Territorial Defense: Aggressive Behavior in Beetles
Abstract
Abstract Views: 0
Territoriality, referring to the defense of a designated area, is one of the common animal behaviors observed in many insect species. In insects, territorial behavior contributes to survival and reproductive success by ensuring resource availability. Beetles (Coleoptera: Hexapoda) comprise one of the largest insect groups, with approximately 0.4 million estimated species. This study critically reviews the published literature collected from journals, books, magazines, and other resources to explore the use of aggressive behavior shown by the dung beetles, blister beetles, burying beetles, bombardier beetles, and bark beetles in territorial defense. In many Coleopterans, aggression has been observed as a behavioral tool of paramount importance in territorial defense (marking and protecting areas), leading ultimately to their continuity and reproductive success. To protect their territory, beetles show aggression using various chemicals, such as cantharidin (blister beetles), pygidial secretions (dung beetles), aggression pheromones like turpentine (bark beetles), and other noxious substances (bombardier beetles), along with the use of elytra (burying beetles). These chemicals play an important part in the success of aggressive behavior in beetles by repelling potential competitors or predators. Beetles in various families also use other behavioral tools, such as dung rolling and storage (as nesting behavior) used by dung beetles. Visual and acoustic signals also contribute significantly to territorial defense. Territorial ownership influences the intensity of aggression among beetles which helps them to deter rivals, sustain their territory, and access crucial resources including food, mate, and shelter without risk.
Downloads
References
Stork NE, McBroom J, Gely C, Hamilton AJ. New approaches narrow global species estimates for beetles, insects, and terrestrial arthropods. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2015;112(24):7519–7523. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas. 1502408112
Stork NE. How many species of insects and other terrestrial arthropods are there on Earth? Ann Rev Entomol. 2018;63(1):31–45. https://doi.org/10. 1146/annurev-ento-020117-043348
Evans AV, Bellamy CL. An Inordinate Fondness for Beetles. University of California Press; 2000.
Alberch P. Museums, collections and biodiversity inventories. Trends Ecol Evol. 1993;8(10):372–375. https://doi. org/10.1016/0169-5347(93)90222-B
Reaka-Kudla ML, Wilson DE, Wilson EO. Santa Rosalia, the turning of the century and a new age of exploration. In: Reaka-Kudla ML, Wilson DE, Wilson EO, eds. Biodiversity II, Understanding and Protecting our Biological Resources. Joseph Henry Press; 1997:507–524. https://doi.org/ 10.17226/4901
Chung AY. An overview of research on beetle diversity and taxonomy in Malaysia. In: Chua LSL, Kirton LG, Saw LG, eds. Status of Biological Diversity in Malaysia and Threat Assessment of Plant Species in Malaysia. FRIM; 2007:137-148.
Erwin TL. Canopy arthropod biodiversity: a chronology of sampling techniques and results. Rev Peru de Entol. 1989;32(1):71–77.
Goczał J, Beutel RG. Beetle elytra: evolution, modifications and biological functions. Biol Lett. 2023;19(3):e20220559. https://doi. org/10.1098/rsbl.2022.0559
Yee DA, Kehl S. Order coleoptera. In: Thorp JH, Rogers DC, eds. Thorp and Covich's Freshwater Invertebrates. Elsevier; 2015:1003–1042. https://doi. org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385026-3.00039-5
Duque-Wilckens N, Trainor BC, Marler CA. Chicago. aggression and territoriality. Encycl Anim Behav. 2019;2:539–546. https://doi.org/10. 1016/B978-0-443-29068-8.00014-3
Kannan K, Galizia CG, Nouvian M. Olfactory strategies in the defensive behavior of insects. Insects. 2022;13(5):e470. https://doi.org/10. 3390/insects13050470
Benelli G, Desneux N, Romano D, Conte G, Messing RH, Canale A. Contest experience enhances aggressive behavior in a fly: when losers learn to win. Sci Rep. 2015;5(1):e9347. https://doi.org/ 10.1038/srep09347
Low ML, Naranjo M, Yack JE. Survival sounds in insects: diversity, function, and evolution. Front Ecol Evol. 2021;9:e641740. https://doi.org/ 10.3389/fevo.2021.641740
Hasegawa E, Kudo T. Aggressiveness of males and females of the stag beetle, prosopocoilus inclinatus (Coleoptera: Lucanidae), are mediated by different biogenic-amines. Entomol Ornithol Herpetol. 2020;9(223):e2161–0983.20. https://10.35248/2161-0983.20.9.223
Goyens J, Dirckx J, Aerts P. Stag beetle battle behavior and its associated anatomical adaptations. J Insect Behav. 2015;28:227–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-015-9495-3
Bologna M, Pinto J. The old world genera of meloidae (Coleoptera): a key and synopsis. J Nat Hist. 2002;36(17):2013–2102. https://doi. org/10.1080/00222930110062318
Bologna MA, Oliverio M, Pitzalis M, Mariottini P. Phylogeny and evolutionary history of the blister beetles (Coleoptera, Meloidae). Molecul Phylog Evol. 2008;48(2):679–693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev. 2008.04.019
Bennett C. A seven year study of the life cycle of the mayfly Ephemera danica. Freshwater Forum. 2007;27:3–14.
