Comparison of Mechanical Properties of Normal & Polypropylene Fiber Reinforced Concrete

  • Z. A. Siddiqi Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
  • M. M. Kaleem Department of Civil Engineering, University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan
  • M. Jawad Department of Civil Engineering, University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan
  • A. Ajwad Department of Civil Engineering, University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan
  • M. Usman Department of Civil Engineering, University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan
Keywords: polypropylene fibers, flexure strength, compressive strength, shrinkage

Abstract

Abstract Views: 108

Concrete is the most commonly used construction material in the world. However, normal weight concrete shows less resistance to flexure. This research dealt with the technique to improve material efficiency in flexure as well as in compression, using polypropylene fibers. Different samples of concrete were prepared containing different dosages of polypropylene fibers (0.1%, 0.2%, 1% and 2% of the total concrete volume). The samples were then tested in compression and flexure, after 7, 14 and 28 days. The experimental investigation showed that the fibers increase the flexural strength of concrete in elastic range, when used in a specific limit. Maximum efficiency from the material was obtained at 0.2% dosage of fibers. Below and above this percentage the flexural and compressive strengths start decreasing. The experimental results also confirmed that with the gradual increase in polypropylene content the water absorption of concrete increases.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2018-01-31
How to Cite
1.
Z. A. Siddiqi, M. M. Kaleem, M. Jawad, A. Ajwad, M. Usman. Comparison of Mechanical Properties of Normal & Polypropylene Fiber Reinforced Concrete. Sci Inquiry Rev. [Internet]. 2018Jan.31 [cited 2024Dec.24];2(1):33-7. Available from: https://journals.umt.edu.pk/index.php/SIR/article/view/312
Section
Orignal Article