Synthesis and Structural Characterization of Bioactive Chitosan Hydrogels from Lobster Shell Waste
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32350/bsr.82.01Keywords:
antibacterial, antibiofilm, biomaterial, chitosan hydrogel, implant coatingsAbstract
Background. Chitosan is a biopolymer derived from chitin, a polysaccharide abundantly present in the shells of marine crustaceans. It has good antimicrobial and biomedical applications. Chitosan plays a vital role in the production of hydrogels, which retain significant water-holding capacity and antimicrobial properties, making this biomaterial useful for treatment options, particularly in implant coatings and wound dressings. The current study focuses on the use of lobster shell waste to produce a bioactive, chitosan-based, hydrogel biomaterial with a wide range of biological applications. Lobsters provide a rich source of chitin, while the hydrogels act as carriers of pharmaceutical drugs. After structural characterization, these hydrogels were evaluated for their antibiofilm activity and dental applications.
Objective. The study focuses on the use of lobster shell waste as a source of chitosan hydrogels. Further, it evaluates the antibacterial and antibiofilm potential of the prepared chitosan hydrogels against dental bacterial isolates.
Method. Polysaccharide chitin from lobster shells was isolated by deproteinization, demineralization, and deacetylization to yield chitosan. For hydrogel preparation, the dispersing agent, tween-80, and 2% acetic acid were mixed. Water holding capacity, swelling, and dissolution were monitored for structural evaluation. Agar well diffusion assay was performed against bacterial isolates (Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus sp., E. coli, and Pseudomonas pneumoneae). Antibiofilm and hemolytic assays were also performed for biofilm and biocompatibility purposes.
Results. Synthesized chitosan hydrogels showed good water retention (51.25%) and swelling (10.45%), with the highest inhibition zone of 22 mm against Staphylococcus aureus, along with strong antibiofilm activity and better biocompatibility. Chitosan hydrogels against dental isolates (DI2, DI5, DI8, DI9) exhibited activity comparable to pyodine, suggesting strain-dependent efficacy of the hydrogel.
Conclusion. The current study suggests chitosan hydrogel as an effective and promising coating material for dental implants.
Downloads
References
1. Ali G, Sharma M, Salama ES, Ling Z, Li X. Applications of chitin and chitosan as natural biopolymer: potential sources, pretreatments, and degradation pathways. Biomass Convers Biorefin. 2024;14(4):4567-4581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-02684-x
2. Desai N, Rana D, Salave S, Gupta R, Patel P, Karunakaran B, et al. Chitosan: a potential biopolymer in drug delivery and biomedical applications. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15(4):e1313. https://doi.org/10. 3390/pharmaceutics15041313
3. Affes S, Aranaz I, Acosta N, Heras Á, Nasri M, Maalej H. Physicochemical and biological properties of chitosan derivatives with varying molecular weight produced by chemical depolymerization. Biomass Convers Biorefin. 2024;14(3):4111-4121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-02662-3
4. Faghmous N, Bouzid D, Boumaza M, Touati A, Boyron O. Optimization of chitosan-coated W/O/W multiple emulsion stabilized with Span 80 and Tween 80 using Box–Behnken design. J Dispersion Sci Technol. 2021;42(10):1566-1578. https://doi. org/10.1080/01932691.2020.1774387
5. Periyannan K, Selvaraj H, Subbu B, Pallikondaperumal M, Karuppiah P, Rajabathar JR, et al. Green fabrication of chitosan from marine crustaceans and mushroom waste: toward sustainable resource utilization. Green Process Synth. 2023;12(1):e20230093. https://doi.org/10.1515/gps-2023-0093
6. Lu G, Ling K, Zhao P, Xu Z, Deng C, Zheng H, et al. A novel in situ-formed hydrogel wound dressing by the photocross-linking of a chitosan derivative. Wound Repair Regen. 2010;18(1):70-79. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2009.00557.x
7. Fasiku VO, Omolo CA, Devnarain N, Ibrahim UH, Rambharose S, Faya M, et al. Chitosan-based hydrogel for the dual delivery of antimicrobial agents against bacterial methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus biofilm-infected wounds. ACS Omega. 2021;6(34):21994-22010. https://doi. org/10.1021/acsomega.1c02547
8. Stewart PS, Bjarnsholt T. Risk factors for chronic biofilm-related infection associated with implanted medical devices. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020;26(8):1034-1038. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.02.027
9. Colombo APV, Tanner ACR. The role of bacterial biofilms in dental caries and periodontal and peri-implant diseases: a historical perspective. J Dent Res. 2019;98(4):373-385. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034519830686
10. Nag M, Lahiri D, Mukherjee D, Banerjee R, Garai S, Sarkar T, et al. Functionalized chitosan nanomaterials: a jammer for quorum sensing. Polymers. 2021;13(15):e2533. https://doi.org/10. 3390/polym13152533
11. Zhou HY, Zhang YP, Zhang WF, Chen XG. Biocompatibility and characteristics of injectable chitosan-based thermosensitive hydrogel for drug delivery. Carbohydr Polym. 2011;83(4):1643-1651. https://doi.org /10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.10.022
12. Jia Y, Wei Z, Fu W, Huo M, Li F, Zhong C, et al. Biocompatibility evaluation on a bio-hydrogel composed of bacterial cellulose and chitosan. J Biomater Tissue Eng. 2014;4(2):118-125. https://doi.org /10.1166/jbt.2014.1142
13. Al Hoqani HAS, Noura AS, Hossain MA, Al Sibani MA. Isolation and optimization of the method for industrial production of chitin and chitosan from Omani shrimp shell. Carbohydr Res. 2020;492:e108001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carres.2020.108001
14. Felinto MC, Parra DF, da Silva C, Angerami J, Oliveira M, Lugão A. The swelling behavior of chitosan hydrogels membranes obtained by UV- and γ-radiation. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2007;265(1):418-424. https://doi.org /10.1016/j.nimb.2007.09.025
15. Ankur G, Harish K. Synthesis and swelling behavior of superabsorbent hydrogels acquired from CMC for efficient drug delivery. Res J Chem Environ. 2018;22:19-26.
16. Malagoli D. A full-length protocol to test hemolytic activity of palytoxin on human erythrocytes. Invertebr Surviv J. 2007;4(2):92-94.
17. Castro-Concha LA, Escobedo RM, de Miranda-Ham ML. Measurement of cell viability in in vitro cultures. In: Loyola-Vargas VM, Vázquez-Flota F. eds. Plant Cell Culture Protocols. Springer; 2006:71-76.
18. Chopra I, Sharad S, Kumar S, et al. A comprehensive review on hydrogels. Curr Drug Deliv. 2021;19(6):658‑675. https://doi.org/10.2174/1567201818666210601155558
19. Wang Y, Zhang Q, Li H, et al. The synergistic effects of 3‑D porous silk fibroin matrix scaffold properties and hydrodynamic environment in cartilage tissue regeneration. Biomaterials. 2010;31(17):4672‑4681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.02.006
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Fatima Zahoor, Hira Tariq, Muhammad Kashif, Shahmeen Sheikh, Saiqa Sattar, Hera Naheed Khan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
BSR follows an open-access publishing policy and full text of all published articles is available free, immediately upon publication of an issue. The journal’s contents are published and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0) license. Thus, the work submitted to the journal implies that it is original, unpublished work of the authors (neither published previously nor accepted/under consideration for publication elsewhere). On acceptance of a manuscript for publication, a corresponding author on the behalf of all co-authors of the manuscript will sign and submit a completed the Copyright and Author Consent Form.
