Exploration of Tools and Techniques for Studying the Tangible and Intangible Aspects of Urban Settlements: Evidence from a Postgraduate Design Studio
Abstract
Abstract Views: 0This research study investigates the tangible and intangible aspects of the urban settlement and explores the tools for it. It was based on a post-graduation design studio named Understanding Urban Settlement, which is part of the Masters in Architecture program at a leading university in Lahore, Pakistan. The research is based on the exploratory methodological approach to attain a deep understanding of the social, cultural, environmental and religious characteristics of the Walled City of Lahore. It further explored the effects of these aspects and the way they affect the built environment, particularly the urban squares. The characteristics of the urban squares became the central part of the study through the research question formulated by students. The tools of space syntax and depth map and the approaches of psychogeographic analysis, systems thinking, and giga mapping were applied. These three approaches make the three sections of the exploratory methodology. Furthermore, the tools helped to understand various aspects of the city, where space syntax helped to explore the tangible character of the built environment and psychogeographic analysis helped to comprehend the intangible nature of social character in the city. Systems thinking and giga mapping are used to grasp and make sense of all the data gathered through the first two tools. The results showed that using these tools not only provides the framework to understand the most complex urban scenarios but also helped to triangulate the information through different sources. Based on the work of the students and their feedback about the three explored tools, it became evident that these approaches helped them to visualize the city under a new light and made the most complex urban scenarios a little more comprehensible. It also showed that the intangible and tangible characteristics of a city are co-dependent and exploring the social and cultural aspects of a city helps to develop a deeper and complete understanding of the spatial character of a city.
Downloads
References
Bassett, K. (2004). Walking as an aesthetic practice and a critical tool: Some psychogeographic experiments. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 28(3), 397–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309826042000286965
Bridger, A. J. (2013). Psychogeography and feminist methodology. Feminism & Psychology, 23(3), 285–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353513481783
Brown, M., & Brown, M. (2024). Psychogeography of the six towns: Lyric cartographies of stoke on Trent. In P. Holloway, & C. Jordan-Baker (Eds.), Writing landscape and setting in the Anthropocene: Britain and beyond. Springer International Publishing.
Careri, F. (2017). Walkscapes: Walking as an aesthetic practice. Culicidae Architectural Press.
Davidova, M. (2018, February 22–23). Roles, agency and relations of giga-maps in systemic approach to architectural performance: The special prototypes of post-anthropocene [Paper presentation]. Architecture, Media, Politics, Society (AMPS) Conference. Arizona, USA.
Debord, G. (1987). The Society of the spectacle. Rebel Press.
Debord, G., & Wolman, G. J. (1956). A user’s guide to détournement. Les Lèvres Nues, 8(7), 1–6.
Ellard, C. (2018). The psychogeography of urban form: Building and measuring baukultur. Intertwining Magazine: Unfolding Art and Science. https://www.torrossa.com/en/resources/an/5149016
Griffiths, S. (2017). Space syntax as interdisciplinary urban design pedagogy. In M. Carmona (Ed.), Explorations in urban design. Routledge.
Gulzar, S. (2017). Traditional dwellings: An architectural anthropological study from the walled city of Lahore. Journal of Advances in Agricultural & Environmental Engineering, 4(1), 152–158.
Haroon, F., Nawaz, M. S., Khilat, F., & Arshad, H. S. H. (2019). Urban heritage of the walled city of Lahore. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 36(4), 289–302.
Hensel, M. U., & Sørensen, S. S. (2019). Performance-oriented architecture and urban design: Relating information-based design and systems-thinking in architecture. Formakademisk, 12(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.2963
Hillier, B. (2007). Space is the machine: A configurational theory of architecture. Space Syntax.
Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1989). The social logic of space. Cambridge University Press.
İlkay, Y. (2023). Psychogeography in planning: A new methodological approach via representations of ‘body’, ‘urban space’ and ‘walking’. ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning, 11(2), 584–603. https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2023.255
Kelly, F. (2020). ‘Hurry up please, it's time!’ A psychogeography of a decommissioned university campus. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(6), 722–735. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1746263
Kim, M. (2021). The pedagogical effects of psychogeographic urban exploration and mapping. Geography, 106(2), 92–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/00167487.2021.1919412
Lerman, Y., Rofè, Y., & Omer, I. (2014). Using space syntax to model pedestrian movement in urban transportation planning. Geographical Analysis, 46(4), 392–410. https://doi.org/10.1111/gean.12063
McCahill, C., & Garrick, N. W. (2008). The applicability of space syntax to bicycle facility planning. Transportation Research Record, 2074(1), 46–51. https://doi.org/10.3141/2074-06
McCandlish, A., & McPherson, G. (2021). Promoting tangible and intangible hidden cultural heritage: Local communities influencing civic decision-making and international cultural policy. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 27(5), 683–698. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2020.1822348
Monokrousou, K., & Giannopoulou, M. (2016). Interpreting and predicting pedestrian movement in public space through space syntax analysis. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 223, 509–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.312
Rana, I. A., & Bhatti, S. S. (2018). Lahore, Pakistan–urbanization challenges and opportunities. Cities, 72, 348–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.09.014
Refaat, A. M. (2019). Space syntax theory and its contribution to urban design. In H. Abusaada, C. Vellguth & A. Elshater. (Eds.), Handbook of research on digital research methods and architectural tools in urban planning and design. IGI Global.
Ryan, A. (2014). A framework for systemic design. Formakademisk, 7(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.787
Sadler, S. (2017). The Naked city: Guy Debord and Asger Jorn. In Companion to the history of architecture (pp. 1–12). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Sevaldson, B. (2011, May 29–31). GIGA-Mapping: Visualization for complexity and systems thinking in design [Paper presentation]. Nordic Design Research Conference. Helsinki, Finland.
Sevaldson, B. (2013, May 14–17). Systems Oriented Design: The emergence and development of a designerly approach to address complexity [Paper presentation]. 2nd International Conference for Design Education Researchers. Oslo, Norway.
Sevaldson, B. (2017). Redesigning systems thinking. Formakademisk, 10(1), 1–23 https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.1755
Smith, P. (2010). The contemporary derive: a partial review of issues concerning the contemporary practice of psychogeography. Cultural Geographies, 17(1), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474009350002
Wollen, P. (2001). Situationists and architecture. New Left Review, 8, 123–139
Yunitsyna, A., & Shtepani, E. (2023). Investigating the socio-spatial relations of the built environment using the space syntax analysis–a case study of Tirana City. Cities, 133, Article e104147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.104147
Zahid, A., & Misirlisoy, D. (2021). Measuring place attachment, identity, and memory in urban spaces: Case of the walled city of Lahore, Pakistan. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 45(2), 171–182. https://doi.org/10.3846/jau.2021.15183
Copyright (c) 2024 Mamuna Iqbal, Usman Awan, Madiha Zaman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
JAABE follows an open-access publishing policy and full text of all published articles is available free, immediately upon publication of an issue. The journal’s contents are published and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0) license. Thus, the work submitted to the journal implies that it is original, unpublished work of the authors (neither published previously nor accepted/under consideration for publication elsewhere). On acceptance of a manuscript for publication, a corresponding author on the behalf of all co-authors of the manuscript will sign and submit a completed Copyright and Author Consent Form.
Copyright (c) The Authors