The Dynamics of the Psychological Approach in Designing Spaces A Study of Architecture Students Section Articles

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Sana Malik
Farah Jamil

Abstract

The psyche of human mind is best expressed through architecture and the interior design of buildings. No doubt, architecture and psychology are interconnected domains of human experience; while building design is the physical illustration of the creative perception of human psyche. Human interaction with the built environment prompts the senses to perceive and react to it in different logical manners, exemplified through unique spatial expression of every single designer. It has been observed that students as future architects, while tackling with the design projects, put forth their own spatial experiences of interaction with the built environment. For this reason, students of Bachelors in Architecture program at the University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan were interviewed informally to document their psychological approach regarding spatial thinking and translating it into architectural designs of varying quality. The findings acknowledged that the architectural psychology of the designer and the psychological influences of environment impact the construction and building design industry. The diversity in design driven by the psyche of each student is interesting to note and it establishes the fact that every single design is dominated by the concepts developed during the design process. The study has significance as a vital contribution towards the psychological implications of architects for a well-designed built environment.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Sana Malik, & Farah Jamil. (2019). The Dynamics of the Psychological Approach in Designing Spaces. Journal of Art, Architecture and Built Environment (JAABE), 2(1), 47-68. https://doi.org/10.32350/jaabe.21.04

References

Adams, R. S., & Fralick, B. (2010). Work in progress: A conceptions of design instrument as an assessment tool. Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference, Washington DC.
Al-Dabbagh, A. H., & Al-Sofee, E. S. (2011). Identity incarnated in contemporary Arab architecture: The architect Abed Wahid El-Wakil. Al-Rafidain Engineering, 19(2), 71–92.
Anbari, M., & Hossein, S. (2015). Child-oriented architecture from the perspective of environmental psychology. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 4(3), 137–144.
Bilda, Z., & Gero, J. S. (2007). The impact of working memory limitations on the design process during conceptualization. Design Studies, 28(4), 343–367.
Bitgood, S. (2002). Environmental psychology in museums, zoos, and other exhibition centers. In R. B. Bechtel, & A. Churchman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 461–480). New York: John Wiley.
Butterworth, I. (2000). The relationship between the built environment and wellbeing: A literature review. Melbourne, Australia: Victorian Health Promotion Foundation.
Casakin, H. (2004). Visual analogy as a cognitive strategy in the design process: Expert versus novice performance. Journal of Design Research, 4(2), 124.
Eastman, C. (2001). New directions in design cognition: Studies of representation and recall. Design Knowing and Learning: Cognition in Design Education, 1, 147–198.
Edgerton, E., Romice, O., & Spencer, C. (2007). Environmental psychology: Putting research into practice. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Gibson, J. J. (1976, October). The theory of affordances and the design of the environment. Paper presented at Symposium on perception in architecture, Toronto.
Howard, T. J., Culley, S. J., & Dekoninck, E. (2008). Describing the creative design process by the integration of engineering design and cognitive psychology literature. Design Studies, 29(2), 160–180.
Hunter, K. (2005). Environmental psychology in classroom design. Ohio: University of Cincinnati.
Maier, J. R., Fadel, G. M., & Battisto, D. G. (2009). An affordance-based approach to architectural theory, design, and practice. Design Studies, 30(4), 393–414.
Namazian, P. A., & Mehdipour, A. (2013). Psychological demands of the built environment, privacy, personal space and territory in architecture. International Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 3(4), 109–113.
Oseland, N. (2009). The impact of psychological needs on office design. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 11(4), 244–254.
Petersson, A., Sandin, G., & Liljas, M. (2016). Room of silence: An explorative investigation of design students’ redesign of an arena for reflection and existential meaning-making. Mortality, 21(2), 130–148.
Smith, J. (2017, July). The world is not a rectangle: A portrait of architect Zaha Hadid by Jeanette Winter. California: Beach Lane Books.
Suwa, M., & Tversky, B. (1997). What do architects and students perceive in their design sketches? A protocol analysis. Design Studies, 18(4), 385–403.
Unwin, S. (1997). Analyzing architecture. London: Routledge.
Vischer, J. C. (2008). Towards an environmental psychology of workspace: How people are affected by environments for work. Architectural Science Review, 51(2), 97–108.
Yalçin, A. M., & Ulusoy, M. (2014, June 25-27). Personal and professional attitudes of architecture students. Paper presented at International Conference on New Horizons in Education, Paris, France.
Yalçin, M. (2015). Exploratory and descriptive aspects of environmental psychology course within the interior design education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 3531–3541.
Young, R. D. (2013). Environmental psychology overview. In A. H. Huffman, & S. Klein (Eds.), Green organizations: Driving change with IO psychology (pp. 17–33). New York: Routledge.