (Labeo rohita, Cirrhinus mrigala and Catla catla) in the downstream Indus River, Sindh. Fishe Aquaculture J. 2017;8:222. https://doi.org/10.4172/2150-3508.1000222
Conand C, Polidoro B, Mercier A, Gamboa R, Hamel JF, Purcell S. The IUCN red list assessment of aspidochirotid sea cucumbers and its implications. SPC Beche-de-mer Inform Bullet. 2014;34(5):3-7.
Rafique M, Akhtar S, Niazi HK. Fish fauna of Jinnah Barrage and adjoining areas. Pak J Zoology. 2003;35:95-98.
Akhter MS, Sharma NK, Mir JI, Singh R, Pandey NN. Length–weight relationships for eight fish species from the Ravi River, north‐western India. J Appl Ichthyol. 2014;31(6):1146-1147. https://doi.org/10.1111/jai.12836
Khan SAR, Yu Z, Belhadi A, Mardani A. Investigating the effects of renewable energy on international trade and environmental quality. J Environ Managt. 2020;272:e111089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111089
Bingpeng X, Heshan L, Zhilan Z, Chunguang W, Yanguo W, Jianjun W. DNA barcoding for identification of fish species in the Taiwan Strait. Public Lib Sci. 2018;13(6):e0198109. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198109
Hubert N, Hanner R, Holm E, Mandrak NE, Taylor E. Identifying Canadian freshwater fishes through DNA barcodes. Public library Sci One. 2008;3:e2490. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002490
Ebach MC, Holdredge C. DNA barcoding is no substitute for taxonomy. Nature. 2005;434:e697. https://doi.org/10.1038/434697b
Will KW, Rubinoff D. Myth of the molecule: DNA barcodes for species cannot replace morphology for identification and classification. Cladistics. 2004;20(1):47-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2003.00008.x
Lakra WS, Verma MS, Goswami M, Lal KK, Mohindra V, Punia P, Gopalakrishnan A, Singh KV, Ward RD, Hebert P. DNA barcoding Indian marine fishes. Molecul Ecol Resour, 2011;11:60–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02894.x
Pradhan V, Kamble Y, Ladniya V, Mogul M. An overview of species identification by DNA barcoding. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2015;4:127-140.
Kocher TD, Thomas WK, Meyer A, Edwards SV, Paabo S, Villablanca FX, Wilson AC. Dynamics of mitochondrial DNA evolution in animals: Amplification and sequencing with conserved primers. Proc National Acad Sci. 1989;86(16):6196–200. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.86.16.6196
Yang CH, Wu KC, Chuang LY, Chang HW. Decision theory-based COI-SNP tagging approach for 126 Scombriformes species tagging. Front Genet. 2019;10:259. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.00259
Copyright (c) 2022 Dr. Saima Naz, Ahmad Manan Mustafa Chatha, Durali Danabas, Saba Iqbal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
BSR follows an open-access publishing policy and full text of all published articles is available free, immediately upon publication of an issue. The journal’s contents are published and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0) license. Thus, the work submitted to the journal implies that it is original, unpublished work of the authors (neither published previously nor accepted/under consideration for publication elsewhere). On acceptance of a manuscript for publication, a corresponding author on the behalf of all co-authors of the manuscript will sign and submit a completed the Copyright and Author Consent Form.