Day RM, Harbord M, Forbes A, Segal AW. Cantharidin blisters: a technique for investigating leukocyte trafficking and cytokine production at sites of inflammation in humans. J Immunol Meth. 2001;257(1-2):213–220. https:// doi.org/10.1016/s0022-1759(01)00467-7
Dettner K. Inter-and intraspecific transfer of toxic insect compound cantharidin. In: Dettner K, Bauer G, Völkl W, eds. Vertical food web interactions: evolutionary patterns and driving forces. Springer; 1997:115–145. https://doi.org/10. 1007/978-3-642-60725-7_8
Muzzi M, Mancini E, Fratini E, et al. Male accessory glands of blister beetles and cantharidin release: a comparative ultrastructural analysis. Insects. 2022;13(2):e132. https:// doi.org/10.3390/insects13020132
Nikbakhtzadeh M, Vahedi M, Vatandoost H, Mehdinia A. Origin, transfer and distribution of cantharidin-related compounds in the blister beetle Hycleus scabiosae. J Venom Anim Tox Includ Tropical Dis. 2012;18:88–96. https://doi.org/ 10.1590/S1678-91992012000100011
Wang B, Lu M, Cook JM, Yang D-R, Dunn DW, Wang R-W. Chemical camouflage: a key process in shaping an ant-treehopper and fig-fig wasp mutualistic network. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):e1833. https://doi.org/10. 1038/s41598-018-20310-7
Blum MS. Chemical defense. In: Resh VH, Cardé RT, eds. Encyclopedia of Insects. Elsevier; 2009:145–147.
Safryn SA, Scott MP. Sizing up the competition: do burying beetles weigh or measure their opponents? J Insect Behav. 2000;13(2):291–297.
Lindstedt C, Boncoraglio G, Cotter S, Gilbert J, Kilner RM. Aposematism in the burying beetle? Dual function of anal fluid in parental care and chemical defense. Behav Ecol. 2017;28(6):1414–1422. https://doi. org/10.1093/beheco/arx100
Scott MP. The ecology and behavior of burying beetles. Ann Rev Entomol. 1998;43(1):595–618.
Eggert A-K, Müller JK. 10-Biparental care and social evolution in burying beetles: lessons from the larder. In: Choe JC, Crespi BJ, eds. The Evolution of Social Behavior in Insects and Arachnids. Cambridge University Press; 1997:216–236. https://doi.org/ 10.1017/CBO9780511721953.011
Koulianos S, Schwarz H. Probability of intra-and interspecific encounters, and the duration of parental care in Nicrophorus investigator (Coleoptera: Silphidae). Annals Entomol Soc Am. 2000;93(4):836–840. https://doi.org/ 10.1603/0013-8746(2000)093[0836: POIAIE]2.0.CO;2
Arce AN, Smiseth PT, Rozen DE. Antimicrobial secretions and social immunity in larval burying beetles, Nicrophorus vespilloides. Anim Behav. 2013;86(4):741–745. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.07.008
Birch M. Aggregation in bark beetles. In: Bell WJ, Cardé RT, eds. Chemical Ecology of Insects. Springer; 1984:331–353.
Pitman G, Vité J, Kinzer G, Fentiman A. Bark beetle attractants: trans-verbenol isolated from Dendroctonus. Nature. 1968;218(5137):168–169. https://doi.org/10.1038/218168a0
Sperry JS, Tyree MT. Mechanism of water stress-induced xylem embolism. Plant Physiol. 1988;88(3):581–587. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.88.3.581
Byk A, Piętka J. Dung Beetles and Their Role in the Nature. Instytut Badań Edukacyjnych; 2018:17–26.
Emlen DJ, Philips TK. Phylogenetic evidence for an association between tunneling behavior and the evolution of horns in dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae). Coleopter Bullet. 2006;60(mo5):47–56. https://doi.org/10.1649/0010-065X(2006)60[47:PEFAAB]2.0.CO;2
Carvalho R, Châline RSF, Audino LD, Louzada J, Châline N. Do pygidial secretions of dung beetles have the potential to repel urban pest ants? Entomol Experiment Appl. 2018;166(7):517–527. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/eea.12706
Eisner T. For Love of Insects. Harvard University Press; 2005.
Eisner T, Eisner M, Siegler M. Secret Weapons: Defenses of Insects, Spiders, Scorpions, and Other Many-Legged Creatures. Harvard University Press; 2005.
Aneshansley DJ, Eisner T, Widom JM, Widom B. Biochemistry at 100 C: explosive secretory discharge of bombardier beetles (Brachinus). Science. 1969;165(3888):61–63. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.165.3888.61
Attygalle AB, Xu S, Moore W, McManus R, Gill A, Will K. Biosynthetic origin of benzoquinones in the explosive discharge of the bombardier beetle Brachinus elongatulus. Sci Nat. 2020;107:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-020-01683-0
Dean J. Encounters between bombardier beetles and two species of toads (Bufo americanus, B. marinus): speed of prey-capture does not determine success. J Comparat Physiol. 1980;135:41–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00660180
Copyright (c) 2025 Mubashar Hussain, Rabia Afzal, Salwa Anosh Butt, Narjis Batool, Aniza Iftikhar, Aqsa Noreen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
BSR follows an open-access publishing policy and full text of all published articles is available free, immediately upon publication of an issue. The journal’s contents are published and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0) license. Thus, the work submitted to the journal implies that it is original, unpublished work of the authors (neither published previously nor accepted/under consideration for publication elsewhere). On acceptance of a manuscript for publication, a corresponding author on the behalf of all co-authors of the manuscript will sign and submit a completed the Copyright and Author Consent Form.
